2023-06-22 17:55:22

by Björn Töpel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: Discard vector state on syscalls

From: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>

The RISC-V vector specification states:
Executing a system call causes all caller-saved vector registers
(v0-v31, vl, vtype) and vstart to become unspecified.

The vector registers are cleared, vill is set (invalid), and the
vector status is set to Initial.

That way we can prevent userspace from accidentally relying on the
stated save.

Rémi pointed out [1] that clearing the registers might be superfluous,
and setting vill is sufficient.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/[email protected]/ # [1]
Suggested-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
---

I figured I'd sent out a proper patch. I like Andy's optimization
patch, but TBH I think we should do that as a follow up.

As Rémi pointed out, the clearing might be opted out, but I left it in
here.


Björn

---
arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
index 04c0b07bf6cd..692ce55e4a69 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
@@ -163,6 +163,30 @@ static inline void __switch_to_vector(struct task_struct *prev,
void riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_init(struct task_struct *tsk);
bool riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_user_allowed(void);

+static inline void riscv_v_vstate_discard(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ unsigned long vl, vtype_inval = 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
+
+ if (!riscv_v_vstate_query(regs))
+ return;
+
+ riscv_v_enable();
+ asm volatile (
+ ".option push\n\t"
+ ".option arch, +v\n\t"
+ "vsetvli %0, x0, e8, m8, ta, ma\n\t"
+ "vmv.v.i v0, 0\n\t"
+ "vmv.v.i v8, 0\n\t"
+ "vmv.v.i v16, 0\n\t"
+ "vmv.v.i v24, 0\n\t"
+ "vsetvl %0, x0, %1\n\t"
+ ".option pop\n\t"
+ : "=&r" (vl) : "r" (vtype_inval) : "memory");
+ riscv_v_disable();
+
+ riscv_v_vstate_on(regs);
+}
+
#else /* ! CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V */

struct pt_regs;
@@ -178,6 +202,7 @@ static inline bool riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_user_allowed(void) { return false; }
#define __switch_to_vector(__prev, __next) do {} while (0)
#define riscv_v_vstate_off(regs) do {} while (0)
#define riscv_v_vstate_on(regs) do {} while (0)
+#define riscv_v_vstate_discard(regs) do {} while (0)

#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V */

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
index 05ffdcd1424e..00c68b57ff88 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
@@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ asmlinkage __visible __trap_section void do_trap_ecall_u(struct pt_regs *regs)
regs->epc += 4;
regs->orig_a0 = regs->a0;

+ riscv_v_vstate_discard(regs);
+
syscall = syscall_enter_from_user_mode(regs, syscall);

if (syscall < NR_syscalls)

base-commit: 4681dacadeefa5ca6017e00736adc1d7dc963c6a
--
2.39.2



2023-06-22 18:00:24

by Palmer Dabbelt

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Discard vector state on syscalls

On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:36:13 PDT (-0700), [email protected] wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
>
> The RISC-V vector specification states:
> Executing a system call causes all caller-saved vector registers
> (v0-v31, vl, vtype) and vstart to become unspecified.
>
> The vector registers are cleared, vill is set (invalid), and the
> vector status is set to Initial.
>
> That way we can prevent userspace from accidentally relying on the
> stated save.
>
> Rémi pointed out [1] that clearing the registers might be superfluous,
> and setting vill is sufficient.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/[email protected]/ # [1]
> Suggested-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> I figured I'd sent out a proper patch. I like Andy's optimization
> patch, but TBH I think we should do that as a follow up.
>
> As Rémi pointed out, the clearing might be opted out, but I left it in
> here.

I think we're going to end up with a bunch of uarch-specific stuff here,
but for now having the heavy hammer seems safest. There's no V hardware
yet so we can't really tell how anything performs, at least this way
we're definately not leaking anything.

So I'm OK with this. I'd also be fine with clearing to all-1s, I think
it's kind of splitting hairs at this point: the 1s are nice because
they're what the rest of V does, but setting vill should make everything
trap anyway so maybe it doesn't matter -- and it's not clear if 1 or 0
will allow initial, so who knows.

Darius: I'm cool swapping over to the 1s if you feel strongly about it.
Bjorn says Sweeden is on vacation, so just LMK and I'll re-spin it with
the 1s.

Regardless I'd like to pick up something that blows away V state for
this merge window, as it'll make sure the uABI is quite strictly
enforced.

> Björn
>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
> index 04c0b07bf6cd..692ce55e4a69 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
> @@ -163,6 +163,30 @@ static inline void __switch_to_vector(struct task_struct *prev,
> void riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_init(struct task_struct *tsk);
> bool riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_user_allowed(void);
>
> +static inline void riscv_v_vstate_discard(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + unsigned long vl, vtype_inval = 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
> +
> + if (!riscv_v_vstate_query(regs))
> + return;
> +
> + riscv_v_enable();
> + asm volatile (
> + ".option push\n\t"
> + ".option arch, +v\n\t"
> + "vsetvli %0, x0, e8, m8, ta, ma\n\t"
> + "vmv.v.i v0, 0\n\t"
> + "vmv.v.i v8, 0\n\t"
> + "vmv.v.i v16, 0\n\t"
> + "vmv.v.i v24, 0\n\t"
> + "vsetvl %0, x0, %1\n\t"
> + ".option pop\n\t"
> + : "=&r" (vl) : "r" (vtype_inval) : "memory");
> + riscv_v_disable();
> +
> + riscv_v_vstate_on(regs);
> +}
> +
> #else /* ! CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V */
>
> struct pt_regs;
> @@ -178,6 +202,7 @@ static inline bool riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_user_allowed(void) { return false; }
> #define __switch_to_vector(__prev, __next) do {} while (0)
> #define riscv_v_vstate_off(regs) do {} while (0)
> #define riscv_v_vstate_on(regs) do {} while (0)
> +#define riscv_v_vstate_discard(regs) do {} while (0)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V */
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> index 05ffdcd1424e..00c68b57ff88 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ asmlinkage __visible __trap_section void do_trap_ecall_u(struct pt_regs *regs)
> regs->epc += 4;
> regs->orig_a0 = regs->a0;
>
> + riscv_v_vstate_discard(regs);
> +
> syscall = syscall_enter_from_user_mode(regs, syscall);
>
> if (syscall < NR_syscalls)
>
> base-commit: 4681dacadeefa5ca6017e00736adc1d7dc963c6a

2023-06-22 18:21:54

by Darius Rad

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Discard vector state on syscalls

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:46:31AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:36:13 PDT (-0700), [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
> >
> > The RISC-V vector specification states:
> > Executing a system call causes all caller-saved vector registers
> > (v0-v31, vl, vtype) and vstart to become unspecified.
> >
> > The vector registers are cleared, vill is set (invalid), and the
> > vector status is set to Initial.
> >
> > That way we can prevent userspace from accidentally relying on the
> > stated save.
> >
> > Rémi pointed out [1] that clearing the registers might be superfluous,
> > and setting vill is sufficient.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/[email protected]/ # [1]
> > Suggested-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
> > Suggested-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > I figured I'd sent out a proper patch. I like Andy's optimization
> > patch, but TBH I think we should do that as a follow up.
> >
> > As Rémi pointed out, the clearing might be opted out, but I left it in
> > here.
>
> I think we're going to end up with a bunch of uarch-specific stuff here, but
> for now having the heavy hammer seems safest. There's no V hardware yet so
> we can't really tell how anything performs, at least this way we're
> definately not leaking anything.
>
> So I'm OK with this. I'd also be fine with clearing to all-1s, I think it's
> kind of splitting hairs at this point: the 1s are nice because they're what
> the rest of V does, but setting vill should make everything trap anyway so
> maybe it doesn't matter -- and it's not clear if 1 or 0 will allow initial,
> so who knows.
>
> Darius: I'm cool swapping over to the 1s if you feel strongly about it.
> Bjorn says Sweeden is on vacation, so just LMK and I'll re-spin it with the
> 1s.

I think all 1s would be preferred, but I don't think it's particularly
critical (splitting hairs, like you said), so I'll let you make the call.

>
> Regardless I'd like to pick up something that blows away V state for this
> merge window, as it'll make sure the uABI is quite strictly enforced.
>
> > Björn
> >
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
> > index 04c0b07bf6cd..692ce55e4a69 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
> > @@ -163,6 +163,30 @@ static inline void __switch_to_vector(struct task_struct *prev,
> > void riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_init(struct task_struct *tsk);
> > bool riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_user_allowed(void);
> >
> > +static inline void riscv_v_vstate_discard(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long vl, vtype_inval = 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
> > +
> > + if (!riscv_v_vstate_query(regs))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + riscv_v_enable();
> > + asm volatile (
> > + ".option push\n\t"
> > + ".option arch, +v\n\t"
> > + "vsetvli %0, x0, e8, m8, ta, ma\n\t"
> > + "vmv.v.i v0, 0\n\t"
> > + "vmv.v.i v8, 0\n\t"
> > + "vmv.v.i v16, 0\n\t"
> > + "vmv.v.i v24, 0\n\t"
> > + "vsetvl %0, x0, %1\n\t"
> > + ".option pop\n\t"
> > + : "=&r" (vl) : "r" (vtype_inval) : "memory");
> > + riscv_v_disable();
> > +
> > + riscv_v_vstate_on(regs);
> > +}
> > +
> > #else /* ! CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V */
> >
> > struct pt_regs;
> > @@ -178,6 +202,7 @@ static inline bool riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_user_allowed(void) { return false; }
> > #define __switch_to_vector(__prev, __next) do {} while (0)
> > #define riscv_v_vstate_off(regs) do {} while (0)
> > #define riscv_v_vstate_on(regs) do {} while (0)
> > +#define riscv_v_vstate_discard(regs) do {} while (0)
> >
> > #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V */
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> > index 05ffdcd1424e..00c68b57ff88 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> > @@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ asmlinkage __visible __trap_section void do_trap_ecall_u(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > regs->epc += 4;
> > regs->orig_a0 = regs->a0;
> >
> > + riscv_v_vstate_discard(regs);
> > +
> > syscall = syscall_enter_from_user_mode(regs, syscall);
> >
> > if (syscall < NR_syscalls)
> >
> > base-commit: 4681dacadeefa5ca6017e00736adc1d7dc963c6a

2023-06-22 18:44:46

by Vineet Gupta

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Discard vector state on syscalls



On 6/22/23 10:36, Björn Töpel wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
>
> The RISC-V vector specification states:
> Executing a system call causes all caller-saved vector registers
> (v0-v31, vl, vtype) and vstart to become unspecified.

So the only use case of saving/restoring V regs in __switch_to is an
interrupt induced task switch ?

>
> The vector registers are cleared, vill is set (invalid), and the
> vector status is set to Initial.
>
> That way we can prevent userspace from accidentally relying on the
> stated save.
>
> Rémi pointed out [1] that clearing the registers might be superfluous,
> and setting vill is sufficient.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/[email protected]/ # [1]
> Suggested-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> I figured I'd sent out a proper patch. I like Andy's optimization
> patch, but TBH I think we should do that as a follow up.
>
> As Rémi pointed out, the clearing might be opted out, but I left it in
> here.
>
>
> Björn
>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
> index 04c0b07bf6cd..692ce55e4a69 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
> @@ -163,6 +163,30 @@ static inline void __switch_to_vector(struct task_struct *prev,
> void riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_init(struct task_struct *tsk);
> bool riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_user_allowed(void);
>
> +static inline void riscv_v_vstate_discard(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + unsigned long vl, vtype_inval = 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
> +
> + if (!riscv_v_vstate_query(regs))
> + return;
> +
> + riscv_v_enable();
> + asm volatile (
> + ".option push\n\t"
> + ".option arch, +v\n\t"
> + "vsetvli %0, x0, e8, m8, ta, ma\n\t"
> + "vmv.v.i v0, 0\n\t"
> + "vmv.v.i v8, 0\n\t"
> + "vmv.v.i v16, 0\n\t"
> + "vmv.v.i v24, 0\n\t"
> + "vsetvl %0, x0, %1\n\t"
> + ".option pop\n\t"
> + : "=&r" (vl) : "r" (vtype_inval) : "memory");
> + riscv_v_disable();
> +
> + riscv_v_vstate_on(regs);
> +}
> +
> #else /* ! CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V */
>
> struct pt_regs;
> @@ -178,6 +202,7 @@ static inline bool riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_user_allowed(void) { return false; }
> #define __switch_to_vector(__prev, __next) do {} while (0)
> #define riscv_v_vstate_off(regs) do {} while (0)
> #define riscv_v_vstate_on(regs) do {} while (0)
> +#define riscv_v_vstate_discard(regs) do {} while (0)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V */
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> index 05ffdcd1424e..00c68b57ff88 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ asmlinkage __visible __trap_section void do_trap_ecall_u(struct pt_regs *regs)
> regs->epc += 4;
> regs->orig_a0 = regs->a0;
>
> + riscv_v_vstate_discard(regs);
> +
> syscall = syscall_enter_from_user_mode(regs, syscall);
>
> if (syscall < NR_syscalls)
>
> base-commit: 4681dacadeefa5ca6017e00736adc1d7dc963c6a


2023-06-22 18:46:52

by Palmer Dabbelt

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Discard vector state on syscalls

On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:55:54 PDT (-0700), Darius Rad wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:46:31AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:36:13 PDT (-0700), [email protected] wrote:
>> > From: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > The RISC-V vector specification states:
>> > Executing a system call causes all caller-saved vector registers
>> > (v0-v31, vl, vtype) and vstart to become unspecified.
>> >
>> > The vector registers are cleared, vill is set (invalid), and the
>> > vector status is set to Initial.
>> >
>> > That way we can prevent userspace from accidentally relying on the
>> > stated save.
>> >
>> > Rémi pointed out [1] that clearing the registers might be superfluous,
>> > and setting vill is sufficient.
>> >
>> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/[email protected]/ # [1]
>> > Suggested-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
>> > Suggested-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <[email protected]>
>> > Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
>> > ---
>> >
>> > I figured I'd sent out a proper patch. I like Andy's optimization
>> > patch, but TBH I think we should do that as a follow up.
>> >
>> > As Rémi pointed out, the clearing might be opted out, but I left it in
>> > here.
>>
>> I think we're going to end up with a bunch of uarch-specific stuff here, but
>> for now having the heavy hammer seems safest. There's no V hardware yet so
>> we can't really tell how anything performs, at least this way we're
>> definately not leaking anything.
>>
>> So I'm OK with this. I'd also be fine with clearing to all-1s, I think it's
>> kind of splitting hairs at this point: the 1s are nice because they're what
>> the rest of V does, but setting vill should make everything trap anyway so
>> maybe it doesn't matter -- and it's not clear if 1 or 0 will allow initial,
>> so who knows.
>>
>> Darius: I'm cool swapping over to the 1s if you feel strongly about it.
>> Bjorn says Sweeden is on vacation, so just LMK and I'll re-spin it with the
>> 1s.
>
> I think all 1s would be preferred, but I don't think it's particularly
> critical (splitting hairs, like you said), so I'll let you make the call.

OK, I'm just going to take this then as it's the less work option ;)

>
>>
>> Regardless I'd like to pick up something that blows away V state for this
>> merge window, as it'll make sure the uABI is quite strictly enforced.
>>
>> > Björn
>> >
>> > ---
>> > arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 2 ++
>> > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
>> > index 04c0b07bf6cd..692ce55e4a69 100644
>> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
>> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
>> > @@ -163,6 +163,30 @@ static inline void __switch_to_vector(struct task_struct *prev,
>> > void riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_init(struct task_struct *tsk);
>> > bool riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_user_allowed(void);
>> >
>> > +static inline void riscv_v_vstate_discard(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> > +{
>> > + unsigned long vl, vtype_inval = 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
>> > +
>> > + if (!riscv_v_vstate_query(regs))
>> > + return;
>> > +
>> > + riscv_v_enable();
>> > + asm volatile (
>> > + ".option push\n\t"
>> > + ".option arch, +v\n\t"
>> > + "vsetvli %0, x0, e8, m8, ta, ma\n\t"
>> > + "vmv.v.i v0, 0\n\t"
>> > + "vmv.v.i v8, 0\n\t"
>> > + "vmv.v.i v16, 0\n\t"
>> > + "vmv.v.i v24, 0\n\t"
>> > + "vsetvl %0, x0, %1\n\t"
>> > + ".option pop\n\t"
>> > + : "=&r" (vl) : "r" (vtype_inval) : "memory");
>> > + riscv_v_disable();
>> > +
>> > + riscv_v_vstate_on(regs);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > #else /* ! CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V */
>> >
>> > struct pt_regs;
>> > @@ -178,6 +202,7 @@ static inline bool riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_user_allowed(void) { return false; }
>> > #define __switch_to_vector(__prev, __next) do {} while (0)
>> > #define riscv_v_vstate_off(regs) do {} while (0)
>> > #define riscv_v_vstate_on(regs) do {} while (0)
>> > +#define riscv_v_vstate_discard(regs) do {} while (0)
>> >
>> > #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V */
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>> > index 05ffdcd1424e..00c68b57ff88 100644
>> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>> > @@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ asmlinkage __visible __trap_section void do_trap_ecall_u(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> > regs->epc += 4;
>> > regs->orig_a0 = regs->a0;
>> >
>> > + riscv_v_vstate_discard(regs);
>> > +
>> > syscall = syscall_enter_from_user_mode(regs, syscall);
>> >
>> > if (syscall < NR_syscalls)
>> >
>> > base-commit: 4681dacadeefa5ca6017e00736adc1d7dc963c6a
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/rivosinc.com/d/msgid/linux/ZJSLKrB/4xaYB75d%40bruce.bluespec.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/a/rivosinc.com/d/optout.

2023-06-26 16:29:14

by Björn Töpel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Discard vector state on syscalls

Vineet Gupta <[email protected]> writes:

> On 6/22/23 10:36, Björn Töpel wrote:
>> From: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
>>
>> The RISC-V vector specification states:
>> Executing a system call causes all caller-saved vector registers
>> (v0-v31, vl, vtype) and vstart to become unspecified.
>
> So the only use case of saving/restoring V regs in __switch_to is an
> interrupt induced task switch ?

Yes!