From: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
This driver enables r5f dual core Real time Processing Unit subsystem
available on Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale MPSoC Platform. RPU subsystem
(cluster) can be configured in different modes e.g. split mode in which
two r5f cores work independent of each other and lock-step mode in which
both r5f cores execute same code clock-for-clock and notify if the
result is different.
The Xilinx r5 Remoteproc Driver boots the RPU cores via calls to the Xilinx
Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory access
and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this
driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls.
Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v9
- replace devm_rproc_alloc with rproc_alloc
- %s/until/while/r
- remove extra line
- %s/i > -1/i >=0/r fix this throughout the driver
- fix type of tcm_mode from int to enum rpu_tcm_comb
- release &child_pdev->dev references in case of failure
- remove zynqmp_r5_core_exit()
- undefined memory-region property isn't driver failure
- remove tcm bank count check from ops
- fix tcm bank turn-off sequence
- fix parse_fw function documentation
- do not use rproc_mem_entry_init on vdev0buffers
- declare variabls in reverse xmas tree order throughout the driver
Changes in v8:
- None
Changes in v7:
- None
Changes in v6:
- None
Changes in v5:
- None
Changes in v4:
- Remove redundant header files
- use dev_err_probe() to report errors during probe
- Fix missing check on error code returned by zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
- Fix memory leaks all over the driver when resource allocation fails for any core
- make cluster mode check only at one place
- remove redundant initialization of variable
- remove redundant use of of_node_put()
- Fix Comment format problem
- Assign offset of zynqmp_tcm_banks instead of duplicating it
- Add tcm and memory regions rproc carveouts during prepare instead of parse_fw
- Remove rproc_mem_entry object from r5_core
- Use put_device() and rproc_del() APIs to fix memory leaks
- Replace pr_* with dev_*. This was missed in v3, fix now.
- Use "GPL" instead of "GPL v2" in MODULE_LICENSE macro. This was suggested by checkpatch script.
Changes in v3:
- Fix checkpatch script indentation warning
- Remove unused variable from xilinx remoteproc driver
- use C style comments, i.e /*...*/
- Remove redundant debug information which can be derived using /proc/device-tree
- Fix multilined comment format
- s/"final fot TCM"/"final for TCM"
- Function devm_kzalloc() does not return an code on error, just NULL.
Remove redundant error check for this function throughout the driver.
- Fix RPU mode configuration and add documentation accordingly
- Get rid of the indentations to match function documentation style with rest of the driver
- Fix memory leak by only using r5_rproc->priv and not replace it with new instance
- Use 'i' for the outer loop and 'j' for the inner one as per convention
- Remove redundant error and NULL checks throughout the driver
- Use devm_kcalloc() when more than one element is required
- Add memory-regions carveouts during driver probe instead of parse_fw call
This removes redundant copy of reserved_mem object in r5_core structure.
- Fix memory leak by using of_node_put()
- Fix indentation of tcm_mem_map function args
- Remove redundant init of variables
- Initialize tcm bank size variable for lockstep mode
- Replace u32 with phys_addr_t for variable stroing memory bank address
- Add documentation of TCM behavior in lockstep mode
- Use dev_get_drvdata instead of platform driver API
- Remove info level messages
- Fix checkpatch.pl warnings
- Add documentation for the Xilinx r5f platform to understand driver design
drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 12 +
drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 1055 +++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 1068 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
index 166019786653..5637a71c0677 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
@@ -352,6 +352,18 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC
It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
a slave processor.
+config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC
+ tristate "Xilinx R5 remoteproc support"
+ depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP
+ depends on ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE
+ select RPMSG_VIRTIO
+ select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
+ help
+ Say y or m here to support Xilinx R5 remote processors via the remote
+ processor framework.
+
+ It's safe to say N if not interested in using RPU r5f cores.
+
endif # REMOTEPROC
endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
index 5478c7cb9e07..91314a9b43ce 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
@@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC) += xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9865b51e0356
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,1055 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
+#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
+#include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
+
+/* settings for RPU cluster mode */
+enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode {
+ SPLIT_MODE = 0, /* When cores run as separate processor */
+ LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1, /* cores execute same code in lockstep,clk-for-clk */
+ SINGLE_CPU_MODE = 2, /* core0 is held in reset and only core1 runs */
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct mem_bank_data - Memory Bank description
+ *
+ * @addr: Start address of memory bank
+ * @size: Size of Memory bank
+ * @pm_domain_id: Power-domains id of memory bank for firmware to turn on/off
+ * @bank_name: name of the bank for remoteproc framework
+ */
+struct mem_bank_data {
+ phys_addr_t addr;
+ size_t size;
+ u32 pm_domain_id;
+ char *bank_name;
+};
+
+static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks[] = {
+ {0xffe00000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
+ {0xffe20000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_BTCM, "btcm0"},
+ {0xffe90000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_ATCM, "atcm1"},
+ {0xffeb0000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_BTCM, "btcm1"},
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct zynqmp_r5_core - ZynqMP R5 core structure
+ *
+ * @dev: device of RPU instance
+ * @np: device node of RPU instance
+ * @tcm_bank_count: number TCM banks accessible to this RPU
+ * @tcm_banks: array of each TCM bank data
+ * @rmem_count: Number of reserved mem regions
+ * @rmem: reserved memory region nodes from device tree
+ * @rproc: rproc handle
+ * @pm_domain_id: RPU CPU power domain id
+ */
+struct zynqmp_r5_core {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct device_node *np;
+ int tcm_bank_count;
+ struct mem_bank_data **tcm_banks;
+ int rmem_count;
+ struct reserved_mem **rmem;
+ struct rproc *rproc;
+ u32 pm_domain_id;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct zynqmp_r5_cluster - ZynqMP R5 cluster structure
+ *
+ * @dev: r5f subsystem cluster device node
+ * @mode: cluster mode of type zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode
+ * @core_count: number of r5 cores used for this cluster mode
+ * @r5_cores: Array of pointers pointing to r5 core
+ */
+struct zynqmp_r5_cluster {
+ struct device *dev;
+ enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode mode;
+ int core_count;
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
+};
+
+/*
+ * zynqmp_r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode
+ *
+ * set RPU operation mode
+ *
+ * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure
+ */
+static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core,
+ enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
+ enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, fw_reg_val);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to set RPU mode\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to configure TCM\n");
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start
+ * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
+ *
+ * Start R5 Core from designated boot address.
+ *
+ * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
+ */
+static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
+ enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem;
+ int ret;
+
+ /*
+ * The exception vector pointers (EVP) refer to the base-address of
+ * exception vectors (for reset, IRQ, FIQ, etc). The reset-vector
+ * starts at the base-address and subsequent vectors are on 4-byte
+ * boundaries.
+ *
+ * Exception vectors can start either from 0x0000_0000 (LOVEC) or
+ * from 0xFFFF_0000 (HIVEC) which is mapped in the OCM (On-Chip Memory)
+ *
+ * Usually firmware will put Exception vectors at LOVEC.
+ *
+ * It is not recommend that you change the exception vector.
+ * Changing the EVP to HIVEC will result in increased interrupt latency
+ * and jitter. Also, if the OCM is secured and the Cortex-R5F processor
+ * is non-secured, then the Cortex-R5F processor cannot access the
+ * HIVEC exception vectors in the OCM.
+ */
+ bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr >= 0xFFFC0000) ?
+ PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC;
+
+ dev_dbg(r5_core->dev, "RPU boot addr 0x%llx from %s.", rproc->bootaddr,
+ bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM");
+
+ ret = zynqmp_pm_request_wake(r5_core->pm_domain_id, 1,
+ bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(r5_core->dev,
+ "failed to start RPU = 0x%x\n", r5_core->pm_domain_id);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop
+ * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
+ *
+ * Power down R5 Core.
+ *
+ * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
+ */
+static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(r5_core->pm_domain_id,
+ ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to stop remoteproc RPU %d\n", ret);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map
+ * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
+ * @mem: mem entry to map
+ *
+ * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout.
+ *
+ * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
+ */
+static int zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map(struct rproc *rproc,
+ struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
+{
+ void __iomem *va;
+
+ va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ mem->va = (void *)va;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
+ * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
+ * @mem: mem entry to unmap
+ *
+ * Unmap memory-region carveout
+ *
+ * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
+ */
+static int zynqmp_r5_mem_region_unmap(struct rproc *rproc,
+ struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
+{
+ iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * add_mem_regions
+ * @r5_core: single R5 core's corresponding zynqmp_r5_core type instance
+ * @rmem: reserved mem region parsed from dt node
+ *
+ * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in
+ * memory-region property
+ *
+ * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
+ */
+static int add_mem_regions_carveout(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ struct rproc_mem_entry **rproc_mem;
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
+ struct reserved_mem *rmem;
+ int i, num_mem_regions;
+
+ r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
+ num_mem_regions = r5_core->rmem_count;
+
+ /* memory regions not defined */
+ if (num_mem_regions < 1)
+ return 0;
+
+ rproc_mem = kcalloc(num_mem_regions,
+ sizeof(struct rproc_mem_entry *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rproc_mem)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_mem_regions; i++) {
+ rmem = r5_core->rmem[i];
+
+ if (!strncmp(rmem->name, "vdev0buffer", strlen("vdev0buffer"))) {
+ /* Register reserved memory for vdev buffer */
+ rproc_mem[i] = rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, i,
+ rmem->size,
+ rmem->base,
+ rmem->name);
+ } else {
+ /* Register associated reserved memory regions */
+ rproc_mem[i] = rproc_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, NULL,
+ (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
+ rmem->size, rmem->base,
+ zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map,
+ zynqmp_r5_mem_region_unmap,
+ rmem->name);
+ }
+
+ if (!rproc_mem[i])
+ goto release_mem_regions;
+
+ dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "reserved mem carveout %s addr=%llx, size=0x%llx",
+ rmem->name, rmem->base, rmem->size);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Add carveouts only if all rproc mem enties are
+ * successfully initialized
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_mem_regions; i++)
+ rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem[i]);
+
+ kfree(rproc_mem);
+ return 0;
+
+release_mem_regions:
+ for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
+ kfree(rproc_mem[i]);
+ kfree(rproc_mem);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+/*
+ * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
+ * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
+ * @mem: mem entry to unmap
+ *
+ * Unmap TCM banks when powering down R5 core.
+ *
+ * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
+ */
+static int tcm_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
+{
+ iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * tcm_mem_map
+ * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
+ * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of
+ *
+ * Given TCM bank entry, this callback will set device address for R5
+ * running on TCM and also setup virtual address for TCM bank
+ * remoteproc carveout.
+ *
+ * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
+ */
+static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc,
+ struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
+{
+ void __iomem *va;
+
+ va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ /* Update memory entry va */
+ mem->va = (void *)va;
+
+ /* clear TCMs */
+ memset_io(va, 0, mem->len);
+
+ /*
+ * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000,
+ * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx.
+ *
+ * Zero out the high 12 bits of the address. This will give
+ * expected values for TCM Banks 0A and 0B (0x0 and 0x20000).
+ */
+ mem->da &= 0x000fffff;
+
+ /*
+ * TCM Banks 1A and 1B still have to be translated.
+ *
+ * Below handle these two banks' absolute addresses (0xffe90000 and
+ * 0xffeb0000) and convert to the expected relative addresses
+ * (0x0 and 0x20000).
+ */
+ if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000)
+ mem->da -= 0x90000;
+
+ /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */
+ if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) {
+ dev_err(&rproc->dev, "invalid TCM address: %x\n", mem->da);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ struct rproc_mem_entry **rproc_mem;
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
+ int i, num_banks, ret;
+ phys_addr_t bank_addr;
+ struct device *dev;
+ u32 pm_domain_id;
+ size_t bank_size;
+ char *bank_name;
+
+ r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
+ dev = r5_core->dev;
+ num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
+
+ rproc_mem = kcalloc(num_banks,
+ sizeof(struct rproc_mem_entry *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rproc_mem)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ /*
+ * Power-on Each 64KB TCM,
+ * register its address space, map and unmap functions
+ * and add carveouts accordingly
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
+ bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->addr;
+ bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->bank_name;
+ bank_size = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
+ pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
+
+ ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
+ ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
+ ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
+ goto release_tcm_split;
+ }
+
+ dev_dbg(dev, "TCM carveout split mode %s addr=%llx, size=0x%lx",
+ bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
+
+ rproc_mem[i] = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
+ bank_size, bank_addr,
+ tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
+ bank_name);
+ if (!rproc_mem[i]) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
+ goto release_tcm_split;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Add carveouts only if all rproc mem enties are
+ * successfully initialized
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++)
+ rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem[i]);
+
+ kfree(rproc_mem);
+ return 0;
+
+release_tcm_split:
+ /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
+ for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
+ pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
+ zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
+ kfree(rproc_mem[i]);
+ }
+ kfree(rproc_mem);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ struct rproc_mem_entry *rproc_mem;
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
+ int i, num_banks, ret;
+ phys_addr_t bank_addr;
+ size_t bank_size = 0;
+ struct device *dev;
+ u32 pm_domain_id;
+ char *bank_name;
+
+ r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
+ dev = r5_core->dev;
+
+ /* Go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */
+ num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
+
+ /*
+ * In lockstep mode, TCM is contiguous memory block
+ * However, each TCM block still needs to be enabled individually.
+ * So, Enable each TCM block individually, but add their size
+ * to create contiguous memory region.
+ */
+ bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[0]->addr;
+ bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[0]->bank_name;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
+ bank_size += r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
+ pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
+
+ /* Turn on each TCM bank individually */
+ ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
+ ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
+ ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
+ goto release_tcm_lockstep;
+ }
+ }
+
+ dev_dbg(dev, "TCM add carveout lockstep mode %s addr=0x%llx, size=0x%lx",
+ bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
+
+ /* Register TCM address range, TCM map and unmap functions */
+ rproc_mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
+ bank_size, bank_addr,
+ tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
+ bank_name);
+ if (!rproc_mem) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto release_tcm_lockstep;
+ }
+
+ /* If registration is success, add carveouts */
+ rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem);
+
+ return 0;
+
+release_tcm_lockstep:
+ /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
+ for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
+ pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
+ zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * add_tcm_banks()
+ * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
+ *
+ * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance
+ * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory
+ * needed for firmware to be loaded
+ *
+ * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
+ */
+static int add_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
+ struct device *dev;
+
+ r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
+ if (!r5_core)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ dev = r5_core->dev;
+
+ cluster = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+ if (!cluster) {
+ dev_err(dev->parent, "Invalid driver data\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * In lockstep mode TCM banks are one contiguous memory region of 256Kb
+ * In split mode, each TCM bank is 64Kb and not contiguous.
+ * We add memory carveouts accordingly.
+ */
+ if (cluster->mode == SPLIT_MODE)
+ return add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(rproc);
+ else if (cluster->mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE)
+ return add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(rproc);
+
+ dev_err(cluster->dev, "invalid cluster mode\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw()
+ * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
+ * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core
+ *
+ * get resource table if available
+ *
+ * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
+ */
+static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
+ if (ret == -EINVAL) {
+ /*
+ * resource table only required for IPC.
+ * if not present, this is not necessarily an error;
+ * for example, loading r5 hello world application
+ * so simply inform user and keep going.
+ */
+ dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n");
+ ret = 0;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = add_tcm_banks(rproc);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to get TCM banks, err %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = add_mem_regions_carveout(rproc);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "failed to get reserve mem regions %d\n",
+ ret);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
+ u32 pm_domain_id;
+ int i;
+
+ r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; i++) {
+ pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
+ if (zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id))
+ dev_warn(r5_core->dev,
+ "can't turn off TCM bank 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
+ .prepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare,
+ .unprepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare,
+ .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
+ .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
+ .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
+ .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
+ .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
+ .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
+ .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
+};
+
+/**
+ * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
+ * Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node
+ * this is called for each individual R5 core
+ *
+ * @cdev: Device node of each r5 core
+ *
+ * Return: zynqmp_r5_core object for success, error pointer in case of error.
