The s390 IOMMU driver currently sets the IOMMU domain's aperture to
match the device specific DMA address range of the device that is first
attached. This is not ideal. For one if the domain has no device
attached in the meantime the aperture could be shrunk allowing
translations outside the aperture to exist in the translation tables.
Also this is a bit of a misuse of the aperture which really should
describe what addresses can be translated and not some device specific
limitations.
Instead of misusing the aperture like this we can instead create
reserved ranges for the ranges inaccessible to the attached devices
allowing devices with overlapping ranges to still share an IOMMU domain.
This also significantly simplifies s390_iommu_attach_device() allowing
us to move the aperture check to the beginning of the function and
removing the need to hold the device list's lock to check the aperture.
Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <[email protected]>
---
drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
index 8c4b180b3247..ed0e64f478cf 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ static struct iommu_domain *s390_domain_alloc(unsigned domain_type)
kfree(s390_domain);
return NULL;
}
+ s390_domain->domain.geometry.force_aperture = true;
+ s390_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_start = 0;
+ s390_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = ZPCI_TABLE_SIZE_RT - 1;
spin_lock_init(&s390_domain->dma_table_lock);
spin_lock_init(&s390_domain->list_lock);
@@ -107,30 +110,24 @@ static int s390_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
if (!zdev)
return -ENODEV;
+ if (domain->geometry.aperture_start > zdev->end_dma ||
+ domain->geometry.aperture_end < zdev->start_dma)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (zdev->s390_domain)
__s390_iommu_detach_device(zdev->s390_domain, zdev);
else if (zdev->dma_table)
zpci_dma_exit_device(zdev);
- zdev->dma_table = s390_domain->dma_table;
cc = zpci_register_ioat(zdev, 0, zdev->start_dma, zdev->end_dma,
- virt_to_phys(zdev->dma_table));
+ virt_to_phys(s390_domain->dma_table));
if (cc)
return -EIO;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
- /* First device defines the DMA range limits */
- if (list_empty(&s390_domain->devices)) {
- domain->geometry.aperture_start = zdev->start_dma;
- domain->geometry.aperture_end = zdev->end_dma;
- domain->geometry.force_aperture = true;
- /* Allow only devices with identical DMA range limits */
- } else if (domain->geometry.aperture_start != zdev->start_dma ||
- domain->geometry.aperture_end != zdev->end_dma) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ zdev->dma_table = s390_domain->dma_table;
zdev->s390_domain = s390_domain;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
list_add(&zdev->iommu_list, &s390_domain->devices);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
@@ -147,6 +144,30 @@ static void s390_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
zpci_dma_init_device(zdev);
}
+static void s390_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev,
+ struct list_head *list)
+{
+ struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci_dev(dev);
+ struct iommu_resv_region *region;
+
+ if (zdev->start_dma) {
+ region = iommu_alloc_resv_region(0, zdev->start_dma, 0,
+ IOMMU_RESV_RESERVED);
+ if (!region)
+ return;
+ list_add_tail(®ion->list, list);
+ }
+
+ if (zdev->end_dma < ZPCI_TABLE_SIZE_RT - 1) {
+ region = iommu_alloc_resv_region(zdev->end_dma + 1,
+ ZPCI_TABLE_SIZE_RT - zdev->end_dma - 1,
+ 0, IOMMU_RESV_RESERVED);
+ if (!region)
+ return;
+ list_add_tail(®ion->list, list);
+ }
+}
+
static struct iommu_device *s390_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
{
struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci_dev(dev);
@@ -340,6 +361,7 @@ static const struct iommu_ops s390_iommu_ops = {
.release_device = s390_iommu_release_device,
.device_group = generic_device_group,
.pgsize_bitmap = S390_IOMMU_PGSIZES,
+ .get_resv_regions = s390_iommu_get_resv_regions,
.default_domain_ops = &(const struct iommu_domain_ops) {
.attach_dev = s390_iommu_attach_device,
.detach_dev = s390_iommu_detach_device,
--
2.34.1
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 05:33:00PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> The s390 IOMMU driver currently sets the IOMMU domain's aperture to
> match the device specific DMA address range of the device that is first
> attached. This is not ideal. For one if the domain has no device
> attached in the meantime the aperture could be shrunk allowing
> translations outside the aperture to exist in the translation tables.
> Also this is a bit of a misuse of the aperture which really should
> describe what addresses can be translated and not some device specific
> limitations.
>
> Instead of misusing the aperture like this we can instead create
> reserved ranges for the ranges inaccessible to the attached devices
> allowing devices with overlapping ranges to still share an IOMMU domain.
> This also significantly simplifies s390_iommu_attach_device() allowing
> us to move the aperture check to the beginning of the function and
> removing the need to hold the device list's lock to check the aperture.
>
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
Jason