commit 0a31bd5f2bbb ("KMEM_CACHE(): simplify slab cache creation")
introduces a new macro.
Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <[email protected]>
---
net/ipv4/inetpeer.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c b/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
index e9fed83e9b3c..5bd759963451 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
@@ -81,10 +81,7 @@ void __init inet_initpeers(void)
inet_peer_threshold = clamp_val(nr_entries, 4096, 65536 + 128);
- peer_cachep = kmem_cache_create("inet_peer_cache",
- sizeof(struct inet_peer),
- 0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC,
- NULL);
+ peer_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(inet_peer, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC);
}
/* Called with rcu_read_lock() or base->lock held */
--
2.39.2
Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:22:55AM CET, [email protected] wrote:
>commit 0a31bd5f2bbb ("KMEM_CACHE(): simplify slab cache creation")
>introduces a new macro.
>Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
>to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.
>
>Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <[email protected]>
>---
> net/ipv4/inetpeer.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c b/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
>index e9fed83e9b3c..5bd759963451 100644
>--- a/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
>+++ b/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
>@@ -81,10 +81,7 @@ void __init inet_initpeers(void)
>
> inet_peer_threshold = clamp_val(nr_entries, 4096, 65536 + 128);
>
>- peer_cachep = kmem_cache_create("inet_peer_cache",
>- sizeof(struct inet_peer),
>- 0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC,
>- NULL);
>+ peer_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(inet_peer, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC);
The name is going to be different. Could it be a source of some issue?
My guess is not, just want to make sure.
> }
>
> /* Called with rcu_read_lock() or base->lock held */
>--
>2.39.2
>
>
Thanks for your reply.
As the code say, the name is only for human beings and to identify a
cache, so it's ok.
"A string which is used in /proc/slabinfo to identify this cache."
--
Thanks,
Kunwu
Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:22:55AM CET, [email protected] wrote:
>commit 0a31bd5f2bbb ("KMEM_CACHE(): simplify slab cache creation")
>introduces a new macro.
>Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
>to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.
>
>Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:22:55 +0800 you wrote:
> commit 0a31bd5f2bbb ("KMEM_CACHE(): simplify slab cache creation")
> introduces a new macro.
> Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
> to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <[email protected]>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] net: ipv4: Simplify the allocation of slab caches in inet_initpeers
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/57f2c6350f2d
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html