Could anyone remind me of why NFS kernel would not pass byte range lock
requests to the underlying filsystem at the server side?
I think another person at IBM (Brian?) submitted a patch for this but such
patch never got included in the distribution.
I think a patch to pass lock requests to the underlying filesystem does not
affect single node NFS servers and it enables us to
support clustered Linux-based NAS heads over distributed file systems.
Juan
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 00:11, Juan Gomez wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Could anyone remind me of why NFS kernel would not pass byte range lock
> requests to the underlying filsystem at the server side?
> I think another person at IBM (Brian?) submitted a patch for this but such
> patch never got included in the distribution.
I know Matthew had the patches, and I know I looked at them and they
seemed sane enough. But I don't know where they eventually went. Things
like NFS over AFS are going to need it
Oh ok. Well can we resuscitate this patch? The AFS NAS head example is a
good reason to do this.
If you need any help please let me know and I will be happy to test/adapt
the patch in/to the version that you may want to apply it.
We have one version for 2.4.18 that someone created recently if the one you
have is too old...
Thanks, Juan
|---------+---------------------------------->
| | Alan Cox |
| | <[email protected].|
| | uk> |
| | Sent by: |
| | linux-kernel-owner@vger|
| | .kernel.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 10/09/02 04:32 PM |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------------->
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: Juan Gomez/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS |
| cc: [email protected], Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]> |
| Subject: Re: Why NFS server does not pass lock requests via VFS lock() op? |
| |
| |
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 00:11, Juan Gomez wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Could anyone remind me of why NFS kernel would not pass byte range lock
> requests to the underlying filsystem at the server side?
> I think another person at IBM (Brian?) submitted a patch for this but
such
> patch never got included in the distribution.
I know Matthew had the patches, and I know I looked at them and they
seemed sane enough. But I don't know where they eventually went. Things
like NFS over AFS are going to need it
>>>>> " " == Juan Gomez <[email protected]> writes:
> Oh ok. Well can we resuscitate this patch? The AFS NAS head
> example is a good reason to do this. If you need any help
If you do, make sure that you get the latest patch from Brian and
*NOT* the one that was in earlier versions of the -ac tree. The
latter screws lockd quite royally...
Cheers,
Trond