2014-07-04 21:04:10

by Nicholas Krause

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] mach-omap2: Change if statement in omap2_dflt_clk_enable

This patch changes this function to check for if v is returning value from the
called function. If not it does the else. Furthermore fixes the FIXME message above
if statement for holding INVERT_ENABLE bit when not needing to be checked for
in if statement by just checking for if v is not Null.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
index 591581a..626363d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ void omap2_dflt_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
}

v = omap2_clk_readl(clk, clk->enable_reg);
- if (clk->flags & INVERT_ENABLE)
+ if (v)
v |= (1 << clk->enable_bit);
else
v &= ~(1 << clk->enable_bit);
--
1.9.1


2014-07-05 05:37:25

by Paul Walmsley

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mach-omap2: Change if statement in omap2_dflt_clk_enable

On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Nicholas Krause wrote:

> This patch changes this function to check for if v is returning value from the
> called function. If not it does the else. Furthermore fixes the FIXME message above
> if statement for holding INVERT_ENABLE bit when not needing to be checked for
> in if statement by just checking for if v is not Null.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <[email protected]>

This patch doesn't make any sense. Neither does the commit message.
Please explain exactly what this patch is intended to do in terms of the
clock framework or the hardware.


- Paul

> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
> index 591581a..626363d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ void omap2_dflt_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> }
>
> v = omap2_clk_readl(clk, clk->enable_reg);
> - if (clk->flags & INVERT_ENABLE)
> + if (v)
> v |= (1 << clk->enable_bit);
> else
> v &= ~(1 << clk->enable_bit);
> --
> 1.9.1
>


- Paul