2022-05-13 02:44:24

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/5] Documentation: gpio: Fix IRQ mask and unmask examples

After switching to immutable IRQ chips for GPIO drivers the examples become
uncompilable due to wrong IRQ API, i.e. irq_desc_get_handler_data() in use.
Replace it with proper irq_data_get_irq_chip_data() call where it applies.

Fixes: 5644b66a9c63 ("Documentation: Update the recommended pattern for GPIO irqchips")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
index a1ddefa1f55f..964d09118d17 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ call into the core gpiolib code:

static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);

/*
* Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ call into the core gpiolib code:

static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);

gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);

@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ the interrupt separately and go with it:

static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);

/*
* Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ the interrupt separately and go with it:

static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);

gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);

@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ In this case the typical set-up will look like this:

static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);

/*
* Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ In this case the typical set-up will look like this:

static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);

gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);

--
2.35.1



2022-05-13 06:41:17

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/5] pinctrl: baytrail: make irq_chip immutable

Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:

"not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"

Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.

While at it, switch to use hwirq variable instead of offset for
the sake of consistency.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 42 ++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
index f89c9fcd4e1b..31f8f271628c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
@@ -1350,15 +1350,15 @@ static void byt_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct intel_pinctrl *vg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- unsigned int offset = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
void __iomem *reg;

- reg = byt_gpio_reg(vg, offset, BYT_INT_STAT_REG);
+ reg = byt_gpio_reg(vg, hwirq, BYT_INT_STAT_REG);
if (!reg)
return;

raw_spin_lock(&byt_lock);
- writel(BIT(offset % 32), reg);
+ writel(BIT(hwirq % 32), reg);
raw_spin_unlock(&byt_lock);
}

@@ -1366,20 +1366,24 @@ static void byt_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct intel_pinctrl *vg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);

- byt_gpio_clear_triggering(vg, irqd_to_hwirq(d));
+ byt_gpio_clear_triggering(vg, hwirq);
+ gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq);
}

static void byt_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct intel_pinctrl *vg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- unsigned int offset = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
unsigned long flags;
void __iomem *reg;
u32 value;

- reg = byt_gpio_reg(vg, offset, BYT_CONF0_REG);
+ gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq);
+
+ reg = byt_gpio_reg(vg, hwirq, BYT_CONF0_REG);
if (!reg)
return;

@@ -1412,12 +1416,13 @@ static void byt_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
static int byt_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
{
struct intel_pinctrl *vg = gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d));
- u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
u32 value;
unsigned long flags;
- void __iomem *reg = byt_gpio_reg(vg, offset, BYT_CONF0_REG);
+ void __iomem *reg;

- if (!reg || offset >= vg->chip.ngpio)
+ reg = byt_gpio_reg(vg, hwirq, BYT_CONF0_REG);
+ if (!reg)
return -EINVAL;

raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&byt_lock, flags);
@@ -1447,6 +1452,16 @@ static int byt_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
return 0;
}

+static const struct irq_chip byt_gpio_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "BYT-GPIO",
+ .irq_ack = byt_irq_ack,
+ .irq_mask = byt_irq_mask,
+ .irq_unmask = byt_irq_unmask,
+ .irq_set_type = byt_irq_type,
+ .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED | IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
+ GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
+};
+
static void byt_gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
struct irq_data *data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
@@ -1633,15 +1648,8 @@ static int byt_gpio_probe(struct intel_pinctrl *vg)
if (irq > 0) {
struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;

- vg->irqchip.name = "BYT-GPIO",
- vg->irqchip.irq_ack = byt_irq_ack,
- vg->irqchip.irq_mask = byt_irq_mask,
- vg->irqchip.irq_unmask = byt_irq_unmask,
- vg->irqchip.irq_set_type = byt_irq_type,
- vg->irqchip.flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED,
-
girq = &gc->irq;
- girq->chip = &vg->irqchip;
+ gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &byt_gpio_irq_chip);
girq->init_hw = byt_gpio_irq_init_hw;
girq->init_valid_mask = byt_init_irq_valid_mask;
girq->parent_handler = byt_gpio_irq_handler;
--
2.35.1


2022-05-13 22:43:58

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] Documentation: gpio: Fix IRQ mask and unmask examples

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 7:52 PM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:

