2023-03-26 12:43:36

by Tom Rix

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused pHalData variable

clang with W=1 reports
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c:1182:23: error: variable
'pHalData' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
^
This variable is not used so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
index e36f8c369a04..0cb2adcc1f78 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
@@ -1179,10 +1179,6 @@ bool hal_btcoex_IsBtDisabled(struct adapter *padapter)

void hal_btcoex_SetChipType(struct adapter *padapter, u8 chipType)
{
- struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
-
-
- pHalData = GET_HAL_DATA(padapter);
}

void hal_btcoex_SetPgAntNum(struct adapter *padapter, u8 antNum)
--
2.27.0


2023-03-26 12:55:24

by Nam Cao

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused pHalData variable

On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 08:23:21AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> clang with W=1 reports
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c:1182:23: error: variable
> 'pHalData' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
> ^
> This variable is not used so remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
> index e36f8c369a04..0cb2adcc1f78 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
> @@ -1179,10 +1179,6 @@ bool hal_btcoex_IsBtDisabled(struct adapter *padapter)
>
> void hal_btcoex_SetChipType(struct adapter *padapter, u8 chipType)
> {
> - struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
> -
> -
> - pHalData = GET_HAL_DATA(padapter);
> }

If this function doesn't do anything, does it not make more sense to
just remove this function entirely?

Best regards,
Nam

2023-03-26 12:57:52

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused pHalData variable

On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:46:52PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 08:23:21AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> > clang with W=1 reports
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c:1182:23: error: variable
> > 'pHalData' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
> > ^
> > This variable is not used so remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
> > index e36f8c369a04..0cb2adcc1f78 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
> > @@ -1179,10 +1179,6 @@ bool hal_btcoex_IsBtDisabled(struct adapter *padapter)
> >
> > void hal_btcoex_SetChipType(struct adapter *padapter, u8 chipType)
> > {
> > - struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
> > -
> > -
> > - pHalData = GET_HAL_DATA(padapter);
> > }
>
> If this function doesn't do anything, does it not make more sense to
> just remove this function entirely?

This function is already removed in linux-next, so it doesn't matter :)

thanks,

greg k-h

2023-03-26 13:27:56

by Tom Rix

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused pHalData variable


On 3/26/23 5:55 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:46:52PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 08:23:21AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
>>> clang with W=1 reports
>>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c:1182:23: error: variable
>>> 'pHalData' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>> struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
>>> ^
>>> This variable is not used so remove it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c | 4 ----
>>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
>>> index e36f8c369a04..0cb2adcc1f78 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
>>> @@ -1179,10 +1179,6 @@ bool hal_btcoex_IsBtDisabled(struct adapter *padapter)
>>>
>>> void hal_btcoex_SetChipType(struct adapter *padapter, u8 chipType)
>>> {
>>> - struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
>>> -
>>> -
>>> - pHalData = GET_HAL_DATA(padapter);
>>> }
>> If this function doesn't do anything, does it not make more sense to
>> just remove this function entirely?
> This function is already removed in linux-next, so it doesn't matter :)

My patch is against linux-next from tag next-20230324

Tom

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

2023-03-26 13:43:55

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused pHalData variable

On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 06:13:16AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 3/26/23 5:55 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:46:52PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 08:23:21AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > > clang with W=1 reports
> > > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c:1182:23: error: variable
> > > > 'pHalData' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > > > struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
> > > > ^
> > > > This variable is not used so remove it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c | 4 ----
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
> > > > index e36f8c369a04..0cb2adcc1f78 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
> > > > @@ -1179,10 +1179,6 @@ bool hal_btcoex_IsBtDisabled(struct adapter *padapter)
> > > > void hal_btcoex_SetChipType(struct adapter *padapter, u8 chipType)
> > > > {
> > > > - struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
> > > > -
> > > > -
> > > > - pHalData = GET_HAL_DATA(padapter);
> > > > }
> > > If this function doesn't do anything, does it not make more sense to
> > > just remove this function entirely?
> > This function is already removed in linux-next, so it doesn't matter :)
>
> My patch is against linux-next from tag next-20230324

Ah, ok, well it will be gone in the next one, as this is already gone in
my tree.

thanks,

greg k-h