2024-03-22 08:34:42

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/14] transfer page to folio in KSM

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

This is the first part of page to folio transfer on KSM. Since only
single page could be stored in KSM, we could safely transfer stable tree
pages to folios.
This patchset could reduce ksm.o 81kbytes from 2570760 bytes on latest
akpm/mm-stable branch with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM enabled.

Alex Shi (tencent) (14):
mm/ksm: add ksm_get_folio
mm/ksm: use folio in remove_rmap_item_from_tree
mm/ksm: add folio_set_stable_node
mm/ksm: use folio in remove_stable_node
mm/ksm: use folio in stable_node_dup
mm/ksm: use ksm_get_folio in scan_get_next_rmap_item
mm/ksm: use folio in write_protect_page
mm/ksm: Convert chain series funcs to use folio
mm/ksm: Convert stable_tree_insert to use folio
mm/ksm: Convert stable_tree_search to use folio
mm/ksm: return folio for chain series funcs
mm/ksm: remove get_ksm_page and related info
mm/ksm: use folio_set_stable_node in try_to_merge_one_page
mm/ksm: remove set_page_stable_node

mm/ksm.c | 259 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
mm/migrate.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)

--
2.43.0



2024-03-22 08:34:54

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/14] mm/ksm: add ksm_get_folio

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

The ksm only contains single pages, so we could add a new func
ksm_get_folio for get_ksm_page to use folio instead of pages to save a
couple of compound_head calls.

After all caller replaced, get_ksm_page will be removed.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index 8c001819cf10..ac080235b002 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -915,10 +915,10 @@ enum get_ksm_page_flags {
* a page to put something that might look like our key in page->mapping.
* is on its way to being freed; but it is an anomaly to bear in mind.
*/
-static struct page *get_ksm_page(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node,
+static struct folio *ksm_get_folio(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node,
enum get_ksm_page_flags flags)
{
- struct page *page;
+ struct folio *folio;
void *expected_mapping;
unsigned long kpfn;

@@ -926,8 +926,8 @@ static struct page *get_ksm_page(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node,
PAGE_MAPPING_KSM);
again:
kpfn = READ_ONCE(stable_node->kpfn); /* Address dependency. */
- page = pfn_to_page(kpfn);
- if (READ_ONCE(page->mapping) != expected_mapping)
+ folio = pfn_folio(kpfn);
+ if (READ_ONCE(folio->mapping) != expected_mapping)
goto stale;

/*
@@ -940,41 +940,41 @@ static struct page *get_ksm_page(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node,
* in folio_migrate_mapping(), it might still be our page,
* in which case it's essential to keep the node.
*/
- while (!get_page_unless_zero(page)) {
+ while (!folio_try_get(folio)) {
/*
* Another check for page->mapping != expected_mapping would
* work here too. We have chosen the !PageSwapCache test to
* optimize the common case, when the page is or is about to
* be freed: PageSwapCache is cleared (under spin_lock_irq)
* in the ref_freeze section of __remove_mapping(); but Anon
- * page->mapping reset to NULL later, in free_pages_prepare().
+ * folio->mapping reset to NULL later, in free_pages_prepare().
*/
- if (!PageSwapCache(page))
+ if (!folio_test_swapcache(folio))
goto stale;
cpu_relax();
}

- if (READ_ONCE(page->mapping) != expected_mapping) {
- put_page(page);
+ if (READ_ONCE(folio->mapping) != expected_mapping) {
+ folio_put(folio);
goto stale;
}

if (flags == GET_KSM_PAGE_TRYLOCK) {
- if (!trylock_page(page)) {
- put_page(page);
+ if (!folio_trylock(folio)) {
+ folio_put(folio);
return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
}
} else if (flags == GET_KSM_PAGE_LOCK)
- lock_page(page);
+ folio_lock(folio);

if (flags != GET_KSM_PAGE_NOLOCK) {
- if (READ_ONCE(page->mapping) != expected_mapping) {
- unlock_page(page);
- put_page(page);
+ if (READ_ONCE(folio->mapping) != expected_mapping) {
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ folio_put(folio);
goto stale;
}
}
- return page;
+ return folio;

stale:
/*
@@ -990,6 +990,14 @@ static struct page *get_ksm_page(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node,
return NULL;
}

+static struct page *get_ksm_page(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node,
+ enum get_ksm_page_flags flags)
+{
+ struct folio *folio = ksm_get_folio(stable_node, flags);
+
+ return &folio->page;
+}
+
/*
* Removing rmap_item from stable or unstable tree.
* This function will clean the information from the stable/unstable tree.
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:35:19

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/14] mm/ksm: add folio_set_stable_node

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

Turn set_page_stable_node() into a wrapper folio_set_stable_node, and then
use it to replace the former. we will merge them together after all
place converted to folio.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index ea3dabf71e47..c9b7c5701f22 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1109,6 +1109,12 @@ static inline void set_page_stable_node(struct page *page,
page->mapping = (void *)((unsigned long)stable_node | PAGE_MAPPING_KSM);
}

+static inline void folio_set_stable_node(struct folio *folio,
+ struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node)
+{
+ set_page_stable_node(&folio->page, stable_node);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
/*
* Only called through the sysfs control interface:
@@ -3241,7 +3247,7 @@ void folio_migrate_ksm(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio)
* has gone stale (or that folio_test_swapcache has been cleared).
*/
smp_wmb();
- set_page_stable_node(&folio->page, NULL);
+ folio_set_stable_node(folio, NULL);
}
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MIGRATION */
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:35:32

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/14] mm/ksm: use folio in remove_stable_node

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

pages in stable tree are all single normal page, so uses ksm_get_folio()
and folio_set_stable_node(), also saves 3 calls to compound_head().

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index c9b7c5701f22..b6ee2bc7646f 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1121,11 +1121,11 @@ static inline void folio_set_stable_node(struct folio *folio,
*/
static int remove_stable_node(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node)
{
- struct page *page;
+ struct folio *folio;
int err;

- page = get_ksm_page(stable_node, GET_KSM_PAGE_LOCK);
- if (!page) {
+ folio = ksm_get_folio(stable_node, GET_KSM_PAGE_LOCK);
+ if (!folio) {
/*
* get_ksm_page did remove_node_from_stable_tree itself.
*/
@@ -1138,22 +1138,22 @@ static int remove_stable_node(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node)
* merge_across_nodes/max_page_sharing be switched.
*/
err = -EBUSY;
- if (!page_mapped(page)) {
+ if (!folio_mapped(folio)) {
/*
* The stable node did not yet appear stale to get_ksm_page(),
- * since that allows for an unmapped ksm page to be recognized
+ * since that allows for an unmapped ksm folio to be recognized
* right up until it is freed; but the node is safe to remove.
- * This page might be in an LRU cache waiting to be freed,
- * or it might be PageSwapCache (perhaps under writeback),
+ * This folio might be in an LRU cache waiting to be freed,
+ * or it might be in the swapcache (perhaps under writeback),
* or it might have been removed from swapcache a moment ago.
*/
- set_page_stable_node(page, NULL);
+ folio_set_stable_node(folio, NULL);
remove_node_from_stable_tree(stable_node);
err = 0;
}

- unlock_page(page);
- put_page(page);
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ folio_put(folio);
return err;
}

--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:35:44

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/14] mm/ksm: use folio in stable_node_dup

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

Use ksm_get_folio() and save 2 compound_head calls.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index b6ee2bc7646f..a1e382ecd501 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1631,14 +1631,14 @@ bool is_page_sharing_candidate(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node)
return __is_page_sharing_candidate(stable_node, 0);
}

-static struct page *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
- struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
- struct rb_root *root,
- bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
+static void *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
+ struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
+ struct rb_root *root,
+ bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
{
struct ksm_stable_node *dup, *found = NULL, *stable_node = *_stable_node;
struct hlist_node *hlist_safe;
- struct page *_tree_page, *tree_page = NULL;
+ struct folio *folio, *tree_folio = NULL;
int nr = 0;
int found_rmap_hlist_len;

@@ -1663,18 +1663,18 @@ static struct page *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
* stable_node parameter itself will be freed from
* under us if it returns NULL.
*/
- _tree_page = get_ksm_page(dup, GET_KSM_PAGE_NOLOCK);
- if (!_tree_page)
+ folio = ksm_get_folio(dup, GET_KSM_PAGE_NOLOCK);
+ if (!folio)
continue;
nr += 1;
if (is_page_sharing_candidate(dup)) {
if (!found ||
dup->rmap_hlist_len > found_rmap_hlist_len) {
if (found)
- put_page(tree_page);
+ folio_put(tree_folio);
found = dup;
found_rmap_hlist_len = found->rmap_hlist_len;
- tree_page = _tree_page;
+ tree_folio = folio;

/* skip put_page for found dup */
if (!prune_stale_stable_nodes)
@@ -1682,7 +1682,7 @@ static struct page *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
continue;
}
}
- put_page(_tree_page);
+ folio_put(folio);
}

if (found) {
@@ -1747,7 +1747,7 @@ static struct page *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
}

*_stable_node_dup = found;
- return tree_page;
+ return tree_folio;
}

static struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node_dup_any(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node,
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:35:57

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/14] mm/ksm: use ksm_get_folio in scan_get_next_rmap_item

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

Save a compound calls.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index a1e382ecd501..cd607b942c26 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -2611,14 +2611,14 @@ static struct ksm_rmap_item *scan_get_next_rmap_item(struct page **page)
*/
if (!ksm_merge_across_nodes) {
struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node, *next;
- struct page *page;
+ struct folio *folio;

list_for_each_entry_safe(stable_node, next,
&migrate_nodes, list) {
- page = get_ksm_page(stable_node,
- GET_KSM_PAGE_NOLOCK);
- if (page)
- put_page(page);
+ folio = ksm_get_folio(stable_node,
+ GET_KSM_PAGE_NOLOCK);
+ if (folio)
+ folio_put(folio);
cond_resched();
}
}
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:36:10

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/14] mm/ksm: use folio in remove_rmap_item_from_tree

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

To save 2 compound_head calls.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index ac080235b002..ea3dabf71e47 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1006,16 +1006,16 @@ static void remove_rmap_item_from_tree(struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_item)
{
if (rmap_item->address & STABLE_FLAG) {
struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node;
- struct page *page;
+ struct folio *folio;

stable_node = rmap_item->head;
- page = get_ksm_page(stable_node, GET_KSM_PAGE_LOCK);
- if (!page)
+ folio = ksm_get_folio(stable_node, GET_KSM_PAGE_LOCK);
+ if (!folio)
goto out;

hlist_del(&rmap_item->hlist);
- unlock_page(page);
- put_page(page);
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ folio_put(folio);

if (!hlist_empty(&stable_node->hlist))
ksm_pages_sharing--;
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:36:27

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/14] mm/ksm: Convert chain series funcs to use folio

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

In ksm stable tree all page are single, let's convert them to use folios.
Change return type to void is ugly, but for a series funcs, it's still a
bit simpler than adding new funcs. And they will be changed to 'struct
folio' soon.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index f41491cf13c6..30570e1f68ec 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1777,7 +1777,7 @@ static struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node_dup_any(struct ksm_stable_node *stabl
* function and will be overwritten in all cases, the caller doesn't
* need to initialize it.
*/
-static struct page *__stable_node_chain(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
+static void *__stable_node_chain(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
struct rb_root *root,
bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
@@ -1799,24 +1799,24 @@ static struct page *__stable_node_chain(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_du
prune_stale_stable_nodes);
}

-static __always_inline struct page *chain_prune(struct ksm_stable_node **s_n_d,
+static __always_inline void *chain_prune(struct ksm_stable_node **s_n_d,
struct ksm_stable_node **s_n,
struct rb_root *root)
{
return __stable_node_chain(s_n_d, s_n, root, true);
}

-static __always_inline struct page *chain(struct ksm_stable_node **s_n_d,
+static __always_inline void *chain(struct ksm_stable_node **s_n_d,
struct ksm_stable_node *s_n,
struct rb_root *root)
{
struct ksm_stable_node *old_stable_node = s_n;
- struct page *tree_page;
+ struct folio *tree_folio;

- tree_page = __stable_node_chain(s_n_d, &s_n, root, false);
+ tree_folio = __stable_node_chain(s_n_d, &s_n, root, false);
/* not pruning dups so s_n cannot have changed */
VM_BUG_ON(s_n != old_stable_node);
- return tree_page;
+ return tree_folio;
}

/*
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:36:52

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/14] mm/ksm: Convert stable_tree_insert to use folio

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

KSM stable tree only store single page, so convert the func users to use
folio and save few compound_head calls.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index 30570e1f68ec..e6837e615ef0 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -2078,7 +2078,7 @@ static struct page *stable_tree_search(struct page *page)
* This function returns the stable tree node just allocated on success,
* NULL otherwise.
*/
-static struct ksm_stable_node *stable_tree_insert(struct page *kpage)
+static struct ksm_stable_node *stable_tree_insert(struct folio *kfolio)
{
int nid;
unsigned long kpfn;
@@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ static struct ksm_stable_node *stable_tree_insert(struct page *kpage)
struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node, *stable_node_dup, *stable_node_any;
bool need_chain = false;

- kpfn = page_to_pfn(kpage);
+ kpfn = folio_pfn(kfolio);
nid = get_kpfn_nid(kpfn);
root = root_stable_tree + nid;
again:
@@ -2096,13 +2096,13 @@ static struct ksm_stable_node *stable_tree_insert(struct page *kpage)
new = &root->rb_node;

while (*new) {
- struct page *tree_page;
+ struct folio *tree_folio;
int ret;

cond_resched();
stable_node = rb_entry(*new, struct ksm_stable_node, node);
stable_node_any = NULL;
- tree_page = chain(&stable_node_dup, stable_node, root);
+ tree_folio = chain(&stable_node_dup, stable_node, root);
if (!stable_node_dup) {
/*
* Either all stable_node dups were full in
@@ -2124,11 +2124,11 @@ static struct ksm_stable_node *stable_tree_insert(struct page *kpage)
* write protected at all times. Any will work
* fine to continue the walk.
*/
- tree_page = get_ksm_page(stable_node_any,
- GET_KSM_PAGE_NOLOCK);
+ tree_folio = ksm_get_folio(stable_node_any,
+ GET_KSM_PAGE_NOLOCK);
}
VM_BUG_ON(!stable_node_dup ^ !!stable_node_any);
- if (!tree_page) {
+ if (!tree_folio) {
/*
* If we walked over a stale stable_node,
* get_ksm_page() will call rb_erase() and it
@@ -2141,8 +2141,8 @@ static struct ksm_stable_node *stable_tree_insert(struct page *kpage)
goto again;
}

- ret = memcmp_pages(kpage, tree_page);
- put_page(tree_page);
+ ret = memcmp_pages(&kfolio->page, &tree_folio->page);
+ folio_put(tree_folio);

parent = *new;
if (ret < 0)
@@ -2161,7 +2161,7 @@ static struct ksm_stable_node *stable_tree_insert(struct page *kpage)

INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&stable_node_dup->hlist);
stable_node_dup->kpfn = kpfn;
- set_page_stable_node(kpage, stable_node_dup);
+ folio_set_stable_node(kfolio, stable_node_dup);
stable_node_dup->rmap_hlist_len = 0;
DO_NUMA(stable_node_dup->nid = nid);
if (!need_chain) {
@@ -2439,7 +2439,7 @@ static void cmp_and_merge_page(struct page *page, struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_ite
* node in the stable tree and add both rmap_items.
*/
lock_page(kpage);
- stable_node = stable_tree_insert(kpage);
+ stable_node = stable_tree_insert(page_folio(kpage));
if (stable_node) {
stable_tree_append(tree_rmap_item, stable_node,
false);
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:36:57

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/14] mm/ksm: Convert stable_tree_search to use folio

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

Although, the func may pass a tail page to check its contents, but only
single page exist in KSM stable tree, so we still can use folio in
stable_tree_search() to save a few compound_head calls.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index e6837e615ef0..0692bede5ca6 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1828,7 +1828,7 @@ static __always_inline void *chain(struct ksm_stable_node **s_n_d,
* This function returns the stable tree node of identical content if found,
* NULL otherwise.
*/
-static struct page *stable_tree_search(struct page *page)
+static void *stable_tree_search(struct page *page)
{
int nid;
struct rb_root *root;
@@ -1836,28 +1836,30 @@ static struct page *stable_tree_search(struct page *page)
struct rb_node *parent;
struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node, *stable_node_dup, *stable_node_any;
struct ksm_stable_node *page_node;
+ struct folio *folio;

- page_node = page_stable_node(page);
+ folio = page_folio(page);
+ page_node = folio_stable_node(folio);
if (page_node && page_node->head != &migrate_nodes) {
/* ksm page forked */
- get_page(page);
- return page;
+ folio_get(folio);
+ return folio;
}

- nid = get_kpfn_nid(page_to_pfn(page));
+ nid = get_kpfn_nid(folio_pfn(folio));
root = root_stable_tree + nid;
again:
new = &root->rb_node;
parent = NULL;

while (*new) {
- struct page *tree_page;
+ struct folio *tree_folio;
int ret;

cond_resched();
stable_node = rb_entry(*new, struct ksm_stable_node, node);
stable_node_any = NULL;
- tree_page = chain_prune(&stable_node_dup, &stable_node, root);
+ tree_folio = chain_prune(&stable_node_dup, &stable_node, root);
/*
* NOTE: stable_node may have been freed by
* chain_prune() if the returned stable_node_dup is
@@ -1891,11 +1893,11 @@ static struct page *stable_tree_search(struct page *page)
* write protected at all times. Any will work
* fine to continue the walk.
*/
- tree_page = get_ksm_page(stable_node_any,
- GET_KSM_PAGE_NOLOCK);
+ tree_folio = ksm_get_folio(stable_node_any,
+ GET_KSM_PAGE_NOLOCK);
}
VM_BUG_ON(!stable_node_dup ^ !!stable_node_any);
- if (!tree_page) {
+ if (!tree_folio) {
/*
* If we walked over a stale stable_node,
* get_ksm_page() will call rb_erase() and it
@@ -1908,8 +1910,8 @@ static struct page *stable_tree_search(struct page *page)
goto again;
}

- ret = memcmp_pages(page, tree_page);
- put_page(tree_page);
+ ret = memcmp_pages(page, &tree_folio->page);
+ folio_put(tree_folio);

parent = *new;
if (ret < 0)
@@ -1952,26 +1954,26 @@ static struct page *stable_tree_search(struct page *page)
* It would be more elegant to return stable_node
* than kpage, but that involves more changes.
*/
- tree_page = get_ksm_page(stable_node_dup,
- GET_KSM_PAGE_TRYLOCK);
+ tree_folio = ksm_get_folio(stable_node_dup,
+ GET_KSM_PAGE_TRYLOCK);

- if (PTR_ERR(tree_page) == -EBUSY)
+ if (PTR_ERR(tree_folio) == -EBUSY)
return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);

- if (unlikely(!tree_page))
+ if (unlikely(!tree_folio))
/*
* The tree may have been rebalanced,
* so re-evaluate parent and new.
*/
goto again;
- unlock_page(tree_page);
+ folio_unlock(tree_folio);

if (get_kpfn_nid(stable_node_dup->kpfn) !=
NUMA(stable_node_dup->nid)) {
- put_page(tree_page);
+ folio_put(tree_folio);
goto replace;
}
- return tree_page;
+ return tree_folio;
}
}

@@ -1984,8 +1986,8 @@ static struct page *stable_tree_search(struct page *page)
rb_insert_color(&page_node->node, root);
out:
if (is_page_sharing_candidate(page_node)) {
- get_page(page);
- return page;
+ folio_get(folio);
+ return folio;
} else
return NULL;

@@ -2010,12 +2012,12 @@ static struct page *stable_tree_search(struct page *page)
&page_node->node,
root);
if (is_page_sharing_candidate(page_node))
- get_page(page);
+ folio_get(folio);
else
- page = NULL;
+ folio = NULL;
} else {
rb_erase(&stable_node_dup->node, root);
- page = NULL;
+ folio = NULL;
}
} else {
VM_BUG_ON(!is_stable_node_chain(stable_node));
@@ -2026,16 +2028,16 @@ static struct page *stable_tree_search(struct page *page)
DO_NUMA(page_node->nid = nid);
stable_node_chain_add_dup(page_node, stable_node);
if (is_page_sharing_candidate(page_node))
- get_page(page);
+ folio_get(folio);
else
- page = NULL;
+ folio = NULL;
} else {
- page = NULL;
+ folio = NULL;
}
}
stable_node_dup->head = &migrate_nodes;
list_add(&stable_node_dup->list, stable_node_dup->head);
- return page;
+ return folio;

chain_append:
/* stable_node_dup could be null if it reached the limit */
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:37:13

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/14] mm/ksm: remove get_ksm_page and related info

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

Now since all caller are changed to ksm_get_folio, let's sync up the
related usages with ksm_get_folio, and remove get_ksm_page.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 34 +++++++++++++---------------------
mm/migrate.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index 0692bede5ca6..afcf26510669 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -890,14 +890,14 @@ static void remove_node_from_stable_tree(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node)
free_stable_node(stable_node);
}

-enum get_ksm_page_flags {
+enum ksm_get_folio_flags {
GET_KSM_PAGE_NOLOCK,
GET_KSM_PAGE_LOCK,
GET_KSM_PAGE_TRYLOCK
};

/*
- * get_ksm_page: checks if the page indicated by the stable node
+ * ksm_get_folio: checks if the page indicated by the stable node
* is still its ksm page, despite having held no reference to it.
* In which case we can trust the content of the page, and it
* returns the gotten page; but if the page has now been zapped,
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ enum get_ksm_page_flags {
* is on its way to being freed; but it is an anomaly to bear in mind.
*/
static struct folio *ksm_get_folio(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node,
- enum get_ksm_page_flags flags)
+ enum ksm_get_folio_flags flags)
{
struct folio *folio;
void *expected_mapping;
@@ -990,14 +990,6 @@ static struct folio *ksm_get_folio(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node,
return NULL;
}

-static struct page *get_ksm_page(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node,
- enum get_ksm_page_flags flags)
-{
- struct folio *folio = ksm_get_folio(stable_node, flags);
-
- return &folio->page;
-}
-
/*
* Removing rmap_item from stable or unstable tree.
* This function will clean the information from the stable/unstable tree.
@@ -1127,7 +1119,7 @@ static int remove_stable_node(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node)
folio = ksm_get_folio(stable_node, GET_KSM_PAGE_LOCK);
if (!folio) {
/*
- * get_ksm_page did remove_node_from_stable_tree itself.
+ * ksm_get_folio did remove_node_from_stable_tree itself.
*/
return 0;
}
@@ -1140,7 +1132,7 @@ static int remove_stable_node(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node)
err = -EBUSY;
if (!folio_mapped(folio)) {
/*
- * The stable node did not yet appear stale to get_ksm_page(),
+ * The stable node did not yet appear stale to ksm_get_folio(),
* since that allows for an unmapped ksm folio to be recognized
* right up until it is freed; but the node is safe to remove.
* This folio might be in an LRU cache waiting to be freed,
@@ -1657,7 +1649,7 @@ static void *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
* We must walk all stable_node_dup to prune the stale
* stable nodes during lookup.
*
- * get_ksm_page can drop the nodes from the
+ * ksm_get_folio can drop the nodes from the
* stable_node->hlist if they point to freed pages
* (that's why we do a _safe walk). The "dup"
* stable_node parameter itself will be freed from
@@ -1764,7 +1756,7 @@ static struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node_dup_any(struct ksm_stable_node *stabl
}

/*
- * Like for get_ksm_page, this function can free the *_stable_node and
+ * Like for ksm_get_folio, this function can free the *_stable_node and
* *_stable_node_dup if the returned tree_page is NULL.
*
* It can also free and overwrite *_stable_node with the found
@@ -1786,7 +1778,7 @@ static void *__stable_node_chain(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
if (!is_stable_node_chain(stable_node)) {
if (is_page_sharing_candidate(stable_node)) {
*_stable_node_dup = stable_node;
- return get_ksm_page(stable_node, GET_KSM_PAGE_NOLOCK);
+ return ksm_get_folio(stable_node, GET_KSM_PAGE_NOLOCK);
}
/*
* _stable_node_dup set to NULL means the stable_node
@@ -1900,7 +1892,7 @@ static void *stable_tree_search(struct page *page)
if (!tree_folio) {
/*
* If we walked over a stale stable_node,
- * get_ksm_page() will call rb_erase() and it
+ * ksm_get_folio() will call rb_erase() and it
* may rebalance the tree from under us. So
* restart the search from scratch. Returning
* NULL would be safe too, but we'd generate
@@ -2133,7 +2125,7 @@ static struct ksm_stable_node *stable_tree_insert(struct folio *kfolio)
if (!tree_folio) {
/*
* If we walked over a stale stable_node,
- * get_ksm_page() will call rb_erase() and it
+ * ksm_get_folio() will call rb_erase() and it
* may rebalance the tree from under us. So
* restart the search from scratch. Returning
* NULL would be safe too, but we'd generate
@@ -3245,7 +3237,7 @@ void folio_migrate_ksm(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio)
/*
* newfolio->mapping was set in advance; now we need smp_wmb()
* to make sure that the new stable_node->kpfn is visible
- * to get_ksm_page() before it can see that folio->mapping
+ * to ksm_get_folio() before it can see that folio->mapping
* has gone stale (or that folio_test_swapcache has been cleared).
*/
smp_wmb();
@@ -3272,7 +3264,7 @@ static bool stable_node_dup_remove_range(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node,
if (stable_node->kpfn >= start_pfn &&
stable_node->kpfn < end_pfn) {
/*
- * Don't get_ksm_page, page has already gone:
+ * Don't ksm_get_folio, page has already gone:
* which is why we keep kpfn instead of page*
*/
remove_node_from_stable_tree(stable_node);
@@ -3360,7 +3352,7 @@ static int ksm_memory_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
* Most of the work is done by page migration; but there might
* be a few stable_nodes left over, still pointing to struct
* pages which have been offlined: prune those from the tree,
- * otherwise get_ksm_page() might later try to access a
+ * otherwise ksm_get_folio() might later try to access a
* non-existent struct page.
*/
ksm_check_stable_tree(mn->start_pfn,
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 73a052a382f1..9f0494fd902c 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio)
folio_migrate_ksm(newfolio, folio);
/*
* Please do not reorder this without considering how mm/ksm.c's
- * get_ksm_page() depends upon ksm_migrate_page() and PageSwapCache().
+ * ksm_get_folio() depends upon ksm_migrate_page() and PageSwapCache().
*/
if (folio_test_swapcache(folio))
folio_clear_swapcache(folio);
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:37:27

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/14] mm/ksm: use folio in write_protect_page

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

Compound page is checked and skipped before write_protect_page() called,
use folio to save a few compound_head checking.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index cd607b942c26..f41491cf13c6 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1289,22 +1289,22 @@ static u32 calc_checksum(struct page *page)
return checksum;
}

-static int write_protect_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
+static int write_protect_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct folio *folio,
pte_t *orig_pte)
{
struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
- DEFINE_PAGE_VMA_WALK(pvmw, page, vma, 0, 0);
+ DEFINE_FOLIO_VMA_WALK(pvmw, folio, vma, 0, 0);
int swapped;
int err = -EFAULT;
struct mmu_notifier_range range;
bool anon_exclusive;
pte_t entry;

- pvmw.address = page_address_in_vma(page, vma);
+ pvmw.address = page_address_in_vma(&folio->page, vma);
if (pvmw.address == -EFAULT)
goto out;

- BUG_ON(PageTransCompound(page));
+ VM_BUG_ON(folio_test_large(folio));

mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, mm, pvmw.address,
pvmw.address + PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -1315,12 +1315,12 @@ static int write_protect_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
if (WARN_ONCE(!pvmw.pte, "Unexpected PMD mapping?"))
goto out_unlock;

- anon_exclusive = PageAnonExclusive(page);
+ anon_exclusive = PageAnonExclusive(&folio->page);
entry = ptep_get(pvmw.pte);
if (pte_write(entry) || pte_dirty(entry) ||
anon_exclusive || mm_tlb_flush_pending(mm)) {
- swapped = PageSwapCache(page);
- flush_cache_page(vma, pvmw.address, page_to_pfn(page));
+ swapped = folio_test_swapcache(folio);
+ flush_cache_page(vma, pvmw.address, folio_pfn(folio));
/*
* Ok this is tricky, when get_user_pages_fast() run it doesn't
* take any lock, therefore the check that we are going to make
@@ -1340,20 +1340,20 @@ static int write_protect_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
* Check that no O_DIRECT or similar I/O is in progress on the
* page
*/
- if (page_mapcount(page) + 1 + swapped != page_count(page)) {
+ if (folio_mapcount(folio) + 1 + swapped != folio_ref_count(folio)) {
set_pte_at(mm, pvmw.address, pvmw.pte, entry);
goto out_unlock;
}

/* See folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte(): clear PTE first. */
if (anon_exclusive &&
- folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte(page_folio(page), page)) {
+ folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte(folio, &folio->page)) {
set_pte_at(mm, pvmw.address, pvmw.pte, entry);
goto out_unlock;
}

if (pte_dirty(entry))
- set_page_dirty(page);
+ folio_mark_dirty(folio);
entry = pte_mkclean(entry);

if (pte_write(entry))
@@ -1519,7 +1519,7 @@ static int try_to_merge_one_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* ptes are necessarily already write-protected. But in either
* case, we need to lock and check page_count is not raised.
*/
- if (write_protect_page(vma, page, &orig_pte) == 0) {
+ if (write_protect_page(vma, page_folio(page), &orig_pte) == 0) {
if (!kpage) {
/*
* While we hold page lock, upgrade page from
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:37:34

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/14] mm/ksm: use folio_set_stable_node in try_to_merge_one_page

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

Only single page could be reached where we set stable node after write
protect, so use folio converted func to replace page's.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index 15a78a9bab59..d7c4cc4a0cc1 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1518,7 +1518,7 @@ static int try_to_merge_one_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* PageAnon+anon_vma to PageKsm+NULL stable_node:
* stable_tree_insert() will update stable_node.
*/
- set_page_stable_node(page, NULL);
+ folio_set_stable_node(page_folio(page), NULL);
mark_page_accessed(page);
/*
* Page reclaim just frees a clean page with no dirty
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:37:47

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 14/14] mm/ksm: remove set_page_stable_node

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

Remove the func since all caller are gone. Also remove the
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() because it's not applicable for a folio.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
To: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index d7c4cc4a0cc1..136909f0c5d5 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1094,17 +1094,10 @@ static inline struct ksm_stable_node *page_stable_node(struct page *page)
return folio_stable_node(page_folio(page));
}

-static inline void set_page_stable_node(struct page *page,
- struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node)
-{
- VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageAnon(page) && PageAnonExclusive(page), page);
- page->mapping = (void *)((unsigned long)stable_node | PAGE_MAPPING_KSM);
-}
-
static inline void folio_set_stable_node(struct folio *folio,
struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node)
{
- set_page_stable_node(&folio->page, stable_node);
+ folio->mapping = (void *)((unsigned long)stable_node | PAGE_MAPPING_KSM);
}

#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 08:38:51

by alexs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 12/14] mm/ksm: return folio for chain series funcs

From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>

Since all caller changed to folios, change their return type to folio
too.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
mm/ksm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index afcf26510669..15a78a9bab59 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1623,10 +1623,10 @@ bool is_page_sharing_candidate(struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node)
return __is_page_sharing_candidate(stable_node, 0);
}

-static void *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
- struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
- struct rb_root *root,
- bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
+static struct folio *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
+ struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
+ struct rb_root *root,
+ bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
{
struct ksm_stable_node *dup, *found = NULL, *stable_node = *_stable_node;
struct hlist_node *hlist_safe;
@@ -1769,10 +1769,10 @@ static struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node_dup_any(struct ksm_stable_node *stabl
* function and will be overwritten in all cases, the caller doesn't
* need to initialize it.
*/
-static void *__stable_node_chain(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
- struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
- struct rb_root *root,
- bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
+static struct folio *__stable_node_chain(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
+ struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
+ struct rb_root *root,
+ bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
{
struct ksm_stable_node *stable_node = *_stable_node;
if (!is_stable_node_chain(stable_node)) {
@@ -1791,16 +1791,16 @@ static void *__stable_node_chain(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
prune_stale_stable_nodes);
}

-static __always_inline void *chain_prune(struct ksm_stable_node **s_n_d,
- struct ksm_stable_node **s_n,
- struct rb_root *root)
+static __always_inline struct folio *chain_prune(struct ksm_stable_node **s_n_d,
+ struct ksm_stable_node **s_n,
+ struct rb_root *root)
{
return __stable_node_chain(s_n_d, s_n, root, true);
}

-static __always_inline void *chain(struct ksm_stable_node **s_n_d,
- struct ksm_stable_node *s_n,
- struct rb_root *root)
+static __always_inline struct folio *chain(struct ksm_stable_node **s_n_d,
+ struct ksm_stable_node *s_n,
+ struct rb_root *root)
{
struct ksm_stable_node *old_stable_node = s_n;
struct folio *tree_folio;
--
2.43.0


2024-03-22 17:11:54

by David Hildenbrand

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] mm/ksm: use folio in stable_node_dup

On 22.03.24 16:57, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 04:36:52PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
>> -static struct page *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
>> - struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
>> - struct rb_root *root,
>> - bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
>> +static void *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
>> + struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
>> + struct rb_root *root,
>> + bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
>
> Do we really have to go through this void * stage?
>
> Also, please stop reindenting the arguments. I tend to just switch to
> two tabs, but lining them up with the opening bracket leads to extra
> churn. Either leave them alone for the entire series or switch _once_.

I wish the coding style would at least recommend something -- I know,
different subsystems/files have their own rules. Nowadays, I prefer 2
tabs as well.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb


2024-03-22 19:02:50

by Matthew Wilcox

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] mm/ksm: use folio in stable_node_dup

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 04:36:52PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> -static struct page *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
> - struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
> - struct rb_root *root,
> - bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
> +static void *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
> + struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
> + struct rb_root *root,
> + bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)

Do we really have to go through this void * stage?

Also, please stop reindenting the arguments. I tend to just switch to
two tabs, but lining them up with the opening bracket leads to extra
churn. Either leave them alone for the entire series or switch _once_.


2024-03-23 04:55:16

by Matthew Wilcox

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/14] mm/ksm: use folio_set_stable_node in try_to_merge_one_page

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 04:37:00PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>
>
> Only single page could be reached where we set stable node after write
> protect, so use folio converted func to replace page's.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
> Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
> Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
> ---
> mm/ksm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> index 15a78a9bab59..d7c4cc4a0cc1 100644
> --- a/mm/ksm.c
> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> @@ -1518,7 +1518,7 @@ static int try_to_merge_one_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> * PageAnon+anon_vma to PageKsm+NULL stable_node:
> * stable_tree_insert() will update stable_node.
> */
> - set_page_stable_node(page, NULL);
> + folio_set_stable_node(page_folio(page), NULL);
> mark_page_accessed(page);

I'd rather you did a conversion of try_to_merge_one_page() instead of
just this. It'll be a fun one because you'll have to recalculate the
folio after calling split_huge_page().

2024-03-25 15:13:49

by Alex Shi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] mm/ksm: use folio in stable_node_dup



On 3/22/24 11:57 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 04:36:52PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
>> -static struct page *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
>> - struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
>> - struct rb_root *root,
>> - bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
>> +static void *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
>> + struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
>> + struct rb_root *root,
>> + bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
>
> Do we really have to go through this void * stage?

Hi Willy,
Thank a lot for reminder. Yes, we could keep the 'struct page*' return value here.
And so we don't need to change indent here.

Thanks!

>
> Also, please stop reindenting the arguments. I tend to just switch to
> two tabs, but lining them up with the opening bracket leads to extra
> churn. Either leave them alone for the entire series or switch _once_.
>

2024-03-25 15:27:53

by Alex Shi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] mm/ksm: use folio in stable_node_dup



On 3/23/24 1:11 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 22.03.24 16:57, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 04:36:52PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
>>> -static struct page *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
>>> -                    struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
>>> -                    struct rb_root *root,
>>> -                    bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
>>> +static void *stable_node_dup(struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node_dup,
>>> +                 struct ksm_stable_node **_stable_node,
>>> +                 struct rb_root *root,
>>> +                 bool prune_stale_stable_nodes)
>>
>> Do we really have to go through this void * stage?
>>
>> Also, please stop reindenting the arguments.  I tend to just switch to
>> two tabs, but lining them up with the opening bracket leads to extra
>> churn.  Either leave them alone for the entire series or switch _once_.
>
> I wish the coding style would at least recommend something -- I know, different subsystems/files have their own rules. Nowadays, I prefer 2 tabs as well.
>

Hi David,

Thanks for comments, 2 tabs looks good. But just this file keep using more tabs.
For the style alignment, let's keep them for now?

Thanks

2024-03-25 15:28:33

by Alex Shi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/14] mm/ksm: use folio_set_stable_node in try_to_merge_one_page



On 3/23/24 11:38 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 04:37:00PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
>> From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <[email protected]>
>>
>> Only single page could be reached where we set stable node after write
>> protect, so use folio converted func to replace page's.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> mm/ksm.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
>> index 15a78a9bab59..d7c4cc4a0cc1 100644
>> --- a/mm/ksm.c
>> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
>> @@ -1518,7 +1518,7 @@ static int try_to_merge_one_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> * PageAnon+anon_vma to PageKsm+NULL stable_node:
>> * stable_tree_insert() will update stable_node.
>> */
>> - set_page_stable_node(page, NULL);
>> + folio_set_stable_node(page_folio(page), NULL);
>> mark_page_accessed(page);
>
> I'd rather you did a conversion of try_to_merge_one_page() instead of
> just this. It'll be a fun one because you'll have to recalculate the
> folio after calling split_huge_page().

Hi Willy,

Definitely right, the merge series funcs need more careful changes. :)
I'd like to left them for late changes.

Thanks