> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ben
> Dooks (Codethink)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 1:50 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Ben Dooks (Codethink) <[email protected]>; Antoine Tenart
> <[email protected]>; Herbert Xu <[email protected]>; David S. Miller
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [PATCH] crypto: inside-secure - fix type of buffer in eip197_write_firmware
>
> In eip197_write_firmware() the firmware buffer is sent using
> writel(be32_to_cpu(),,,) this produces a number of warnings.
>
> Note, should this really be cpu_to_be32() ?
>
No, it should certainly not be cpu_to_be32() since the HW itself is most
definitely little endian, so that would not make sense to me.
Actually, I don't think either solution would be correct on a big-endian
CPU. But I don't have any big-endian CPU available to test that theory.
What I believe must happen is that the bytes must *always* be swapped
here, regardless of the endianness of the CPU. And with a little-endian
CPU, be32_to_cpu() coincidentally always does that.
Basically, what we need here is: read a dword (32 bits) from the memory
subsystem and write it back to the memory subsystem with bytes reversed.
Does the kernel have any dedicated function for just always swapping?
Anyway: NACK on this patch for now due to this.
> drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c:306:17: warning: cast to restricted __be32
> drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c:306:17: warning: cast to restricted __be32
> drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c:306:17: warning: cast to restricted __be32
> drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c:306:17: warning: cast to restricted __be32
> drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c:306:17: warning: cast to restricted __be32
> drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c:306:17: warning: cast to restricted __be32
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <[email protected]>
> ---
> Cc: Antoine Tenart <[email protected]>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
> index 223d1bfdc7e6..dd33f6dda295 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
> @@ -298,13 +298,13 @@ static void eip197_init_firmware(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv)
> static int eip197_write_firmware(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv,
> const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> - const u32 *data = (const u32 *)fw->data;
> + const __be32 *data = (const __be32 *)fw->data;
> int i;
>
> /* Write the firmware */
> - for (i = 0; i < fw->size / sizeof(u32); i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < fw->size / sizeof(__be32); i++)
> writel(be32_to_cpu(data[i]),
> - priv->base + EIP197_CLASSIFICATION_RAMS + i * sizeof(u32));
> + priv->base + EIP197_CLASSIFICATION_RAMS + i * sizeof(__be32));
>
> /* Exclude final 2 NOPs from size */
> return i - EIP197_FW_TERMINAL_NOPS;
> --
> 2.23.0
Regards,
Pascal van Leeuwen
Silicon IP Architect, Multi-Protocol Engines @ Verimatrix
http://www.insidesecure.com