2023-07-17 21:16:54

by Samuel Holland

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: ocores: Move system PM hooks to the NOIRQ phase

When an I2C device contains a wake IRQ subordinate to a regmap-irq chip,
the regmap-irq code must be able to perform I2C transactions during
suspend_device_irqs() and resume_device_irqs(). Therefore, the bus must
be suspended/resumed during the NOIRQ phase.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>
---

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c
index 4ac77e57bbbf..b1f621d42910 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c
@@ -743,7 +743,6 @@ static void ocores_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
i2c_del_adapter(&i2c->adap);
}

-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
static int ocores_i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct ocores_i2c *i2c = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -772,11 +771,9 @@ static int ocores_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
return ocores_init(dev, i2c);
}

-static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ocores_i2c_pm, ocores_i2c_suspend, ocores_i2c_resume);
-#define OCORES_I2C_PM (&ocores_i2c_pm)
-#else
-#define OCORES_I2C_PM NULL
-#endif
+static const struct dev_pm_ops ocores_i2c_pm_ops = {
+ NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(ocores_i2c_suspend, ocores_i2c_resume)
+};

static struct platform_driver ocores_i2c_driver = {
.probe = ocores_i2c_probe,
@@ -784,7 +781,7 @@ static struct platform_driver ocores_i2c_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "ocores-i2c",
.of_match_table = ocores_i2c_match,
- .pm = OCORES_I2C_PM,
+ .pm = &ocores_i2c_pm_ops,
},
};

--
2.40.1



2023-07-27 01:07:11

by Andi Shyti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: ocores: Move system PM hooks to the NOIRQ phase

Hi Samuel,

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 01:38:57PM -0700, Samuel Holland wrote:
> When an I2C device contains a wake IRQ subordinate to a regmap-irq chip,
> the regmap-irq code must be able to perform I2C transactions during
> suspend_device_irqs() and resume_device_irqs(). Therefore, the bus must
> be suspended/resumed during the NOIRQ phase.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>

it's OK for me.

Peter, any comment on this?

Andi

> ---
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c | 11 ++++-------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c
> index 4ac77e57bbbf..b1f621d42910 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c
> @@ -743,7 +743,6 @@ static void ocores_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> i2c_del_adapter(&i2c->adap);
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int ocores_i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct ocores_i2c *i2c = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -772,11 +771,9 @@ static int ocores_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
> return ocores_init(dev, i2c);
> }
>
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ocores_i2c_pm, ocores_i2c_suspend, ocores_i2c_resume);
> -#define OCORES_I2C_PM (&ocores_i2c_pm)
> -#else
> -#define OCORES_I2C_PM NULL
> -#endif
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops ocores_i2c_pm_ops = {
> + NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(ocores_i2c_suspend, ocores_i2c_resume)
> +};
>
> static struct platform_driver ocores_i2c_driver = {
> .probe = ocores_i2c_probe,
> @@ -784,7 +781,7 @@ static struct platform_driver ocores_i2c_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "ocores-i2c",
> .of_match_table = ocores_i2c_match,
> - .pm = OCORES_I2C_PM,
> + .pm = &ocores_i2c_pm_ops,
> },
> };
>
> --
> 2.40.1
>

2023-08-05 02:35:07

by Andi Shyti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: ocores: Move system PM hooks to the NOIRQ phase

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:35:51AM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 01:38:57PM -0700, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > When an I2C device contains a wake IRQ subordinate to a regmap-irq chip,
> > the regmap-irq code must be able to perform I2C transactions during
> > suspend_device_irqs() and resume_device_irqs(). Therefore, the bus must
> > be suspended/resumed during the NOIRQ phase.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>
>
> it's OK for me.
>
> Peter, any comment on this?

a kind ping...

Andi

2023-10-24 20:20:55

by Andi Shyti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: ocores: Move system PM hooks to the NOIRQ phase

Hi Samuel,

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 01:38:57PM -0700, Samuel Holland wrote:
> When an I2C device contains a wake IRQ subordinate to a regmap-irq chip,
> the regmap-irq code must be able to perform I2C transactions during
> suspend_device_irqs() and resume_device_irqs(). Therefore, the bus must
> be suspended/resumed during the NOIRQ phase.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>

I think this patch has failed to receive some comments, I'll go
ahead and give it my blessing:

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Andi

2023-10-28 19:36:33

by Wolfram Sang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: ocores: Move system PM hooks to the NOIRQ phase


> > When an I2C device contains a wake IRQ subordinate to a regmap-irq chip,
> > the regmap-irq code must be able to perform I2C transactions during
> > suspend_device_irqs() and resume_device_irqs(). Therefore, the bus must
> > be suspended/resumed during the NOIRQ phase.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>
>
> I think this patch has failed to receive some comments, I'll go
> ahead and give it my blessing:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]>

It needs to be rebased on top of 0ad93449b043 ("i2c: ocores: Remove
#ifdef guards for PM related functions"), though. This series did clean
this up for the whole subsystem. It also introduced using pm_sleep_ptr
which probably was missing here?


Attachments:
(No filename) (761.00 B)
signature.asc (849.00 B)
Download all attachments