On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 07:01:31PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On 9/13/23 18:56, Steve Wahl wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 05:16:56PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Remove the custom, hard to read code to:
> >>
> >> 1. Make a copy of "val" with any potential '\n' at the end stripped
> >> 2. Compare the copy against an array of allowed string values
> >>
> >> Linux has the sysfs_match_string() helper exactly for cases like this,
> >> switch to this.
> >
> > Hans,
> >
> > I like this patch, compiling and testing now.
> >
> > I was wondering, as long as we're in the neighborhood, how you feel
> > about changing the stored variable uv_nmi_action to an int or enum
> > rather than a string, since it can only be one of 6 values, and the
> > string compare while processing an NMI strikes me as inefficent.
> >
> > It could extend this patch, or be done as a follow on. And I'm
> > willing to supply the effort if you want me to.
>
> I must admit I did not look at the code consuming uv_nmi_action
> and I did wonder why this was not an enum from day 1.
>
> I'll prepare a v2 of this patch which changes uv_nmi_action
> to an enum.
>
> Note I can compile test this only, so I gope you will be able to
> test the v2 a bit more thoroughly :)
I will!
--> Steve Wahl
--
Steve Wahl, Hewlett Packard Enterprise