Through the routine bond_mii_monitor(), bonding driver inspects and commits
the slave state changes. During the times when slave state change and
failure in aqcuiring rtnl lock happen at the same time, the routine
bond_mii_monitor() reschedules itself to come around after 1 msec to commit
the new state.
During this, it executes the routine bond_miimon_inspect() to re-inspect
the state chane and prints the corresponding slave state on to the console.
Hence we do see a message at every 1 msec till the rtnl lock is acquired
and state chage is committed.
This patch doesn't change how bond functions. It only simply limits this
kind of log flood.
Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar Kannoju <[email protected]>
---
v5:
- Redundant indentation addressed.
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
- Rectification in the patch subject and versioning details.
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
- Commit message is modified to provide summary of the issue, because of
which rate-limiting the bonding driver messages is needed.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
- Use exising net_ratelimit() instead of introducing new rate-limit
parameter.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 4e0600c..c8482cd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2609,12 +2609,12 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_FAIL);
commit++;
slave->delay = bond->params.downdelay;
- if (slave->delay) {
+ if (slave->delay && net_ratelimit()) {
slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down for %sinterface, disabling it in %d ms\n",
(BOND_MODE(bond) ==
- BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?
- (bond_is_active_slave(slave) ?
- "active " : "backup ") : "",
+ BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?
+ (bond_is_active_slave(slave) ?
+ "active " : "backup ") : "",
bond->params.downdelay * bond->params.miimon);
}
fallthrough;
@@ -2623,9 +2623,10 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
/* recovered before downdelay expired */
bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_UP);
slave->last_link_up = jiffies;
- slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up again after %d ms\n",
- (bond->params.downdelay - slave->delay) *
- bond->params.miimon);
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up again after %d ms\n",
+ (bond->params.downdelay - slave->delay) *
+ bond->params.miimon);
commit++;
continue;
}
@@ -2647,7 +2648,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
commit++;
slave->delay = bond->params.updelay;
- if (slave->delay) {
+ if (slave->delay && net_ratelimit()) {
slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up, enabling it in %d ms\n",
ignore_updelay ? 0 :
bond->params.updelay *
@@ -2657,9 +2658,10 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
case BOND_LINK_BACK:
if (!link_state) {
bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_DOWN);
- slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down again after %d ms\n",
- (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) *
- bond->params.miimon);
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down again after %d ms\n",
+ (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) *
+ bond->params.miimon);
commit++;
continue;
}
--
1.8.3.1
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:38:09AM +0530, Praveen Kumar Kannoju wrote:
> Through the routine bond_mii_monitor(), bonding driver inspects and commits
> the slave state changes. During the times when slave state change and
> failure in aqcuiring rtnl lock happen at the same time, the routine
> bond_mii_monitor() reschedules itself to come around after 1 msec to commit
> the new state.
>
> During this, it executes the routine bond_miimon_inspect() to re-inspect
> the state chane and prints the corresponding slave state on to the console.
> Hence we do see a message at every 1 msec till the rtnl lock is acquired
> and state chage is committed.
>
> This patch doesn't change how bond functions. It only simply limits this
> kind of log flood.
>
> Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar Kannoju <[email protected]>
> ---
> v5:
> - Redundant indentation addressed.
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> - Rectification in the patch subject and versioning details.
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> - Commit message is modified to provide summary of the issue, because of
> which rate-limiting the bonding driver messages is needed.
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> - Use exising net_ratelimit() instead of introducing new rate-limit
> parameter.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 4e0600c..c8482cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -2609,12 +2609,12 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_FAIL);
> commit++;
> slave->delay = bond->params.downdelay;
> - if (slave->delay) {
> + if (slave->delay && net_ratelimit()) {
> slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down for %sinterface, disabling it in %d ms\n",
> (BOND_MODE(bond) ==
> - BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?
> - (bond_is_active_slave(slave) ?
> - "active " : "backup ") : "",
> + BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?
> + (bond_is_active_slave(slave) ?
> + "active " : "backup ") : "",
Why these lines changed?
Hangbin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]>
> Sent: 21 February 2024 01:21 PM
> To: Praveen Kannoju <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Rajesh Sivaramasubramaniom
> <[email protected]>; Rama Nichanamatlu <[email protected]>; Manjunath Patil
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] bonding: rate-limit bonding driver inspect messages
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:38:09AM +0530, Praveen Kumar Kannoju wrote:
> > Through the routine bond_mii_monitor(), bonding driver inspects and
> > commits the slave state changes. During the times when slave state
> > change and failure in aqcuiring rtnl lock happen at the same time, the
> > routine
> > bond_mii_monitor() reschedules itself to come around after 1 msec to
> > commit the new state.
> >
> > During this, it executes the routine bond_miimon_inspect() to
> > re-inspect the state chane and prints the corresponding slave state on to the console.
> > Hence we do see a message at every 1 msec till the rtnl lock is
> > acquired and state chage is committed.
> >
> > This patch doesn't change how bond functions. It only simply limits
> > this kind of log flood.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar Kannoju <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v5:
> > - Redundant indentation addressed.
> > v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > - Rectification in the patch subject and versioning details.
> > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> > - Commit message is modified to provide summary of the issue, because of
> > which rate-limiting the bonding driver messages is needed.
> > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> > - Use exising net_ratelimit() instead of introducing new rate-limit
> > parameter.
> > v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240214044245.33170-1-praveen.kannoju@or
> > acle.com/
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c index 4e0600c..c8482cd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > @@ -2609,12 +2609,12 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> > bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_FAIL);
> > commit++;
> > slave->delay = bond->params.downdelay;
> > - if (slave->delay) {
> > + if (slave->delay && net_ratelimit()) {
> > slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down for %sinterface, disabling it in %d ms\n",
> > (BOND_MODE(bond) ==
> > - BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?
> > - (bond_is_active_slave(slave) ?
> > - "active " : "backup ") : "",
> > + BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?
> > + (bond_is_active_slave(slave) ?
> > + "active " : "backup ") : "",
>
> Why these lines changed?
>
> Hangbin
Must be a editing mistake from my-end, Hangbin.
Addressed it.
-
Praveen.