2021-02-11 10:03:35

by Claudius Heine

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx: imx8mm: fix pad offset of SD1_DATA0 pin

There is a 0 missing in the pad register offset. This patch adds it.

Signed-off-by: Claudius Heine <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h
index 5ccc4cc91959d..a003e6af33533 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
#define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_CMD_USDHC1_CMD 0x0A4 0x30C 0x000 0x0 0x0
#define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_CMD_GPIO2_IO1 0x0A4 0x30C 0x000 0x5 0x0
#define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA0_USDHC1_DATA0 0x0A8 0x310 0x000 0x0 0x0
-#define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA0_GPIO2_IO2 0x0A8 0x31 0x000 0x5 0x0
+#define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA0_GPIO2_IO2 0x0A8 0x310 0x000 0x5 0x0
#define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA1_USDHC1_DATA1 0x0AC 0x314 0x000 0x0 0x0
#define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA1_GPIO2_IO3 0x0AC 0x314 0x000 0x5 0x0
#define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA2_USDHC1_DATA2 0x0B0 0x318 0x000 0x0 0x0
--
2.30.0


2021-02-11 10:18:02

by Claudius Heine

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx: imx8mm: fix pad offset of SD1_DATA0 pin

Hi,

can you please add:

Fixes: c1c9d41319c3 ("dt-bindings: imx: Add pinctrl binding doc for imx8mm")

to the commit message.

regards,
Claudius

On 2021-02-11 10:54, Claudius Heine wrote:
> There is a 0 missing in the pad register offset. This patch adds it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudius Heine <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h
> index 5ccc4cc91959d..a003e6af33533 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
> #define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_CMD_USDHC1_CMD 0x0A4 0x30C 0x000 0x0 0x0
> #define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_CMD_GPIO2_IO1 0x0A4 0x30C 0x000 0x5 0x0
> #define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA0_USDHC1_DATA0 0x0A8 0x310 0x000 0x0 0x0
> -#define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA0_GPIO2_IO2 0x0A8 0x31 0x000 0x5 0x0
> +#define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA0_GPIO2_IO2 0x0A8 0x310 0x000 0x5 0x0
> #define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA1_USDHC1_DATA1 0x0AC 0x314 0x000 0x0 0x0
> #define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA1_GPIO2_IO3 0x0AC 0x314 0x000 0x5 0x0
> #define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA2_USDHC1_DATA2 0x0B0 0x318 0x000 0x0 0x0
>

2021-02-11 10:20:42

by Frieder Schrempf

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx: imx8mm: fix pad offset of SD1_DATA0 pin

On 11.02.21 10:54, Claudius Heine wrote:
> There is a 0 missing in the pad register offset. This patch adds it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudius Heine <[email protected]>

I think this should rather be prefixed by "arm64: dts: imx8mm:" as this
is no change in the pinctrl driver, but only in the devicetree.

And I guess this deserves a "Fixes" and "Cc: stable" tag, so:

Fixes: c1c9d41319c3 ("dt-bindings: imx: Add pinctrl binding doc for imx8mm")
Cc: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <[email protected]>

> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h
> index 5ccc4cc91959d..a003e6af33533 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-pinfunc.h
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
> #define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_CMD_USDHC1_CMD 0x0A4 0x30C 0x000 0x0 0x0
> #define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_CMD_GPIO2_IO1 0x0A4 0x30C 0x000 0x5 0x0
> #define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA0_USDHC1_DATA0 0x0A8 0x310 0x000 0x0 0x0
> -#define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA0_GPIO2_IO2 0x0A8 0x31 0x000 0x5 0x0
> +#define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA0_GPIO2_IO2 0x0A8 0x310 0x000 0x5 0x0
> #define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA1_USDHC1_DATA1 0x0AC 0x314 0x000 0x0 0x0
> #define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA1_GPIO2_IO3 0x0AC 0x314 0x000 0x5 0x0
> #define MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD1_DATA2_USDHC1_DATA2 0x0B0 0x318 0x000 0x0 0x0
>

2021-02-11 10:20:47

by Fabio Estevam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx: imx8mm: fix pad offset of SD1_DATA0 pin

Hi Claudius,

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 7:15 AM Claudius Heine <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can you please add:
>
> Fixes: c1c9d41319c3 ("dt-bindings: imx: Add pinctrl binding doc for imx8mm")

Yes, I was about to suggest the same. Thanks for the fix:

Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>

2021-02-11 11:50:19

by Marek Vasut

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx: imx8mm: fix pad offset of SD1_DATA0 pin

On 2/11/21 11:17 AM, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> On 11.02.21 10:54, Claudius Heine wrote:
>> There is a 0 missing in the pad register offset. This patch adds it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudius Heine <[email protected]>
>
> I think this should rather be prefixed by "arm64: dts: imx8mm:" as this
> is no change in the pinctrl driver, but only in the devicetree.
>
> And I guess this deserves a "Fixes" and "Cc: stable" tag, so:
>
> Fixes: c1c9d41319c3 ("dt-bindings: imx: Add pinctrl binding doc for
> imx8mm")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <[email protected]>

Indeed.

But since this isn't the first such fix, I wonder whether it wouldn't be
a good idea to regenerate those pinctrl tables and see whether there are
any other such issues in them. I wonder, is there some sort of register
and bit list in machine-parseable form for the MX8M ?