+ */
+static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
+{
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
+ struct rproc *r5_rproc;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Set up DMA mask */
+ ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(cdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
+ if (ret)
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+
+ /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
+ r5_rproc = rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev),
+ &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
+ NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core));
+ if (!r5_rproc) {
+ dev_err(cdev, "failed to allocate memory for rproc instance\n");
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ }
+
+ r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
+ r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)r5_rproc->priv;
+ r5_core->dev = cdev;
+ r5_core->np = dev_of_node(cdev);
+ if (!r5_core->np) {
+ dev_err(cdev, "can't get device node for r5 core\n");
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ }
+
+ /* Add R5 remoteproc core */
+ ret = rproc_add(r5_rproc);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(cdev, "failed to add r5 remoteproc\n");
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ }
+
+ r5_core->rproc = r5_rproc;
+ return r5_core;
+}
+
+/**
+ * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node()
+ * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
+ * in r5_core instance. We will use hardcoded TCM information from
+ * driver for now in this function.
+ *
+ * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
+ *
+ * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
+ */
+static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
+{
+ struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
+ int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node;
+ int i, j;
+
+ /*
+ * ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver while
+ * system-dt spec is not final for TCM
+ */
+ tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks);
+
+ /* count per core tcm banks */
+ tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count;
+
+ if (tcm_bank_count <= 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode.
+ * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another
+ * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly
+ */
+ tcm_node = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
+ r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
+ r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count,
+ sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!r5_core->tcm_banks)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < tcm_bank_count; j++) {
+ /*
+ * Use pre-defined TCM reg values.
+ * Eventually this should be replaced by values
+ * parsed from dts.
+ */
+ r5_core->tcm_banks[j] =
+ (struct mem_bank_data *)&zynqmp_tcm_banks[tcm_node];
+ tcm_node++;
+ }
+
+ r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node()
+ * parse memory-region property from dt node and add
+ * memory region carveouts
+ *
+ * @r5_core: pointer to zynqmp_r5_core type object
+ *
+ * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
+ */
+static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
+{
+ struct device_node *np, *rmem_np;
+ struct reserved_mem **rmem;
+ int res_mem_count, i;
+ struct device *dev;
+
+ dev = r5_core->dev;
+ np = r5_core->np;
+
+ res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
+ sizeof(phandle));
+ if (res_mem_count <= 0) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n",
+ res_mem_count);
+ r5_core->rmem_count = 0;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ rmem = devm_kcalloc(dev, res_mem_count,
+ sizeof(struct reserved_mem *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rmem)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) {
+ rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i);
+ if (!rmem_np)
+ goto release_rmem;
+
+ rmem[i] = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
+ if (!rmem[i]) {
+ of_node_put(rmem_np);
+ goto release_rmem;
+ }
+
+ of_node_put(rmem_np);
+ }
+
+ r5_core->rmem_count = res_mem_count;
+ r5_core->rmem = rmem;
+ return 0;
+
+release_rmem:
+ for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
+ kfree(rmem[i]);
+ devm_kfree(dev, rmem);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+/*
+ * zynqmp_r5_core_init()
+ * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_core type object
+ *
+ * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
+ *
+ * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
+ */
+static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
+ enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
+ enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
+{
+ struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
+ int ret, i;
+
+ ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
+ r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
+
+ ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret);
+
+ /* Initialize r5 cores with power-domains parsed from dts */
+ ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains",
+ 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to set r5 cluster mode %d, err %d\n",
+ cluster->mode, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * zynqmp_r5_cluster_init()
+ * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
+ *
+ * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
+ *
+ * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
+ */
+static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
+{
+ enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE;
+ struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
+ struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev);
+ struct platform_device *child_pdev;
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
+ enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val;
+ struct device **child_devs;
+ struct device_node *child;
+ enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode;
+ int core_count, ret, i;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode);
+
+ /*
+ * on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL,
+ * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode
+ */
+ if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * For now driver only supports split mode and lockstep mode.
+ * fail driver probe if either of that is not set in dts.
+ */
+ if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) {
+ tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_COMB;
+ fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
+ } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE) {
+ tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
+ fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT;
+ } else {
+ dev_err(dev, "driver does not support cluster mode %d\n", cluster_mode);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Number of cores is decided by number of child nodes of
+ * r5f subsystem node in dts. If Split mode is used in dts
+ * 2 child nodes are expected.
+ * In lockstep mode if two child nodes are available,
+ * only use first child node and consider it as core0
+ * and ignore core1 dt node.
+ */
+ core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node);
+ if (core_count <= 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n");
+ core_count = 1;
+ }
+
+ child_devs = kcalloc(core_count, sizeof(struct device *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!child_devs)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ r5_cores = kcalloc(core_count,
+ sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!r5_cores) {
+ kfree(child_devs);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ i = 0;
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) {
+ child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
+ if (!child_pdev) {
+ of_node_put(child);
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto release_r5_cores;
+ }
+
+ child_devs[i] = &child_pdev->dev;
+
+ /* create and add remoteproc instance of type struct rproc */
+ r5_cores[i] = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(&child_pdev->dev);
+ if (IS_ERR(r5_cores[i])) {
+ of_node_put(child);
+ ret = PTR_ERR(r5_cores[i]);
+ goto release_r5_cores;
+ }
+
+ i++;
+
+ /*
+ * If two child nodes are available in dts in lockstep mode,
+ * then ignore second child node.
+ */
+ if (i == core_count) {
+ of_node_put(child);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ cluster->mode = cluster_mode;
+ cluster->core_count = core_count;
+ cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores;
+
+ ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret);
+ cluster->core_count = 0;
+ cluster->r5_cores = NULL;
+ goto release_r5_cores;
+ }
+
+ kfree(child_devs);
+ return 0;
+
+release_r5_cores:
+ for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
+ put_device(child_devs[i]);
+ rproc_del(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
+ rproc_free(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
+ }
+ kfree(r5_cores);
+ kfree(child_devs);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data)
+{
+ struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data;
+ struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
+ int i;
+
+ cluster = (struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ if (!cluster)
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
+ r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
+ put_device(r5_core->dev);
+ rproc_del(r5_core->rproc);
+ rproc_free(r5_core->rproc);
+ }
+
+ kfree(cluster->r5_cores);
+ kfree(cluster);
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
+}
+
+/*
+ * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe()
+ *
+ * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
+ *
+ * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT,
+ * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations
+ *
+ * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
+ */
+static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ int ret;
+
+ cluster = kzalloc(sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!cluster)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ cluster->dev = dev;
+
+ ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to populate platform dev\n");
+ kfree(cluster);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
+
+ ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster);
+ if (ret) {
+ zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(pdev);
+ dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Match table for OF platform binding */
+static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
+ { /* end of list */ },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
+ .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
+ .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
+ },
+};
+module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
2.25.1
Hi Tanmay,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on c6a669485125145afd22230df6e0e6c37f19ad41]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tanmay-Shah/Add-Xilinx-RPU-subsystem-support/20220708-094221
base: c6a669485125145afd22230df6e0e6c37f19ad41
config: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220709/[email protected]/config)
reproduce:
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/77a934574239ba990778a8007045b8c43955d9f5
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Tanmay-Shah/Add-Xilinx-RPU-subsystem-support/20220708-094221
git checkout 77a934574239ba990778a8007045b8c43955d9f5
# 1. reproduce by kismet
# install kmax per https://github.com/paulgazz/kmax/blob/master/README.md
kismet --linux-ksrc=linux --selectees CONFIG_ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX --selectors CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC -a=arm64
# 2. reproduce by make
# save the config file to linux source tree
cd linux
make ARCH=arm64 olddefconfig
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
kismet warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> kismet: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX when selected by XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
Depends on [n]: MAILBOX [=n] && ARCH_ZYNQMP [=y] && OF [=y]
Selected by [y]:
- XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC [=y] && REMOTEPROC [=y] && PM [=y] && ARCH_ZYNQMP [=y] && ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE [=y]
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 06:39:55PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> From: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
>
> This driver enables r5f dual core Real time Processing Unit subsystem
> available on Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale MPSoC Platform. RPU subsystem
> (cluster) can be configured in different modes e.g. split mode in which
> two r5f cores work independent of each other and lock-step mode in which
> both r5f cores execute same code clock-for-clock and notify if the
> result is different.
>
> The Xilinx r5 Remoteproc Driver boots the RPU cores via calls to the Xilinx
> Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory access
> and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this
> driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Changes in v9
> - replace devm_rproc_alloc with rproc_alloc
> - %s/until/while/r
> - remove extra line
> - %s/i > -1/i >=0/r fix this throughout the driver
> - fix type of tcm_mode from int to enum rpu_tcm_comb
> - release &child_pdev->dev references in case of failure
> - remove zynqmp_r5_core_exit()
> - undefined memory-region property isn't driver failure
> - remove tcm bank count check from ops
> - fix tcm bank turn-off sequence
> - fix parse_fw function documentation
> - do not use rproc_mem_entry_init on vdev0buffers
> - declare variabls in reverse xmas tree order throughout the driver
>
> Changes in v8:
> - None
>
> Changes in v7:
> - None
>
> Changes in v6:
> - None
>
> Changes in v5:
> - None
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Remove redundant header files
> - use dev_err_probe() to report errors during probe
> - Fix missing check on error code returned by zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
> - Fix memory leaks all over the driver when resource allocation fails for any core
> - make cluster mode check only at one place
> - remove redundant initialization of variable
> - remove redundant use of of_node_put()
> - Fix Comment format problem
> - Assign offset of zynqmp_tcm_banks instead of duplicating it
> - Add tcm and memory regions rproc carveouts during prepare instead of parse_fw
> - Remove rproc_mem_entry object from r5_core
> - Use put_device() and rproc_del() APIs to fix memory leaks
> - Replace pr_* with dev_*. This was missed in v3, fix now.
> - Use "GPL" instead of "GPL v2" in MODULE_LICENSE macro. This was suggested by checkpatch script.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix checkpatch script indentation warning
> - Remove unused variable from xilinx remoteproc driver
> - use C style comments, i.e /*...*/
> - Remove redundant debug information which can be derived using /proc/device-tree
> - Fix multilined comment format
> - s/"final fot TCM"/"final for TCM"
> - Function devm_kzalloc() does not return an code on error, just NULL.
> Remove redundant error check for this function throughout the driver.
> - Fix RPU mode configuration and add documentation accordingly
> - Get rid of the indentations to match function documentation style with rest of the driver
> - Fix memory leak by only using r5_rproc->priv and not replace it with new instance
> - Use 'i' for the outer loop and 'j' for the inner one as per convention
> - Remove redundant error and NULL checks throughout the driver
> - Use devm_kcalloc() when more than one element is required
> - Add memory-regions carveouts during driver probe instead of parse_fw call
> This removes redundant copy of reserved_mem object in r5_core structure.
> - Fix memory leak by using of_node_put()
> - Fix indentation of tcm_mem_map function args
> - Remove redundant init of variables
> - Initialize tcm bank size variable for lockstep mode
> - Replace u32 with phys_addr_t for variable stroing memory bank address
> - Add documentation of TCM behavior in lockstep mode
> - Use dev_get_drvdata instead of platform driver API
> - Remove info level messages
> - Fix checkpatch.pl warnings
> - Add documentation for the Xilinx r5f platform to understand driver design
> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 1055 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 1068 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> index 166019786653..5637a71c0677 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> @@ -352,6 +352,18 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC
> It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
> a slave processor.
>
> +config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC
> + tristate "Xilinx R5 remoteproc support"
> + depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP
> + depends on ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE
> + select RPMSG_VIRTIO
> + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
> + help
> + Say y or m here to support Xilinx R5 remote processors via the remote
> + processor framework.
> +
> + It's safe to say N if not interested in using RPU r5f cores.
> +
> endif # REMOTEPROC
>
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> index 5478c7cb9e07..91314a9b43ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> @@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC) += xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9865b51e0356
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1055 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> +
> +/* settings for RPU cluster mode */
> +enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode {
> + SPLIT_MODE = 0, /* When cores run as separate processor */
> + LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1, /* cores execute same code in lockstep,clk-for-clk */
> + SINGLE_CPU_MODE = 2, /* core0 is held in reset and only core1 runs */
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct mem_bank_data - Memory Bank description
> + *
> + * @addr: Start address of memory bank
> + * @size: Size of Memory bank
> + * @pm_domain_id: Power-domains id of memory bank for firmware to turn on/off
> + * @bank_name: name of the bank for remoteproc framework
> + */
> +struct mem_bank_data {
> + phys_addr_t addr;
> + size_t size;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> + char *bank_name;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks[] = {
> + {0xffe00000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
> + {0xffe20000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_BTCM, "btcm0"},
> + {0xffe90000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_ATCM, "atcm1"},
> + {0xffeb0000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_BTCM, "btcm1"},
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct zynqmp_r5_core - ZynqMP R5 core structure
> + *
> + * @dev: device of RPU instance
> + * @np: device node of RPU instance
> + * @tcm_bank_count: number TCM banks accessible to this RPU
> + * @tcm_banks: array of each TCM bank data
> + * @rmem_count: Number of reserved mem regions
> + * @rmem: reserved memory region nodes from device tree
> + * @rproc: rproc handle
> + * @pm_domain_id: RPU CPU power domain id
> + */
> +struct zynqmp_r5_core {
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + int tcm_bank_count;
> + struct mem_bank_data **tcm_banks;
> + int rmem_count;
> + struct reserved_mem **rmem;
> + struct rproc *rproc;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct zynqmp_r5_cluster - ZynqMP R5 cluster structure
> + *
> + * @dev: r5f subsystem cluster device node
> + * @mode: cluster mode of type zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode
> + * @core_count: number of r5 cores used for this cluster mode
> + * @r5_cores: Array of pointers pointing to r5 core
> + */
> +struct zynqmp_r5_cluster {
> + struct device *dev;
> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode mode;
> + int core_count;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode
> + *
> + * set RPU operation mode
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core,
> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, fw_reg_val);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to set RPU mode\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to configure TCM\n");
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + *
> + * Start R5 Core from designated boot address.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
> + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * The exception vector pointers (EVP) refer to the base-address of
> + * exception vectors (for reset, IRQ, FIQ, etc). The reset-vector
> + * starts at the base-address and subsequent vectors are on 4-byte
> + * boundaries.
> + *
> + * Exception vectors can start either from 0x0000_0000 (LOVEC) or
> + * from 0xFFFF_0000 (HIVEC) which is mapped in the OCM (On-Chip Memory)
> + *
> + * Usually firmware will put Exception vectors at LOVEC.
> + *
> + * It is not recommend that you change the exception vector.
> + * Changing the EVP to HIVEC will result in increased interrupt latency
> + * and jitter. Also, if the OCM is secured and the Cortex-R5F processor
> + * is non-secured, then the Cortex-R5F processor cannot access the
> + * HIVEC exception vectors in the OCM.
> + */
> + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr >= 0xFFFC0000) ?
> + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC;
> +
> + dev_dbg(r5_core->dev, "RPU boot addr 0x%llx from %s.", rproc->bootaddr,
> + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM");
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_wake(r5_core->pm_domain_id, 1,
> + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev,
> + "failed to start RPU = 0x%x\n", r5_core->pm_domain_id);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + *
> + * Power down R5 Core.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(r5_core->pm_domain_id,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to stop remoteproc RPU %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @mem: mem entry to map
> + *
> + * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map(struct rproc *rproc,
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + void __iomem *va;
> +
> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mem->va = (void *)va;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
> + *
> + * Unmap memory-region carveout
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_mem_region_unmap(struct rproc *rproc,
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * add_mem_regions
> + * @r5_core: single R5 core's corresponding zynqmp_r5_core type instance
> + * @rmem: reserved mem region parsed from dt node
> + *
> + * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in
> + * memory-region property
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int add_mem_regions_carveout(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct rproc_mem_entry **rproc_mem;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> + int i, num_mem_regions;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> + num_mem_regions = r5_core->rmem_count;
> +
> + /* memory regions not defined */
> + if (num_mem_regions < 1)
> + return 0;
> +
> + rproc_mem = kcalloc(num_mem_regions,
> + sizeof(struct rproc_mem_entry *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rproc_mem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_mem_regions; i++) {
> + rmem = r5_core->rmem[i];
> +
> + if (!strncmp(rmem->name, "vdev0buffer", strlen("vdev0buffer"))) {
> + /* Register reserved memory for vdev buffer */
> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, i,
> + rmem->size,
> + rmem->base,
> + rmem->name);
> + } else {
> + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */
> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, NULL,
> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
> + rmem->size, rmem->base,
> + zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map,
> + zynqmp_r5_mem_region_unmap,
> + rmem->name);
> + }
> +
> + if (!rproc_mem[i])
> + goto release_mem_regions;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "reserved mem carveout %s addr=%llx, size=0x%llx",
> + rmem->name, rmem->base, rmem->size);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Add carveouts only if all rproc mem enties are
> + * successfully initialized
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_mem_regions; i++)
> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem[i]);
> +
> + kfree(rproc_mem);
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_mem_regions:
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> + kfree(rproc_mem[i]);
> + kfree(rproc_mem);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
> + *
> + * Unmap TCM banks when powering down R5 core.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int tcm_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * tcm_mem_map
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of
> + *
> + * Given TCM bank entry, this callback will set device address for R5
> + * running on TCM and also setup virtual address for TCM bank
> + * remoteproc carveout.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc,
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + void __iomem *va;
> +
> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* Update memory entry va */
> + mem->va = (void *)va;
> +
> + /* clear TCMs */
> + memset_io(va, 0, mem->len);
> +
> + /*
> + * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000,
> + * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx.
> + *
> + * Zero out the high 12 bits of the address. This will give
> + * expected values for TCM Banks 0A and 0B (0x0 and 0x20000).
> + */
> + mem->da &= 0x000fffff;
> +
> + /*
> + * TCM Banks 1A and 1B still have to be translated.
> + *
> + * Below handle these two banks' absolute addresses (0xffe90000 and
> + * 0xffeb0000) and convert to the expected relative addresses
> + * (0x0 and 0x20000).
> + */
> + if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000)
> + mem->da -= 0x90000;
> +
> + /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */
> + if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) {
> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "invalid TCM address: %x\n", mem->da);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct rproc_mem_entry **rproc_mem;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int i, num_banks, ret;
> + phys_addr_t bank_addr;
> + struct device *dev;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> + size_t bank_size;
> + char *bank_name;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
> +
> + rproc_mem = kcalloc(num_banks,
> + sizeof(struct rproc_mem_entry *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rproc_mem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /*
> + * Power-on Each 64KB TCM,
> + * register its address space, map and unmap functions
> + * and add carveouts accordingly
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->addr;
> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->bank_name;
> + bank_size = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
> + goto release_tcm_split;
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM carveout split mode %s addr=%llx, size=0x%lx",
> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
> +
> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
> + bank_size, bank_addr,
> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
> + bank_name);
> + if (!rproc_mem[i]) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> + goto release_tcm_split;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Add carveouts only if all rproc mem enties are
> + * successfully initialized
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++)
> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem[i]);
> +
> + kfree(rproc_mem);
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_tcm_split:
> + /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> + kfree(rproc_mem[i]);
> + }
> + kfree(rproc_mem);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *rproc_mem;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int i, num_banks, ret;
> + phys_addr_t bank_addr;
> + size_t bank_size = 0;
> + struct device *dev;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> + char *bank_name;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> +
> + /* Go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */
> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
> +
> + /*
> + * In lockstep mode, TCM is contiguous memory block
> + * However, each TCM block still needs to be enabled individually.
> + * So, Enable each TCM block individually, but add their size
> + * to create contiguous memory region.
> + */
> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[0]->addr;
> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[0]->bank_name;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
> + bank_size += r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> +
> + /* Turn on each TCM bank individually */
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
> + goto release_tcm_lockstep;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM add carveout lockstep mode %s addr=0x%llx, size=0x%lx",
> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
> +
> + /* Register TCM address range, TCM map and unmap functions */
> + rproc_mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
> + bank_size, bank_addr,
> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
> + bank_name);
> + if (!rproc_mem) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto release_tcm_lockstep;
> + }
> +
> + /* If registration is success, add carveouts */
> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_tcm_lockstep:
> + /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * add_tcm_banks()
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + *
> + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance
> + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory
> + * needed for firmware to be loaded
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int add_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> + if (!r5_core)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> +
> + cluster = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
> + if (!cluster) {
> + dev_err(dev->parent, "Invalid driver data\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * In lockstep mode TCM banks are one contiguous memory region of 256Kb
> + * In split mode, each TCM bank is 64Kb and not contiguous.
> + * We add memory carveouts accordingly.
> + */
> + if (cluster->mode == SPLIT_MODE)
> + return add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(rproc);
> + else if (cluster->mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE)
> + return add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(rproc);
> +
> + dev_err(cluster->dev, "invalid cluster mode\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw()
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core
> + *
> + * get resource table if available
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> + /*
> + * resource table only required for IPC.
> + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error;
> + * for example, loading r5 hello world application
> + * so simply inform user and keep going.
> + */
> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n");
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = add_tcm_banks(rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to get TCM banks, err %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = add_mem_regions_carveout(rproc);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "failed to get reserve mem regions %d\n",
> + ret);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> + int i;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; i++) {
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> + if (zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id))
> + dev_warn(r5_core->dev,
> + "can't turn off TCM bank 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
> + .prepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare,
> + .unprepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare,
> + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
> + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
> + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
> + * Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node
> + * this is called for each individual R5 core
> + *
> + * @cdev: Device node of each r5 core
> + *
> + * Return: zynqmp_r5_core object for success, error pointer in case of error.
> + */
> +static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + struct rproc *r5_rproc;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Set up DMA mask */
> + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(cdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
> + r5_rproc = rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev),
> + &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
> + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core));
> + if (!r5_rproc) {
> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to allocate memory for rproc instance\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + }
> +
> + r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)r5_rproc->priv;
> + r5_core->dev = cdev;
> + r5_core->np = dev_of_node(cdev);
> + if (!r5_core->np) {
> + dev_err(cdev, "can't get device node for r5 core\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
Here @r5_rproc is leaked and r5_rproc->rproc never free'ed.
> + }
> +
> + /* Add R5 remoteproc core */
> + ret = rproc_add(r5_rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to add r5 remoteproc\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
Same.
> + }
> +
> + r5_core->rproc = r5_rproc;
> + return r5_core;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node()
> + * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
> + * in r5_core instance. We will use hardcoded TCM information from
> + * driver for now in this function.
> + *
It would be a good idea to explain _why_ hardcoded values are used.
> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node;
> + int i, j;
> +
> + /*
> + * ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver while
I'm not sure why there is a "ToDo" here since this is exactly what you are
doing.
> + * system-dt spec is not final for TCM
> + */
> + tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks);
> +
> + /* count per core tcm banks */
> + tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count;
> +
> + if (tcm_bank_count <= 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
As far as I can tell this can't happen and as such should be removed.
> +
> + /*
> + * r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode.
> + * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another
> + * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly
> + */
> + tcm_node = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count,
> + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < tcm_bank_count; j++) {
> + /*
> + * Use pre-defined TCM reg values.
> + * Eventually this should be replaced by values
> + * parsed from dts.
> + */
> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j] =
> + (struct mem_bank_data *)&zynqmp_tcm_banks[tcm_node];
> + tcm_node++;
> + }
> +
> + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node()
> + * parse memory-region property from dt node and add
> + * memory region carveouts
> + *
> + * @r5_core: pointer to zynqmp_r5_core type object
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np, *rmem_np;
> + struct reserved_mem **rmem;
> + int res_mem_count, i;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> + np = r5_core->np;
> +
> + res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
> + sizeof(phandle));
> + if (res_mem_count <= 0) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n",
> + res_mem_count);
> + r5_core->rmem_count = 0;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + rmem = devm_kcalloc(dev, res_mem_count,
> + sizeof(struct reserved_mem *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rmem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) {
> + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i);
> + if (!rmem_np)
> + goto release_rmem;
> +
> + rmem[i] = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
> + if (!rmem[i]) {
> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
> + goto release_rmem;
> + }
> +
> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
> + }
> +
> + r5_core->rmem_count = res_mem_count;
> + r5_core->rmem = rmem;
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_rmem:
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> + kfree(rmem[i]);
Function of_reserved_mem_lookup() doesn't allocate a new reserved_mem structure,
you get a reference to an existing one. As such there is no need to explicitly
free individual elements of the rmem array.
> + devm_kfree(dev, rmem);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_core_init()
> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_core type object
> + *
> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret);
> +
> + /* Initialize r5 cores with power-domains parsed from dts */
> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains",
> + 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to set r5 cluster mode %d, err %d\n",
> + cluster->mode, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_cluster_init()
> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> + *
> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> +{
> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE;
> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> + struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev);
> + struct platform_device *child_pdev;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val;
> + struct device **child_devs;
> + struct device_node *child;
> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode;
> + int core_count, ret, i;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode);
> +
> + /*
> + * on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL,
> + * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode
> + */
> + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * For now driver only supports split mode and lockstep mode.
> + * fail driver probe if either of that is not set in dts.
> + */
> + if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) {
Why is are LOCKSTEP_MODE and LOCKSTEP_MODE defined when the same values were
already added in xlnx-zynqmp.h in patch 3/6? And why not add SINGLE_CPU_MODE
there as well instead of duplicating things in enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode?
> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_COMB;
> + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE) {
> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
> + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT;
> + } else {
> + dev_err(dev, "driver does not support cluster mode %d\n", cluster_mode);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Number of cores is decided by number of child nodes of
> + * r5f subsystem node in dts. If Split mode is used in dts
> + * 2 child nodes are expected.
> + * In lockstep mode if two child nodes are available,
> + * only use first child node and consider it as core0
> + * and ignore core1 dt node.
> + */
> + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node);
> + if (core_count <= 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n");
> + core_count = 1;
> + }
> +
> + child_devs = kcalloc(core_count, sizeof(struct device *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!child_devs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + r5_cores = kcalloc(core_count,
> + sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!r5_cores) {
> + kfree(child_devs);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + i = 0;
> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) {
> + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
> + if (!child_pdev) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto release_r5_cores;
> + }
> +
> + child_devs[i] = &child_pdev->dev;
> +
> + /* create and add remoteproc instance of type struct rproc */
> + r5_cores[i] = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(&child_pdev->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(r5_cores[i])) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + ret = PTR_ERR(r5_cores[i]);
> + goto release_r5_cores;
If we are here and i == 0, we are leaking a reference to child_pdev since the
loop in release_r5_cores won't execute.
> + }
> +
> + i++;
> +
> + /*
> + * If two child nodes are available in dts in lockstep mode,
> + * then ignore second child node.
> + */
> + if (i == core_count) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + break;
> + }
Instead of using the i to check the cores, simply break if cluster_mode ==
LOCKSTEP_MODE. That will avoid the fragile dance around the manipulation of
variable i and simplify the release of resources in release_r5_cores.
> + }
> +
> + cluster->mode = cluster_mode;
> + cluster->core_count = core_count;
> + cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret);
> + cluster->core_count = 0;
> + cluster->r5_cores = NULL;
> + goto release_r5_cores;
> + }
> +
> + kfree(child_devs);
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_r5_cores:
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> + put_device(child_devs[i]);
> + rproc_del(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
> + rproc_free(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
> + }
> + kfree(r5_cores);
> + kfree(child_devs);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int i;
> +
> + cluster = (struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + if (!cluster)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> + put_device(r5_core->dev);
> + rproc_del(r5_core->rproc);
> + rproc_free(r5_core->rproc);
> + }
> +
> + kfree(cluster->r5_cores);
> + kfree(cluster);
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe()
> + *
> + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
> + *
> + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT,
> + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + cluster = kzalloc(sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cluster)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + cluster->dev = dev;
> +
> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to populate platform dev\n");
> + kfree(cluster);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster);
> + if (ret) {
> + zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(pdev);
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Match table for OF platform binding */
> +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
> + { /* end of list */ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
> + },
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
There is a discrepency between the GPL-2.0 in the SPDS identifier and the above.
More comments tomorrow or Tuesday.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> --
> 2.25.1
>
On 9/1/22 1:25 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 06:39:55PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> From: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
>>
>> This driver enables r5f dual core Real time Processing Unit subsystem
>> available on Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale MPSoC Platform. RPU subsystem
>> (cluster) can be configured in different modes e.g. split mode in which
>> two r5f cores work independent of each other and lock-step mode in which
>> both r5f cores execute same code clock-for-clock and notify if the
>> result is different.
>>
>> The Xilinx r5 Remoteproc Driver boots the RPU cores via calls to the Xilinx
>> Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory access
>> and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this
>> driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v9
>> - replace devm_rproc_alloc with rproc_alloc
>> - %s/until/while/r
>> - remove extra line
>> - %s/i > -1/i >=0/r fix this throughout the driver
>> - fix type of tcm_mode from int to enum rpu_tcm_comb
>> - release &child_pdev->dev references in case of failure
>> - remove zynqmp_r5_core_exit()
>> - undefined memory-region property isn't driver failure
>> - remove tcm bank count check from ops
>> - fix tcm bank turn-off sequence
>> - fix parse_fw function documentation
>> - do not use rproc_mem_entry_init on vdev0buffers
>> - declare variabls in reverse xmas tree order throughout the driver
>>
>> Changes in v8:
>> - None
>>
>> Changes in v7:
>> - None
>>
>> Changes in v6:
>> - None
>>
>> Changes in v5:
>> - None
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Remove redundant header files
>> - use dev_err_probe() to report errors during probe
>> - Fix missing check on error code returned by zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
>> - Fix memory leaks all over the driver when resource allocation fails for any core
>> - make cluster mode check only at one place
>> - remove redundant initialization of variable
>> - remove redundant use of of_node_put()
>> - Fix Comment format problem
>> - Assign offset of zynqmp_tcm_banks instead of duplicating it
>> - Add tcm and memory regions rproc carveouts during prepare instead of parse_fw
>> - Remove rproc_mem_entry object from r5_core
>> - Use put_device() and rproc_del() APIs to fix memory leaks
>> - Replace pr_* with dev_*. This was missed in v3, fix now.
>> - Use "GPL" instead of "GPL v2" in MODULE_LICENSE macro. This was suggested by checkpatch script.
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Fix checkpatch script indentation warning
>> - Remove unused variable from xilinx remoteproc driver
>> - use C style comments, i.e /*...*/
>> - Remove redundant debug information which can be derived using /proc/device-tree
>> - Fix multilined comment format
>> - s/"final fot TCM"/"final for TCM"
>> - Function devm_kzalloc() does not return an code on error, just NULL.
>> Remove redundant error check for this function throughout the driver.
>> - Fix RPU mode configuration and add documentation accordingly
>> - Get rid of the indentations to match function documentation style with rest of the driver
>> - Fix memory leak by only using r5_rproc->priv and not replace it with new instance
>> - Use 'i' for the outer loop and 'j' for the inner one as per convention
>> - Remove redundant error and NULL checks throughout the driver
>> - Use devm_kcalloc() when more than one element is required
>> - Add memory-regions carveouts during driver probe instead of parse_fw call
>> This removes redundant copy of reserved_mem object in r5_core structure.
>> - Fix memory leak by using of_node_put()
>> - Fix indentation of tcm_mem_map function args
>> - Remove redundant init of variables
>> - Initialize tcm bank size variable for lockstep mode
>> - Replace u32 with phys_addr_t for variable stroing memory bank address
>> - Add documentation of TCM behavior in lockstep mode
>> - Use dev_get_drvdata instead of platform driver API
>> - Remove info level messages
>> - Fix checkpatch.pl warnings
>> - Add documentation for the Xilinx r5f platform to understand driver design
>> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 12 +
>> drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 1055 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 1068 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> index 166019786653..5637a71c0677 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> @@ -352,6 +352,18 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC
>> It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
>> a slave processor.
>>
>> +config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC
>> + tristate "Xilinx R5 remoteproc support"
>> + depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP
>> + depends on ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE
>> + select RPMSG_VIRTIO
>> + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
>> + help
>> + Say y or m here to support Xilinx R5 remote processors via the remote
>> + processor framework.
>> +
>> + It's safe to say N if not interested in using RPU r5f cores.
>> +
>> endif # REMOTEPROC
>>
>> endmenu
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>> index 5478c7cb9e07..91314a9b43ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>> @@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC) += xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..9865b51e0356
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,1055 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
>> + *
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> +#include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +
>> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>> +
>> +/* settings for RPU cluster mode */
>> +enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode {
>> + SPLIT_MODE = 0, /* When cores run as separate processor */
>> + LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1, /* cores execute same code in lockstep,clk-for-clk */
>> + SINGLE_CPU_MODE = 2, /* core0 is held in reset and only core1 runs */
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct mem_bank_data - Memory Bank description
>> + *
>> + * @addr: Start address of memory bank
>> + * @size: Size of Memory bank
>> + * @pm_domain_id: Power-domains id of memory bank for firmware to turn on/off
>> + * @bank_name: name of the bank for remoteproc framework
>> + */
>> +struct mem_bank_data {
>> + phys_addr_t addr;
>> + size_t size;
>> + u32 pm_domain_id;
>> + char *bank_name;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks[] = {
>> + {0xffe00000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
>> + {0xffe20000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_BTCM, "btcm0"},
>> + {0xffe90000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_ATCM, "atcm1"},
>> + {0xffeb0000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_BTCM, "btcm1"},
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct zynqmp_r5_core - ZynqMP R5 core structure
>> + *
>> + * @dev: device of RPU instance
>> + * @np: device node of RPU instance
>> + * @tcm_bank_count: number TCM banks accessible to this RPU
>> + * @tcm_banks: array of each TCM bank data
>> + * @rmem_count: Number of reserved mem regions
>> + * @rmem: reserved memory region nodes from device tree
>> + * @rproc: rproc handle
>> + * @pm_domain_id: RPU CPU power domain id
>> + */
>> +struct zynqmp_r5_core {
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + int tcm_bank_count;
>> + struct mem_bank_data **tcm_banks;
>> + int rmem_count;
>> + struct reserved_mem **rmem;
>> + struct rproc *rproc;
>> + u32 pm_domain_id;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct zynqmp_r5_cluster - ZynqMP R5 cluster structure
>> + *
>> + * @dev: r5f subsystem cluster device node
>> + * @mode: cluster mode of type zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode
>> + * @core_count: number of r5 cores used for this cluster mode
>> + * @r5_cores: Array of pointers pointing to r5 core
>> + */
>> +struct zynqmp_r5_cluster {
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode mode;
>> + int core_count;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode
>> + *
>> + * set RPU operation mode
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core,
>> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
>> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, fw_reg_val);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to set RPU mode\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to configure TCM\n");
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + *
>> + * Start R5 Core from designated boot address.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
>> + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The exception vector pointers (EVP) refer to the base-address of
>> + * exception vectors (for reset, IRQ, FIQ, etc). The reset-vector
>> + * starts at the base-address and subsequent vectors are on 4-byte
>> + * boundaries.
>> + *
>> + * Exception vectors can start either from 0x0000_0000 (LOVEC) or
>> + * from 0xFFFF_0000 (HIVEC) which is mapped in the OCM (On-Chip Memory)
>> + *
>> + * Usually firmware will put Exception vectors at LOVEC.
>> + *
>> + * It is not recommend that you change the exception vector.
>> + * Changing the EVP to HIVEC will result in increased interrupt latency
>> + * and jitter. Also, if the OCM is secured and the Cortex-R5F processor
>> + * is non-secured, then the Cortex-R5F processor cannot access the
>> + * HIVEC exception vectors in the OCM.
>> + */
>> + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr >= 0xFFFC0000) ?
>> + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(r5_core->dev, "RPU boot addr 0x%llx from %s.", rproc->bootaddr,
>> + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM");
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_wake(r5_core->pm_domain_id, 1,
>> + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(r5_core->dev,
>> + "failed to start RPU = 0x%x\n", r5_core->pm_domain_id);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + *
>> + * Power down R5 Core.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(r5_core->pm_domain_id,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to stop remoteproc RPU %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @mem: mem entry to map
>> + *
>> + * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map(struct rproc *rproc,
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *va;
>> +
>> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + mem->va = (void *)va;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
>> + *
>> + * Unmap memory-region carveout
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_mem_region_unmap(struct rproc *rproc,
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>> +{
>> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * add_mem_regions
>> + * @r5_core: single R5 core's corresponding zynqmp_r5_core type instance
>> + * @rmem: reserved mem region parsed from dt node
>> + *
>> + * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in
>> + * memory-region property
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int add_mem_regions_carveout(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry **rproc_mem;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
>> + int i, num_mem_regions;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> + num_mem_regions = r5_core->rmem_count;
>> +
>> + /* memory regions not defined */
>> + if (num_mem_regions < 1)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + rproc_mem = kcalloc(num_mem_regions,
>> + sizeof(struct rproc_mem_entry *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rproc_mem)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_mem_regions; i++) {
>> + rmem = r5_core->rmem[i];
>> +
>> + if (!strncmp(rmem->name, "vdev0buffer", strlen("vdev0buffer"))) {
>> + /* Register reserved memory for vdev buffer */
>> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, i,
>> + rmem->size,
>> + rmem->base,
>> + rmem->name);
>> + } else {
>> + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */
>> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, NULL,
>> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
>> + rmem->size, rmem->base,
>> + zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map,
>> + zynqmp_r5_mem_region_unmap,
>> + rmem->name);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!rproc_mem[i])
>> + goto release_mem_regions;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "reserved mem carveout %s addr=%llx, size=0x%llx",
>> + rmem->name, rmem->base, rmem->size);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Add carveouts only if all rproc mem enties are
>> + * successfully initialized
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_mem_regions; i++)
>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem[i]);
>> +
>> + kfree(rproc_mem);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +release_mem_regions:
>> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
>> + kfree(rproc_mem[i]);
>> + kfree(rproc_mem);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
>> + *
>> + * Unmap TCM banks when powering down R5 core.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int tcm_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>> +{
>> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * tcm_mem_map
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of
>> + *
>> + * Given TCM bank entry, this callback will set device address for R5
>> + * running on TCM and also setup virtual address for TCM bank
>> + * remoteproc carveout.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc,
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *va;
>> +
>> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* Update memory entry va */
>> + mem->va = (void *)va;
>> +
>> + /* clear TCMs */
>> + memset_io(va, 0, mem->len);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000,
>> + * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx.
>> + *
>> + * Zero out the high 12 bits of the address. This will give
>> + * expected values for TCM Banks 0A and 0B (0x0 and 0x20000).
>> + */
>> + mem->da &= 0x000fffff;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * TCM Banks 1A and 1B still have to be translated.
>> + *
>> + * Below handle these two banks' absolute addresses (0xffe90000 and
>> + * 0xffeb0000) and convert to the expected relative addresses
>> + * (0x0 and 0x20000).
>> + */
>> + if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000)
>> + mem->da -= 0x90000;
>> +
>> + /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */
>> + if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) {
>> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "invalid TCM address: %x\n", mem->da);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry **rproc_mem;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + int i, num_banks, ret;
>> + phys_addr_t bank_addr;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + u32 pm_domain_id;
>> + size_t bank_size;
>> + char *bank_name;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
>> +
>> + rproc_mem = kcalloc(num_banks,
>> + sizeof(struct rproc_mem_entry *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rproc_mem)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Power-on Each 64KB TCM,
>> + * register its address space, map and unmap functions
>> + * and add carveouts accordingly
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
>> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->addr;
>> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->bank_name;
>> + bank_size = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
>> + goto release_tcm_split;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM carveout split mode %s addr=%llx, size=0x%lx",
>> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
>> +
>> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
>> + bank_size, bank_addr,
>> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
>> + bank_name);
>> + if (!rproc_mem[i]) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
>> + goto release_tcm_split;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Add carveouts only if all rproc mem enties are
>> + * successfully initialized
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++)
>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem[i]);
>> +
>> + kfree(rproc_mem);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +release_tcm_split:
>> + /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
>> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
>> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
>> + kfree(rproc_mem[i]);
>> + }
>> + kfree(rproc_mem);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *rproc_mem;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + int i, num_banks, ret;
>> + phys_addr_t bank_addr;
>> + size_t bank_size = 0;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + u32 pm_domain_id;
>> + char *bank_name;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> +
>> + /* Go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */
>> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * In lockstep mode, TCM is contiguous memory block
>> + * However, each TCM block still needs to be enabled individually.
>> + * So, Enable each TCM block individually, but add their size
>> + * to create contiguous memory region.
>> + */
>> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[0]->addr;
>> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[0]->bank_name;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
>> + bank_size += r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
>> +
>> + /* Turn on each TCM bank individually */
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
>> + goto release_tcm_lockstep;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM add carveout lockstep mode %s addr=0x%llx, size=0x%lx",
>> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
>> +
>> + /* Register TCM address range, TCM map and unmap functions */
>> + rproc_mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
>> + bank_size, bank_addr,
>> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
>> + bank_name);
>> + if (!rproc_mem) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto release_tcm_lockstep;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* If registration is success, add carveouts */
>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +release_tcm_lockstep:
>> + /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
>> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
>> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * add_tcm_banks()
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + *
>> + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance
>> + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory
>> + * needed for firmware to be loaded
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int add_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> + if (!r5_core)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> +
>> + cluster = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>> + if (!cluster) {
>> + dev_err(dev->parent, "Invalid driver data\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * In lockstep mode TCM banks are one contiguous memory region of 256Kb
>> + * In split mode, each TCM bank is 64Kb and not contiguous.
>> + * We add memory carveouts accordingly.
>> + */
>> + if (cluster->mode == SPLIT_MODE)
>> + return add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(rproc);
>> + else if (cluster->mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE)
>> + return add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(rproc);
>> +
>> + dev_err(cluster->dev, "invalid cluster mode\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw()
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core
>> + *
>> + * get resource table if available
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
>> + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
>> + /*
>> + * resource table only required for IPC.
>> + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error;
>> + * for example, loading r5 hello world application
>> + * so simply inform user and keep going.
>> + */
>> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n");
>> + ret = 0;
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = add_tcm_banks(rproc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to get TCM banks, err %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = add_mem_regions_carveout(rproc);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "failed to get reserve mem regions %d\n",
>> + ret);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + u32 pm_domain_id;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; i++) {
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
>> + if (zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id))
>> + dev_warn(r5_core->dev,
>> + "can't turn off TCM bank 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
>> + .prepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare,
>> + .unprepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare,
>> + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
>> + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
>> + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
>> + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
>> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
>> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
>> + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
>> + * Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node
>> + * this is called for each individual R5 core
>> + *
>> + * @cdev: Device node of each r5 core
>> + *
>> + * Return: zynqmp_r5_core object for success, error pointer in case of error.
>> + */
>> +static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + struct rproc *r5_rproc;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /* Set up DMA mask */
>> + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(cdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> +
>> + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
>> + r5_rproc = rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev),
>> + &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
>> + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core));
>> + if (!r5_rproc) {
>> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to allocate memory for rproc instance\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)r5_rproc->priv;
>> + r5_core->dev = cdev;
>> + r5_core->np = dev_of_node(cdev);
>> + if (!r5_core->np) {
>> + dev_err(cdev, "can't get device node for r5 core\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> Here @r5_rproc is leaked and r5_rproc->rproc never free'ed.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Add R5 remoteproc core */
>> + ret = rproc_add(r5_rproc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to add r5 remoteproc\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> Same.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_core->rproc = r5_rproc;
>> + return r5_core;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node()
>> + * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
>> + * in r5_core instance. We will use hardcoded TCM information from
>> + * driver for now in this function.
>> + *
> It would be a good idea to explain _why_ hardcoded values are used.
>
>
>> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node;
>> + int i, j;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver while
> I'm not sure why there is a "ToDo" here since this is exactly what you are
> doing.
>
>> + * system-dt spec is not final for TCM
>> + */
>> + tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks);
>> +
>> + /* count per core tcm banks */
>> + tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count;
>> +
>> + if (tcm_bank_count <= 0)
>> + return -EINVAL;
> As far as I can tell this can't happen and as such should be removed.
>
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode.
>> + * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another
>> + * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly
>> + */
>> + tcm_node = 0;
>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count,
>> + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < tcm_bank_count; j++) {
>> + /*
>> + * Use pre-defined TCM reg values.
>> + * Eventually this should be replaced by values
>> + * parsed from dts.
>> + */
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j] =
>> + (struct mem_bank_data *)&zynqmp_tcm_banks[tcm_node];
>> + tcm_node++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node()
>> + * parse memory-region property from dt node and add
>> + * memory region carveouts
>> + *
>> + * @r5_core: pointer to zynqmp_r5_core type object
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np, *rmem_np;
>> + struct reserved_mem **rmem;
>> + int res_mem_count, i;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> + np = r5_core->np;
>> +
>> + res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
>> + sizeof(phandle));
>> + if (res_mem_count <= 0) {
>> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n",
>> + res_mem_count);
>> + r5_core->rmem_count = 0;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rmem = devm_kcalloc(dev, res_mem_count,
>> + sizeof(struct reserved_mem *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rmem)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) {
>> + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i);
>> + if (!rmem_np)
>> + goto release_rmem;
>> +
>> + rmem[i] = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
>> + if (!rmem[i]) {
>> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
>> + goto release_rmem;
>> + }
>> +
>> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_core->rmem_count = res_mem_count;
>> + r5_core->rmem = rmem;
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +release_rmem:
>> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
>> + kfree(rmem[i]);
> Function of_reserved_mem_lookup() doesn't allocate a new reserved_mem structure,
> you get a reference to an existing one. As such there is no need to explicitly
> free individual elements of the rmem array.
>
>> + devm_kfree(dev, rmem);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_core_init()
>> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_core type object
>> + *
>> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
>> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
>> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + int ret, i;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> + /* Initialize r5 cores with power-domains parsed from dts */
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains",
>> + 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to set r5 cluster mode %d, err %d\n",
>> + cluster->mode, ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_cluster_init()
>> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
>> + *
>> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>> +{
>> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE;
>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>> + struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev);
>> + struct platform_device *child_pdev;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
>> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val;
>> + struct device **child_devs;
>> + struct device_node *child;
>> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode;
>> + int core_count, ret, i;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL,
>> + * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode
>> + */
>> + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * For now driver only supports split mode and lockstep mode.
>> + * fail driver probe if either of that is not set in dts.
>> + */
>> + if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) {
> Why is are LOCKSTEP_MODE and LOCKSTEP_MODE defined when the same values were
> already added in xlnx-zynqmp.h in patch 3/6? And why not add SINGLE_CPU_MODE
> there as well instead of duplicating things in enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode?
>
>> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_COMB;
>> + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
>> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE) {
>> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
>> + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT;
>> + } else {
>> + dev_err(dev, "driver does not support cluster mode %d\n", cluster_mode);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Number of cores is decided by number of child nodes of
>> + * r5f subsystem node in dts. If Split mode is used in dts
>> + * 2 child nodes are expected.
>> + * In lockstep mode if two child nodes are available,
>> + * only use first child node and consider it as core0
>> + * and ignore core1 dt node.
