2019-07-05 19:49:48

by Markus Elfring

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: One function call less in nvme_update_disk_info()

From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 21:08:12 +0200

Avoid an extra function call by using a ternary operator instead of
a conditional statement.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index b2dd4e391f5c..73888195bdb2 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1650,10 +1650,7 @@ static void nvme_update_disk_info(struct gendisk *disk,
nvme_config_discard(disk, ns);
nvme_config_write_zeroes(disk, ns);

- if (id->nsattr & (1 << 0))
- set_disk_ro(disk, true);
- else
- set_disk_ro(disk, false);
+ set_disk_ro(disk, id->nsattr & (1 << 0) ? true : false);

blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(disk->queue);
}
--
2.22.0


2019-07-05 19:55:53

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: One function call less in nvme_update_disk_info()

On 7/5/19 1:15 PM, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 21:08:12 +0200
>
> Avoid an extra function call by using a ternary operator instead of
> a conditional statement.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index b2dd4e391f5c..73888195bdb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -1650,10 +1650,7 @@ static void nvme_update_disk_info(struct gendisk *disk,
> nvme_config_discard(disk, ns);
> nvme_config_write_zeroes(disk, ns);
>
> - if (id->nsattr & (1 << 0))
> - set_disk_ro(disk, true);
> - else
> - set_disk_ro(disk, false);
> + set_disk_ro(disk, id->nsattr & (1 << 0) ? true : false);

Let's please not, the original is much more readable.

--
Jens Axboe