2024-01-05 16:02:24

by Ulf Hansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] PM: domains: Add helpers for multi PM domains to avoid open-coding

Updates in v2:
- Ccing Daniel Baluta and Iuliana Prodan the NXP remoteproc patches to
requests help with testing.
- Fixed NULL pointer bug in patch1, pointed out by Nikunj.
- Added some tested/reviewed-by tags.


Attaching/detaching of a device to multiple PM domains has started to become a
common operation for many drivers, typically during ->probe() and ->remove().
In most cases, this has lead to lots of boilerplate code in the drivers.

This series adds a pair of helper functions to manage the attach/detach of a
device to its multiple PM domains. Moreover, a couple of drivers have been
converted to use the new helpers as a proof of concept.

Note 1)
The changes in the drivers have only been compile tested, while the helpers
have been tested along with a couple of local dummy drivers that I have hacked
up to model both genpd providers and genpd consumers.

Note 2)
I was struggling to make up mind if we should have a separate helper to attach
all available power-domains described in DT, rather than providing "NULL" to the
dev_pm_domain_attach_list(). I decided not to, but please let me know if you
prefer the other option.

Note 3)
For OPP integration, as a follow up I am striving to make the
dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() redundant. Instead I think we should move towards
using dev_pm_opp_set_config()->_opp_set_required_devs(), which would allow us to
use the helpers that $subject series is adding.

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson


Ulf Hansson (5):
PM: domains: Add helper functions to attach/detach multiple PM domains
remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Convert to
dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()
remoteproc: imx_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()
remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_adsp: Convert to
dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()
media: venus: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list() for vcodec

drivers/base/power/common.c | 134 +++++++++++++++
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c | 12 +-
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h | 7 +-
.../media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c | 48 ++----
drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 82 +--------
drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 73 +-------
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 160 ++++++++----------
include/linux/pm_domain.h | 38 +++++
8 files changed, 289 insertions(+), 265 deletions(-)

--
2.34.1


2024-01-05 16:02:48

by Ulf Hansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] PM: domains: Add helper functions to attach/detach multiple PM domains

Attaching/detaching of a device to multiple PM domains has started to
become a common operation for many drivers, typically during ->probe() and
->remove(). In most cases, this has lead to lots of boilerplate code in the
drivers.

To fixup up the situation, let's introduce a pair of helper functions,
dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list(), that driver can use instead of the
open-coding. Note that, it seems reasonable to limit the support for these
helpers to DT based platforms, at it's the only valid use case for now.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
---

Changes in v2:
- Fix NULL pointer bug pointed out by Nikunj.

---
drivers/base/power/common.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/pm_domain.h | 38 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 172 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/common.c b/drivers/base/power/common.c
index 44ec20918a4d..327d168dd37a 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/common.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/common.c
@@ -167,6 +167,115 @@ struct device *dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(struct device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name);

+/**
+ * dev_pm_domain_attach_list - Associate a device with its PM domains.
+ * @dev: The device used to lookup the PM domains for.
+ * @data: The data used for attaching to the PM domains.
+ * @list: An out-parameter with an allocated list of attached PM domains.
+ *
+ * This function helps to attach a device to its multiple PM domains. The
+ * caller, which is typically a driver's probe function, may provide a list of
+ * names for the PM domains that we should try to attach the device to, but it
+ * may also provide an empty list, in case the attach should be done for all of
+ * the available PM domains.
+ *
+ * Callers must ensure proper synchronization of this function with power
+ * management callbacks.
+ *
+ * Returns the number of attached PM domains or a negative error code in case of
+ * a failure. Note that, to detach the list of PM domains, the driver shall call
+ * dev_pm_domain_detach_list(), typically during the remove phase.
+ */
+int dev_pm_domain_attach_list(struct device *dev,
+ const struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data *data,
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list **list)
+{
+ struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list *pds;
+ struct device *pd_dev = NULL;
+ int ret, i, num_pds = 0;
+ bool by_id = true;
+ u32 pd_flags = data ? data->pd_flags : 0;
+ u32 link_flags = pd_flags & PD_FLAG_NO_DEV_LINK ? 0 :
+ DL_FLAG_STATELESS | DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME;
+
+ if (dev->pm_domain)
+ return -EEXIST;
+
+ /* For now this is limited to OF based platforms. */
+ if (!np)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (data && data->pd_names) {
+ num_pds = data->num_pd_names;
+ by_id = false;
+ } else {
+ num_pds = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains",
+ "#power-domain-cells");
+ }
+
+ if (num_pds <= 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ pds = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pds), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pds)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ pds->pd_devs = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_pds, sizeof(*pds->pd_devs),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pds->pd_devs)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ pds->pd_links = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_pds, sizeof(*pds->pd_links),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pds->pd_links)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (link_flags && pd_flags & PD_FLAG_DEV_LINK_ON)
+ link_flags |= DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_pds; i++) {
+ if (by_id)
+ pd_dev = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
+ else
+ pd_dev = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev,
+ data->pd_names[i]);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pd_dev)) {
+ ret = pd_dev ? PTR_ERR(pd_dev) : -ENODEV;
+ goto err_attach;
+ }
+
+ if (link_flags) {
+ struct device_link *link;
+
+ link = device_link_add(dev, pd_dev, link_flags);
+ if (!link) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_link;
+ }
+
+ pds->pd_links[i] = link;
+ }
+
+ pds->pd_devs[i] = pd_dev;
+ }
+
+ pds->num_pds = num_pds;
+ *list = pds;
+ return num_pds;
+
+err_link:
+ dev_pm_domain_detach(pd_dev, true);
+err_attach:
+ while (--i >= 0) {
+ if (pds->pd_links[i])
+ device_link_del(pds->pd_links[i]);
+ dev_pm_domain_detach(pds->pd_devs[i], true);
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_domain_attach_list);
+
/**
* dev_pm_domain_detach - Detach a device from its PM domain.
* @dev: Device to detach.
@@ -187,6 +296,31 @@ void dev_pm_domain_detach(struct device *dev, bool power_off)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_domain_detach);