>> + */
>> + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node);
>> + if (core_count <= 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) {
>> + dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n");
>> + core_count = 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + child_devs = kcalloc(core_count, sizeof(struct device *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!child_devs)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + r5_cores = kcalloc(core_count,
>> + sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!r5_cores) {
>> + kfree(child_devs);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + i = 0;
>> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) {
>> + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
>> + if (!child_pdev) {
>> + of_node_put(child);
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto release_r5_cores;
>> + }
>> +
>> + child_devs[i] = &child_pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + /* create and add remoteproc instance of type struct rproc */
>> + r5_cores[i] = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(&child_pdev->dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(r5_cores[i])) {
>> + of_node_put(child);
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(r5_cores[i]);
>> + goto release_r5_cores;
> If we are here and i == 0, we are leaking a reference to child_pdev since the
> loop in release_r5_cores won't execute.
>
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + i++;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If two child nodes are available in dts in lockstep mode,
>> + * then ignore second child node.
>> + */
>> + if (i == core_count) {
>> + of_node_put(child);
>> + break;
>> + }
> Instead of using the i to check the cores, simply break if cluster_mode ==
> LOCKSTEP_MODE. That will avoid the fragile dance around the manipulation of
> variable i and simplify the release of resources in release_r5_cores.
>
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + cluster->mode = cluster_mode;
>> + cluster->core_count = core_count;
>> + cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret);
>> + cluster->core_count = 0;
>> + cluster->r5_cores = NULL;
>> + goto release_r5_cores;
>> + }
>> +
>> + kfree(child_devs);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +release_r5_cores:
>> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>> + put_device(child_devs[i]);
>> + rproc_del(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
>> + rproc_free(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
>> + }
>> + kfree(r5_cores);
>> + kfree(child_devs);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + cluster = (struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + if (!cluster)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
>> + put_device(r5_core->dev);
>> + rproc_del(r5_core->rproc);
>> + rproc_free(r5_core->rproc);
>> + }
>> +
>> + kfree(cluster->r5_cores);
>> + kfree(cluster);
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe()
>> + *
>> + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
>> + *
>> + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT,
>> + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + cluster = kzalloc(sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!cluster)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + cluster->dev = dev;
>> +
>> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to populate platform dev\n");
>> + kfree(cluster);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(pdev);
>> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Match table for OF platform binding */
>> +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
>> + { /* end of list */ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
>> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
>> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> There is a discrepency between the GPL-2.0 in the SPDS identifier and the above.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
I will fix above as
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL
>
> More comments tomorrow or Tuesday.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
Hi Mathieu,
Thanks for reviews. Please find my comments below.
On 9/1/22 1:25 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 06:39:55PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> From: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
>>
>> This driver enables r5f dual core Real time Processing Unit subsystem
>> available on Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale MPSoC Platform. RPU subsystem
>> (cluster) can be configured in different modes e.g. split mode in which
>> two r5f cores work independent of each other and lock-step mode in which
>> both r5f cores execute same code clock-for-clock and notify if the
>> result is different.
>>
>> The Xilinx r5 Remoteproc Driver boots the RPU cores via calls to the Xilinx
>> Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory access
>> and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this
>> driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v9
>> - replace devm_rproc_alloc with rproc_alloc
>> - %s/until/while/r
>> - remove extra line
>> - %s/i > -1/i >=0/r fix this throughout the driver
>> - fix type of tcm_mode from int to enum rpu_tcm_comb
>> - release &child_pdev->dev references in case of failure
>> - remove zynqmp_r5_core_exit()
>> - undefined memory-region property isn't driver failure
>> - remove tcm bank count check from ops
>> - fix tcm bank turn-off sequence
>> - fix parse_fw function documentation
>> - do not use rproc_mem_entry_init on vdev0buffers
>> - declare variabls in reverse xmas tree order throughout the driver
>>
>> Changes in v8:
>> - None
>>
>> Changes in v7:
>> - None
>>
>> Changes in v6:
>> - None
>>
>> Changes in v5:
>> - None
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Remove redundant header files
>> - use dev_err_probe() to report errors during probe
>> - Fix missing check on error code returned by zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
>> - Fix memory leaks all over the driver when resource allocation fails for any core
>> - make cluster mode check only at one place
>> - remove redundant initialization of variable
>> - remove redundant use of of_node_put()
>> - Fix Comment format problem
>> - Assign offset of zynqmp_tcm_banks instead of duplicating it
>> - Add tcm and memory regions rproc carveouts during prepare instead of parse_fw
>> - Remove rproc_mem_entry object from r5_core
>> - Use put_device() and rproc_del() APIs to fix memory leaks
>> - Replace pr_* with dev_*. This was missed in v3, fix now.
>> - Use "GPL" instead of "GPL v2" in MODULE_LICENSE macro. This was suggested by checkpatch script.
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Fix checkpatch script indentation warning
>> - Remove unused variable from xilinx remoteproc driver
>> - use C style comments, i.e /*...*/
>> - Remove redundant debug information which can be derived using /proc/device-tree
>> - Fix multilined comment format
>> - s/"final fot TCM"/"final for TCM"
>> - Function devm_kzalloc() does not return an code on error, just NULL.
>> Remove redundant error check for this function throughout the driver.
>> - Fix RPU mode configuration and add documentation accordingly
>> - Get rid of the indentations to match function documentation style with rest of the driver
>> - Fix memory leak by only using r5_rproc->priv and not replace it with new instance
>> - Use 'i' for the outer loop and 'j' for the inner one as per convention
>> - Remove redundant error and NULL checks throughout the driver
>> - Use devm_kcalloc() when more than one element is required
>> - Add memory-regions carveouts during driver probe instead of parse_fw call
>> This removes redundant copy of reserved_mem object in r5_core structure.
>> - Fix memory leak by using of_node_put()
>> - Fix indentation of tcm_mem_map function args
>> - Remove redundant init of variables
>> - Initialize tcm bank size variable for lockstep mode
>> - Replace u32 with phys_addr_t for variable stroing memory bank address
>> - Add documentation of TCM behavior in lockstep mode
>> - Use dev_get_drvdata instead of platform driver API
>> - Remove info level messages
>> - Fix checkpatch.pl warnings
>> - Add documentation for the Xilinx r5f platform to understand driver design
>> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 12 +
>> drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 1055 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 1068 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> index 166019786653..5637a71c0677 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> @@ -352,6 +352,18 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC
>> It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
>> a slave processor.
>>
>> +config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC
>> + tristate "Xilinx R5 remoteproc support"
>> + depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP
>> + depends on ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE
>> + select RPMSG_VIRTIO
>> + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
>> + help
>> + Say y or m here to support Xilinx R5 remote processors via the remote
>> + processor framework.
>> +
>> + It's safe to say N if not interested in using RPU r5f cores.
>> +
>> endif # REMOTEPROC
>>
>> endmenu
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>> index 5478c7cb9e07..91314a9b43ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>> @@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC) += xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..9865b51e0356
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,1055 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
>> + *
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> +#include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +
>> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>> +
>> +/* settings for RPU cluster mode */
>> +enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode {
>> + SPLIT_MODE = 0, /* When cores run as separate processor */
>> + LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1, /* cores execute same code in lockstep,clk-for-clk */
>> + SINGLE_CPU_MODE = 2, /* core0 is held in reset and only core1 runs */
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct mem_bank_data - Memory Bank description
>> + *
>> + * @addr: Start address of memory bank
>> + * @size: Size of Memory bank
>> + * @pm_domain_id: Power-domains id of memory bank for firmware to turn on/off
>> + * @bank_name: name of the bank for remoteproc framework
>> + */
>> +struct mem_bank_data {
>> + phys_addr_t addr;
>> + size_t size;
>> + u32 pm_domain_id;
>> + char *bank_name;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks[] = {
>> + {0xffe00000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
>> + {0xffe20000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_BTCM, "btcm0"},
>> + {0xffe90000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_ATCM, "atcm1"},
>> + {0xffeb0000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_BTCM, "btcm1"},
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct zynqmp_r5_core - ZynqMP R5 core structure
>> + *
>> + * @dev: device of RPU instance
>> + * @np: device node of RPU instance
>> + * @tcm_bank_count: number TCM banks accessible to this RPU
>> + * @tcm_banks: array of each TCM bank data
>> + * @rmem_count: Number of reserved mem regions
>> + * @rmem: reserved memory region nodes from device tree
>> + * @rproc: rproc handle
>> + * @pm_domain_id: RPU CPU power domain id
>> + */
>> +struct zynqmp_r5_core {
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + int tcm_bank_count;
>> + struct mem_bank_data **tcm_banks;
>> + int rmem_count;
>> + struct reserved_mem **rmem;
>> + struct rproc *rproc;
>> + u32 pm_domain_id;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct zynqmp_r5_cluster - ZynqMP R5 cluster structure
>> + *
>> + * @dev: r5f subsystem cluster device node
>> + * @mode: cluster mode of type zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode
>> + * @core_count: number of r5 cores used for this cluster mode
>> + * @r5_cores: Array of pointers pointing to r5 core
>> + */
>> +struct zynqmp_r5_cluster {
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode mode;
>> + int core_count;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode
>> + *
>> + * set RPU operation mode
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core,
>> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
>> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, fw_reg_val);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to set RPU mode\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to configure TCM\n");
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + *
>> + * Start R5 Core from designated boot address.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
>> + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The exception vector pointers (EVP) refer to the base-address of
>> + * exception vectors (for reset, IRQ, FIQ, etc). The reset-vector
>> + * starts at the base-address and subsequent vectors are on 4-byte
>> + * boundaries.
>> + *
>> + * Exception vectors can start either from 0x0000_0000 (LOVEC) or
>> + * from 0xFFFF_0000 (HIVEC) which is mapped in the OCM (On-Chip Memory)
>> + *
>> + * Usually firmware will put Exception vectors at LOVEC.
>> + *
>> + * It is not recommend that you change the exception vector.
>> + * Changing the EVP to HIVEC will result in increased interrupt latency
>> + * and jitter. Also, if the OCM is secured and the Cortex-R5F processor
>> + * is non-secured, then the Cortex-R5F processor cannot access the
>> + * HIVEC exception vectors in the OCM.
>> + */
>> + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr >= 0xFFFC0000) ?
>> + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(r5_core->dev, "RPU boot addr 0x%llx from %s.", rproc->bootaddr,
>> + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM");
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_wake(r5_core->pm_domain_id, 1,
>> + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(r5_core->dev,
>> + "failed to start RPU = 0x%x\n", r5_core->pm_domain_id);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + *
>> + * Power down R5 Core.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(r5_core->pm_domain_id,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to stop remoteproc RPU %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @mem: mem entry to map
>> + *
>> + * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map(struct rproc *rproc,
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *va;
>> +
>> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + mem->va = (void *)va;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
>> + *
>> + * Unmap memory-region carveout
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_mem_region_unmap(struct rproc *rproc,
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>> +{
>> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * add_mem_regions
>> + * @r5_core: single R5 core's corresponding zynqmp_r5_core type instance
>> + * @rmem: reserved mem region parsed from dt node
>> + *
>> + * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in
>> + * memory-region property
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int add_mem_regions_carveout(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry **rproc_mem;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
>> + int i, num_mem_regions;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> + num_mem_regions = r5_core->rmem_count;
>> +
>> + /* memory regions not defined */
>> + if (num_mem_regions < 1)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + rproc_mem = kcalloc(num_mem_regions,
>> + sizeof(struct rproc_mem_entry *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rproc_mem)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_mem_regions; i++) {
>> + rmem = r5_core->rmem[i];
>> +
>> + if (!strncmp(rmem->name, "vdev0buffer", strlen("vdev0buffer"))) {
>> + /* Register reserved memory for vdev buffer */
>> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, i,
>> + rmem->size,
>> + rmem->base,
>> + rmem->name);
>> + } else {
>> + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */
>> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, NULL,
>> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
>> + rmem->size, rmem->base,
>> + zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map,
>> + zynqmp_r5_mem_region_unmap,
>> + rmem->name);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!rproc_mem[i])
>> + goto release_mem_regions;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "reserved mem carveout %s addr=%llx, size=0x%llx",
>> + rmem->name, rmem->base, rmem->size);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Add carveouts only if all rproc mem enties are
>> + * successfully initialized
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_mem_regions; i++)
>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem[i]);
>> +
>> + kfree(rproc_mem);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +release_mem_regions:
>> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
>> + kfree(rproc_mem[i]);
>> + kfree(rproc_mem);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
>> + *
>> + * Unmap TCM banks when powering down R5 core.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int tcm_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>> +{
>> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * tcm_mem_map
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of
>> + *
>> + * Given TCM bank entry, this callback will set device address for R5
>> + * running on TCM and also setup virtual address for TCM bank
>> + * remoteproc carveout.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc,
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *va;
>> +
>> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* Update memory entry va */
>> + mem->va = (void *)va;
>> +
>> + /* clear TCMs */
>> + memset_io(va, 0, mem->len);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000,
>> + * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx.
>> + *
>> + * Zero out the high 12 bits of the address. This will give
>> + * expected values for TCM Banks 0A and 0B (0x0 and 0x20000).
>> + */
>> + mem->da &= 0x000fffff;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * TCM Banks 1A and 1B still have to be translated.
>> + *
>> + * Below handle these two banks' absolute addresses (0xffe90000 and
>> + * 0xffeb0000) and convert to the expected relative addresses
>> + * (0x0 and 0x20000).
>> + */
>> + if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000)
>> + mem->da -= 0x90000;
>> +
>> + /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */
>> + if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) {
>> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "invalid TCM address: %x\n", mem->da);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry **rproc_mem;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + int i, num_banks, ret;
>> + phys_addr_t bank_addr;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + u32 pm_domain_id;
>> + size_t bank_size;
>> + char *bank_name;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
>> +
>> + rproc_mem = kcalloc(num_banks,
>> + sizeof(struct rproc_mem_entry *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rproc_mem)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Power-on Each 64KB TCM,
>> + * register its address space, map and unmap functions
>> + * and add carveouts accordingly
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
>> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->addr;
>> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->bank_name;
>> + bank_size = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
>> + goto release_tcm_split;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM carveout split mode %s addr=%llx, size=0x%lx",
>> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
>> +
>> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
>> + bank_size, bank_addr,
>> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
>> + bank_name);
>> + if (!rproc_mem[i]) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
>> + goto release_tcm_split;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Add carveouts only if all rproc mem enties are
>> + * successfully initialized
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++)
>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem[i]);
>> +
>> + kfree(rproc_mem);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +release_tcm_split:
>> + /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
>> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
>> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
>> + kfree(rproc_mem[i]);
>> + }
>> + kfree(rproc_mem);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *rproc_mem;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + int i, num_banks, ret;
>> + phys_addr_t bank_addr;
>> + size_t bank_size = 0;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + u32 pm_domain_id;
>> + char *bank_name;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> +
>> + /* Go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */
>> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * In lockstep mode, TCM is contiguous memory block
>> + * However, each TCM block still needs to be enabled individually.
>> + * So, Enable each TCM block individually, but add their size
>> + * to create contiguous memory region.
>> + */
>> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[0]->addr;
>> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[0]->bank_name;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
>> + bank_size += r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
>> +
>> + /* Turn on each TCM bank individually */
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
>> + goto release_tcm_lockstep;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM add carveout lockstep mode %s addr=0x%llx, size=0x%lx",
>> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
>> +
>> + /* Register TCM address range, TCM map and unmap functions */
>> + rproc_mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
>> + bank_size, bank_addr,
>> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
>> + bank_name);
>> + if (!rproc_mem) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto release_tcm_lockstep;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* If registration is success, add carveouts */
>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +release_tcm_lockstep:
>> + /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
>> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
>> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * add_tcm_banks()
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + *
>> + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance
>> + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory
>> + * needed for firmware to be loaded
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int add_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> + if (!r5_core)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> +
>> + cluster = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>> + if (!cluster) {
>> + dev_err(dev->parent, "Invalid driver data\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * In lockstep mode TCM banks are one contiguous memory region of 256Kb
>> + * In split mode, each TCM bank is 64Kb and not contiguous.
