From: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 3:03 PM
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
Hi Fabio,
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 9:17 AM Christoph Niedermaier
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> + - description: i.MX6S DHCOM DRC02 Board
>> + items:
>> + - const: dh,imx6s-dhcom-drc02
>> + - const: dh,imx6s-dhcom-som
>> + - const: fsl,imx6s
>
> We don't have an fsl,imx6s compatible for the i.MX6 Solo variant. We
> just use fsl,imx6dl instead.
My thought was to be future proof. If there is no match with the Solo now,
it will fall back to the i.MX6 DualLite. That is why I added both fsl,imx6s
and fsl,imx6dl in this order.
Should I remove the line with fsl,imx6s?
Regards
Christoph
Hi Christoph,
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 7:39 PM Christoph Niedermaier
<[email protected]> wrote:
> My thought was to be future proof. If there is no match with the Solo now,
> it will fall back to the i.MX6 DualLite. That is why I added both fsl,imx6s
> and fsl,imx6dl in this order.
>
> Should I remove the line with fsl,imx6s?
Yes, please.
Thanks