+/**
+ * dev_pm_domain_detach_list - Detach a list of PM domains.
+ * @list: The list of PM domains to detach.
+ *
+ * This function reverse the actions from dev_pm_domain_attach_list().
+ * Typically it should be invoked during the remove phase from drivers.
+ *
+ * Callers must ensure proper synchronization of this function with power
+ * management callbacks.
+ */
+void dev_pm_domain_detach_list(struct dev_pm_domain_list *list)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ if (!list)
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < list->num_pds; i++) {
+ if (list->pd_links[i])
+ device_link_del(list->pd_links[i]);
+ dev_pm_domain_detach(list->pd_devs[i], true);
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_domain_detach_list);
+
/**
* dev_pm_domain_start - Start the device through its PM domain.
* @dev: Device to start.
diff --git a/include/linux/pm_domain.h b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
index 34663d0d5c55..6b71fb69c349 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm_domain.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
@@ -19,6 +19,33 @@
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/time64.h>

+/*
+ * Flags to control the behaviour when attaching a device to its PM domains.
+ *
+ * PD_FLAG_NO_DEV_LINK: As the default behaviour creates a device-link
+ * for every PM domain that gets attached, this
+ * flag can be used to skip that.
+ *
+ * PD_FLAG_DEV_LINK_ON: Add the DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE to power-on the
+ * supplier and its PM domain when creating the
+ * device-links.
+ *
+ */
+#define PD_FLAG_NO_DEV_LINK BIT(0)
+#define PD_FLAG_DEV_LINK_ON BIT(1)
+
+struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data {
+ const char * const *pd_names;
+ const u32 num_pd_names;
+ const u32 pd_flags;
+};
+
+struct dev_pm_domain_list {
+ struct device **pd_devs;
+ struct device_link **pd_links;
+ u32 num_pds;
+};
+
/*
* Flags to control the behaviour of a genpd.
*
@@ -432,7 +459,11 @@ struct device *dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(struct device *dev,
unsigned int index);
struct device *dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(struct device *dev,
const char *name);
+int dev_pm_domain_attach_list(struct device *dev,
+ const struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data *data,
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list **list);
void dev_pm_domain_detach(struct device *dev, bool power_off);
+void dev_pm_domain_detach_list(struct dev_pm_domain_list *list);
int dev_pm_domain_start(struct device *dev);
void dev_pm_domain_set(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_domain *pd);
int dev_pm_domain_set_performance_state(struct device *dev, unsigned int state);
@@ -451,7 +482,14 @@ static inline struct device *dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(struct device *dev,
{
return NULL;
}
+static inline int dev_pm_domain_attach_list(struct device *dev,
+ const struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data *data,
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list **list)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
static inline void dev_pm_domain_detach(struct device *dev, bool power_off) {}
+static inline void dev_pm_domain_detach_list(struct dev_pm_domain_list *list) {}
static inline int dev_pm_domain_start(struct device *dev)
{
return 0;
--
2.34.1


2024-01-05 16:03:09

by Ulf Hansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()

Let's avoid the boilerplate code to manage the multiple PM domain case, by
converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list().

Cc: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Cc: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
---

Changes in v2:
- None.

Iuliana/Daniel I am ccing you to request help with test/review of this change.
Note that, you will need patch 1/5 in the series too, to be able to test this.

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson

---
drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 82 ++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
index 8fcda9b74545..0409b7c47d5c 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
@@ -103,12 +103,10 @@ enum imx_dsp_rp_mbox_messages {
* @tx_ch: mailbox tx channel handle
* @rx_ch: mailbox rx channel handle
* @rxdb_ch: mailbox rx doorbell channel handle
- * @pd_dev: power domain device
- * @pd_dev_link: power domain device link
+ * @pd_list: power domain list
* @ipc_handle: System Control Unit ipc handle
* @rproc_work: work for processing virtio interrupts
* @pm_comp: completion primitive to sync for suspend response
- * @num_domains: power domain number
* @flags: control flags
*/
struct imx_dsp_rproc {
@@ -121,12 +119,10 @@ struct imx_dsp_rproc {
struct mbox_chan *tx_ch;
struct mbox_chan *rx_ch;
struct mbox_chan *rxdb_ch;
- struct device **pd_dev;
- struct device_link **pd_dev_link;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
struct imx_sc_ipc *ipc_handle;
struct work_struct rproc_work;
struct completion pm_comp;
- int num_domains;
u32 flags;
};

@@ -954,74 +950,14 @@ static const struct rproc_ops imx_dsp_rproc_ops = {
static int imx_dsp_attach_pm_domains(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
{
struct device *dev = priv->rproc->dev.parent;
- int ret, i;
-
- priv->num_domains = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node,
- "power-domains",
- "#power-domain-cells");
-
- /* If only one domain, then no need to link the device */
- if (priv->num_domains <= 1)
- return 0;
-
- priv->pd_dev = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_domains,
- sizeof(*priv->pd_dev),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!priv->pd_dev)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- priv->pd_dev_link = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_domains,
- sizeof(*priv->pd_dev_link),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!priv->pd_dev_link)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_domains; i++) {
- priv->pd_dev[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
- if (IS_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i])) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i]);
- goto detach_pm;
- }
-
- /*
- * device_link_add will check priv->pd_dev[i], if it is
- * NULL, then will break.
- */
- priv->pd_dev_link[i] = device_link_add(dev,
- priv->pd_dev[i],
- DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
- DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME);
- if (!priv->pd_dev_link[i]) {
- dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto detach_pm;
- }
- }
-
- return 0;
-
-detach_pm:
- while (--i >= 0) {
- device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
- dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-static int imx_dsp_detach_pm_domains(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
-{
- int i;
+ int ret;

- if (priv->num_domains <= 1)
+ /* A single PM domain is already attached. */
+ if (dev->pm_domain)
return 0;

- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_domains; i++) {
- device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
- dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
- }
-
- return 0;
+ ret = dev_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, NULL, &priv->pd_list);
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
}

/**
@@ -1153,7 +1089,7 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;

err_detach_domains:
- imx_dsp_detach_pm_domains(priv);
+ dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list);
err_put_rproc:
rproc_free(rproc);

@@ -1167,7 +1103,7 @@ static void imx_dsp_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)

pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
rproc_del(rproc);
- imx_dsp_detach_pm_domains(priv);
+ dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list);
rproc_free(rproc);
}

--
2.34.1


2024-01-05 16:03:55

by Ulf Hansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_adsp: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()

Let's avoid some of the boilerplate code to manage the various PM domain
cases, by converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list().

As a part of the conversion, we are moving over to use device_links, which
simplifies the runtime PM support too. Moreover, while attaching let's
trust that an already attached single PM domain is the correct one.

Cc: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
---

Changes in v2:
- None.

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
---
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 160 +++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
index 6c67514cc493..93f9a1537ec6 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
@@ -55,8 +55,6 @@
#define QDSP6SS_CORE_CBCR 0x20
#define QDSP6SS_SLEEP_CBCR 0x3c

-#define QCOM_Q6V5_RPROC_PROXY_PD_MAX 3
-
#define LPASS_BOOT_CORE_START BIT(0)
#define LPASS_BOOT_CMD_START BIT(0)
#define LPASS_EFUSE_Q6SS_EVB_SEL 0x0
@@ -74,7 +72,8 @@ struct adsp_pil_data {

const char **clk_ids;
int num_clks;
- const char **proxy_pd_names;
+ const char **pd_names;
+ unsigned int num_pds;
const char *load_state;
};

@@ -110,8 +109,7 @@ struct qcom_adsp {
size_t mem_size;
bool has_iommu;

- struct device *proxy_pds[QCOM_Q6V5_RPROC_PROXY_PD_MAX];
- size_t proxy_pd_count;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;

struct qcom_rproc_glink glink_subdev;
struct qcom_rproc_ssr ssr_subdev;
@@ -120,98 +118,92 @@ struct qcom_adsp {
int (*shutdown)(struct qcom_adsp *adsp);
};

-static int qcom_rproc_pds_attach(struct device *dev, struct qcom_adsp *adsp,
- const char **pd_names)
+static int qcom_rproc_pds_attach(struct qcom_adsp *adsp, const char **pd_names,
+ unsigned int num_pds)
{
- struct device **devs = adsp->proxy_pds;
- size_t num_pds = 0;
+ struct device *dev = adsp->dev;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data pd_data = {
+ .pd_names = pd_names,
+ .num_pd_names = num_pds,
+ };
int ret;
- int i;
-
- if (!pd_names)
- return 0;

/* Handle single power domain */
- if (dev->pm_domain) {
- devs[0] = dev;
- pm_runtime_enable(dev);
- return 1;
- }
+ if (dev->pm_domain)
+ goto out;

- while (pd_names[num_pds])
- num_pds++;
+ if (!pd_names)
+ return 0;

- if (num_pds > ARRAY_SIZE(adsp->proxy_pds))
- return -E2BIG;
+ ret = dev_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &adsp->pd_list);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;

- for (i = 0; i < num_pds; i++) {
- devs[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev, pd_names[i]);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(devs[i])) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(devs[i]) ? : -ENODATA;
- goto unroll_attach;
- }
- }
+out:
+ pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+ return 0;
+}

- return num_pds;
+static void qcom_rproc_pds_detach(struct qcom_adsp *adsp)
+{
+ struct device *dev = adsp->dev;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list *pds = adsp->pd_list;

-unroll_attach:
- for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
- dev_pm_domain_detach(devs[i], false);
+ dev_pm_domain_detach_list(pds);

- return ret;
+ if (dev->pm_domain || pds)
+ pm_runtime_disable(adsp->dev);
}

-static void qcom_rproc_pds_detach(struct qcom_adsp *adsp, struct device **pds,
- size_t pd_count)
+static int qcom_rproc_pds_enable(struct qcom_adsp *adsp)
{
struct device *dev = adsp->dev;
- int i;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list *pds = adsp->pd_list;
+ int ret, i = 0;

- /* Handle single power domain */
- if (dev->pm_domain && pd_count) {
- pm_runtime_disable(dev);
- return;
- }
+ if (!dev->pm_domain && !pds)
+ return 0;

- for (i = 0; i < pd_count; i++)
- dev_pm_domain_detach(pds[i], false);
-}
+ if (dev->pm_domain)
+ dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(dev, INT_MAX);

-static int qcom_rproc_pds_enable(struct qcom_adsp *adsp, struct device **pds,
- size_t pd_count)
-{
- int ret;
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < pd_count; i++) {
- dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(pds[i], INT_MAX);
- ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(pds[i]);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(pds[i], 0);
- goto unroll_pd_votes;
- }
+ while (pds && i < pds->num_pds) {
+ dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(pds->pd_devs[i], INT_MAX);
+ i++;
}

- return 0;
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ while (pds && i > 0) {
+ i--;
+ dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(pds->pd_devs[i], 0);
+ }

-unroll_pd_votes:
- for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
- dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(pds[i], 0);
- pm_runtime_put(pds[i]);
+ if (dev->pm_domain)
+ dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(dev, 0);
}

return ret;
}

-static void qcom_rproc_pds_disable(struct qcom_adsp *adsp, struct device **pds,
- size_t pd_count)
+static void qcom_rproc_pds_disable(struct qcom_adsp *adsp)
{
- int i;
+ struct device *dev = adsp->dev;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list *pds = adsp->pd_list;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ if (!dev->pm_domain && !pds)
+ return;
+
+ if (dev->pm_domain)
+ dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(dev, 0);

- for (i = 0; i < pd_count; i++) {
- dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(pds[i], 0);
- pm_runtime_put(pds[i]);
+ while (pds && i < pds->num_pds) {
+ dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(pds->pd_devs[i], 0);
+ i++;
}
+
+ pm_runtime_put(dev);
}

static int qcom_wpss_shutdown(struct qcom_adsp *adsp)
@@ -397,8 +389,7 @@ static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
if (ret)
goto adsp_smmu_unmap;

- ret = qcom_rproc_pds_enable(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds,
- adsp->proxy_pd_count);
+ ret = qcom_rproc_pds_enable(adsp);
if (ret < 0)
goto disable_xo_clk;

@@ -448,7 +439,7 @@ static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
disable_adsp_clks:
clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(adsp->num_clks, adsp->clks);
disable_power_domain:
- qcom_rproc_pds_disable(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds, adsp->proxy_pd_count);
+ qcom_rproc_pds_disable(adsp);
disable_xo_clk:
clk_disable_unprepare(adsp->xo);
adsp_smmu_unmap:
@@ -464,7 +455,7 @@ static void qcom_adsp_pil_handover(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5)
struct qcom_adsp *adsp = container_of(q6v5, struct qcom_adsp, q6v5);

clk_disable_unprepare(adsp->xo);
- qcom_rproc_pds_disable(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds, adsp->proxy_pd_count);
+ qcom_rproc_pds_disable(adsp);
}

static int adsp_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
@@ -715,13 +706,11 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
goto free_rproc;

- ret = qcom_rproc_pds_attach(adsp->dev, adsp,
- desc->proxy_pd_names);
+ ret = qcom_rproc_pds_attach(adsp, desc->pd_names, desc->num_pds);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to attach proxy power domains\n");
goto free_rproc;
}
- adsp->proxy_pd_count = ret;

ret = adsp_init_reset(adsp);
if (ret)
@@ -753,7 +742,7 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;

disable_pm:
- qcom_rproc_pds_detach(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds, adsp->proxy_pd_count);
+ qcom_rproc_pds_detach(adsp);

free_rproc:
rproc_free(rproc);
@@ -771,7 +760,7 @@ static void adsp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
qcom_remove_glink_subdev(adsp->rproc, &adsp->glink_subdev);
qcom_remove_sysmon_subdev(adsp->sysmon);
qcom_remove_ssr_subdev(adsp->rproc, &adsp->ssr_subdev);
- qcom_rproc_pds_detach(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds, adsp->proxy_pd_count);
+ qcom_rproc_pds_detach(adsp);
rproc_free(adsp->rproc);
}

@@ -788,9 +777,8 @@ static const struct adsp_pil_data adsp_resource_init = {
"qdsp6ss_xo", "qdsp6ss_sleep", "qdsp6ss_core", NULL
},
.num_clks = 7,
- .proxy_pd_names = (const char*[]) {
- "cx", NULL
- },
+ .pd_names = (const char*[]) { "cx" },
+ .num_pds = 1,
};

static const struct adsp_pil_data adsp_sc7280_resource_init = {
@@ -821,9 +809,8 @@ static const struct adsp_pil_data cdsp_resource_init = {
"q6_axim", NULL
},
.num_clks = 7,
- .proxy_pd_names = (const char*[]) {
- "cx", NULL
- },
+ .pd_names = (const char*[]) { "cx" },
+ .num_pds = 1,
};

static const struct adsp_pil_data wpss_resource_init = {
@@ -839,9 +826,8 @@ static const struct adsp_pil_data wpss_resource_init = {
"ahb_bdg", "ahb", "rscp", NULL
},
.num_clks = 3,
- .proxy_pd_names = (const char*[]) {
- "cx", "mx", NULL
- },
+ .pd_names = (const char*[]) { "cx", "mx" },
+ .num_pds = 2,
};

static const struct of_device_id adsp_of_match[] = {
--
2.34.1


2024-01-05 16:06:47

by Ulf Hansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] media: venus: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list() for vcodec

Let's avoid some of the boilerplate code to manage the vcodec PM domains,
by converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list().

Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Cc: Stanimir Varbanov <[email protected]>
Cc: Vikash Garodia <[email protected]>
Cc: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <[email protected]>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
---

Changes in v2:
- Added tags Bryan's tags.

---
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c | 12 +++--
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h | 7 ++-
.../media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c | 48 +++++++------------
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
index 9cffe975581b..bd9b474280e4 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <media/videobuf2-v4l2.h>
#include <media/v4l2-mem2mem.h>
@@ -114,7 +115,8 @@ static void venus_sys_error_handler(struct work_struct *work)
pm_runtime_put_sync(core->dev);

for (i = 0; i < max_attempts; i++) {
- if (!core->pmdomains[0] || !pm_runtime_active(core->pmdomains[0]))
+ if (!core->pmdomains ||
+ !pm_runtime_active(core->pmdomains->pd_devs[0]))
break;
usleep_range(1000, 1500);
}
@@ -705,7 +707,7 @@ static const struct venus_resources sdm845_res_v2 = {
.vcodec0_clks = { "vcodec0_core", "vcodec0_bus" },
.vcodec1_clks = { "vcodec1_core", "vcodec1_bus" },
.vcodec_clks_num = 2,
- .vcodec_pmdomains = { "venus", "vcodec0", "vcodec1" },
+ .vcodec_pmdomains = (const char *[]) { "venus", "vcodec0", "vcodec1" },
.vcodec_pmdomains_num = 3,
.opp_pmdomain = (const char *[]) { "cx", NULL },
.vcodec_num = 2,
@@ -754,7 +756,7 @@ static const struct venus_resources sc7180_res = {
.clks_num = 3,
.vcodec0_clks = { "vcodec0_core", "vcodec0_bus" },
.vcodec_clks_num = 2,
- .vcodec_pmdomains = { "venus", "vcodec0" },
+ .vcodec_pmdomains = (const char *[]) { "venus", "vcodec0" },
.vcodec_pmdomains_num = 2,
.opp_pmdomain = (const char *[]) { "cx", NULL },
.vcodec_num = 1,
@@ -811,7 +813,7 @@ static const struct venus_resources sm8250_res = {
.resets_num = 2,
.vcodec0_clks = { "vcodec0_core" },
.vcodec_clks_num = 1,
- .vcodec_pmdomains = { "venus", "vcodec0" },
+ .vcodec_pmdomains = (const char *[]) { "venus", "vcodec0" },
.vcodec_pmdomains_num = 2,
.opp_pmdomain = (const char *[]) { "mx", NULL },
.vcodec_num = 1,
@@ -870,7 +872,7 @@ static const struct venus_resources sc7280_res = {
.clks_num = 3,
.vcodec0_clks = {"vcodec_core", "vcodec_bus"},
.vcodec_clks_num = 2,
- .vcodec_pmdomains = { "venus", "vcodec0" },
+ .vcodec_pmdomains = (const char *[]) { "venus", "vcodec0" },
.vcodec_pmdomains_num = 2,
.opp_pmdomain = (const char *[]) { "cx", NULL },
.vcodec_num = 1,
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h
index 4a633261ece4..7ef341bf21cc 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@

