When nci_rx_work() receives a zero-length payload packet, it should not
discard the packet and exit the loop. Instead, it should continue
processing subsequent packets.
Fixes: d24b03535e5e ("nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet")
Reported-by: Ryosuke Yasuoka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryosuke Yasuoka <[email protected]>
---
v2
- Fix commit msg to be clearer to say
- Remove inappropriate Closes tag
net/nfc/nci/core.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/core.c b/net/nfc/nci/core.c
index b133dc55304c..f2ae8b0d81b9 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/core.c
@@ -1518,8 +1518,7 @@ static void nci_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (!nci_plen(skb->data)) {
kfree_skb(skb);
- kcov_remote_stop();
- break;
+ continue;
}
/* Process frame */
--
2.44.0
On 17/05/2024 04:06, Ryosuke Yasuoka wrote:
> When nci_rx_work() receives a zero-length payload packet, it should not
> discard the packet and exit the loop. Instead, it should continue
> processing subsequent packets.
>
> Fixes: d24b03535e5e ("nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet")
> Reported-by: Ryosuke Yasuoka <[email protected]>
That's not a valid tag here. Every bug we find - like hundreds of my
commits - is reported by us...
Drop the tag.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 11:58:47AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/05/2024 04:06, Ryosuke Yasuoka wrote:
> > When nci_rx_work() receives a zero-length payload packet, it should not
> > discard the packet and exit the loop. Instead, it should continue
> > processing subsequent packets.
> >
> > Fixes: d24b03535e5e ("nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet")
> > Reported-by: Ryosuke Yasuoka <[email protected]>
>
> That's not a valid tag here. Every bug we find - like hundreds of my
> commits - is reported by us...
>
> Drop the tag.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Thank you for pointing me out, Krzysztof. I didn't understand how to use
Reported-by tag correctly. Now I'm clear.
Yes, I remove the tag and send a new patch.
Very sorry for sending this patch again and again.
Ryosuke