Hi Marcelo!
just verified that the NFS root bug-fix was not
included in 2.4.22-pre9, unfortunately I have
to ask you again, why you do not want to fix
this issue in 2.4.22 ...
I do not understand why Trond obviously is
ignoring my mails, regarding this particular
issue, maybe he is just too busy to look at
four twoline changes, and more, I do not
understand why this isn't accepted into the
marcelo kernel tree, as it obviously fixes a
misbehaviour?
please explain!
It is okay for me, if your argumentation goes
like "I don't like you, that's reason enough
for me to not include your patches ...", but I
would like to know ...
best,
Herbert
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Herbert P?tzl wrote:
>
> Hi Marcelo!
>
> just verified that the NFS root bug-fix was not
> included in 2.4.22-pre9, unfortunately I have
> to ask you again, why you do not want to fix
> this issue in 2.4.22 ...
>
> I do not understand why Trond obviously is
> ignoring my mails, regarding this particular
> issue, maybe he is just too busy to look at
> four twoline changes, and more, I do not
> understand why this isn't accepted into the
> marcelo kernel tree, as it obviously fixes a
> misbehaviour?
>
> please explain!
>
> It is okay for me, if your argumentation goes
> like "I don't like you, that's reason enough
> for me to not include your patches ...", but I
> would like to know ...
I do not consider the patch critical enough.
Get it in 2.5 first, then come back :)
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Herbert P?tzl wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:57:52AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Herbert P?tzl wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi Marcelo!
> > >
> > > just verified that the NFS root bug-fix was not
> > > included in 2.4.22-pre9, unfortunately I have
> > > to ask you again, why you do not want to fix
> > > this issue in 2.4.22 ...
> > >
> > > I do not understand why Trond obviously is
> > > ignoring my mails, regarding this particular
> > > issue, maybe he is just too busy to look at
> > > four twoline changes, and more, I do not
> > > understand why this isn't accepted into the
> > > marcelo kernel tree, as it obviously fixes a
> > > misbehaviour?
> > >
> > > please explain!
> > >
> > > It is okay for me, if your argumentation goes
> > > like "I don't like you, that's reason enough
> > > for me to not include your patches ...", but I
> > > would like to know ...
> >
> > I do not consider the patch critical enough.
> >
> > Get it in 2.5 first, then come back :)
>
> I hope this is a joke, and you are still reading
> your mail ...
No, this is not a joke, at all.
Let me repeat: I (and Trond) do not consider this patch critical.
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 15:57, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Hi Marcelo, Herbert,
> > just verified that the NFS root bug-fix was not
> > included in 2.4.22-pre9, unfortunately I have
> > to ask you again, why you do not want to fix
> > this issue in 2.4.22 ...
> > I do not understand why Trond obviously is
> > ignoring my mails, regarding this particular
> > issue, maybe he is just too busy to look at
> > four twoline changes, and more, I do not
> > understand why this isn't accepted into the
> > marcelo kernel tree, as it obviously fixes a
> > misbehaviour?
> I do not consider the patch critical enough.
> Get it in 2.5 first, then come back :)
err, correct me if I am totally wrong here but does "ROOT NFS fixes" means
somewhat like
append="nfsroot=10.0.0.7:/home/nfsroot \
ip=10.0.0.254:10.0.0.7:10.0.0.7:255.255.255.0:temp:eth0:off root=/dev/nfs"
does not work w/o the fix?
ciao, Marc
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Herbert P?tzl wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:57:52AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Herbert P?tzl wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Marcelo!
> > > >
> > > > just verified that the NFS root bug-fix was not
> > > > included in 2.4.22-pre9, unfortunately I have
> > > > to ask you again, why you do not want to fix
> > > > this issue in 2.4.22 ...
> > > >
> > > > I do not understand why Trond obviously is
> > > > ignoring my mails, regarding this particular
> > > > issue, maybe he is just too busy to look at
> > > > four twoline changes, and more, I do not
> > > > understand why this isn't accepted into the
> > > > marcelo kernel tree, as it obviously fixes a
> > > > misbehaviour?
> > > >
> > > > please explain!
> > > >
> > > > It is okay for me, if your argumentation goes
> > > > like "I don't like you, that's reason enough
> > > > for me to not include your patches ...", but I
> > > > would like to know ...
> > >
> > > I do not consider the patch critical enough.
> > >
> > > Get it in 2.5 first, then come back :)
> >
> > I hope this is a joke, and you are still reading
> > your mail ...
>
> No, this is not a joke, at all.
>
> Let me repeat: I (and Trond) do not consider this patch critical.
Ok, I'm wrong. I just read Trond's mail saying the patch is OK.
I'll apply it to -pre10.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:28:46AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Herbert P?tzl wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:57:52AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Herbert P?tzl wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Marcelo!
> > > > >
> > > > > just verified that the NFS root bug-fix was not
> > > > > included in 2.4.22-pre9, unfortunately I have
> > > > > to ask you again, why you do not want to fix
> > > > > this issue in 2.4.22 ...
> > > > >
> > > > > I do not understand why Trond obviously is
> > > > > ignoring my mails, regarding this particular
> > > > > issue, maybe he is just too busy to look at
> > > > > four twoline changes, and more, I do not
> > > > > understand why this isn't accepted into the
> > > > > marcelo kernel tree, as it obviously fixes a
> > > > > misbehaviour?
> > > > >
> > > > > please explain!
> > > > >
> > > > > It is okay for me, if your argumentation goes
> > > > > like "I don't like you, that's reason enough
> > > > > for me to not include your patches ...", but I
> > > > > would like to know ...
> > > >
> > > > I do not consider the patch critical enough.
> > > >
> > > > Get it in 2.5 first, then come back :)
> > >
> > > I hope this is a joke, and you are still reading
> > > your mail ...
> >
> > No, this is not a joke, at all.
> >
> > Let me repeat: I (and Trond) do not consider this patch critical.
>
> Ok, I'm wrong. I just read Trond's mail saying the patch is OK.
>
> I'll apply it to -pre10.
hmm, maybe it _is_ too early to do this ;)
but on the other hand, I'm a fearless creature ...
many thanks,
Herbert
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Herbert P?tzl wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:28:46AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Herbert P?tzl wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:57:52AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Herbert P?tzl wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Marcelo!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > just verified that the NFS root bug-fix was not
> > > > > > included in 2.4.22-pre9, unfortunately I have
> > > > > > to ask you again, why you do not want to fix
> > > > > > this issue in 2.4.22 ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I do not understand why Trond obviously is
> > > > > > ignoring my mails, regarding this particular
> > > > > > issue, maybe he is just too busy to look at
> > > > > > four twoline changes, and more, I do not
> > > > > > understand why this isn't accepted into the
> > > > > > marcelo kernel tree, as it obviously fixes a
> > > > > > misbehaviour?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > please explain!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is okay for me, if your argumentation goes
> > > > > > like "I don't like you, that's reason enough
> > > > > > for me to not include your patches ...", but I
> > > > > > would like to know ...
> > > > >
> > > > > I do not consider the patch critical enough.
> > > > >
> > > > > Get it in 2.5 first, then come back :)
> > > >
> > > > I hope this is a joke, and you are still reading
> > > > your mail ...
> > >
> > > No, this is not a joke, at all.
> > >
> > > Let me repeat: I (and Trond) do not consider this patch critical.
> >
> > Ok, I'm wrong. I just read Trond's mail saying the patch is OK.
> >
> > I'll apply it to -pre10.
>
> hmm, maybe it _is_ too early to do this ;)
> but on the other hand, I'm a fearless creature ...
What do you mean too early ?
Trond is OK with it, it seems.