2024-06-03 17:01:36

by Thomas Richard

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: tps6594-regulator: Fix the number of irqs for TPS65224 and TPS6594

The number of irqs is computed to allocate the right amount of memory for
the irq data. An array of struct tps6594_regulator_irq_data is allocated
one time for all the irqs. Each irq uses one cell of the array.

If the computed number of irqs is not correct, not allocated memory could
be used.

Fix the values used in the calculation for TPS6594 and TPS65224.

Fixes: 00c826525fba (regulator: tps6594-regulator: Add TI TPS65224 PMIC regulators)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard <[email protected]>
---

Issue detected with Linux v6.10-rc1 and v6.10-rc2 using a TI J7200 EVM board
during the suspend sequence.

#echo 1 > /sys/power/pm_debug_messages
#echo 1 > /sys/power/pm_print_times
#echo 0 > /sys/module/printk/parameters/console_suspend
#echo 8 > /proc/sys/kernel/printk
#echo deep > /sys/power/mem_sleep
#echo mem > /sys/power/state
[ 12.607734] PM: suspend entry (deep)
[ 12.612619] Filesystems sync: 0.000 seconds
[ 12.618349] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 000000366b63756a
[ 12.626255] Mem abort info:
[ 12.629037] ESR = 0x0000000096000004
[ 12.632772] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 12.638070] SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 12.641111] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 12.644240] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
[ 12.649103] Data abort info:
[ 12.651971] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
[ 12.657441] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
[ 12.662477] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
[ 12.667774] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000008844be000
[ 12.674198] [000000366b63756a] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
[ 12.680974] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 12.687225] Modules linked in:
[ 12.690271] CPU: 1 PID: 135 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-00036-g8de0c9c7e923-dirty #46
[ 12.698430] Hardware name: Texas Instruments J7200 EVM (DT)
[ 12.703987] pstate: a00000c5 (NzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 12.710932] pc : devres_for_each_res+0x64/0xf0
[ 12.715370] lr : devres_for_each_res+0x4c/0xf0
[ 12.719800] sp : ffff8000840d3a80
[ 12.723102] x29: ffff8000840d3a80 x28: ffff800081aeef50 x27: ffff00080038d2bc
[ 12.730224] x26: 000000366b637562 x25: ffff80008358a978 x24: ffff8000840d3b68
[ 12.737346] x23: ffff800080923924 x22: ffff00080038d2c0 x21: ffff800080923290
[ 12.744467] x20: ffff8000809232fc x19: ffff00080038d010 x18: ffff8000840d3af8
[ 12.751589] x17: ffff8000833d5c58 x16: 0000000078d6c4df x15: 0000000069b9dda5
[ 12.758710] x14: 00000000f75c2086 x13: 00000000a0b1f81f x12: 000000004a81b180
[ 12.765831] x11: 00000000e38eab80 x10: 00000000981bbba1 x9 : 00000000d391c60b
[ 12.772952] x8 : ffff8000840d3b98 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff800081aeeed0
[ 12.780073] x5 : ffff8000840d3b68 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001
[ 12.787194] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 000000364b435542
[ 12.794315] Call trace:
[ 12.796751] devres_for_each_res+0x64/0xf0
[ 12.800837] dev_cache_fw_image+0x5c/0x1a8
[ 12.804921] dpm_for_each_dev+0x54/0x88
[ 12.808749] fw_pm_notify+0x80/0x108
[ 12.812312] blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust+0x74/0xe4
[ 12.817785] pm_notifier_call_chain_robust+0x28/0x48
[ 12.822738] pm_suspend+0x118/0x270
[ 12.826216] state_store+0x80/0xec
[ 12.829607] kobj_attr_store+0x18/0x2c
[ 12.833349] sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x54
[ 12.837001] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x120/0x1ec
[ 12.841432] vfs_write+0x238/0x368
[ 12.844823] ksys_write+0x70/0x104
[ 12.848213] __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28
[ 12.852124] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x118
[ 12.855867] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0
[ 12.860560] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28
[ 12.863865] el0_svc+0x34/0xdc
[ 12.866910] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x12c
[ 12.871255] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
[ 12.874907] Code: f94004da eb1600df 540000e1 14000018 (f9400740)
[ 12.880986] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

drivers/regulator/tps6594-regulator.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps6594-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps6594-regulator.c
index 4a859f4c0f83..ac53792e3fed 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps6594-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps6594-regulator.c
@@ -653,18 +653,14 @@ static int tps6594_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
}

