Use devm version of gpiochip add function to handle removal for us.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-as3722.c | 17 ++---------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-as3722.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-as3722.c
index 6a5f23cf7a2a2..0d8c75ce20eda 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-as3722.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-as3722.c
@@ -542,7 +542,6 @@ static int as3722_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
as_pci->dev = &pdev->dev;
as_pci->as3722 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
- platform_set_drvdata(pdev, as_pci);
as_pci->pins = as3722_pins_desc;
as_pci->num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(as3722_pins_desc);
@@ -562,7 +561,7 @@ static int as3722_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
as_pci->gpio_chip = as3722_gpio_chip;
as_pci->gpio_chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
- ret = gpiochip_add_data(&as_pci->gpio_chip, as_pci);
+ ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &as_pci->gpio_chip, as_pci);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't register gpiochip, %d\n", ret);
return ret;
@@ -572,21 +571,10 @@ static int as3722_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
0, 0, AS3722_PIN_NUM);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't add pin range, %d\n", ret);
- goto fail_range_add;
+ return ret;
}
return 0;
-
-fail_range_add:
- gpiochip_remove(&as_pci->gpio_chip);
- return ret;
-}
-
-static void as3722_pinctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
- struct as3722_pctrl_info *as_pci = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-
- gpiochip_remove(&as_pci->gpio_chip);
}
static const struct of_device_id as3722_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
@@ -601,7 +589,6 @@ static struct platform_driver as3722_pinctrl_driver = {
.of_match_table = as3722_pinctrl_of_match,
},
.probe = as3722_pinctrl_probe,
- .remove_new = as3722_pinctrl_remove,
};
module_platform_driver(as3722_pinctrl_driver);
--
2.39.2
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 04:30:45PM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote:
> Use devm version of gpiochip add function to handle removal for us.
Seems reasonable. Consider also to convert to dev_err_probe()
(in a separate change).
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:30 AM Andrew Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Use devm version of gpiochip add function to handle removal for us.
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Consider adding a new patch to convert to use return dev_err_probe(...);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 11:30 PM Andrew Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Use devm version of gpiochip add function to handle removal for us.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Patch applied!
Yours,
Linus Walleij