#define VIDC_CLKS_NUM_MAX 4
#define VIDC_VCODEC_CLKS_NUM_MAX 2
-#define VIDC_PMDOMAINS_NUM_MAX 3
#define VIDC_RESETS_NUM_MAX 2

extern int venus_fw_debug;
@@ -72,7 +71,7 @@ struct venus_resources {
const char * const vcodec0_clks[VIDC_VCODEC_CLKS_NUM_MAX];
const char * const vcodec1_clks[VIDC_VCODEC_CLKS_NUM_MAX];
unsigned int vcodec_clks_num;
- const char * const vcodec_pmdomains[VIDC_PMDOMAINS_NUM_MAX];
+ const char **vcodec_pmdomains;
unsigned int vcodec_pmdomains_num;
const char **opp_pmdomain;
unsigned int vcodec_num;
@@ -134,7 +133,7 @@ struct venus_format {
* @video_path: an interconnect handle to video to/from memory path
* @cpucfg_path: an interconnect handle to cpu configuration path
* @has_opp_table: does OPP table exist
- * @pmdomains: an array of pmdomains struct device pointers
+ * @pmdomains: a pointer to a list of pmdomains
* @opp_dl_venus: an device-link for device OPP
* @opp_pmdomain: an OPP power-domain
* @resets: an array of reset signals
@@ -187,7 +186,7 @@ struct venus_core {
struct icc_path *video_path;
struct icc_path *cpucfg_path;
bool has_opp_table;
- struct device *pmdomains[VIDC_PMDOMAINS_NUM_MAX];
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list *pmdomains;
struct device_link *opp_dl_venus;
struct device *opp_pmdomain;
struct reset_control *resets[VIDC_RESETS_NUM_MAX];
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
index a1b127caa90a..502822059498 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int poweroff_coreid(struct venus_core *core, unsigned int coreid_mask)
if (ret)
return ret;

- ret = pm_runtime_put_sync(core->pmdomains[1]);
+ ret = pm_runtime_put_sync(core->pmdomains->pd_devs[1]);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
}
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static int poweroff_coreid(struct venus_core *core, unsigned int coreid_mask)
if (ret)
return ret;

- ret = pm_runtime_put_sync(core->pmdomains[2]);
+ ret = pm_runtime_put_sync(core->pmdomains->pd_devs[2]);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
}
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int poweron_coreid(struct venus_core *core, unsigned int coreid_mask)
int ret;

if (coreid_mask & VIDC_CORE_ID_1) {
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(core->pmdomains[1]);
+ ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(core->pmdomains->pd_devs[1]);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;

@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int poweron_coreid(struct venus_core *core, unsigned int coreid_mask)
}

if (coreid_mask & VIDC_CORE_ID_2) {
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(core->pmdomains[2]);
+ ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(core->pmdomains->pd_devs[2]);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;

@@ -860,19 +860,18 @@ static int vcodec_domains_get(struct venus_core *core)
struct device **opp_virt_dev;
struct device *dev = core->dev;
const struct venus_resources *res = core->res;
- struct device *pd;
- unsigned int i;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data vcodec_data = {
+ .pd_names = res->vcodec_pmdomains,
+ .num_pd_names = res->vcodec_pmdomains_num,
+ .pd_flags = PD_FLAG_NO_DEV_LINK,
+ };

if (!res->vcodec_pmdomains_num)
goto skip_pmdomains;

- for (i = 0; i < res->vcodec_pmdomains_num; i++) {
- pd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev,
- res->vcodec_pmdomains[i]);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pd))
- return pd ? PTR_ERR(pd) : -ENODATA;
- core->pmdomains[i] = pd;
- }
+ ret = dev_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &vcodec_data, &core->pmdomains);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;

skip_pmdomains:
if (!core->res->opp_pmdomain)
@@ -896,30 +895,14 @@ static int vcodec_domains_get(struct venus_core *core)
return 0;

opp_attach_err:
- for (i = 0; i < res->vcodec_pmdomains_num; i++) {
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(core->pmdomains[i]))
- continue;
- dev_pm_domain_detach(core->pmdomains[i], true);
- }
-
+ dev_pm_domain_detach_list(core->pmdomains);
return ret;
}

static void vcodec_domains_put(struct venus_core *core)
{
- const struct venus_resources *res = core->res;
- unsigned int i;
+ dev_pm_domain_detach_list(core->pmdomains);

- if (!res->vcodec_pmdomains_num)
- goto skip_pmdomains;
-
- for (i = 0; i < res->vcodec_pmdomains_num; i++) {
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(core->pmdomains[i]))
- continue;
- dev_pm_domain_detach(core->pmdomains[i], true);
- }
-
-skip_pmdomains:
if (!core->has_opp_table)
return;

@@ -1035,7 +1018,8 @@ static void core_put_v4(struct venus_core *core)
static int core_power_v4(struct venus_core *core, int on)
{
struct device *dev = core->dev;
- struct device *pmctrl = core->pmdomains[0];
+ struct device *pmctrl = core->pmdomains ?
+ core->pmdomains->pd_devs[0] : NULL;
int ret = 0;

if (on == POWER_ON) {
--
2.34.1


2024-01-05 16:11:52

by Ulf Hansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()

Let's avoid the boilerplate code to manage the multiple PM domain case, by
converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list().

Cc: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Cc: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
---

Changes in v2:
- None.

Iuliana/Daniel I am ccing you to request help with test/review of this change.
Note that, you will need patch 1/5 in the series too, to be able to test this.

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson

---
drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 73 +++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index 8bb293b9f327..3161f14442bc 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {

static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc);
static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
-static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);

struct imx_rproc {
struct device *dev;
@@ -113,10 +112,8 @@ struct imx_rproc {
u32 rproc_pt; /* partition id */
u32 rsrc_id; /* resource id */
u32 entry; /* cpu start address */
- int num_pd;
u32 core_index;
- struct device **pd_dev;
- struct device_link **pd_dev_link;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
};

static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
@@ -853,7 +850,7 @@ static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
return;

if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id)) {
- imx_rproc_detach_pd(rproc);
+ dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list);
return;
}

@@ -880,72 +877,20 @@ static int imx_rproc_partition_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
static int imx_rproc_attach_pd(struct imx_rproc *priv)
{
struct device *dev = priv->dev;
- int ret, i;
-
- /*
- * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
- * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
- */
- priv->num_pd = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
- "#power-domain-cells");
- if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
- return 0;
-
- priv->pd_dev = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!priv->pd_dev)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- priv->pd_dev_link = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev_link),
- GFP_KERNEL);
-
- if (!priv->pd_dev_link)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
- priv->pd_dev[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
- if (IS_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i])) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i]);
- goto detach_pd;
- }
-
- priv->pd_dev_link[i] = device_link_add(dev, priv->pd_dev[i], DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
- DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
- if (!priv->pd_dev_link[i]) {
- dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto detach_pd;
- }
- }
-
- return 0;
-
-detach_pd:
- while (--i >= 0) {
- device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
- dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc)
-{
- struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
- int i;
+ int ret;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data pd_data = {
+ .pd_flags = PD_FLAG_DEV_LINK_ON,
+ };

