2023-06-08 22:34:39

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree

Hi all,

In commit

df772c12508a ("selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use generic __NR_statx")

Fixes tag

Fixes: 8e3ab529bef9 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")

has these problem(s):

- Target SHA1 does not exist

Maybe you meant

Fixes: 6bff2a1e97e3 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2023-06-08 22:55:19

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree

Hi all,

Sorry, the subject should have been "linux-next: fixes tag needs work
in rcu tree".

On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 08:27:22 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In commit
>
> df772c12508a ("selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use generic __NR_statx")
>
> Fixes tag
>
> Fixes: 8e3ab529bef9 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")
>
> has these problem(s):
>
> - Target SHA1 does not exist
>
> Maybe you meant
>
> Fixes: 6bff2a1e97e3 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2023-06-09 04:37:49

by Zhangjin Wu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree

Hi, Stephen, Willy, Thomas, Paul

> Hi all,
>
> Sorry, the subject should have been "linux-next: fixes tag needs work
> in rcu tree".
>
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 08:27:22 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> w=
> rote:
> >
> > In commit
> >=20
> > df772c12508a ("selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use generic __NR_statx")
> >=20
> > Fixes tag
> >=20
> > Fixes: 8e3ab529bef9 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")
> >=20
> > has these problem(s):
> >=20
> > - Target SHA1 does not exist
> >=20
> > Maybe you meant
> >=20
> > Fixes: 6bff2a1e97e3 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")

Thanks, just checked the rcu/next branch of Paul, the commit is really the one
you corrected:

Fixes: 6bff2a1e97e3 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")

Willy, this happened may be because of the 'int' to 'long' fixup merged to the
old "tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()" commit, I forgot the check of this
change in my patch.

Btw, perhaps it is possible to merge this typo fixup (tools/nolibc: fix up typo
_sycall_narg -> _syscall_narg) [1] to this commit too:

6bff2a1e97e3 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")

And then update the new 'Fixes' tag in this patch:

df772c12508a ("selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use generic __NR_statx")

Or even merge both of them to the first one, and eventually, no Fixes lines
required.

As a summary, the following two fixes:

df772c12508a ("selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use generic __NR_statx")

not merged ("tools/nolibc: fix up typo _sycall_narg -> _syscall_narg"), see [1]

are for this one:

6bff2a1e97e3 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")

Merging both of them to the above one may be a choice ;-)

Best Regards,
Zhangjin

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/64f663e9e024564a7baca6769394f1e7d5a0422c.1686230738.git.falcon@tinylab.org/

2023-06-09 09:52:06

by Willy Tarreau

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree

On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 12:08:04PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> Hi, Stephen, Willy, Thomas, Paul
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Sorry, the subject should have been "linux-next: fixes tag needs work
> > in rcu tree".
> >
> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 08:27:22 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> w=
> > rote:
> > >
> > > In commit
> > >=20
> > > df772c12508a ("selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use generic __NR_statx")
> > >=20
> > > Fixes tag
> > >=20
> > > Fixes: 8e3ab529bef9 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")
> > >=20
> > > has these problem(s):
> > >=20
> > > - Target SHA1 does not exist
> > >=20
> > > Maybe you meant
> > >=20
> > > Fixes: 6bff2a1e97e3 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")
>
> Thanks, just checked the rcu/next branch of Paul, the commit is really the one
> you corrected:
>
> Fixes: 6bff2a1e97e3 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")
>
> Willy, this happened may be because of the 'int' to 'long' fixup merged to the
> old "tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()" commit, I forgot the check of this
> change in my patch.

I was very careful about squashing the patches that mentioned commit IDs
that were not merged yet (since we don't want to merge incomplete patches),
but apparently missed this one :-/

> Btw, perhaps it is possible to merge this typo fixup (tools/nolibc: fix up typo
> _sycall_narg -> _syscall_narg) [1] to this commit too:
>
> 6bff2a1e97e3 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")
>
> And then update the new 'Fixes' tag in this patch:
>
> df772c12508a ("selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use generic __NR_statx")
>
> Or even merge both of them to the first one, and eventually, no Fixes lines
> required.
>
> As a summary, the following two fixes:
>
> df772c12508a ("selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use generic __NR_statx")
>
> not merged ("tools/nolibc: fix up typo _sycall_narg -> _syscall_narg"), see [1]
>
> are for this one:
>
> 6bff2a1e97e3 ("tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()")
>
> Merging both of them to the above one may be a choice ;-)

Agreed. I'll see off-line with Paul how to best proceed.

Thanks,
Willy