>> + * We add memory carveouts accordingly.
>> + */
>> + if (cluster->mode == SPLIT_MODE)
>> + return add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(rproc);
>> + else if (cluster->mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE)
>> + return add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(rproc);
>> +
>> + dev_err(cluster->dev, "invalid cluster mode\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw()
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core
>> + *
>> + * get resource table if available
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
>> + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
>> + /*
>> + * resource table only required for IPC.
>> + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error;
>> + * for example, loading r5 hello world application
>> + * so simply inform user and keep going.
>> + */
>> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n");
>> + ret = 0;
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = add_tcm_banks(rproc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to get TCM banks, err %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = add_mem_regions_carveout(rproc);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "failed to get reserve mem regions %d\n",
>> + ret);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + u32 pm_domain_id;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; i++) {
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
>> + if (zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id))
>> + dev_warn(r5_core->dev,
>> + "can't turn off TCM bank 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
>> + .prepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare,
>> + .unprepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare,
>> + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
>> + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
>> + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
>> + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
>> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
>> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
>> + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
>> + * Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node
>> + * this is called for each individual R5 core
>> + *
>> + * @cdev: Device node of each r5 core
>> + *
>> + * Return: zynqmp_r5_core object for success, error pointer in case of error.
>> + */
>> +static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + struct rproc *r5_rproc;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /* Set up DMA mask */
>> + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(cdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> +
>> + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
>> + r5_rproc = rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev),
>> + &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
>> + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core));
>> + if (!r5_rproc) {
>> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to allocate memory for rproc instance\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)r5_rproc->priv;
>> + r5_core->dev = cdev;
>> + r5_core->np = dev_of_node(cdev);
>> + if (!r5_core->np) {
>> + dev_err(cdev, "can't get device node for r5 core\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> Here @r5_rproc is leaked and r5_rproc->rproc never free'ed.
This function is only used in cluster_init.
r5_rproc->rproc is free'ed in release_r5_core label in
zynqmp_r5_cluster_init function if this function fails.
This avoids multiple free of same resource.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Add R5 remoteproc core */
>> + ret = rproc_add(r5_rproc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to add r5 remoteproc\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> Same.
Same as above.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_core->rproc = r5_rproc;
>> + return r5_core;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node()
>> + * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
>> + * in r5_core instance. We will use hardcoded TCM information from
>> + * driver for now in this function.
>> + *
> It would be a good idea to explain _why_ hardcoded values are used.
It is explained in function, but will add in description too.
>
>
>> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node;
>> + int i, j;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver while
> I'm not sure why there is a "ToDo" here since this is exactly what you are
> doing.
Ack. ToDo needs to go.
>> + * system-dt spec is not final for TCM
>> + */
>> + tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks);
>> +
>> + /* count per core tcm banks */
>> + tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count;
>> +
>> + if (tcm_bank_count <= 0)
>> + return -EINVAL;
> As far as I can tell this can't happen and as such should be removed.
I kept this check for future, when we add TCM dt nodes. I will remove it.
>
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode.
>> + * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another
>> + * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly
>> + */
>> + tcm_node = 0;
>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count,
>> + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < tcm_bank_count; j++) {
>> + /*
>> + * Use pre-defined TCM reg values.
>> + * Eventually this should be replaced by values
>> + * parsed from dts.
>> + */
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j] =
>> + (struct mem_bank_data *)&zynqmp_tcm_banks[tcm_node];
>> + tcm_node++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node()
>> + * parse memory-region property from dt node and add
>> + * memory region carveouts
>> + *
>> + * @r5_core: pointer to zynqmp_r5_core type object
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np, *rmem_np;
>> + struct reserved_mem **rmem;
>> + int res_mem_count, i;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> + np = r5_core->np;
>> +
>> + res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
>> + sizeof(phandle));
>> + if (res_mem_count <= 0) {
>> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n",
>> + res_mem_count);
>> + r5_core->rmem_count = 0;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rmem = devm_kcalloc(dev, res_mem_count,
>> + sizeof(struct reserved_mem *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rmem)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) {
>> + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i);
>> + if (!rmem_np)
>> + goto release_rmem;
>> +
>> + rmem[i] = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
>> + if (!rmem[i]) {
>> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
>> + goto release_rmem;
>> + }
>> +
>> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_core->rmem_count = res_mem_count;
>> + r5_core->rmem = rmem;
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +release_rmem:
>> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
>> + kfree(rmem[i]);
> Function of_reserved_mem_lookup() doesn't allocate a new reserved_mem structure,
> you get a reference to an existing one. As such there is no need to explicitly
> free individual elements of the rmem array.
Ack.
>
>> + devm_kfree(dev, rmem);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_core_init()
>> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_core type object
>> + *
>> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
>> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
>> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + int ret, i;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> + /* Initialize r5 cores with power-domains parsed from dts */
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains",
>> + 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to set r5 cluster mode %d, err %d\n",
>> + cluster->mode, ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_cluster_init()
>> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
>> + *
>> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>> +{
>> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE;
>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>> + struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev);
>> + struct platform_device *child_pdev;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
>> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val;
>> + struct device **child_devs;
>> + struct device_node *child;
>> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode;
>> + int core_count, ret, i;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL,
>> + * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode
>> + */
>> + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * For now driver only supports split mode and lockstep mode.
>> + * fail driver probe if either of that is not set in dts.
>> + */
>> + if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) {
> Why is are LOCKSTEP_MODE and LOCKSTEP_MODE defined when the same values were
> already added in xlnx-zynqmp.h in patch 3/6?
Actually LOCKSTEP_MODE defined in this driver is taken from dt-bindings
of this driver. However, PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP defined in firmware
represents value expected by firmware. They are not the same defines.
LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1 which is defined as per xlnx,cluster-mode bindings and
similar to ti cluster-mode bindings. PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP = 0 which is
expected from firmware.
> And why not add SINGLE_CPU_MODE
> there as well instead of duplicating things in enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode?
SINGLE_CPU_MODE just represents xlnx,cluster-mode value from
dt-bindings. It is not supported in firmware.
There are multiple ways to configure r5 cluster in single-cpu mode.
1) Add new EEMI call which asks firmware to configure cluster in
single-cpu mode.
or 2) use existing EEMI calls and configure cores from driver. As
single-cpu-mode is not supported yet, I am not sure, how it will
be implemented or what its design will look like. So, I haven't modified
anything in firmware driver related to single-cpu mode.
>> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_COMB;
>> + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
>> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE) {
>> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
>> + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT;
>> + } else {
>> + dev_err(dev, "driver does not support cluster mode %d\n", cluster_mode);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Number of cores is decided by number of child nodes of
>> + * r5f subsystem node in dts. If Split mode is used in dts
>> + * 2 child nodes are expected.
>> + * In lockstep mode if two child nodes are available,
>> + * only use first child node and consider it as core0
>> + * and ignore core1 dt node.
>> + */
>> + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node);
>> + if (core_count <= 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) {
>> + dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n");
>> + core_count = 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + child_devs = kcalloc(core_count, sizeof(struct device *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!child_devs)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + r5_cores = kcalloc(core_count,
>> + sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!r5_cores) {
>> + kfree(child_devs);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + i = 0;
>> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) {
>> + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
>> + if (!child_pdev) {
>> + of_node_put(child);
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto release_r5_cores;
>> + }
>> +
>> + child_devs[i] = &child_pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + /* create and add remoteproc instance of type struct rproc */
>> + r5_cores[i] = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(&child_pdev->dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(r5_cores[i])) {
>> + of_node_put(child);
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(r5_cores[i]);
>> + goto release_r5_cores;
> If we are here and i == 0, we are leaking a reference to child_pdev since the
> loop in release_r5_cores won't execute.
Ack. I will check if i == 0 and put_device() before jumping to
release_r5_cores.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + i++;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If two child nodes are available in dts in lockstep mode,
>> + * then ignore second child node.
>> + */
>> + if (i == core_count) {
>> + of_node_put(child);
>> + break;
>> + }
> Instead of using the i to check the cores, simply break if cluster_mode ==
> LOCKSTEP_MODE. That will avoid the fragile dance around the manipulation of
> variable i and simplify the release of resources in release_r5_cores.
>
Actually variable name "i" needs to be changed. I need that variable to
track how many cores are added successfully.
So, if first core is added and second core fails, then I can release
resources allocated for first core successfully.
So, instead of "i" I can use meaningful variable name like "cores_added"
or "cores_allocated".
>> + }
>> +
>> + cluster->mode = cluster_mode;
>> + cluster->core_count = core_count;
>> + cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret);
>> + cluster->core_count = 0;
>> + cluster->r5_cores = NULL;
>> + goto release_r5_cores;
>> + }
>> +
>> + kfree(child_devs);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +release_r5_cores:
>> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>> + put_device(child_devs[i]);
>> + rproc_del(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
>> + rproc_free(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
>> + }
>> + kfree(r5_cores);
>> + kfree(child_devs);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + cluster = (struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + if (!cluster)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
>> + put_device(r5_core->dev);
>> + rproc_del(r5_core->rproc);
>> + rproc_free(r5_core->rproc);
>> + }
>> +
>> + kfree(cluster->r5_cores);
>> + kfree(cluster);
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe()
>> + *
>> + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
>> + *
>> + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT,
>> + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + cluster = kzalloc(sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!cluster)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + cluster->dev = dev;
>> +
>> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to populate platform dev\n");
>> + kfree(cluster);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(pdev);
>> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Match table for OF platform binding */
>> +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
>> + { /* end of list */ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
>> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
>> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> There is a discrepency between the GPL-2.0 in the SPDS identifier and the above.
>
> More comments tomorrow or Tuesday.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
[...]
> > > +
> > > +static const struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
> > > + .prepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare,
> > > + .unprepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare,
> > > + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
> > > + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
> > > + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> > > + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
> > > + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> > > + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> > > + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
> > > + * Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node
> > > + * this is called for each individual R5 core
> > > + *
> > > + * @cdev: Device node of each r5 core
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: zynqmp_r5_core object for success, error pointer in case of error.
> > > + */
> > > +static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> > > + struct rproc *r5_rproc;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + /* Set up DMA mask */
> > > + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(cdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > > +
> > > + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
> > > + r5_rproc = rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev),
> > > + &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
> > > + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core));
> > > + if (!r5_rproc) {
> > > + dev_err(cdev, "failed to allocate memory for rproc instance\n");
> > > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
> > > + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)r5_rproc->priv;
> > > + r5_core->dev = cdev;
> > > + r5_core->np = dev_of_node(cdev);
> > > + if (!r5_core->np) {
> > > + dev_err(cdev, "can't get device node for r5 core\n");
> > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > Here @r5_rproc is leaked and r5_rproc->rproc never free'ed.
>
> This function is only used in cluster_init.
>
> r5_rproc->rproc is free'ed in release_r5_core label in
> zynqmp_r5_cluster_init function if this function fails.
It would be the case if @r5_core was returned, but it is not. A such
@r5_core[i] zynqmp_r5_cluster_init() is still null and the memory leaked.
>
> This avoids multiple free of same resource.
>
> >
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Add R5 remoteproc core */
> > > + ret = rproc_add(r5_rproc);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(cdev, "failed to add r5 remoteproc\n");
> > > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > Same.
> Same as above.
> >
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + r5_core->rproc = r5_rproc;
> > > + return r5_core;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node()
> > > + * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
> > > + * in r5_core instance. We will use hardcoded TCM information from
> > > + * driver for now in this function.
> > > + *
> > It would be a good idea to explain _why_ hardcoded values are used.
> It is explained in function, but will add in description too.
> >
> >
> > > + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> > > + */
> > > +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> > > +{
> > > + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> > > + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> > > + int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node;
> > > + int i, j;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver while
> > I'm not sure why there is a "ToDo" here since this is exactly what you are
> > doing.
> Ack. ToDo needs to go.
> > > + * system-dt spec is not final for TCM
> > > + */
> > > + tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks);
> > > +
> > > + /* count per core tcm banks */
> > > + tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count;
> > > +
> > > + if (tcm_bank_count <= 0)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > As far as I can tell this can't happen and as such should be removed.
>
> I kept this check for future, when we add TCM dt nodes. I will remove it.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode.
> > > + * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another
> > > + * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly
> > > + */
> > > + tcm_node = 0;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> > > + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> > > + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count,
> > > + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *),
> > > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + for (j = 0; j < tcm_bank_count; j++) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Use pre-defined TCM reg values.
> > > + * Eventually this should be replaced by values
> > > + * parsed from dts.
> > > + */
> > > + r5_core->tcm_banks[j] =
> > > + (struct mem_bank_data *)&zynqmp_tcm_banks[tcm_node];
> > > + tcm_node++;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node()
> > > + * parse memory-region property from dt node and add
> > > + * memory region carveouts
> > > + *
> > > + * @r5_core: pointer to zynqmp_r5_core type object
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> > > + */
> > > +static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
> > > +{
> > > + struct device_node *np, *rmem_np;
> > > + struct reserved_mem **rmem;
> > > + int res_mem_count, i;
> > > + struct device *dev;
> > > +
> > > + dev = r5_core->dev;
> > > + np = r5_core->np;
> > > +
> > > + res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
> > > + sizeof(phandle));
> > > + if (res_mem_count <= 0) {
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n",
> > > + res_mem_count);
> > > + r5_core->rmem_count = 0;
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + rmem = devm_kcalloc(dev, res_mem_count,
> > > + sizeof(struct reserved_mem *), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!rmem)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) {
> > > + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i);
> > > + if (!rmem_np)
> > > + goto release_rmem;
> > > +
> > > + rmem[i] = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
> > > + if (!rmem[i]) {
> > > + of_node_put(rmem_np);
> > > + goto release_rmem;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + of_node_put(rmem_np);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + r5_core->rmem_count = res_mem_count;
> > > + r5_core->rmem = rmem;
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > +release_rmem:
> > > + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> > > + kfree(rmem[i]);
> > Function of_reserved_mem_lookup() doesn't allocate a new reserved_mem structure,
> > you get a reference to an existing one. As such there is no need to explicitly
> > free individual elements of the rmem array.
> Ack.
> >
> > > + devm_kfree(dev, rmem);
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * zynqmp_r5_core_init()
> > > + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_core type object
> > > + *
> > > + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> > > + */
> > > +static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
> > > + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
> > > + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
> > > +{
> > > + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> > > + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> > > + int ret, i;
> > > +
> > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> > > + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> > > +
> > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret);
> > > +
> > > + /* Initialize r5 cores with power-domains parsed from dts */
> > > + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains",
> > > + 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n");
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to set r5 cluster mode %d, err %d\n",
> > > + cluster->mode, ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * zynqmp_r5_cluster_init()
> > > + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> > > + *
> > > + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> > > + */
> > > +static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> > > +{
> > > + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE;
> > > + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> > > + struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev);
> > > + struct platform_device *child_pdev;
> > > + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
> > > + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val;
> > > + struct device **child_devs;
> > > + struct device_node *child;
> > > + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode;
> > > + int core_count, ret, i;
> > > +
> > > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL,
> > > + * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode
> > > + */
> > > + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * For now driver only supports split mode and lockstep mode.
> > > + * fail driver probe if either of that is not set in dts.
> > > + */
> > > + if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) {
> > Why is are LOCKSTEP_MODE and LOCKSTEP_MODE defined when the same values were
> > already added in xlnx-zynqmp.h in patch 3/6?
>
> Actually LOCKSTEP_MODE defined in this driver is taken from dt-bindings of
> this driver. However, PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP defined in firmware represents
> value expected by firmware. They are not the same defines. LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1
> which is defined as per xlnx,cluster-mode bindings and similar to ti
> cluster-mode bindings. PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP = 0 which is expected from
> firmware.
Ah yes, you are correct.
>
>
> > And why not add SINGLE_CPU_MODE
> > there as well instead of duplicating things in enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode?
>
>
> SINGLE_CPU_MODE just represents xlnx,cluster-mode value from dt-bindings. It
> is not supported in firmware.
>
> There are multiple ways to configure r5 cluster in single-cpu mode.
>
> 1) Add new EEMI call which asks firmware to configure cluster in single-cpu
> mode.
>
> or 2) use existing EEMI calls and configure cores from driver. As
> single-cpu-mode is not supported yet, I am not sure, how it will
>
> be implemented or what its design will look like. So, I haven't modified
> anything in firmware driver related to single-cpu mode.
>
>
That is fine.
> > > + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_COMB;
> > > + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
> > > + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE) {
> > > + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
> > > + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT;
> > > + } else {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "driver does not support cluster mode %d\n", cluster_mode);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Number of cores is decided by number of child nodes of
> > > + * r5f subsystem node in dts. If Split mode is used in dts
> > > + * 2 child nodes are expected.
> > > + * In lockstep mode if two child nodes are available,
> > > + * only use first child node and consider it as core0
> > > + * and ignore core1 dt node.
> > > + */
> > > + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node);
> > > + if (core_count <= 0) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) {
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n");
> > > + core_count = 1;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + child_devs = kcalloc(core_count, sizeof(struct device *), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!child_devs)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + r5_cores = kcalloc(core_count,
> > > + sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core *), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!r5_cores) {
> > > + kfree(child_devs);
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + i = 0;
> > > + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) {
> > > + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
> > > + if (!child_pdev) {
> > > + of_node_put(child);
> > > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > > + goto release_r5_cores;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + child_devs[i] = &child_pdev->dev;
> > > +
> > > + /* create and add remoteproc instance of type struct rproc */
> > > + r5_cores[i] = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(&child_pdev->dev);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(r5_cores[i])) {
> > > + of_node_put(child);
> > > + ret = PTR_ERR(r5_cores[i]);
> > > + goto release_r5_cores;
> > If we are here and i == 0, we are leaking a reference to child_pdev since the
> > loop in release_r5_cores won't execute.
> Ack. I will check if i == 0 and put_device() before jumping to
> release_r5_cores.
> >
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + i++;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * If two child nodes are available in dts in lockstep mode,
> > > + * then ignore second child node.
> > > + */
> > > + if (i == core_count) {
> > > + of_node_put(child);
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > Instead of using the i to check the cores, simply break if cluster_mode ==
> > LOCKSTEP_MODE. That will avoid the fragile dance around the manipulation of
> > variable i and simplify the release of resources in release_r5_cores.
> >
> Actually variable name "i" needs to be changed. I need that variable to
> track how many cores? are added successfully.
>
> So, if first core is added and second core fails, then I can release
> resources allocated for first core successfully.
>
> So, instead of "i" I can use meaningful variable name like "cores_added" or
> "cores_allocated".
You can still use variable @i, just don't use it to break out of the loop. As I
pointed out, it would be much easier to simply do that if in lockstep mode.
>
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + cluster->mode = cluster_mode;
> > > + cluster->core_count = core_count;
> > > + cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores;
> > > +
> > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret);
> > > + cluster->core_count = 0;
> > > + cluster->r5_cores = NULL;
> > > + goto release_r5_cores;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + kfree(child_devs);
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > +release_r5_cores:
> > > + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> > > + put_device(child_devs[i]);
> > > + rproc_del(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
> > > + rproc_free(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
> > > + }
> > > + kfree(r5_cores);
> > > + kfree(child_devs);
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data;
> > > + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
> > > + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + cluster = (struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > + if (!cluster)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> > > + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> > > + put_device(r5_core->dev);
> > > + rproc_del(r5_core->rproc);
> > > + rproc_free(r5_core->rproc);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + kfree(cluster->r5_cores);
> > > + kfree(cluster);
> > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe()
> > > + *
> > > + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
> > > + *
> > > + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT,
> > > + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
> > > + */
> > > +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
> > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + cluster = kzalloc(sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!cluster)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + cluster->dev = dev;
> > > +
> > > + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to populate platform dev\n");
> > > + kfree(cluster);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */
> > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
> > > +
> > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(pdev);
> > > + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n");
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/* Match table for OF platform binding */
> > > +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
> > > + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
> > > + { /* end of list */ },
> > > +};
> > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
> > > +
> > > +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
> > > + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
> > > + .driver = {
> > > + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
> > > + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
> > > + },
> > > +};
> > > +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
> > > +
> > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
> > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
> > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > There is a discrepency between the GPL-2.0 in the SPDS identifier and the above.
> >
> > More comments tomorrow or Tuesday.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mathieu
> >
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 06:39:55PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> From: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
>
> This driver enables r5f dual core Real time Processing Unit subsystem
> available on Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale MPSoC Platform. RPU subsystem
> (cluster) can be configured in different modes e.g. split mode in which
> two r5f cores work independent of each other and lock-step mode in which
> both r5f cores execute same code clock-for-clock and notify if the
> result is different.
>
> The Xilinx r5 Remoteproc Driver boots the RPU cores via calls to the Xilinx
> Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory access
> and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this
> driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Changes in v9
> - replace devm_rproc_alloc with rproc_alloc
> - %s/until/while/r
> - remove extra line
> - %s/i > -1/i >=0/r fix this throughout the driver
> - fix type of tcm_mode from int to enum rpu_tcm_comb
> - release &child_pdev->dev references in case of failure
> - remove zynqmp_r5_core_exit()
> - undefined memory-region property isn't driver failure
> - remove tcm bank count check from ops
> - fix tcm bank turn-off sequence
> - fix parse_fw function documentation
> - do not use rproc_mem_entry_init on vdev0buffers
> - declare variabls in reverse xmas tree order throughout the driver
>
> Changes in v8:
> - None
>
> Changes in v7:
> - None
>
> Changes in v6:
> - None
>
> Changes in v5:
> - None
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Remove redundant header files
> - use dev_err_probe() to report errors during probe
> - Fix missing check on error code returned by zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
> - Fix memory leaks all over the driver when resource allocation fails for any core
> - make cluster mode check only at one place
> - remove redundant initialization of variable
> - remove redundant use of of_node_put()
> - Fix Comment format problem
> - Assign offset of zynqmp_tcm_banks instead of duplicating it
> - Add tcm and memory regions rproc carveouts during prepare instead of parse_fw
> - Remove rproc_mem_entry object from r5_core
> - Use put_device() and rproc_del() APIs to fix memory leaks
> - Replace pr_* with dev_*. This was missed in v3, fix now.
> - Use "GPL" instead of "GPL v2" in MODULE_LICENSE macro. This was suggested by checkpatch script.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix checkpatch script indentation warning
> - Remove unused variable from xilinx remoteproc driver
> - use C style comments, i.e /*...*/
> - Remove redundant debug information which can be derived using /proc/device-tree
> - Fix multilined comment format
> - s/"final fot TCM"/"final for TCM"
> - Function devm_kzalloc() does not return an code on error, just NULL.
> Remove redundant error check for this function throughout the driver.
> - Fix RPU mode configuration and add documentation accordingly
> - Get rid of the indentations to match function documentation style with rest of the driver
> - Fix memory leak by only using r5_rproc->priv and not replace it with new instance
> - Use 'i' for the outer loop and 'j' for the inner one as per convention
> - Remove redundant error and NULL checks throughout the driver
> - Use devm_kcalloc() when more than one element is required
> - Add memory-regions carveouts during driver probe instead of parse_fw call
> This removes redundant copy of reserved_mem object in r5_core structure.
> - Fix memory leak by using of_node_put()
> - Fix indentation of tcm_mem_map function args
> - Remove redundant init of variables
> - Initialize tcm bank size variable for lockstep mode
> - Replace u32 with phys_addr_t for variable stroing memory bank address
> - Add documentation of TCM behavior in lockstep mode
> - Use dev_get_drvdata instead of platform driver API
> - Remove info level messages
> - Fix checkpatch.pl warnings
> - Add documentation for the Xilinx r5f platform to understand driver design
> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 1055 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 1068 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> index 166019786653..5637a71c0677 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> @@ -352,6 +352,18 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC
> It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
> a slave processor.
>
> +config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC
> + tristate "Xilinx R5 remoteproc support"
> + depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP
> + depends on ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE
> + select RPMSG_VIRTIO
> + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
> + help
> + Say y or m here to support Xilinx R5 remote processors via the remote
> + processor framework.
> +
> + It's safe to say N if not interested in using RPU r5f cores.
> +
> endif # REMOTEPROC
>
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> index 5478c7cb9e07..91314a9b43ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> @@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC) += xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9865b51e0356
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1055 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> +
> +/* settings for RPU cluster mode */
> +enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode {
> + SPLIT_MODE = 0, /* When cores run as separate processor */
> + LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1, /* cores execute same code in lockstep,clk-for-clk */
> + SINGLE_CPU_MODE = 2, /* core0 is held in reset and only core1 runs */
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct mem_bank_data - Memory Bank description
> + *
> + * @addr: Start address of memory bank
> + * @size: Size of Memory bank
> + * @pm_domain_id: Power-domains id of memory bank for firmware to turn on/off
> + * @bank_name: name of the bank for remoteproc framework
> + */
> +struct mem_bank_data {
> + phys_addr_t addr;
> + size_t size;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> + char *bank_name;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks[] = {
> + {0xffe00000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
> + {0xffe20000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_BTCM, "btcm0"},
> + {0xffe90000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_ATCM, "atcm1"},
> + {0xffeb0000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_BTCM, "btcm1"},
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct zynqmp_r5_core - ZynqMP R5 core structure
> + *
> + * @dev: device of RPU instance
> + * @np: device node of RPU instance
> + * @tcm_bank_count: number TCM banks accessible to this RPU
> + * @tcm_banks: array of each TCM bank data
> + * @rmem_count: Number of reserved mem regions
> + * @rmem: reserved memory region nodes from device tree
> + * @rproc: rproc handle
> + * @pm_domain_id: RPU CPU power domain id
> + */
> +struct zynqmp_r5_core {
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + int tcm_bank_count;
> + struct mem_bank_data **tcm_banks;
> + int rmem_count;
> + struct reserved_mem **rmem;
> + struct rproc *rproc;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct zynqmp_r5_cluster - ZynqMP R5 cluster structure
> + *
> + * @dev: r5f subsystem cluster device node
> + * @mode: cluster mode of type zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode
> + * @core_count: number of r5 cores used for this cluster mode
> + * @r5_cores: Array of pointers pointing to r5 core
> + */
> +struct zynqmp_r5_cluster {
> + struct device *dev;
> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode mode;
> + int core_count;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode
> + *
> + * set RPU operation mode
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core,
> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, fw_reg_val);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to set RPU mode\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to configure TCM\n");
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + *
> + * Start R5 Core from designated boot address.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
> + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * The exception vector pointers (EVP) refer to the base-address of
> + * exception vectors (for reset, IRQ, FIQ, etc). The reset-vector
> + * starts at the base-address and subsequent vectors are on 4-byte
> + * boundaries.
> + *
> + * Exception vectors can start either from 0x0000_0000 (LOVEC) or
> + * from 0xFFFF_0000 (HIVEC) which is mapped in the OCM (On-Chip Memory)
> + *
> + * Usually firmware will put Exception vectors at LOVEC.
> + *
> + * It is not recommend that you change the exception vector.
> + * Changing the EVP to HIVEC will result in increased interrupt latency
> + * and jitter. Also, if the OCM is secured and the Cortex-R5F processor
> + * is non-secured, then the Cortex-R5F processor cannot access the
> + * HIVEC exception vectors in the OCM.
> + */
> + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr >= 0xFFFC0000) ?
> + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC;
> +
> + dev_dbg(r5_core->dev, "RPU boot addr 0x%llx from %s.", rproc->bootaddr,
> + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM");
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_wake(r5_core->pm_domain_id, 1,
> + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev,
> + "failed to start RPU = 0x%x\n", r5_core->pm_domain_id);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + *
> + * Power down R5 Core.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(r5_core->pm_domain_id,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to stop remoteproc RPU %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @mem: mem entry to map
> + *
> + * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map(struct rproc *rproc,
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + void __iomem *va;
> +
> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mem->va = (void *)va;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
> + *
> + * Unmap memory-region carveout
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_mem_region_unmap(struct rproc *rproc,
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * add_mem_regions
> + * @r5_core: single R5 core's corresponding zynqmp_r5_core type instance
> + * @rmem: reserved mem region parsed from dt node
> + *
> + * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in
> + * memory-region property
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int add_mem_regions_carveout(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct rproc_mem_entry **rproc_mem;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> + int i, num_mem_regions;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> + num_mem_regions = r5_core->rmem_count;
> +
> + /* memory regions not defined */
> + if (num_mem_regions < 1)
You have made sure this can't happen in zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node().
> + return 0;
> +
> + rproc_mem = kcalloc(num_mem_regions,
> + sizeof(struct rproc_mem_entry *), GFP_KERNEL);
Same comment as above.
> + if (!rproc_mem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_mem_regions; i++) {
> + rmem = r5_core->rmem[i];
> +
> + if (!strncmp(rmem->name, "vdev0buffer", strlen("vdev0buffer"))) {
> + /* Register reserved memory for vdev buffer */
> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, i,
> + rmem->size,
> + rmem->base,
> + rmem->name);
> + } else {
> + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */
> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, NULL,
> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
> + rmem->size, rmem->base,
> + zynqmp_r5_mem_region_map,
> + zynqmp_r5_mem_region_unmap,
> + rmem->name);
> + }
> +
> + if (!rproc_mem[i])
> + goto release_mem_regions;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "reserved mem carveout %s addr=%llx, size=0x%llx",
> + rmem->name, rmem->base, rmem->size);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Add carveouts only if all rproc mem enties are
> + * successfully initialized
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_mem_regions; i++)
> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem[i]);
> +
> + kfree(rproc_mem);
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_mem_regions:
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> + kfree(rproc_mem[i]);
Go see the implementation of rproc_resource_cleanup() to understand why this is
not needed.
> + kfree(rproc_mem);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
> + *
> + * Unmap TCM banks when powering down R5 core.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int tcm_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * tcm_mem_map
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of
> + *
> + * Given TCM bank entry, this callback will set device address for R5
> + * running on TCM and also setup virtual address for TCM bank
> + * remoteproc carveout.
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc,
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + void __iomem *va;
> +
> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* Update memory entry va */
> + mem->va = (void *)va;
> +
> + /* clear TCMs */
> + memset_io(va, 0, mem->len);
> +
> + /*
> + * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000,
> + * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx.
> + *
> + * Zero out the high 12 bits of the address. This will give
> + * expected values for TCM Banks 0A and 0B (0x0 and 0x20000).
> + */
> + mem->da &= 0x000fffff;
> +
> + /*
> + * TCM Banks 1A and 1B still have to be translated.
> + *
> + * Below handle these two banks' absolute addresses (0xffe90000 and
> + * 0xffeb0000) and convert to the expected relative addresses
> + * (0x0 and 0x20000).
> + */
> + if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000)
> + mem->da -= 0x90000;
> +
> + /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */
> + if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) {
> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "invalid TCM address: %x\n", mem->da);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct rproc_mem_entry **rproc_mem;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int i, num_banks, ret;
> + phys_addr_t bank_addr;
> + struct device *dev;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> + size_t bank_size;
> + char *bank_name;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
> +
> + rproc_mem = kcalloc(num_banks,
> + sizeof(struct rproc_mem_entry *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rproc_mem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /*
> + * Power-on Each 64KB TCM,
> + * register its address space, map and unmap functions
> + * and add carveouts accordingly
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->addr;
> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->bank_name;
> + bank_size = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
> + goto release_tcm_split;
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM carveout split mode %s addr=%llx, size=0x%lx",
> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
> +
> + rproc_mem[i] = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
> + bank_size, bank_addr,
> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
> + bank_name);
> + if (!rproc_mem[i]) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> + goto release_tcm_split;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Add carveouts only if all rproc mem enties are
> + * successfully initialized
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++)
> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem[i]);
Why not doing this in the above loop? That way you wouldn't have to allocate
@rproc_mem, nor having to free the memory in the error path.
