2018-08-05 00:28:53

by Gustavo A. R. Silva

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Use true and false for boolean values

Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.

This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
index 5d2475d..16af9d1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
@@ -62,12 +62,12 @@ static bool cik_event_interrupt_isr(struct kfd_dev *dev,
vmid = (ihre->ring_id & 0x0000ff00) >> 8;
if (vmid < dev->vm_info.first_vmid_kfd ||
vmid > dev->vm_info.last_vmid_kfd)
- return 0;
+ return false;

/* If there is no valid PASID, it's likely a firmware bug */
pasid = (ihre->ring_id & 0xffff0000) >> 16;
if (WARN_ONCE(pasid == 0, "FW bug: No PASID in KFD interrupt"))
- return 0;
+ return false;

/* Interrupt types we care about: various signals and faults.
* They will be forwarded to a work queue (see below).
--
2.7.4



2018-08-07 06:13:22

by Huang Rui

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Use true and false for boolean values

On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 07:27:02PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
> instead of an integer value.
>
> This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>

Looks good for me.
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <[email protected]>

Add Felix for his awareness.

> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
> index 5d2475d..16af9d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
> @@ -62,12 +62,12 @@ static bool cik_event_interrupt_isr(struct kfd_dev *dev,
> vmid = (ihre->ring_id & 0x0000ff00) >> 8;
> if (vmid < dev->vm_info.first_vmid_kfd ||
> vmid > dev->vm_info.last_vmid_kfd)
> - return 0;
> + return false;
>
> /* If there is no valid PASID, it's likely a firmware bug */
> pasid = (ihre->ring_id & 0xffff0000) >> 16;
> if (WARN_ONCE(pasid == 0, "FW bug: No PASID in KFD interrupt"))
> - return 0;
> + return false;
>
> /* Interrupt types we care about: various signals and faults.
> * They will be forwarded to a work queue (see below).
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

2018-08-07 10:29:24

by Russell, Kent

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Use true and false for boolean values

Thanks for that!
Reviewed-by: Kent Russell <[email protected]>

-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Huang Rui
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2018 1:28 AM
To: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>; Kuehling, Felix <[email protected]>
Cc: Oded Gabbay <[email protected]>; Zhou, David(ChunMing) <[email protected]>; David Airlie <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Deucher, Alexander <[email protected]>; Koenig, Christian <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Use true and false for boolean values

On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 07:27:02PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
> instead of an integer value.
>
> This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>

Looks good for me.
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <[email protected]>

Add Felix for his awareness.

> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
> index 5d2475d..16af9d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
> @@ -62,12 +62,12 @@ static bool cik_event_interrupt_isr(struct kfd_dev *dev,
> vmid = (ihre->ring_id & 0x0000ff00) >> 8;
> if (vmid < dev->vm_info.first_vmid_kfd ||
> vmid > dev->vm_info.last_vmid_kfd)
> - return 0;
> + return false;
>
> /* If there is no valid PASID, it's likely a firmware bug */
> pasid = (ihre->ring_id & 0xffff0000) >> 16;
> if (WARN_ONCE(pasid == 0, "FW bug: No PASID in KFD interrupt"))
> - return 0;
> + return false;
>
> /* Interrupt types we care about: various signals and faults.
> * They will be forwarded to a work queue (see below).
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx