2020-05-20 09:05:21

by Dinghao Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: fix runtime pm imbalance on error

pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.

Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
index ae30a2fd3716..a69f9e49dcb5 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
@@ -1651,8 +1651,8 @@ static int tegra_pcie_config_rp(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie)
fail_host_init:
tegra_pcie_deinit_controller(pcie);
fail_pinctrl:
- pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
fail_pm_get_sync:
+ pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
pm_runtime_disable(dev);
return ret;
}
--
2.17.1


2020-05-20 10:01:13

by Thierry Reding

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: fix runtime pm imbalance on error

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:52:23PM +0800, Dinghao Liu wrote:
> pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
> it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on

s/even it/even when it/

Might also be a good idea to use a different subject prefix because I
was almost not going to look at the other patch, taking this to be a
replacement for it.

Although, looking at the log we have used this same prefix for both
drivers in the past...

> the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> index ae30a2fd3716..a69f9e49dcb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> @@ -1651,8 +1651,8 @@ static int tegra_pcie_config_rp(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie)
> fail_host_init:
> tegra_pcie_deinit_controller(pcie);
> fail_pinctrl:
> - pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> fail_pm_get_sync:

Either of those two labels is now no longer needed. Of course it'll now
be odd to jump to fail_pm_get_sync on pinctrl_pm_select_default_state()
failure, but that's one of the reasons why label should have names
describing what they do rather than describe the failure location. I
guess we can live with that for now. I'll make a note to send a cleanup
patch for that later on.

With the fixup in the commit message and either of the labels removed:

Acked-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.65 kB)
signature.asc (849.00 B)
Download all attachments

2020-05-20 16:39:31

by Bjorn Helgaas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: fix runtime pm imbalance on error

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:59:08AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:52:23PM +0800, Dinghao Liu wrote:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
> > it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
>
> s/even it/even when it/
>
> Might also be a good idea to use a different subject prefix because I
> was almost not going to look at the other patch, taking this to be a
> replacement for it.

Amen. This would be a good change to start using "PCI: tegra194" or
something for pcie-tegra194.c. Or will there be tegra195, tegra 196,
etc added to this driver?

Also, please capitalize the first word and "PM" in the subjects:

PCI: tegra194: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error

Bjorn

2020-05-20 18:11:07

by Vidya Sagar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: fix runtime pm imbalance on error

Thanks for pushing a patch to fix it. I've been under the wrong
assumption that a failing pm_runtime_get_sync() wouldn't increment the
usage counter.
With Thierry's and Bjorn's comments addressed

Acked-by: Vidya Sagar <[email protected]>

On 20-May-20 10:07 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:59:08AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:52:23PM +0800, Dinghao Liu wrote:
>>> pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
>>> it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
>>
>> s/even it/even when it/
>>
>> Might also be a good idea to use a different subject prefix because I
>> was almost not going to look at the other patch, taking this to be a
>> replacement for it.
>
> Amen. This would be a good change to start using "PCI: tegra194" or
> something for pcie-tegra194.c. Or will there be tegra195, tegra 196,
> etc added to this driver?
>
> Also, please capitalize the first word and "PM" in the subjects:
>
> PCI: tegra194: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error
>
> Bjorn
>

2020-05-21 03:02:29

by Dinghao Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: fix runtime pm imbalance on error

Thank you for your advice. I think tegra194 is a good choice and
I will use it in the next edition of patch.

&quot;Bjorn Helgaas&quot; &lt;[email protected]&gt;写道:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:59:08AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:52:23PM +0800, Dinghao Liu wrote:
> > > pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
> > > it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
> >
> > s/even it/even when it/
> >
> > Might also be a good idea to use a different subject prefix because I
> > was almost not going to look at the other patch, taking this to be a
> > replacement for it.
>
> Amen. This would be a good change to start using "PCI: tegra194" or
> something for pcie-tegra194.c. Or will there be tegra195, tegra 196,
> etc added to this driver?
>
> Also, please capitalize the first word and "PM" in the subjects:
>
> PCI: tegra194: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error
>
> Bjorn

2020-05-21 03:10:32

by Dinghao Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: fix runtime pm imbalance on error

Thank you for your advice. I will fix these problems in the next edition of patch.

&quot;Thierry Reding&quot; &lt;[email protected]&gt;写道:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:52:23PM +0800, Dinghao Liu wrote:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
> > it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
>
> s/even it/even when it/
>
> Might also be a good idea to use a different subject prefix because I
> was almost not going to look at the other patch, taking this to be a
> replacement for it.
>
> Although, looking at the log we have used this same prefix for both
> drivers in the past...
>
> > the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > index ae30a2fd3716..a69f9e49dcb5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > @@ -1651,8 +1651,8 @@ static int tegra_pcie_config_rp(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie)
> > fail_host_init:
> > tegra_pcie_deinit_controller(pcie);
> > fail_pinctrl:
> > - pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> > fail_pm_get_sync:
>
> Either of those two labels is now no longer needed. Of course it'll now
> be odd to jump to fail_pm_get_sync on pinctrl_pm_select_default_state()
> failure, but that's one of the reasons why label should have names
> describing what they do rather than describe the failure location. I
> guess we can live with that for now. I'll make a note to send a cleanup
> patch for that later on.
>
> With the fixup in the commit message and either of the labels removed:
>
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>

2020-05-29 10:27:52

by Lorenzo Pieralisi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: fix runtime pm imbalance on error

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:39:08PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> Thanks for pushing a patch to fix it. I've been under the wrong assumption
> that a failing pm_runtime_get_sync() wouldn't increment the usage counter.
> With Thierry's and Bjorn's comments addressed
>
> Acked-by: Vidya Sagar <[email protected]>

Thierry, Vidya,

are your ACKs applying also to:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11562109/

Dinghao did not carry them over and I could not understand from this
thread if your ACKs apply to both tegra and tegra194.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> On 20-May-20 10:07 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:59:08AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:52:23PM +0800, Dinghao Liu wrote:
> > > > pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
> > > > it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
> > >
> > > s/even it/even when it/
> > >
> > > Might also be a good idea to use a different subject prefix because I
> > > was almost not going to look at the other patch, taking this to be a
> > > replacement for it.
> >
> > Amen. This would be a good change to start using "PCI: tegra194" or
> > something for pcie-tegra194.c. Or will there be tegra195, tegra 196,
> > etc added to this driver?
> >
> > Also, please capitalize the first word and "PM" in the subjects:
> >
> > PCI: tegra194: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error
> >
> > Bjorn
> >

2020-05-29 11:00:54

by Vidya Sagar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: fix runtime pm imbalance on error



On 29-May-20 3:53 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:39:08PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>> Thanks for pushing a patch to fix it. I've been under the wrong assumption
>> that a failing pm_runtime_get_sync() wouldn't increment the usage counter.
>> With Thierry's and Bjorn's comments addressed
>>
>> Acked-by: Vidya Sagar <[email protected]>
>
> Thierry, Vidya,
>
> are your ACKs applying also to:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11562109/
I just took a look at this change and it looks good to me.
So, I'm fine with extending my 'Acked-by' to this patch as well.

Thanks,
Vidya Sagar
>
> Dinghao did not carry them over and I could not understand from this
> thread if your ACKs apply to both tegra and tegra194.
>
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
>
>> On 20-May-20 10:07 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:59:08AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:52:23PM +0800, Dinghao Liu wrote:
>>>>> pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
>>>>> it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
>>>>
>>>> s/even it/even when it/
>>>>
>>>> Might also be a good idea to use a different subject prefix because I
>>>> was almost not going to look at the other patch, taking this to be a
>>>> replacement for it.
>>>
>>> Amen. This would be a good change to start using "PCI: tegra194" or
>>> something for pcie-tegra194.c. Or will there be tegra195, tegra 196,
>>> etc added to this driver?
>>>
>>> Also, please capitalize the first word and "PM" in the subjects:
>>>
>>> PCI: tegra194: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error
>>>
>>> Bjorn
>>>