/*
* If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
* will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
*/
- if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
+ if (dev->pm_domain)
return 0;

- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
- device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
- dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
- }
-
- return 0;
+ ret = dev_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &priv->pd_list);
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
}

static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
--
2.34.1


2024-01-08 08:44:24

by Daniel Baluta

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] PM: domains: Add helpers for multi PM domains to avoid open-coding

On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 6:02 PM Ulf Hansson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Updates in v2:
> - Ccing Daniel Baluta and Iuliana Prodan the NXP remoteproc patches to
> requests help with testing.
> - Fixed NULL pointer bug in patch1, pointed out by Nikunj.
> - Added some tested/reviewed-by tags.

Thanks for doing this Ulf. I remember that I've tried introducing the
helpers some time ago
but got side tracked by other tasks.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/[email protected]/t/

Will review the series and test the remoteproc part this week.

Daniel.

2024-01-12 11:11:53

by Ulf Hansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] PM: domains: Add helpers for multi PM domains to avoid open-coding

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 09:44, Daniel Baluta <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 6:02 PM Ulf Hansson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Updates in v2:
> > - Ccing Daniel Baluta and Iuliana Prodan the NXP remoteproc patches to
> > requests help with testing.
> > - Fixed NULL pointer bug in patch1, pointed out by Nikunj.
> > - Added some tested/reviewed-by tags.
>
> Thanks for doing this Ulf. I remember that I've tried introducing the
> helpers some time ago
> but got side tracked by other tasks.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/[email protected]/t/

Thanks for the pointer, yes I recall that too!

I should have added your suggested-by tag to patch1 in this series,
let me update that if/when I submit a new version!

>
> Will review the series and test the remoteproc part this week.

Thanks a lot, looking forward to your feedback!

Kind regards
Uffe

2024-01-22 18:24:03

by Iuliana Prodan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()

On 1/5/2024 6:01 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Let's avoid the boilerplate code to manage the multiple PM domain case, by
> converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list().
>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
> Cc: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - None.
>
> Iuliana/Daniel I am ccing you to request help with test/review of this change.
> Note that, you will need patch 1/5 in the series too, to be able to test this.
>
> Kind regards
> Ulf Hansson

Tested-by: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>

Iulia

> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 73 +++++-----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 8bb293b9f327..3161f14442bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
>
> static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc);
> static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
> -static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);
>
> struct imx_rproc {
> struct device *dev;
> @@ -113,10 +112,8 @@ struct imx_rproc {
> u32 rproc_pt; /* partition id */
> u32 rsrc_id; /* resource id */
> u32 entry; /* cpu start address */
> - int num_pd;
> u32 core_index;
> - struct device **pd_dev;
> - struct device_link **pd_dev_link;
> + struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
> };
>
> static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
> @@ -853,7 +850,7 @@ static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
> return;
>
> if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id)) {
> - imx_rproc_detach_pd(rproc);
> + dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -880,72 +877,20 @@ static int imx_rproc_partition_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> static int imx_rproc_attach_pd(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> {
> struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> - int ret, i;
> -
> - /*
> - * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
> - * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
> - */
> - priv->num_pd = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
> - "#power-domain-cells");
> - if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
> - return 0;
> -
> - priv->pd_dev = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!priv->pd_dev)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - priv->pd_dev_link = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev_link),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> - if (!priv->pd_dev_link)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
> - priv->pd_dev[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
> - if (IS_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i])) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i]);
> - goto detach_pd;
> - }
> -
> - priv->pd_dev_link[i] = device_link_add(dev, priv->pd_dev[i], DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
> - DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
> - if (!priv->pd_dev_link[i]) {
> - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto detach_pd;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -
> -detach_pd:
> - while (--i >= 0) {
> - device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
> - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> - }
> -
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc)
> -{
> - struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> - int i;
> + int ret;
> + struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data pd_data = {
> + .pd_flags = PD_FLAG_DEV_LINK_ON,
> + };
>
> /*
> * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
> * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
> */
> - if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
> + if (dev->pm_domain)
> return 0;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
> - device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
> - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> + ret = dev_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &priv->pd_list);
> + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> }
>
> static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)

2024-01-22 19:20:29

by Iuliana Prodan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()


On 1/5/2024 6:01 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Let's avoid the boilerplate code to manage the multiple PM domain case, by
> converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list().
>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
> Cc: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - None.
>
> Iuliana/Daniel I am ccing you to request help with test/review of this change.
> Note that, you will need patch 1/5 in the series too, to be able to test this.
>
> Kind regards
> Ulf Hansson

Sorry for the delay in responding, your patchset was lost in the shuffle.

