2021-09-01 08:47:14

by Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: About resctrl code rebase

Hi, James Morse

> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache
> control function into resctrl. Fujitsu will implement this feature base
> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86
> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/

> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> And where is the rebase code?
> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng


2021-09-01 17:06:40

by James Morse

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: About resctrl code rebase

Hi Tan Shaopeng,

On 01/09/2021 09:35, [email protected] wrote:
>> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache
>> control function into resctrl.

>> Fujitsu will implement this feature base
>> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86
>> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/

I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.

I've also posted the next series here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/

and there are a couple more after that.


>> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
>> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
>> And where is the rebase code?
>> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?

I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is reviewed.
(please help!)

I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that will
happen this month.


> I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.

Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!


Thanks,

James

2021-09-06 06:51:01

by Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: About resctrl code rebase

Hi, James Morse

Thanks for your reply.

> On 01/09/2021 09:35, [email protected] wrote:
> >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> >> cache control function into resctrl.
>
> >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti
> >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
>
> I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
>
> I've also posted the next series here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
> /
>
> and there are a couple more after that.

I understand.

> >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> >> And where is the rebase code?
> >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
>
> I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is
> reviewed.
> (please help!)

I will check these patches.
And I'm going to test these patches on machine with x86.

Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng

> I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that
> will happen this month.
>
>
> > I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
>
> Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!

2021-11-24 11:17:23

by Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: About resctrl code rebase

Hi James

> On 01/09/2021 09:35, [email protected] wrote:
> >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> >> cache control function into resctrl.
>
> >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti
> >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
>
> I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
>
> I've also posted the next series here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
> /
>
> and there are a couple more after that.

When will you post patches v3? And are there any other patches after this?

> >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> >> And where is the rebase code?
> >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
>
> I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is
> reviewed.
> (please help!)
>
> I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that
> will happen this month.

Could you tell me when you are planning to push the rebase code?
Is there anything I can do for you?

Best regards,
Tan shaopeng