From: Wei Yongjun <[email protected]>
The dereference to port should be moved below the NULL test.
dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch.
(https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <[email protected]>
---
drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c b/drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c
index adc6f36..fe16b32 100644
--- a/drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c
+++ b/drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void mtip_timeout_function(unsigned long int data)
struct mtip_cmd *command;
int tag, cmdto_cnt = 0;
unsigned int bit, group;
- unsigned int num_command_slots = port->dd->slot_groups * 32;
+ unsigned int num_command_slots;
unsigned long to, tagaccum[SLOTBITS_IN_LONGS];
if (unlikely(!port))
@@ -572,6 +572,7 @@ static void mtip_timeout_function(unsigned long int data)
}
/* clear the tag accumulator */
memset(tagaccum, 0, SLOTBITS_IN_LONGS * sizeof(long));
+ num_command_slots = port->dd->slot_groups * 32;
for (tag = 0; tag < num_command_slots; tag++) {
/*
On 2012-11-08 10:35, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <[email protected]>
>
> The dereference to port should be moved below the NULL test.
>
> dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch.
> (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
Thanks, it definitely doesn't make sense to check for !port after having
dereferenced it. Applied.
--
Jens Axboe