Add DT binding documentation for the Rockchip RK3588 EVB1,
Radxa Rock 5 Model A and B.
Co-Developed-by: Christopher Obbard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
index c6c69a4e3777..49d442afe67f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
@@ -620,6 +620,16 @@ properties:
- const: radxa,rock3a
- const: rockchip,rk3568
+ - description: Radxa Rock 5 Model A
+ items:
+ - const: radxa,rock-5a
+ - const: rockchip,rk3588s
+
+ - description: Radxa Rock 5 Model B
+ items:
+ - const: radxa,rock-5b
+ - const: rockchip,rk3588
+
- description: Rikomagic MK808 v1
items:
- const: rikomagic,mk808
@@ -704,6 +714,11 @@ properties:
- const: rockchip,rk3399-sapphire-excavator
- const: rockchip,rk3399
+ - description: Rockchip RK3588 Evaluation board
+ items:
+ - const: rockchip,rk3588-evb1-v10
+ - const: rockchip,rk3588
+
- description: Rockchip RV1108 Evaluation board
items:
- const: rockchip,rv1108-evb
--
2.39.0
On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 19:22 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Add DT binding documentation for the Rockchip RK3588 EVB1,
> Radxa Rock 5 Model A and B.
>
> Co-Developed-by: Christopher Obbard <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 15
> +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> index c6c69a4e3777..49d442afe67f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> @@ -620,6 +620,16 @@ properties:
> - const: radxa,rock3a
> - const: rockchip,rk3568
>
> + - description: Radxa Rock 5 Model A
> + items:
> + - const: radxa,rock-5a
> + - const: rockchip,rk3588s
> +
> + - description: Radxa Rock 5 Model B
Hi Sebastian,
To better match other boards from this vendor (e.g. RADXA ROCK 4)
would it be best to capitalise this (and obviously the model field in
the respective DTS patches) the same?
So it would become "Radxa ROCK 5A" and "Radxa ROCK 5B".
It's also capitalised this way on the documentation website [1].
(I think the vendor has specifically dropped the Pi reference from
these boards, but I don't know why)
Thanks!
Chris
[1]: https://wiki.radxa.com/Rock5/5B
> + items:
> + - const: radxa,rock-5b
> + - const: rockchip,rk3588
> +
> - description: Rikomagic MK808 v1
> items:
> - const: rikomagic,mk808
> @@ -704,6 +714,11 @@ properties:
> - const: rockchip,rk3399-sapphire-excavator
> - const: rockchip,rk3399
>
> + - description: Rockchip RK3588 Evaluation board
> + items:
> + - const: rockchip,rk3588-evb1-v10
> + - const: rockchip,rk3588
> +
> - description: Rockchip RV1108 Evaluation board
> items:
> - const: rockchip,rv1108-evb
> --
> 2.39.0
>
>
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 07:20:19PM +0000, Christopher Obbard wrote:
> > +????? - description: Radxa Rock 5 Model A
> > +??????? items:
> > +????????? - const: radxa,rock-5a
> > +????????? - const: rockchip,rk3588s
> > +
> > +????? - description: Radxa Rock 5 Model B
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> To better match other boards from this vendor (e.g. RADXA ROCK 4)
>
> would it be best to capitalise this (and obviously the model field in
> the respective DTS patches) the same?
>
> So it would become "Radxa ROCK 5A" and "Radxa ROCK 5B".
>
> It's also capitalised this way on the documentation website [1].
>
> (I think the vendor has specifically dropped the Pi reference from
> these boards, but I don't know why)
>
> Thanks!
> Chris
>
> [1]: https://wiki.radxa.com/Rock5/5B
The current format has been requested by Radxa:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Greetings,
-- Sebastian
>
>
Hi Sebastian,
> > To better match other boards from this vendor (e.g. RADXA ROCK 4)
> >
> > would it be best to capitalise this (and obviously the model field
> > in
> > the respective DTS patches) the same?
> >
> > So it would become "Radxa ROCK 5A" and "Radxa ROCK 5B".
> >
> > It's also capitalised this way on the documentation website [1].
> >
> > (I think the vendor has specifically dropped the Pi reference from
> > these boards, but I don't know why)
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Chris
> >
> > [1]: https://wiki.radxa.com/Rock5/5B
>
> The current format has been requested by Radxa:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>
The comment there suggests to use "Radxa ROCK 5 Model A" and "Radxa
ROCK 5 Model B", so can we make the following changes before the next
revision, to align on the model names?
PS. I think "board" is a terrible suffix, it's almost like when people
say "PCB Board". But maybe I am missing some historical context here ?
- Patch 4: "description: Radxa Rock 5 Model A" > "description: Radxa
ROCK 5 Model A"
- Patch 4: "description: Radxa Rock 5 Model B" > "description: Radxa
ROCK 5 Model B"
- Patch 6: "Radxa Rock 5A Board" > "Radxa ROCK 5 Model A"
- Patch 7: "Radxa Rock 5B Board" > "Radxa ROCK 5 Model B"
Thanks!
Chris