2017-11-29 18:24:25

by Maran Wilson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point

On 11/29/2017 12:59 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 28/11/2017 20:34, Maran Wilson wrote:
>> For certain applications it is desirable to rapidly boot a KVM virtual
>> machine. In cases where legacy hardware and software support within the
>> guest is not needed, Qemu should be able to boot directly into the
>> uncompressed Linux kernel binary without the need to run firmware.
>>
>> There already exists an ABI to allow this for Xen PVH guests and the ABI is
>> supported by Linux and FreeBSD:
>>
>> https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/hvmlite.html
>>
>> This PoC patch enables Qemu to use that same entry point for booting KVM
>> guests.
> Nice! So QEMU would parse the ELF file just like for multiboot, find
> the ELF note, and then prepare an hvmlite boot info struct instead of
> the multiboot one?

Yes, exactly.

> There would then be a new option ROM, very similar
> to multiboot.S.

That is one option. I guess this gets into a discussion about the QEMU
side of the upcoming patches that would follow ...

I'm currently just initializing the CPU state in QEMU for testing since
there is such minimal (non Linux specific) setup that is required by the
ABI.  And (borrowing from the Intel clear container patches) that VM
setup is only performed when user selects the "nofw" option with the q35
model. But yeah, if folks think it important to move all such machine
state initialization out of QEMU and into an option ROM, I can look into
coding it up that way for the QEMU patches.

Thanks,
-Maran

> Thanks,
>
> Paolo


From 1585425766515004475@xxx Wed Nov 29 18:23:54 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1585339868639162159
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread


2017-11-29 17:18:07

by Paolo Bonzini

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point

On 29/11/2017 18:14, Maran Wilson wrote:
> That is one option. I guess this gets into a discussion about the QEMU
> side of the upcoming patches that would follow ...
>
> I'm currently just initializing the CPU state in QEMU for testing since
> there is such minimal (non Linux specific) setup that is required by the
> ABI.  And (borrowing from the Intel clear container patches) that VM
> setup is only performed when user selects the "nofw" option with the q35
> model. But yeah, if folks think it important to move all such machine
> state initialization out of QEMU and into an option ROM, I can look into
> coding it up that way for the QEMU patches.

Yes, please do an option ROM. I'll take care of porting it to qboot.

Thanks,

Paolo

From 1585412524440810546@xxx Wed Nov 29 14:53:25 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1585339868639162159
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread