2020-02-15 19:42:28

by Steve Longerbeam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(),
have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement
notifier ops (bind, unbind).

The caller is now responsible for first initializing its notifier with a
call to v4l2_async_notifier_init().

Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v3:
- added the missing calls to unregister/cleanup the new subdev notifiers.
Reported by Rui Silva.
---
drivers/media/platform/video-mux.c | 8 +++++++-
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c | 11 +----------
drivers/staging/media/imx/imx6-mipi-csi2.c | 7 ++++++-
drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-media-csi.c | 7 ++++++-
drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c | 9 ++++++++-
include/media/v4l2-fwnode.h | 12 ++++++++----
6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/video-mux.c b/drivers/media/platform/video-mux.c
index ddd0e338f9e4..3d2a5c2b4c08 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/video-mux.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/video-mux.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@

struct video_mux {
struct v4l2_subdev subdev;
+ struct v4l2_async_notifier notifier;
struct media_pad *pads;
struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *format_mbus;
struct mux_control *mux;
@@ -354,8 +355,11 @@ static int video_mux_async_register(struct video_mux *vmux,
for (i = 0; i < num_input_pads; i++)
ports[i] = i;

+ v4l2_async_notifier_init(&vmux->notifier);
+
ret = v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(
- &vmux->subdev, sizeof(struct v4l2_async_subdev),
+ &vmux->subdev, &vmux->notifier,
+ sizeof(struct v4l2_async_subdev),
ports, num_input_pads, video_mux_parse_endpoint);

kfree(ports);
@@ -442,6 +446,8 @@ static int video_mux_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct video_mux *vmux = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct v4l2_subdev *sd = &vmux->subdev;

+ v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&vmux->notifier);
+ v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vmux->notifier);
v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(sd);
media_entity_cleanup(&sd->entity);

diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
index 6ece4320e1d2..ae2cc4d6faf6 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
@@ -1164,12 +1164,12 @@ int v4l2_async_register_subdev_sensor_common(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(v4l2_async_register_subdev_sensor_common);

int v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
+ struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
size_t asd_struct_size,
unsigned int *ports,
unsigned int num_ports,
parse_endpoint_func parse_endpoint)
{
- struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier;
struct device *dev = sd->dev;
struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
int ret;
@@ -1181,12 +1181,6 @@ int v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
if (!fwnode_device_is_available(fwnode))
return -ENODEV;

- notifier = kzalloc(sizeof(*notifier), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!notifier)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- v4l2_async_notifier_init(notifier);
-
if (!ports) {
ret = v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints(dev, notifier,
asd_struct_size,
@@ -1211,15 +1205,12 @@ int v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
if (ret < 0)
goto out_unregister;

- sd->subdev_notifier = notifier;
-
return 0;

out_unregister:
v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(notifier);
out_cleanup:
v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(notifier);
- kfree(notifier);

return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx6-mipi-csi2.c b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx6-mipi-csi2.c
index cd3dd6e33ef0..c1d1afeea53a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx6-mipi-csi2.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx6-mipi-csi2.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
struct csi2_dev {
struct device *dev;
struct v4l2_subdev sd;
+ struct v4l2_async_notifier notifier;
struct media_pad pad[CSI2_NUM_PADS];
struct clk *dphy_clk;
struct clk *pllref_clk;
@@ -636,8 +637,10 @@ static int csi2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

platform_set_drvdata(pdev, &csi2->sd);

+ v4l2_async_notifier_init(&csi2->notifier);
+
ret = v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(
- &csi2->sd, sizeof(struct v4l2_async_subdev),
+ &csi2->sd, &csi2->notifier, sizeof(struct v4l2_async_subdev),
&sink_port, 1, csi2_parse_endpoint);
if (ret)
goto dphy_off;
@@ -658,6 +661,8 @@ static int csi2_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct v4l2_subdev *sd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct csi2_dev *csi2 = sd_to_dev(sd);

+ v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&csi2->notifier);
+ v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&csi2->notifier);
v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(sd);
clk_disable_unprepare(csi2->dphy_clk);
clk_disable_unprepare(csi2->pllref_clk);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-media-csi.c b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-media-csi.c
index db30e2c70f2f..dc6d1a28fde7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-media-csi.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-media-csi.c
@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@
struct imx7_csi {
struct device *dev;
struct v4l2_subdev sd;
+ struct v4l2_async_notifier notifier;
struct imx_media_video_dev *vdev;
struct imx_media_dev *imxmd;
struct media_pad pad[IMX7_CSI_PADS_NUM];
@@ -1266,7 +1267,9 @@ static int imx7_csi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret < 0)
goto free;

- ret = v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(&csi->sd,
+ v4l2_async_notifier_init(&csi->notifier);
+
+ ret = v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(&csi->sd, &csi->notifier,
sizeof(struct v4l2_async_subdev),
NULL, 0,
imx7_csi_parse_endpoint);
@@ -1303,6 +1306,8 @@ static int imx7_csi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
v4l2_device_unregister(&imxmd->v4l2_dev);
media_device_cleanup(&imxmd->md);

+ v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&csi->notifier);
+ v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&csi->notifier);
v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(sd);
v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&csi->ctrl_hdlr);

diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c
index 383abecb3bec..4c54456318ea 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c
@@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ struct csi_state {
struct device *dev;
struct media_pad pads[CSIS_PADS_NUM];
struct v4l2_subdev mipi_sd;
+ struct v4l2_async_notifier notifier;
struct v4l2_subdev *src_sd;

u8 index;
@@ -883,7 +884,9 @@ static int mipi_csis_subdev_init(struct v4l2_subdev *mipi_sd,
if (ret)
return ret;

- ret = v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(mipi_sd,
+ v4l2_async_notifier_init(&state->notifier);
+
+ ret = v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(mipi_sd, &state->notifier,
sizeof(struct v4l2_async_subdev),
&sink_port, 1,
mipi_csis_parse_endpoint);
@@ -1014,6 +1017,8 @@ static int mipi_csis_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
unregister_all:
mipi_csis_debugfs_exit(state);
media_entity_cleanup(&state->mipi_sd.entity);
+ v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&state->notifier);
+ v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&state->notifier);
v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&state->mipi_sd);
disable_clock:
mipi_csis_clk_disable(state);
@@ -1101,6 +1106,8 @@ static int mipi_csis_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct csi_state *state = mipi_sd_to_csis_state(mipi_sd);

mipi_csis_debugfs_exit(state);
+ v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&state->notifier);
+ v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&state->notifier);
v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&state->mipi_sd);

pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-fwnode.h b/include/media/v4l2-fwnode.h
index f6a7bcd13197..b2b61e6c3769 100644
--- a/include/media/v4l2-fwnode.h
+++ b/include/media/v4l2-fwnode.h
@@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_sensor_common(struct device *dev,
* and parses fwnode endpoints
*
* @sd: pointer to struct &v4l2_subdev
+ * @notifier: the sub-device's notifier.
* @asd_struct_size: size of the driver's async sub-device struct, including
* sizeof(struct v4l2_async_subdev). The &struct
* v4l2_async_subdev shall be the first member of
@@ -387,13 +388,15 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_sensor_common(struct device *dev,
* endpoint. Optional.
*
* This function is just like v4l2_async_register_subdev() with the
- * exception that calling it will also allocate a notifier for the
- * sub-device, parse the sub-device's firmware node endpoints using
- * v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints() or
+ * exception that calling it will also parse the sub-device's firmware
+ * node endpoints using v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints() or
* v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints_by_port(), and
- * registers the sub-device notifier. The sub-device is similarly
+ * registers the sub-device's notifier. The sub-device is similarly
* unregistered by calling v4l2_async_unregister_subdev().
*
+ * The caller must first initialize the notifier with a call to
+ * v4l2_async_notifier_init().
+ *
* While registered, the subdev module is marked as in-use.
*
* An error is returned if the module is no longer loaded on any attempts
@@ -401,6 +404,7 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_sensor_common(struct device *dev,
*/
int
v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
+ struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
size_t asd_struct_size,
unsigned int *ports,
unsigned int num_ports,
--
2.17.1


2020-02-25 15:11:59

by Sakari Ailus

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

Hi Steve,

On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:41:21AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(),
> have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement
> notifier ops (bind, unbind).
>
> The caller is now responsible for first initializing its notifier with a
> call to v4l2_async_notifier_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <[email protected]>

Instead of improving v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(), could you convert
the users (IMX driver in this case) to call the preferred APIs instead? As
the lines below show, v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev() has only two
users left --- the other one of which is the IMX driver. After converting
these two, we could just remove this API.

See e.g. drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c and
drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c for examples.

> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - added the missing calls to unregister/cleanup the new subdev notifiers.
> Reported by Rui Silva.
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/video-mux.c | 8 +++++++-
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c | 11 +----------
> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx6-mipi-csi2.c | 7 ++++++-
> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-media-csi.c | 7 ++++++-
> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c | 9 ++++++++-
> include/media/v4l2-fwnode.h | 12 ++++++++----
> 6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus

2020-02-26 23:53:37

by Steve Longerbeam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

Hi Sakari,

Thanks for the feedback.


On 2/25/20 7:07 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:41:21AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>> Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(),
>> have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement
>> notifier ops (bind, unbind).
>>
>> The caller is now responsible for first initializing its notifier with a
>> call to v4l2_async_notifier_init().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <[email protected]>
> Instead of improving v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(), could you convert
> the users (IMX driver in this case) to call the preferred APIs instead?

I presume you mean using v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev().
Ok, I'll convert to use that API.

Steve

> As
> the lines below show, v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev() has only two
> users left --- the other one of which is the IMX driver. After converting
> these two, we could just remove this API.
>
> See e.g. drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c and
> drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c for examples.
>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> - added the missing calls to unregister/cleanup the new subdev notifiers.
>> Reported by Rui Silva.
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/video-mux.c | 8 +++++++-
>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c | 11 +----------
>> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx6-mipi-csi2.c | 7 ++++++-
>> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-media-csi.c | 7 ++++++-
>> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> include/media/v4l2-fwnode.h | 12 ++++++++----
>> 6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

2020-02-27 07:53:11

by Sakari Ailus

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 03:50:04PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
>
> On 2/25/20 7:07 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:41:21AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> > > Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(),
> > > have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement
> > > notifier ops (bind, unbind).
> > >
> > > The caller is now responsible for first initializing its notifier with a
> > > call to v4l2_async_notifier_init().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <[email protected]>
> > Instead of improving v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(), could you convert
> > the users (IMX driver in this case) to call the preferred APIs instead?
>
> I presume you mean using v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev(). Ok,
> I'll convert to use that API.

Thanks, Steve!

--
Sakari Ailus

2020-02-28 18:17:39

by Steve Longerbeam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

Hi Sakari,

On 2/25/20 7:07 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:41:21AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>> Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(),
>> have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement
>> notifier ops (bind, unbind).
>>
>> The caller is now responsible for first initializing its notifier with a
>> call to v4l2_async_notifier_init().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <[email protected]>
> Instead of improving v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(), could you convert
> the users (IMX driver in this case) to call the preferred APIs instead? As
> the lines below show, v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev() has only two
> users left --- the other one of which is the IMX driver. After converting
> these two, we could just remove this API.
>
> See e.g. drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c and
> drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c for examples.

Shouldn't v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev() check for the
availability of the remote before adding it to the notifier's asd list,
as in:

diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
index 8bde33c21ce4..b48ed68c6c6c 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
@@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev(struct
v4l2_async_notifier *notif,
        int ret;

        remote = fwnode_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint);
-       if (!remote)
+       if (!remote || !fwnode_device_is_available(remote))
                return -ENOTCONN;

        asd->match_type = V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE;


Otherwise we are back to the problem that the notifier will never
complete because the remote's driver is not probed.

Steve

>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> - added the missing calls to unregister/cleanup the new subdev notifiers.
>> Reported by Rui Silva.
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/video-mux.c | 8 +++++++-
>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c | 11 +----------
>> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx6-mipi-csi2.c | 7 ++++++-
>> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-media-csi.c | 7 ++++++-
>> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> include/media/v4l2-fwnode.h | 12 ++++++++----
>> 6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

2020-02-28 22:29:06

by Sakari Ailus

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

Hi Steve,

Btw. I think probably a smaller list of recipients would be just fine on the
next version.

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:16:06AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> On 2/25/20 7:07 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:41:21AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> > > Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(),
> > > have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement
> > > notifier ops (bind, unbind).
> > >
> > > The caller is now responsible for first initializing its notifier with a
> > > call to v4l2_async_notifier_init().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <[email protected]>
> > Instead of improving v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(), could you convert
> > the users (IMX driver in this case) to call the preferred APIs instead? As
> > the lines below show, v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev() has only two
> > users left --- the other one of which is the IMX driver. After converting
> > these two, we could just remove this API.
> >
> > See e.g. drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c and
> > drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c for examples.
>
> Shouldn't v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev() check for the
> availability of the remote before adding it to the notifier's asd list, as
> in:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> index 8bde33c21ce4..b48ed68c6c6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev(struct
> v4l2_async_notifier *notif,
> ??????? int ret;
>
> ??????? remote = fwnode_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint);
> -?????? if (!remote)
> +?????? if (!remote || !fwnode_device_is_available(remote))
> ??????????????? return -ENOTCONN;
>
> ??????? asd->match_type = V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE;
>
>
> Otherwise we are back to the problem that the notifier will never complete
> because the remote's driver is not probed.

fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() only gives you endpoints that belong to an
enabled device (unless requested otherwise). So the there's need to check
the same in v4l2-fwnode.c.

--
Regards,

Sakari Ailus
[email protected]