> After switching to immutable IRQ chips for GPIO drivers the examples become
> uncompilable due to wrong IRQ API, i.e. irq_desc_get_handler_data() in use.
> Replace it with proper irq_data_get_irq_chip_data() call where it applies.
>
> Fixes: 5644b66a9c63 ("Documentation: Update the recommended pattern for GPIO irqchips")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

2022-05-14 00:35:27

by Mika Westerberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] pinctrl: baytrail: make irq_chip immutable

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 08:39:19PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:
>
> "not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"
>
> Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
> helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.
>
> While at it, switch to use hwirq variable instead of offset for
> the sake of consistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>

2022-05-14 01:12:08

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 4/5] pinctrl: cherryview: make irq_chip immutable

Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:

"not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"

Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.

While at it, switch to use hwirq variable instead of pin for
the sake of consistency.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-cherryview.c | 65 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-cherryview.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-cherryview.c
index 1d5818269076..b696f9392789 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-cherryview.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-cherryview.c
@@ -1242,12 +1242,12 @@ static void chv_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- int pin = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
u32 intr_line;

raw_spin_lock(&chv_lock);

- intr_line = chv_readl(pctrl, pin, CHV_PADCTRL0);
+ intr_line = chv_readl(pctrl, hwirq, CHV_PADCTRL0);
intr_line &= CHV_PADCTRL0_INTSEL_MASK;
intr_line >>= CHV_PADCTRL0_INTSEL_SHIFT;
chv_pctrl_writel(pctrl, CHV_INTSTAT, BIT(intr_line));
@@ -1255,17 +1255,16 @@ static void chv_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
raw_spin_unlock(&chv_lock);
}

-static void chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool mask)
+static void chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(struct irq_data *d, irq_hw_number_t hwirq, bool mask)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- int pin = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
u32 value, intr_line;
unsigned long flags;

raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&chv_lock, flags);

- intr_line = chv_readl(pctrl, pin, CHV_PADCTRL0);
+ intr_line = chv_readl(pctrl, hwirq, CHV_PADCTRL0);
intr_line &= CHV_PADCTRL0_INTSEL_MASK;
intr_line >>= CHV_PADCTRL0_INTSEL_SHIFT;

@@ -1281,12 +1280,20 @@ static void chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool mask)

static void chv_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
{
- chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(d, true);
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+
+ chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(d, hwirq, true);
+ gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq);
}

static void chv_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
{
- chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(d, false);
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+
+ gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq);
+ chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(d, hwirq, false);
}

static unsigned chv_gpio_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -1306,17 +1313,17 @@ static unsigned chv_gpio_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)
struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
struct device *dev = pctrl->dev;
struct intel_community_context *cctx = &pctrl->context.communities[0];
- unsigned int pin = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
irq_flow_handler_t handler;
unsigned long flags;
u32 intsel, value;

raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&chv_lock, flags);
- intsel = chv_readl(pctrl, pin, CHV_PADCTRL0);
+ intsel = chv_readl(pctrl, hwirq, CHV_PADCTRL0);
intsel &= CHV_PADCTRL0_INTSEL_MASK;
intsel >>= CHV_PADCTRL0_INTSEL_SHIFT;

- value = chv_readl(pctrl, pin, CHV_PADCTRL1);
+ value = chv_readl(pctrl, hwirq, CHV_PADCTRL1);
if (value & CHV_PADCTRL1_INTWAKECFG_LEVEL)
handler = handle_level_irq;
else
@@ -1324,9 +1331,9 @@ static unsigned chv_gpio_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)

if (cctx->intr_lines[intsel] == CHV_INVALID_HWIRQ) {
irq_set_handler_locked(d, handler);
- dev_dbg(dev, "using interrupt line %u for IRQ_TYPE_NONE on pin %u\n",
- intsel, pin);
- cctx->intr_lines[intsel] = pin;
+ dev_dbg(dev, "using interrupt line %u for IRQ_TYPE_NONE on pin %lu\n",
+ intsel, hwirq);
+ cctx->intr_lines[intsel] = hwirq;
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chv_lock, flags);
}
@@ -1392,14 +1399,14 @@ static int chv_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- unsigned int pin = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
unsigned long flags;
u32 value;
int ret;

raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&chv_lock, flags);

- ret = chv_gpio_set_intr_line(pctrl, pin);
+ ret = chv_gpio_set_intr_line(pctrl, hwirq);
if (ret)
goto out_unlock;

@@ -1416,8 +1423,8 @@ static int chv_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
* 2. If the pin cfg is not locked in BIOS:
* Driver programs the IntWakeCfg bits and save the mapping.
*/
- if (!chv_pad_locked(pctrl, pin)) {
- value = chv_readl(pctrl, pin, CHV_PADCTRL1);
+ if (!chv_pad_locked(pctrl, hwirq)) {
+ value = chv_readl(pctrl, hwirq, CHV_PADCTRL1);
value &= ~CHV_PADCTRL1_INTWAKECFG_MASK;
value &= ~CHV_PADCTRL1_INVRXTX_MASK;

@@ -1434,7 +1441,7 @@ static int chv_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
value |= CHV_PADCTRL1_INVRXTX_RXDATA;
}

- chv_writel(pctrl, pin, CHV_PADCTRL1, value);
+ chv_writel(pctrl, hwirq, CHV_PADCTRL1, value);
}

if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
@@ -1448,6 +1455,17 @@ static int chv_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
return ret;
}

+static const struct irq_chip chv_gpio_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "chv-gpio",
+ .irq_startup = chv_gpio_irq_startup,
+ .irq_ack = chv_gpio_irq_ack,
+ .irq_mask = chv_gpio_irq_mask,
+ .irq_unmask = chv_gpio_irq_unmask,
+ .irq_set_type = chv_gpio_irq_type,
+ .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
+ GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
+};
+
static void chv_gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
@@ -1611,15 +1629,8 @@ static int chv_gpio_probe(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl, int irq)
chip->base = -1;

pctrl->irq = irq;
- pctrl->irqchip.name = "chv-gpio";
- pctrl->irqchip.irq_startup = chv_gpio_irq_startup;
- pctrl->irqchip.irq_ack = chv_gpio_irq_ack;
- pctrl->irqchip.irq_mask = chv_gpio_irq_mask;
- pctrl->irqchip.irq_unmask = chv_gpio_irq_unmask;
- pctrl->irqchip.irq_set_type = chv_gpio_irq_type;
- pctrl->irqchip.flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE;
-
- chip->irq.chip = &pctrl->irqchip;
+
+ gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(&chip->irq, &chv_gpio_irq_chip);
chip->irq.init_hw = chv_gpio_irq_init_hw;
chip->irq.parent_handler = chv_gpio_irq_handler;
chip->irq.num_parents = 1;
--
2.35.1


2022-05-14 01:16:10

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 5/5] pinctrl: lynxpoint: make irq_chip immutable

Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:

"not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"

Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.

While at it, switch hwirq variable to use the correct type for
the sake of consistency.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-lynxpoint.c | 26 ++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-lynxpoint.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-lynxpoint.c
index 561fa322b0b4..4fb39eb30902 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-lynxpoint.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-lynxpoint.c
@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ static void lp_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct intel_pinctrl *lg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- u32 hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
void __iomem *reg = lp_gpio_reg(&lg->chip, hwirq, LP_INT_STAT);
unsigned long flags;

@@ -684,10 +684,12 @@ static void lp_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct intel_pinctrl *lg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- u32 hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
void __iomem *reg = lp_gpio_reg(&lg->chip, hwirq, LP_INT_ENABLE);
unsigned long flags;

+ gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq);
+
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lg->lock, flags);
iowrite32(ioread32(reg) | BIT(hwirq % 32), reg);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lg->lock, flags);
@@ -697,30 +699,33 @@ static void lp_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct intel_pinctrl *lg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- u32 hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
void __iomem *reg = lp_gpio_reg(&lg->chip, hwirq, LP_INT_ENABLE);
unsigned long flags;

raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lg->lock, flags);
iowrite32(ioread32(reg) & ~BIT(hwirq % 32), reg);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lg->lock, flags);
+
+ gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq);
}

static int lp_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct intel_pinctrl *lg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- u32 hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
- void __iomem *reg = lp_gpio_reg(&lg->chip, hwirq, LP_CONFIG1);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
unsigned long flags;
+ void __iomem *reg;
u32 value;

