2022-04-07 19:41:17

by Harry Wentland

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix indenting mistakes in dcn10_hw_sequencer.c



On 2022-04-07 12:07, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Actually this just causes another warning. Dropped for now. More below.
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 11:52 AM Alex Deucher <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Applied. Thanks!
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:18 AM Harry Wentland <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2022-04-07 02:00, Haowen Bai wrote:
>>>> Smatch reports the following:
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c:2174
>>>> dcn10_enable_vblanks_synchronization() warn: if statement not indented
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Harry
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c | 14 +++++++-------
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c
>>>> index ee22f4422d26..3c338b85040c 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c
>>>> @@ -2172,13 +2172,13 @@ void dcn10_enable_vblanks_synchronization(
>>>> if (master >= 0) {
>>>> for (i = 0; i < group_size; i++) {
>>>> if (i != master && !grouped_pipes[i]->stream->has_non_synchronizable_pclk)
>>>> - grouped_pipes[i]->stream_res.tg->funcs->align_vblanks(
>>>> - grouped_pipes[master]->stream_res.tg,
>>>> - grouped_pipes[i]->stream_res.tg,
>>>> - grouped_pipes[master]->stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
>>>> - grouped_pipes[i]->stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
>>>> - get_clock_divider(grouped_pipes[master], false),
>>>> - get_clock_divider(grouped_pipes[i], false));
>>>> + grouped_pipes[i]->stream_res.tg->funcs->align_vblanks(
>>>> + grouped_pipes[master]->stream_res.tg,
>>>> + grouped_pipes[i]->stream_res.tg,
>>>> + grouped_pipes[master]->stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
>>>> + grouped_pipes[i]->stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
>>>> + get_clock_divider(grouped_pipes[master], false),
>>>> + get_clock_divider(grouped_pipes[i], false));
>>>> grouped_pipes[i]->stream->vblank_synchronized = true;
>
> @Harry Wentland should this last statement be part of the if clause or
> the for loop?
>

It should be part of the if clause.

Harry

> Alex
>
>>>> }
>>>> grouped_pipes[master]->stream->vblank_synchronized = true;
>>>


2022-04-07 20:01:50

by Alex Deucher

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix indenting mistakes in dcn10_hw_sequencer.c

On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 1:32 PM Harry Wentland <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2022-04-07 12:07, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Actually this just causes another warning. Dropped for now. More below.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 11:52 AM Alex Deucher <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Applied. Thanks!
> >>
> >> Alex
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:18 AM Harry Wentland <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2022-04-07 02:00, Haowen Bai wrote:
> >>>> Smatch reports the following:
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c:2174
> >>>> dcn10_enable_vblanks_synchronization() warn: if statement not indented
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> Harry
> >>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c | 14 +++++++-------
> >>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c
> >>>> index ee22f4422d26..3c338b85040c 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c
> >>>> @@ -2172,13 +2172,13 @@ void dcn10_enable_vblanks_synchronization(
> >>>> if (master >= 0) {
> >>>> for (i = 0; i < group_size; i++) {
> >>>> if (i != master && !grouped_pipes[i]->stream->has_non_synchronizable_pclk)
> >>>> - grouped_pipes[i]->stream_res.tg->funcs->align_vblanks(
> >>>> - grouped_pipes[master]->stream_res.tg,
> >>>> - grouped_pipes[i]->stream_res.tg,
> >>>> - grouped_pipes[master]->stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
> >>>> - grouped_pipes[i]->stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
> >>>> - get_clock_divider(grouped_pipes[master], false),
> >>>> - get_clock_divider(grouped_pipes[i], false));
> >>>> + grouped_pipes[i]->stream_res.tg->funcs->align_vblanks(
> >>>> + grouped_pipes[master]->stream_res.tg,
> >>>> + grouped_pipes[i]->stream_res.tg,
> >>>> + grouped_pipes[master]->stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
> >>>> + grouped_pipes[i]->stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
> >>>> + get_clock_divider(grouped_pipes[master], false),
> >>>> + get_clock_divider(grouped_pipes[i], false));
> >>>> grouped_pipes[i]->stream->vblank_synchronized = true;
> >
> > @Harry Wentland should this last statement be part of the if clause or
> > the for loop?
> >
>
> It should be part of the if clause.

Can one of you send a patch to fix that up?

Thanks!

Alex

>
> Harry
>
> > Alex
> >
> >>>> }
> >>>> grouped_pipes[master]->stream->vblank_synchronized = true;
> >>>
>