Xattrs, extents, data inline are _placed after_, not _followed by_ the
corresponding inode. This patch fixes it.
Fixes: fdb0536469cb ("staging: erofs: add document")
Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst
index f200d7874495..57c6ae23b3fc 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ may not. All metadatas can be now observed in two different spaces (views):
| |
|__________________| 64 bytes
- Xattrs, extents, data inline are followed by the corresponding inode with
+ Xattrs, extents, data inline are placed after the corresponding inode with
proper alignment, and they could be optional for different data mappings.
_currently_ total 5 data layouts are supported:
--
2.34.1
On 10/10/23 7:39 PM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> Xattrs, extents, data inline are _placed after_, not _followed by_ the
> corresponding inode. This patch fixes it.
>
> Fixes: fdb0536469cb ("staging: erofs: add document")
> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst
> index f200d7874495..57c6ae23b3fc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ may not. All metadatas can be now observed in two different spaces (views):
> | |
> |__________________| 64 bytes
>
> - Xattrs, extents, data inline are followed by the corresponding inode with
> + Xattrs, extents, data inline are placed after the corresponding inode with
> proper alignment, and they could be optional for different data mappings.
> _currently_ total 5 data layouts are supported:
>
Thanks for catching it!
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <[email protected]>
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
Hi Tiwei,
On 2023/10/10 19:39, Tiwei Bie via Linux-erofs wrote:
> Xattrs, extents, data inline are _placed after_, not _followed by_ the
> corresponding inode. This patch fixes it
Thanks for the patch and sorry about my terrible English...
>
> Fixes: fdb0536469cb ("staging: erofs: add document")
I'm not sure if it's necessary to tag document fixes anyway
since docs.kernel.org already uses the latest version and
`.rst` format is adapted much later..
I will drop this tag for the next merge window if not urgent.
> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst
> index f200d7874495..57c6ae23b3fc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/erofs.rst
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ may not. All metadatas can be now observed in two different spaces (views):
> | |
> |__________________| 64 bytes
>
> - Xattrs, extents, data inline are followed by the corresponding inode with
> + Xattrs, extents, data inline are placed after the corresponding inode with
> proper alignment, and they could be optional for different data mappings.
> _currently_ total 5 data layouts are supported:
>
On 10/10/23 9:06 PM, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> Fixes: fdb0536469cb ("staging: erofs: add document")
>
> I'm not sure if it's necessary to tag document fixes anyway
> since docs.kernel.org already uses the latest version and
> `.rst` format is adapted much later..
>
> I will drop this tag for the next merge window if not urgent.
Thanks! This patch is not urgent. :)
Regards,
Tiwei
On 2023/10/10 21:06, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <[email protected]>
Looks fine to me for the version in dev-test branch.
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Hi Chao,
On 2023/10/12 09:10, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/10/10 21:06, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <[email protected]>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <[email protected]>
>
> Looks fine to me for the version in dev-test branch.
>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Yeah, thanks! I will add the tag when applying to -next.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
> Thanks,