Tested-by: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>

Iulia


> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 82 ++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> index 8fcda9b74545..0409b7c47d5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> @@ -103,12 +103,10 @@ enum imx_dsp_rp_mbox_messages {
> * @tx_ch: mailbox tx channel handle
> * @rx_ch: mailbox rx channel handle
> * @rxdb_ch: mailbox rx doorbell channel handle
> - * @pd_dev: power domain device
> - * @pd_dev_link: power domain device link
> + * @pd_list: power domain list
> * @ipc_handle: System Control Unit ipc handle
> * @rproc_work: work for processing virtio interrupts
> * @pm_comp: completion primitive to sync for suspend response
> - * @num_domains: power domain number
> * @flags: control flags
> */
> struct imx_dsp_rproc {
> @@ -121,12 +119,10 @@ struct imx_dsp_rproc {
> struct mbox_chan *tx_ch;
> struct mbox_chan *rx_ch;
> struct mbox_chan *rxdb_ch;
> - struct device **pd_dev;
> - struct device_link **pd_dev_link;
> + struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
> struct imx_sc_ipc *ipc_handle;
> struct work_struct rproc_work;
> struct completion pm_comp;
> - int num_domains;
> u32 flags;
> };
>
> @@ -954,74 +950,14 @@ static const struct rproc_ops imx_dsp_rproc_ops = {
> static int imx_dsp_attach_pm_domains(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
> {
> struct device *dev = priv->rproc->dev.parent;
> - int ret, i;
> -
> - priv->num_domains = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node,
> - "power-domains",
> - "#power-domain-cells");
> -
> - /* If only one domain, then no need to link the device */
> - if (priv->num_domains <= 1)
> - return 0;
> -
> - priv->pd_dev = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_domains,
> - sizeof(*priv->pd_dev),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!priv->pd_dev)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - priv->pd_dev_link = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_domains,
> - sizeof(*priv->pd_dev_link),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!priv->pd_dev_link)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_domains; i++) {
> - priv->pd_dev[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
> - if (IS_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i])) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i]);
> - goto detach_pm;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * device_link_add will check priv->pd_dev[i], if it is
> - * NULL, then will break.
> - */
> - priv->pd_dev_link[i] = device_link_add(dev,
> - priv->pd_dev[i],
> - DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
> - DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME);
> - if (!priv->pd_dev_link[i]) {
> - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto detach_pm;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -
> -detach_pm:
> - while (--i >= 0) {
> - device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
> - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> - }
> -
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static int imx_dsp_detach_pm_domains(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
> -{
> - int i;
> + int ret;
>
> - if (priv->num_domains <= 1)
> + /* A single PM domain is already attached. */
> + if (dev->pm_domain)
> return 0;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_domains; i++) {
> - device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
> - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> + ret = dev_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, NULL, &priv->pd_list);
> + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1153,7 +1089,7 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
>
> err_detach_domains:
> - imx_dsp_detach_pm_domains(priv);
> + dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list);
> err_put_rproc:
> rproc_free(rproc);
>
> @@ -1167,7 +1103,7 @@ static void imx_dsp_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> rproc_del(rproc);
> - imx_dsp_detach_pm_domains(priv);
> + dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list);
> rproc_free(rproc);
> }
>

2024-01-22 20:02:34

by Mathieu Poirier

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()

On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 10:51, Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 1/5/2024 6:01 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > Let's avoid the boilerplate code to manage the multiple PM domain case, by
> > converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list().
> >
> > Cc: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> > Cc: <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - None.
> >
> > Iuliana/Daniel I am ccing you to request help with test/review of this change.
> > Note that, you will need patch 1/5 in the series too, to be able to test this.
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Ulf Hansson
>
> Tested-by: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
>

Thanks for the leg-work on this. I'll pick this up in rc1 later this week.

> Iulia
>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 73 +++++-----------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > index 8bb293b9f327..3161f14442bc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
> >
> > static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc);
> > static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
> > -static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);
> >
> > struct imx_rproc {
> > struct device *dev;
> > @@ -113,10 +112,8 @@ struct imx_rproc {
> > u32 rproc_pt; /* partition id */
> > u32 rsrc_id; /* resource id */
> > u32 entry; /* cpu start address */
> > - int num_pd;
> > u32 core_index;
> > - struct device **pd_dev;
> > - struct device_link **pd_dev_link;
> > + struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
> > };
> >
> > static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
> > @@ -853,7 +850,7 @@ static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
> > return;
> >
> > if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id)) {
> > - imx_rproc_detach_pd(rproc);
> > + dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -880,72 +877,20 @@ static int imx_rproc_partition_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > static int imx_rproc_attach_pd(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> > - int ret, i;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
> > - * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
> > - */
> > - priv->num_pd = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
> > - "#power-domain-cells");
> > - if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > - priv->pd_dev = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!priv->pd_dev)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > - priv->pd_dev_link = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev_link),
> > - GFP_KERNEL);
> > -
> > - if (!priv->pd_dev_link)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
> > - priv->pd_dev[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
> > - if (IS_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i])) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i]);
> > - goto detach_pd;
> > - }
> > -
> > - priv->pd_dev_link[i] = device_link_add(dev, priv->pd_dev[i], DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
> > - DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
> > - if (!priv->pd_dev_link[i]) {
> > - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > - goto detach_pd;
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > -detach_pd:
> > - while (--i >= 0) {
> > - device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
> > - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> > - }
> > -
> > - return ret;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc)
> > -{
> > - struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > - int i;
> > + int ret;
> > + struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data pd_data = {
> > + .pd_flags = PD_FLAG_DEV_LINK_ON,
> > + };
> >
> > /*
> > * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
> > * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
> > */
> > - if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
> > + if (dev->pm_domain)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
> > - device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
> > - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> > - }
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > + ret = dev_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &priv->pd_list);
> > + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)

2024-01-23 02:13:30

by Mathieu Poirier

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 01:02:08PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 10:51, Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/5/2024 6:01 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > Let's avoid the boilerplate code to manage the multiple PM domain case, by
> > > converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list().
> > >
> > > Cc: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - None.
> > >
> > > Iuliana/Daniel I am ccing you to request help with test/review of this change.
> > > Note that, you will need patch 1/5 in the series too, to be able to test this.
> > >
> > > Kind regards
> > > Ulf Hansson
> >
> > Tested-by: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
> >
>
> Thanks for the leg-work on this. I'll pick this up in rc1 later this week.

Looking at the other files in this set, Ulf of perhaps Bjorn should take this
set.

for:

drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>

>
> > Iulia
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 73 +++++-----------------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > index 8bb293b9f327..3161f14442bc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
> > >
> > > static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > -static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);
> > >
> > > struct imx_rproc {
> > > struct device *dev;
> > > @@ -113,10 +112,8 @@ struct imx_rproc {
> > > u32 rproc_pt; /* partition id */
> > > u32 rsrc_id; /* resource id */
> > > u32 entry; /* cpu start address */
> > > - int num_pd;
> > > u32 core_index;
> > > - struct device **pd_dev;
> > > - struct device_link **pd_dev_link;
> > > + struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
> > > };
> > >
> > > static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
> > > @@ -853,7 +850,7 @@ static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > return;
> > >
> > > if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id)) {
> > > - imx_rproc_detach_pd(rproc);
> > > + dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list);
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -880,72 +877,20 @@ static int imx_rproc_partition_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > > static int imx_rproc_attach_pd(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> > > {
> > > struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> > > - int ret, i;
> > > -
> > > - /*
> > > - * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
> > > - * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
> > > - */
> > > - priv->num_pd = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
> > > - "#power-domain-cells");
> > > - if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
> > > - return 0;
> > > -
> > > - priv->pd_dev = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > - if (!priv->pd_dev)
> > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > -
> > > - priv->pd_dev_link = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev_link),
> > > - GFP_KERNEL);
> > > -
> > > - if (!priv->pd_dev_link)
> > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > -
> > > - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
> > > - priv->pd_dev[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
> > > - if (IS_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i])) {
> > > - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i]);
> > > - goto detach_pd;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - priv->pd_dev_link[i] = device_link_add(dev, priv->pd_dev[i], DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
> > > - DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
> > > - if (!priv->pd_dev_link[i]) {
> > > - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> > > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > > - goto detach_pd;
> > > - }
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - return 0;
> > > -
> > > -detach_pd:
> > > - while (--i >= 0) {
> > > - device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
> > > - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - return ret;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > -{
> > > - struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > > - int i;
> > > + int ret;
> > > + struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data pd_data = {
> > > + .pd_flags = PD_FLAG_DEV_LINK_ON,
> > > + };
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
> > > * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
> > > */
> > > - if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
> > > + if (dev->pm_domain)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
> > > - device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
> > > - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - return 0;
> > > + ret = dev_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &priv->pd_list);
> > > + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)

2024-01-23 12:38:31

by Ulf Hansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()

On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 02:27, Mathieu Poirier
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 01:02:08PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 10:51, Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/5/2024 6:01 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > > Let's avoid the boilerplate code to manage the multiple PM domain case, by
> > > > converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list().
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: <[email protected]>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - None.
> > > >
> > > > Iuliana/Daniel I am ccing you to request help with test/review of this change.
> > > > Note that, you will need patch 1/5 in the series too, to be able to test this.
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards
> > > > Ulf Hansson
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
> > > Reviewed-by: Iuliana Prodan <[email protected]>
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the leg-work on this. I'll pick this up in rc1 later this week.
>
> Looking at the other files in this set, Ulf of perhaps Bjorn should take this
> set.

Yes, all patches in the series depend on the new helper function that
is introduced in patch 1.

I can certainly take the whole series via my pmdomain tree, if that's
fine by everyone.

Note that, there is also another series for genpd and qcom drivers
that might make it for v6.9. It may be best to keep all these things
together to avoid conflicts.

Let's see what Greg/Rafael thinks about patch 1 first though.

>
> for:
>
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
>
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>

Thanks Mathieu and Iuliana!

[...]

Kind regards
Uffe

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

2024-01-26 16:14:26

by Ulf Hansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] PM: domains: Add helpers for multi PM domains to avoid open-coding

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 17:01, Ulf Hansson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Updates in v2:
> - Ccing Daniel Baluta and Iuliana Prodan the NXP remoteproc patches to
> requests help with testing.
> - Fixed NULL pointer bug in patch1, pointed out by Nikunj.
> - Added some tested/reviewed-by tags.
>
>
> Attaching/detaching of a device to multiple PM domains has started to become a
> common operation for many drivers, typically during ->probe() and ->remove().
> In most cases, this has lead to lots of boilerplate code in the drivers.
>
> This series adds a pair of helper functions to manage the attach/detach of a
> device to its multiple PM domains. Moreover, a couple of drivers have been
> converted to use the new helpers as a proof of concept.
>
> Note 1)
> The changes in the drivers have only been compile tested, while the helpers
> have been tested along with a couple of local dummy drivers that I have hacked
> up to model both genpd providers and genpd consumers.
>
> Note 2)
> I was struggling to make up mind if we should have a separate helper to attach
> all available power-domains described in DT, rather than providing "NULL" to the
> dev_pm_domain_attach_list(). I decided not to, but please let me know if you
> prefer the other option.
>
> Note 3)
> For OPP integration, as a follow up I am striving to make the
> dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() redundant. Instead I think we should move towards
> using dev_pm_opp_set_config()->_opp_set_required_devs(), which would allow us to
> use the helpers that $subject series is adding.
>
> Kind regards
> Ulf Hansson

Rafael, Greg, do have any objections to this series or would you be
okay that I queue this up via my pmdomain tree?

Kind regards
Uffe

>
>
> Ulf Hansson (5):
> PM: domains: Add helper functions to attach/detach multiple PM domains
> remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Convert to
> dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()
> remoteproc: imx_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()
> remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_adsp: Convert to
> dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()
> media: venus: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list() for vcodec
>
> drivers/base/power/common.c | 134 +++++++++++++++
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c | 12 +-
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h | 7 +-
> .../media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c | 48 ++----
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 82 +--------
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 73 +-------
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 160 ++++++++----------
> include/linux/pm_domain.h | 38 +++++
> 8 files changed, 289 insertions(+), 265 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1

2024-01-26 19:08:10

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] PM: domains: Add helpers for multi PM domains to avoid open-coding

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 05:12:12PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 17:01, Ulf Hansson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Updates in v2:
> > - Ccing Daniel Baluta and Iuliana Prodan the NXP remoteproc patches to
> > requests help with testing.
> > - Fixed NULL pointer bug in patch1, pointed out by Nikunj.
> > - Added some tested/reviewed-by tags.
> >
> >
> > Attaching/detaching of a device to multiple PM domains has started to become a
> > common operation for many drivers, typically during ->probe() and ->remove().
> > In most cases, this has lead to lots of boilerplate code in the drivers.
> >
> > This series adds a pair of helper functions to manage the attach/detach of a
> > device to its multiple PM domains. Moreover, a couple of drivers have been
> > converted to use the new helpers as a proof of concept.
> >
> > Note 1)
> > The changes in the drivers have only been compile tested, while the helpers
> > have been tested along with a couple of local dummy drivers that I have hacked
> > up to model both genpd providers and genpd consumers.
> >
> > Note 2)
> > I was struggling to make up mind if we should have a separate helper to attach
> > all available power-domains described in DT, rather than providing "NULL" to the
> > dev_pm_domain_attach_list(). I decided not to, but please let me know if you
> > prefer the other option.
> >
> > Note 3)
> > For OPP integration, as a follow up I am striving to make the
> > dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() redundant. Instead I think we should move towards
> > using dev_pm_opp_set_config()->_opp_set_required_devs(), which would allow us to
> > use the helpers that $subject series is adding.
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Ulf Hansson
>
> Rafael, Greg, do have any objections to this series or would you be
> okay that I queue this up via my pmdomain tree?

I'll defer to Rafael here.