- if (tps->chip_id == LP8764) {
- nr_buck = ARRAY_SIZE(buck_regs);
- nr_ldo = 0;
- nr_types = REGS_INT_NB;
- } else if (tps->chip_id == TPS65224) {
+ if (tps->chip_id == TPS65224) {
nr_buck = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65224_buck_regs);
nr_ldo = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65224_ldo_regs);
- nr_types = REGS_INT_NB;
+ nr_types = TPS65224_REGS_INT_NB;
} else {
nr_buck = ARRAY_SIZE(buck_regs);
- nr_ldo = ARRAY_SIZE(tps6594_ldo_regs);
- nr_types = TPS65224_REGS_INT_NB;
+ nr_ldo = (tps->chip_id == LP8764) ? 0 : ARRAY_SIZE(tps6594_ldo_regs);
+ nr_types = REGS_INT_NB;
}

reg_irq_nb = nr_types * (nr_buck + nr_ldo);
--
2.39.2



2024-06-04 12:11:15

by Nishanth Menon

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps6594-regulator: Fix the number of irqs for TPS65224 and TPS6594

On 19:01-20240603, Thomas Richard wrote:
> The number of irqs is computed to allocate the right amount of memory for
> the irq data. An array of struct tps6594_regulator_irq_data is allocated
> one time for all the irqs. Each irq uses one cell of the array.
>
> If the computed number of irqs is not correct, not allocated memory could
> be used.
>
> Fix the values used in the calculation for TPS6594 and TPS65224.
>
> Fixes: 00c826525fba (regulator: tps6594-regulator: Add TI TPS65224 PMIC regulators)
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard <[email protected]>
> ---


Thanks a ton for fixing this - this solved a bunch of random regressions
we were tracking:
am62axx_sk, am69_sk, j721e-idk, j721s2-evm in addition to J7200 evm as
well.

Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>


This was definitely a 6.10 regression, could we fast track it in?

--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D

2024-06-04 19:35:41

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps6594-regulator: Fix the number of irqs for TPS65224 and TPS6594

On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 19:01:00 +0200, Thomas Richard wrote:
> The number of irqs is computed to allocate the right amount of memory for
> the irq data. An array of struct tps6594_regulator_irq_data is allocated
> one time for all the irqs. Each irq uses one cell of the array.
>
> If the computed number of irqs is not correct, not allocated memory could
> be used.
>
> [...]

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: tps6594-regulator: Fix the number of irqs for TPS65224 and TPS6594
commit: 8141b6da1763b9db009e5dcf873869bb31bcef45

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


2024-06-10 09:48:32

by Thomas Richard

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps6594-regulator: Fix the number of irqs for TPS65224 and TPS6594

On 6/4/24 14:10, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 19:01-20240603, Thomas Richard wrote:
>> The number of irqs is computed to allocate the right amount of memory for
>> the irq data. An array of struct tps6594_regulator_irq_data is allocated
>> one time for all the irqs. Each irq uses one cell of the array.
>>
>> If the computed number of irqs is not correct, not allocated memory could
>> be used.
>>
>> Fix the values used in the calculation for TPS6594 and TPS65224.
>>
>> Fixes: 00c826525fba (regulator: tps6594-regulator: Add TI TPS65224 PMIC regulators)
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
>
> Thanks a ton for fixing this - this solved a bunch of random regressions
> we were tracking:
> am62axx_sk, am69_sk, j721e-idk, j721s2-evm in addition to J7200 evm as
> well.
>
> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
>
>
> This was definitely a 6.10 regression, could we fast track it in?

Hi Nishanth,

FYI, I also found an other 6.10 regression for j721s2-evm and j7200-evm:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

Regards,

Thomas