2019-01-23 07:50:25

by Gustavo A. R. Silva

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net-next] intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c:636:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6710:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c:237:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c | 3 ++-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
index 96d849460d9b..774e31405ba0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
@@ -235,9 +235,10 @@ static int i40e_run_xdp_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
break;
default:
bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act);
+ /* fall through */
case XDP_ABORTED:
trace_xdp_exception(rx_ring->netdev, xdp_prog, act);
- /* fallthrough -- handle aborts by dropping packet */
+ /* fall through - handle aborts by dropping packet */
case XDP_DROP:
result = I40E_XDP_CONSUMED;
break;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c
index bafdcf70a353..3ec2ce0725d5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
dev_spec->sgmii_active = true;
break;
}
- /* fall through for I2C based SGMII */
+ /* fall through - for I2C based SGMII */
case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_PCIE_SERDES:
/* read media type from SFP EEPROM */
ret_val = igb_set_sfp_media_type_82575(hw);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index dfa357b1a9d6..2c88e47574a7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -6713,7 +6713,7 @@ static int __igb_notify_dca(struct device *dev, void *data)
igb_setup_dca(adapter);
break;
}
- /* Fall Through since DCA is disabled. */
+ /* Fall Through - since DCA is disabled. */
case DCA_PROVIDER_REMOVE:
if (adapter->flags & IGB_FLAG_DCA_ENABLED) {
/* without this a class_device is left
--
2.20.1



2019-01-23 17:05:52

by Jeff Kirsher

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 01:48 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c:636:6: warning: this
> statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6710:6: warning: this
> statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c:237:3: warning: this
> statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

NAK on the igb changes. There is already a "fall through" code comment
which is fine, adding a hyphen does not make the comment any more
readable.

The i40e changes are acceptable, if you want to re-submit with only
those changes.


Attachments:
signature.asc (849.00 B)
This is a digitally signed message part

2019-01-23 17:14:12

by Gustavo A. R. Silva

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

Hi Jeffrey,

On 1/23/19 11:04 AM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 01:48 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>>
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c:636:6: warning: this
>> statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6710:6: warning: this
>> statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c:237:3: warning: this
>> statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> NAK on the igb changes. There is already a "fall through" code comment
> which is fine, adding a hyphen does not make the comment any more
> readable.
>

Those comments are not fine. They trigger the warnings I mention in the
commit log. With this patch such warnings are fixed.

Notice that warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

Thanks
--
Gustavo

2019-01-23 17:44:40

by Jeff Kirsher

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 11:11 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Jeffrey,
>
> On 1/23/19 11:04 AM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 01:48 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> > > cases
> > > where we are expecting to fall through.
> > >
> > > This patch fixes the following warnings:
> > >
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c:636:6: warning: this
> > > statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6710:6: warning: this
> > > statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c:237:3: warning: this
> > > statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> > >
> > > Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> > >
> > > This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
> > > -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c | 3 ++-
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > NAK on the igb changes. There is already a "fall through" code
> > comment
> > which is fine, adding a hyphen does not make the comment any more
> > readable.
> >
>
> Those comments are not fine. They trigger the warnings I mention in
> the
> commit log. With this patch such warnings are fixed.
>
> Notice that warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

This is a "false positive" based on the compiler option definition:

-Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 case sensitively matches a wide range of
regular expressions, listed in the GCC manual. E.g., all of these are
accepted:
/* Falls through. */
/* fall-thru */
/* Else falls through. */
/* FALLTHRU */
/* … falls through … */
etc.

You should be looking to fix the problem with the compiler option,
which is reporting "acceptable" code comments.


Attachments:
signature.asc (849.00 B)
This is a digitally signed message part