2024-04-26 06:36:42

by Yuan, Perry

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v8 6/6] cpufreq: amd-pstate-ut: support new cpb boost control interface

As the new CPB boost control is enabled, pstate unit test needs to remove
legacy `boost_supported` check and start to use new CPB boost control
interface `amd_pstate_global_params.cpb_boost`.

Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Huang Rui <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
index f04ae67dda37..b3601b0e6dd3 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
goto skip_test;
}

- if (cpudata->boost_supported) {
+ if (amd_pstate_global_params.cpb_boost) {
if ((policy->max == cpudata->max_freq) ||
(policy->max == cpudata->nominal_freq))
amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
--
2.34.1



2024-04-26 14:13:38

by Mario Limonciello

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/6] cpufreq: amd-pstate-ut: support new cpb boost control interface

On 4/26/2024 01:34, Perry Yuan wrote:
> As the new CPB boost control is enabled, pstate unit test needs to remove
> legacy `boost_supported` check and start to use new CPB boost control
> interface `amd_pstate_global_params.cpb_boost`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Huang Rui <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> index f04ae67dda37..b3601b0e6dd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
> goto skip_test;
> }
>
> - if (cpudata->boost_supported) {
> + if (amd_pstate_global_params.cpb_boost) {

In order to keep unit tests working across a bisect and with how small
this patch is I think it's better to fold this into patch 3.

> if ((policy->max == cpudata->max_freq) ||
> (policy->max == cpudata->nominal_freq))
> amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;