2024-03-05 00:51:46

by Igor Pylypiv

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes for SATA devices

Libata sysfs attributes cannot be used for libsas managed SATA devices
because the ata_port location is different for libsas.

Defined sysfs attributes (visible for SATA devices only):
- /sys/block/sda/device/ncq_prio_enable
- /sys/block/sda/device/ncq_prio_supported

The newly defined attributes will pass the correct ata_port to libata
helper functions.

Reviewed-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>
---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/scsi/sas_ata.h | 6 +++
2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
index 12e2653846e3..04b0bd9a4e01 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
@@ -964,3 +964,97 @@ int sas_execute_ata_cmd(struct domain_device *device, u8 *fis, int force_phy_id)
force_phy_id, &tmf_task);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sas_execute_ata_cmd);
+
+static ssize_t sas_ncq_prio_supported_show(struct device *device,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf)
+{
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
+ struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
+ bool supported;
+ int rc;
+
+ /* This attribute shall be visible for SATA devices only */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev_is_sata(ddev)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ rc = ata_ncq_prio_supported(ddev->sata_dev.ap, sdev, &supported);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", supported);
+}
+
+DEVICE_ATTR(ncq_prio_supported, S_IRUGO, sas_ncq_prio_supported_show, NULL);
+
+static ssize_t sas_ncq_prio_enable_show(struct device *device,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf)
+{
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
+ struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
+ bool enabled;
+ int rc;
+
+ /* This attribute shall be visible for SATA devices only */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev_is_sata(ddev)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ rc = ata_ncq_prio_enabled(ddev->sata_dev.ap, sdev, &enabled);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", enabled);
+}
+
+static ssize_t sas_ncq_prio_enable_store(struct device *device,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf, size_t len)
+{
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
+ struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
+ bool enable;
+ int rc;
+
+ /* This attribute shall be visible for SATA devices only */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev_is_sata(ddev)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ rc = kstrtobool(buf, &enable);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ rc = ata_ncq_prio_enable(ddev->sata_dev.ap, sdev, enable);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ return len;
+}
+
+DEVICE_ATTR(ncq_prio_enable, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
+ sas_ncq_prio_enable_show, sas_ncq_prio_enable_store);
+
+static struct attribute *sas_ata_sdev_attrs[] = {
+ &dev_attr_ncq_prio_supported.attr,
+ &dev_attr_ncq_prio_enable.attr,
+ NULL
+};
+
+static umode_t sas_ata_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
+ struct attribute *attr, int i)
+{
+ struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
+ struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
+
+ if (!dev_is_sata(ddev))
+ return 0;
+
+ return attr->mode;
+}
+
+const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group = {
+ .attrs = sas_ata_sdev_attrs,
+ .is_visible = sas_ata_attr_is_visible,
+};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sas_ata_sdev_attr_group);
diff --git a/include/scsi/sas_ata.h b/include/scsi/sas_ata.h
index 2f8c719840a6..cded782fdf33 100644
--- a/include/scsi/sas_ata.h
+++ b/include/scsi/sas_ata.h
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ int smp_ata_check_ready_type(struct ata_link *link);
int sas_discover_sata(struct domain_device *dev);
int sas_ata_add_dev(struct domain_device *parent, struct ex_phy *phy,
struct domain_device *child, int phy_id);
+
+extern const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group;
#else

static inline void sas_ata_disabled_notice(void)
@@ -123,6 +125,10 @@ static inline int sas_ata_add_dev(struct domain_device *parent, struct ex_phy *p
sas_ata_disabled_notice();
return -ENODEV;
}
+
+static const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group = {
+ .attrs = NULL,
+};
#endif

#endif /* _SAS_ATA_H_ */
--
2.44.0.278.ge034bb2e1d-goog



2024-03-05 02:45:02

by Jason Yan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes for SATA devices

On 2024/3/5 8:50, Igor Pylypiv wrote:
> Libata sysfs attributes cannot be used for libsas managed SATA devices
> because the ata_port location is different for libsas.
>
> Defined sysfs attributes (visible for SATA devices only):
> - /sys/block/sda/device/ncq_prio_enable
> - /sys/block/sda/device/ncq_prio_supported
>
> The newly defined attributes will pass the correct ata_port to libata
> helper functions.
>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry<[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal<[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Pylypiv<[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/scsi/sas_ata.h | 6 +++
> 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Jason Yan <[email protected]>

2024-03-05 11:32:18

by John Garry

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes for SATA devices

On 05/03/2024 00:50, Igor Pylypiv wrote:
>
> static inline void sas_ata_disabled_notice(void)
> @@ -123,6 +125,10 @@ static inline int sas_ata_add_dev(struct domain_device *parent, struct ex_phy *p
> sas_ata_disabled_notice();
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group = {
> + .attrs = NULL,
> +};

I just noticed a build issue.

With CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_ATA not set, I get this for W=1 build:

In file included from drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h:29,
from drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:7:
/include/scsi/sas_ata.h:129:37: error: ‘sas_ata_sdev_attr_group’
defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
129 | static const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group = {

I suppose that marking sas_ata_sdev_attr_group as __maybe_unused is ok,
but less than ideal. The linker should strip it out of files when unused.

I think that this is also ok:

#define sas_ata_sdev_attr_group (struct attribute_group) {}

The compiler here will create a empty structure and have
&sas_ata_sdev_attr_group point at it.

Thanks,
John

2024-03-06 00:01:34

by Igor Pylypiv

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes for SATA devices

On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 11:29:11AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 05/03/2024 00:50, Igor Pylypiv wrote:
> > static inline void sas_ata_disabled_notice(void)
> > @@ -123,6 +125,10 @@ static inline int sas_ata_add_dev(struct domain_device *parent, struct ex_phy *p
> > sas_ata_disabled_notice();
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> > +
> > +static const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group = {
> > + .attrs = NULL,
> > +};
>
> I just noticed a build issue.
>
> With CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_ATA not set, I get this for W=1 build:
>
> In file included from drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h:29,
> from drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:7:
> ./include/scsi/sas_ata.h:129:37: error: ‘sas_ata_sdev_attr_group’
> defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
> 129 | static const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group = {

Thanks for catching this, John!
For some reason I only get this warning with gcc but not with clang.

>
> I suppose that marking sas_ata_sdev_attr_group as __maybe_unused is ok, but
> less than ideal. The linker should strip it out of files when unused.

Looks like adding the __maybe_unused attribute is a prefferred way since
it is mentioned in the Linux kernel coding style:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.7/process/coding-style.html#conditional-compilation

Added the __maybe_unused attribute in v6. Thank you!

>
> I think that this is also ok:
>
> #define sas_ata_sdev_attr_group (struct attribute_group) {}
>
> The compiler here will create a empty structure and have
> &sas_ata_sdev_attr_group point at it.
>
> Thanks,
> John