- if (hwirq >= lg->chip.ngpio)
+ reg = lp_gpio_reg(&lg->chip, hwirq, LP_CONFIG1);
+ if (!reg)
return -EINVAL;

/* Fail if BIOS reserved pin for ACPI use */
if (lp_gpio_acpi_use(lg, hwirq)) {
- dev_err(lg->dev, "pin %u can't be used as IRQ\n", hwirq);
+ dev_err(lg->dev, "pin %lu can't be used as IRQ\n", hwirq);
return -EBUSY;
}

@@ -755,7 +760,7 @@ static int lp_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
return 0;
}

-static struct irq_chip lp_irqchip = {
+static const struct irq_chip lp_irqchip = {
.name = "LP-GPIO",
.irq_ack = lp_irq_ack,
.irq_mask = lp_irq_mask,
@@ -763,7 +768,8 @@ static struct irq_chip lp_irqchip = {
.irq_enable = lp_irq_enable,
.irq_disable = lp_irq_disable,
.irq_set_type = lp_irq_set_type,
- .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
+ .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
+ GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
};

static int lp_gpio_irq_init_hw(struct gpio_chip *chip)
@@ -884,7 +890,7 @@ static int lp_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;

girq = &gc->irq;
- girq->chip = &lp_irqchip;
+ gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &lp_irqchip);
girq->init_hw = lp_gpio_irq_init_hw;
girq->parent_handler = lp_gpio_irq_handler;
girq->num_parents = 1;
--
2.35.1


2022-05-14 02:06:23

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/5] Documentation: gpio: Advertise irqd_to_hwirq() helper in the examples

Instead of direct dereferencing the IRQ data in order to get HW IRQ number
use the irqd_to_hwirq() helper.

Fixes: 5644b66a9c63 ("Documentation: Update the recommended pattern for GPIO irqchips")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
index 964d09118d17..70ff43ac4fcc 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
@@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ call into the core gpiolib code:
static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);

/*
* Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
@@ -437,14 +438,15 @@ call into the core gpiolib code:
* state.
*/

- gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
+ gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq);
}

static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);

- gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
+ gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq);

/*
* Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt,
@@ -502,6 +504,7 @@ the interrupt separately and go with it:
static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);

/*
* Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
@@ -509,14 +512,15 @@ the interrupt separately and go with it:
* state.
*/

- gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
+ gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq);
}

static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);

- gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
+ gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq);

/*
* Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt,
@@ -577,6 +581,7 @@ In this case the typical set-up will look like this:
static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);

/*
* Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
@@ -584,15 +589,16 @@ In this case the typical set-up will look like this:
* state.
*/

- gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
+ gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq);
irq_mask_mask_parent(d);
}

static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);

- gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
+ gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq);

/*
* Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt,
--
2.35.1


2022-05-14 02:58:29

by Mika Westerberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] pinctrl: lynxpoint: make irq_chip immutable

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 08:39:21PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:
>
> "not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"
>
> Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
> helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.
>
> While at it, switch hwirq variable to use the correct type for
> the sake of consistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>

2022-05-14 03:17:02

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] Documentation: gpio: Advertise irqd_to_hwirq() helper in the examples

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 7:41 PM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Instead of direct dereferencing the IRQ data in order to get HW IRQ number
> use the irqd_to_hwirq() helper.
>
> Fixes: 5644b66a9c63 ("Documentation: Update the recommended pattern for GPIO irqchips")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>

Good idea.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

2022-05-14 03:47:43

by Mika Westerberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] pinctrl: cherryview: make irq_chip immutable

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 08:39:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:
>
> "not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"
>
> Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
> helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.
>
> While at it, switch to use hwirq variable instead of pin for
> the sake of consistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>

2022-05-16 18:58:14

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] Documentation: gpio: Fix IRQ mask and unmask examples

On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:54:46PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 7:52 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > After switching to immutable IRQ chips for GPIO drivers the examples become
> > uncompilable due to wrong IRQ API, i.e. irq_desc_get_handler_data() in use.
> > Replace it with proper irq_data_get_irq_chip_data() call where it applies.
> >
> > Fixes: 5644b66a9c63 ("Documentation: Update the recommended pattern for GPIO irqchips")
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>

Entire series with the respective tags has been pushed to my review and testing
queue, thanks!

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko