Per errata AC03_CPU_29, STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND, STALL_FRONTEND, and STALL
events are not counting as expected. The follow up metrics patch will
include correct way to calculate the impacted events.
Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <[email protected]>
---
.../arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
index f9fae15f7555..711028377f3e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
+++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
@@ -1,18 +1,24 @@
[
{
- "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_FRONTEND"
+ "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_FRONTEND",
+ "Errata": "Errata AC03_CPU_29",
+ "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
},
{
"ArchStdEvent": "STALL_BACKEND"
},
{
- "ArchStdEvent": "STALL"
+ "ArchStdEvent": "STALL",
+ "Errata": "Errata AC03_CPU_29",
+ "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
},
{
"ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT_BACKEND"
},
{
- "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND"
+ "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND",
+ "Errata": "Errata AC03_CPU_29",
+ "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
},
{
"ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT"
--
2.40.1
On 03/08/2023 22:13, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
> Per errata AC03_CPU_29, STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND, STALL_FRONTEND, and STALL
> events are not counting as expected. The follow up metrics patch will
> include correct way to calculate the impacted events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
> index f9fae15f7555..711028377f3e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
> @@ -1,18 +1,24 @@
> [
> {
> - "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_FRONTEND"
> + "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_FRONTEND",
> + "Errata": "Errata AC03_CPU_29",
> + "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
why end with a '-'?
> },
> {
> "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_BACKEND"
> },
> {
> - "ArchStdEvent": "STALL"
> + "ArchStdEvent": "STALL",
> + "Errata": "Errata AC03_CPU_29",
> + "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
> },
> {
> "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT_BACKEND"
> },
> {
> - "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND"
> + "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND",
> + "Errata": "Errata AC03_CPU_29",
> + "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
> },
> {
> "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT"
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023, John Garry wrote:
> On 03/08/2023 22:13, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
>> Per errata AC03_CPU_29, STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND, STALL_FRONTEND, and STALL
>> events are not counting as expected. The follow up metrics patch will
>> include correct way to calculate the impacted events.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
>
>> ---
>> .../arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json | 12 +++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
>> b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
>> index f9fae15f7555..711028377f3e 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
>> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
>> @@ -1,18 +1,24 @@
>> [
>> {
>> - "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_FRONTEND"
>> + "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_FRONTEND",
>> + "Errata": "Errata AC03_CPU_29",
>> + "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
>
> why end with a '-'?
That's a great question! I wish, I remembered why I did that. Looking at
other events with Errata field, they use '.'. I can fix those and submit
the patchset again.
Cheers, Ilkka
>
>> },
>> {
>> "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_BACKEND"
>> },
>> {
>> - "ArchStdEvent": "STALL"
>> + "ArchStdEvent": "STALL",
>> + "Errata": "Errata AC03_CPU_29",
>> + "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
>> },
>> {
>> "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT_BACKEND"
>> },
>> {
>> - "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND"
>> + "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND",
>> + "Errata": "Errata AC03_CPU_29",
>> + "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
>> },
>> {
>> "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT"
>
>
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2023, John Garry wrote:
>
>> On 03/08/2023 22:13, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
>>> Per errata AC03_CPU_29, STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND, STALL_FRONTEND, and STALL
>>> events are not counting as expected. The follow up metrics patch will
>>> include correct way to calculate the impacted events.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <[email protected]>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
>>
>>> ---
>>> .../arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json | 12 +++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
>>> b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
>>> index f9fae15f7555..711028377f3e 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereone/pipeline.json
>>> @@ -1,18 +1,24 @@
>>> [
>>> {
>>> - "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_FRONTEND"
>>> + "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_FRONTEND",
>>> + "Errata": "Errata AC03_CPU_29",
>>> + "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
>>
>> why end with a '-'?
>
> That's a great question! I wish, I remembered why I did that. Looking at
> other events with Errata field, they use '.'. I can fix those and submit the
> patchset again.
John, I took a look at it and it seems that if I use '.', perf will remove
it. Here are two examples:
metrics.json:
"BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead."
# perf list
[Impacted by errata, use metrics instead Spec update: Errata AC03_CPU_29]
vs.
"BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
# perf list
Impacted by errata, use metrics instead - Spec update: Errata AC03_CPU_29
---
So, I believe, I probably used the hyphen to make the 'perf list' output a
little "prettier". Well, I just change to dot and it's fine.
Cheers, Ilkka
>>
>>> },
>>> {
>>> "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_BACKEND"
>>> },
>>> {
>>> - "ArchStdEvent": "STALL"
>>> + "ArchStdEvent": "STALL",
>>> + "Errata": "Errata AC03_CPU_29",
>>> + "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
>>> },
>>> {
>>> "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT_BACKEND"
>>> },
>>> {
>>> - "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND"
>>> + "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND",
>>> + "Errata": "Errata AC03_CPU_29",
>>> + "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
>>> },
>>> {
>>> "ArchStdEvent": "STALL_SLOT"
>>
>>
>
On 10/08/2023 23:38, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
>>> why end with a '-'?
>>
>> That's a great question! I wish, I remembered why I did that. Looking
>> at other events with Errata field, they use '.'. I can fix those and
>> submit the patchset again.
>
> John, I took a look at it and it seems that if I use '.', perf will
> remove it. Here are two examples:
>
> metrics.json:
> "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead."
>
> # perf list
> [Impacted by errata, use metrics instead Spec update: Errata AC03_CPU_29]
>
> vs.
>
> "BriefDescription": "Impacted by errata, use metrics instead -"
>
> # perf list
>
> Impacted by errata, use metrics instead - Spec update: Errata AC03_CPU_29
ah, ok. I am not sure where the '.' removal is coming from.
>
> ---
>
> So, I believe, I probably used the hyphen to make the 'perf list' output
> a little "prettier". Well, I just change to dot and it's fine.
Fine. Or we could consider changing the 'perf list' formatting code to
add this '-' or similar automatically.
Thanks,
John