I am done reviewing this set.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> +
> + kfree(rproc_mem);
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_tcm_split:
> + /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> + kfree(rproc_mem[i]);
> + }
> + kfree(rproc_mem);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *rproc_mem;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int i, num_banks, ret;
> + phys_addr_t bank_addr;
> + size_t bank_size = 0;
> + struct device *dev;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> + char *bank_name;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> +
> + /* Go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */
> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
> +
> + /*
> + * In lockstep mode, TCM is contiguous memory block
> + * However, each TCM block still needs to be enabled individually.
> + * So, Enable each TCM block individually, but add their size
> + * to create contiguous memory region.
> + */
> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[0]->addr;
> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[0]->bank_name;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
> + bank_size += r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> +
> + /* Turn on each TCM bank individually */
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
> + goto release_tcm_lockstep;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM add carveout lockstep mode %s addr=0x%llx, size=0x%lx",
> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
> +
> + /* Register TCM address range, TCM map and unmap functions */
> + rproc_mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
> + bank_size, bank_addr,
> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
> + bank_name);
> + if (!rproc_mem) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto release_tcm_lockstep;
> + }
> +
> + /* If registration is success, add carveouts */
> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_tcm_lockstep:
> + /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * add_tcm_banks()
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + *
> + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance
> + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory
> + * needed for firmware to be loaded
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int add_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> + if (!r5_core)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> +
> + cluster = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
> + if (!cluster) {
> + dev_err(dev->parent, "Invalid driver data\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * In lockstep mode TCM banks are one contiguous memory region of 256Kb
> + * In split mode, each TCM bank is 64Kb and not contiguous.
> + * We add memory carveouts accordingly.
> + */
> + if (cluster->mode == SPLIT_MODE)
> + return add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(rproc);
> + else if (cluster->mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE)
> + return add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(rproc);
> +
> + dev_err(cluster->dev, "invalid cluster mode\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw()
> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> + * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core
> + *
> + * get resource table if available
> + *
> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> + /*
> + * resource table only required for IPC.
> + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error;
> + * for example, loading r5 hello world application
> + * so simply inform user and keep going.
> + */
> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n");
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = add_tcm_banks(rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to get TCM banks, err %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = add_mem_regions_carveout(rproc);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "failed to get reserve mem regions %d\n",
> + ret);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + u32 pm_domain_id;
> + int i;
> +
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; i++) {
> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> + if (zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id))
> + dev_warn(r5_core->dev,
> + "can't turn off TCM bank 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
> + .prepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare,
> + .unprepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare,
> + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
> + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
> + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
> + * Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node
> + * this is called for each individual R5 core
> + *
> + * @cdev: Device node of each r5 core
> + *
> + * Return: zynqmp_r5_core object for success, error pointer in case of error.
> + */
> +static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + struct rproc *r5_rproc;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Set up DMA mask */
> + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(cdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
> + r5_rproc = rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev),
> + &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
> + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core));
> + if (!r5_rproc) {
> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to allocate memory for rproc instance\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + }
> +
> + r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)r5_rproc->priv;
> + r5_core->dev = cdev;
> + r5_core->np = dev_of_node(cdev);
> + if (!r5_core->np) {
> + dev_err(cdev, "can't get device node for r5 core\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + /* Add R5 remoteproc core */
> + ret = rproc_add(r5_rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to add r5 remoteproc\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
> +
> + r5_core->rproc = r5_rproc;
> + return r5_core;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node()
> + * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
> + * in r5_core instance. We will use hardcoded TCM information from
> + * driver for now in this function.
> + *
> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node;
> + int i, j;
> +
> + /*
> + * ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver while
> + * system-dt spec is not final for TCM
> + */
> + tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks);
> +
> + /* count per core tcm banks */
> + tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count;
> +
> + if (tcm_bank_count <= 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode.
> + * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another
> + * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly
> + */
> + tcm_node = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count,
> + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < tcm_bank_count; j++) {
> + /*
> + * Use pre-defined TCM reg values.
> + * Eventually this should be replaced by values
> + * parsed from dts.
> + */
> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j] =
> + (struct mem_bank_data *)&zynqmp_tcm_banks[tcm_node];
> + tcm_node++;
> + }
> +
> + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node()
> + * parse memory-region property from dt node and add
> + * memory region carveouts
> + *
> + * @r5_core: pointer to zynqmp_r5_core type object
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np, *rmem_np;
> + struct reserved_mem **rmem;
> + int res_mem_count, i;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> + np = r5_core->np;
> +
> + res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
> + sizeof(phandle));
> + if (res_mem_count <= 0) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n",
> + res_mem_count);
> + r5_core->rmem_count = 0;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + rmem = devm_kcalloc(dev, res_mem_count,
> + sizeof(struct reserved_mem *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rmem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) {
> + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i);
> + if (!rmem_np)
> + goto release_rmem;
> +
> + rmem[i] = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
> + if (!rmem[i]) {
> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
> + goto release_rmem;
> + }
> +
> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
> + }
> +
> + r5_core->rmem_count = res_mem_count;
> + r5_core->rmem = rmem;
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_rmem:
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> + kfree(rmem[i]);
> + devm_kfree(dev, rmem);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_core_init()
> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_core type object
> + *
> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret);
> +
> + /* Initialize r5 cores with power-domains parsed from dts */
> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains",
> + 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to set r5 cluster mode %d, err %d\n",
> + cluster->mode, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_cluster_init()
> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> + *
> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> +{
> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE;
> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> + struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev);
> + struct platform_device *child_pdev;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val;
> + struct device **child_devs;
> + struct device_node *child;
> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode;
> + int core_count, ret, i;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode);
> +
> + /*
> + * on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL,
> + * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode
> + */
> + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * For now driver only supports split mode and lockstep mode.
> + * fail driver probe if either of that is not set in dts.
> + */
> + if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) {
> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_COMB;
> + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE) {
> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
> + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT;
> + } else {
> + dev_err(dev, "driver does not support cluster mode %d\n", cluster_mode);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Number of cores is decided by number of child nodes of
> + * r5f subsystem node in dts. If Split mode is used in dts
> + * 2 child nodes are expected.
> + * In lockstep mode if two child nodes are available,
> + * only use first child node and consider it as core0
> + * and ignore core1 dt node.
> + */
> + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node);
> + if (core_count <= 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n");
> + core_count = 1;
> + }
> +
> + child_devs = kcalloc(core_count, sizeof(struct device *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!child_devs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + r5_cores = kcalloc(core_count,
> + sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!r5_cores) {
> + kfree(child_devs);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + i = 0;
> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) {
> + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
> + if (!child_pdev) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto release_r5_cores;
> + }
> +
> + child_devs[i] = &child_pdev->dev;
> +
> + /* create and add remoteproc instance of type struct rproc */
> + r5_cores[i] = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(&child_pdev->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(r5_cores[i])) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + ret = PTR_ERR(r5_cores[i]);
> + goto release_r5_cores;
> + }
> +
> + i++;
> +
> + /*
> + * If two child nodes are available in dts in lockstep mode,
> + * then ignore second child node.
> + */
> + if (i == core_count) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + cluster->mode = cluster_mode;
> + cluster->core_count = core_count;
> + cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret);
> + cluster->core_count = 0;
> + cluster->r5_cores = NULL;
> + goto release_r5_cores;
> + }
> +
> + kfree(child_devs);
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_r5_cores:
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> + put_device(child_devs[i]);
> + rproc_del(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
> + rproc_free(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
> + }
> + kfree(r5_cores);
> + kfree(child_devs);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + int i;
> +
> + cluster = (struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + if (!cluster)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> + put_device(r5_core->dev);
> + rproc_del(r5_core->rproc);
> + rproc_free(r5_core->rproc);
> + }
> +
> + kfree(cluster->r5_cores);
> + kfree(cluster);
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe()
> + *
> + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
> + *
> + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT,
> + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + cluster = kzalloc(sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cluster)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + cluster->dev = dev;
> +
> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to populate platform dev\n");
> + kfree(cluster);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster);
> + if (ret) {
> + zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(pdev);
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Match table for OF platform binding */
> +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
> + { /* end of list */ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
> + },
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Hi Mathieu,
Thanks for reviewing this patch-set. Ack to comments and will fix in new
revision.
On 9/2/22 12:59 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> [...]
>
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
>>>> + .prepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare,
>>>> + .unprepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare,
>>>> + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
>>>> + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
>>>> + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
>>>> + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
>>>> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
>>>> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
>>>> + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
>>>> + * Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node
>>>> + * this is called for each individual R5 core
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @cdev: Device node of each r5 core
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return: zynqmp_r5_core object for success, error pointer in case of error.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> + struct rproc *r5_rproc;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Set up DMA mask */
>>>> + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(cdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
>>>> + r5_rproc = rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev),
>>>> + &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
>>>> + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core));
>>>> + if (!r5_rproc) {
>>>> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to allocate memory for rproc instance\n");
>>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
>>>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)r5_rproc->priv;
>>>> + r5_core->dev = cdev;
>>>> + r5_core->np = dev_of_node(cdev);
>>>> + if (!r5_core->np) {
>>>> + dev_err(cdev, "can't get device node for r5 core\n");
>>>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> Here @r5_rproc is leaked and r5_rproc->rproc never free'ed.
>> This function is only used in cluster_init.
>>
>> r5_rproc->rproc is free'ed in release_r5_core label in
>> zynqmp_r5_cluster_init function if this function fails.
> It would be the case if @r5_core was returned, but it is not. A such
> @r5_core[i] zynqmp_r5_cluster_init() is still null and the memory leaked.
Ack. Yes you are right. Thanks!!
>
>> This avoids multiple free of same resource.
>>
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Add R5 remoteproc core */
>>>> + ret = rproc_add(r5_rproc);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to add r5 remoteproc\n");
>>>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>> Same.
>> Same as above.
Ack. I will fix this.
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_core->rproc = r5_rproc;
>>>> + return r5_core;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node()
>>>> + * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
>>>> + * in r5_core instance. We will use hardcoded TCM information from
>>>> + * driver for now in this function.
>>>> + *
>>> It would be a good idea to explain _why_ hardcoded values are used.
>> It is explained in function, but will add in description too.
>>>
>>>> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> + int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node;
>>>> + int i, j;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver while
>>> I'm not sure why there is a "ToDo" here since this is exactly what you are
>>> doing.
>> Ack. ToDo needs to go.
>>>> + * system-dt spec is not final for TCM
>>>> + */
>>>> + tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* count per core tcm banks */
>>>> + tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (tcm_bank_count <= 0)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> As far as I can tell this can't happen and as such should be removed.
>> I kept this check for future, when we add TCM dt nodes. I will remove it.
>>
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode.
>>>> + * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another
>>>> + * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly
>>>> + */
>>>> + tcm_node = 0;
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>>>> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
>>>> + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count,
>>>> + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *),
>>>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (j = 0; j < tcm_bank_count; j++) {
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Use pre-defined TCM reg values.
>>>> + * Eventually this should be replaced by values
>>>> + * parsed from dts.
>>>> + */
>>>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j] =
>>>> + (struct mem_bank_data *)&zynqmp_tcm_banks[tcm_node];
>>>> + tcm_node++;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node()
>>>> + * parse memory-region property from dt node and add
>>>> + * memory region carveouts
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @r5_core: pointer to zynqmp_r5_core type object
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct device_node *np, *rmem_np;
>>>> + struct reserved_mem **rmem;
>>>> + int res_mem_count, i;
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>>>> + np = r5_core->np;
>>>> +
>>>> + res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
>>>> + sizeof(phandle));
>>>> + if (res_mem_count <= 0) {
>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n",
>>>> + res_mem_count);
>>>> + r5_core->rmem_count = 0;
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + rmem = devm_kcalloc(dev, res_mem_count,
>>>> + sizeof(struct reserved_mem *), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!rmem)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) {
>>>> + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i);
>>>> + if (!rmem_np)
>>>> + goto release_rmem;
>>>> +
>>>> + rmem[i] = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
>>>> + if (!rmem[i]) {
>>>> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
>>>> + goto release_rmem;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_core->rmem_count = res_mem_count;
>>>> + r5_core->rmem = rmem;
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +release_rmem:
>>>> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
>>>> + kfree(rmem[i]);
>>> Function of_reserved_mem_lookup() doesn't allocate a new reserved_mem structure,
>>> you get a reference to an existing one. As such there is no need to explicitly
>>> free individual elements of the rmem array.
>> Ack.
>>>> + devm_kfree(dev, rmem);
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_core_init()
>>>> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_core type object
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
>>>> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
>>>> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> + int ret, i;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>>>> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Initialize r5 cores with power-domains parsed from dts */
>>>> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains",
>>>> + 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to set r5 cluster mode %d, err %d\n",
>>>> + cluster->mode, ret);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_cluster_init()
>>>> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>>>> +{
>>>> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE;
>>>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>>>> + struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev);
>>>> + struct platform_device *child_pdev;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores;
>>>> + enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val;
>>>> + struct device **child_devs;
>>>> + struct device_node *child;
>>>> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode;
>>>> + int core_count, ret, i;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode);
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL,
>>>> + * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * For now driver only supports split mode and lockstep mode.
>>>> + * fail driver probe if either of that is not set in dts.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) {
>>> Why is are LOCKSTEP_MODE and LOCKSTEP_MODE defined when the same values were
>>> already added in xlnx-zynqmp.h in patch 3/6?
>> Actually LOCKSTEP_MODE defined in this driver is taken from dt-bindings of
>> this driver. However, PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP defined in firmware represents
>> value expected by firmware. They are not the same defines. LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1
>> which is defined as per xlnx,cluster-mode bindings and similar to ti
>> cluster-mode bindings. PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP = 0 which is expected from
>> firmware.
> Ah yes, you are correct.
>
>>
>>> And why not add SINGLE_CPU_MODE
>>> there as well instead of duplicating things in enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode?
>>
>> SINGLE_CPU_MODE just represents xlnx,cluster-mode value from dt-bindings. It
>> is not supported in firmware.
>>
>> There are multiple ways to configure r5 cluster in single-cpu mode.
>>
>> 1) Add new EEMI call which asks firmware to configure cluster in single-cpu
>> mode.
>>
>> or 2) use existing EEMI calls and configure cores from driver. As
>> single-cpu-mode is not supported yet, I am not sure, how it will
>>
>> be implemented or what its design will look like. So, I haven't modified
>> anything in firmware driver related to single-cpu mode.
>>
>>
> That is fine.
>
>>>> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_COMB;
>>>> + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
>>>> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE) {
>>>> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
>>>> + fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT;
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "driver does not support cluster mode %d\n", cluster_mode);
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Number of cores is decided by number of child nodes of
>>>> + * r5f subsystem node in dts. If Split mode is used in dts
>>>> + * 2 child nodes are expected.
>>>> + * In lockstep mode if two child nodes are available,
>>>> + * only use first child node and consider it as core0
>>>> + * and ignore core1 dt node.
>>>> + */
>>>> + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node);
>>>> + if (core_count <= 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count);
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) {
>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n");
>>>> + core_count = 1;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + child_devs = kcalloc(core_count, sizeof(struct device *), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!child_devs)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_cores = kcalloc(core_count,
>>>> + sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core *), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!r5_cores) {
>>>> + kfree(child_devs);
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + i = 0;
>>>> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) {
>>>> + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
>>>> + if (!child_pdev) {
>>>> + of_node_put(child);
>>>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>>>> + goto release_r5_cores;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + child_devs[i] = &child_pdev->dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* create and add remoteproc instance of type struct rproc */
>>>> + r5_cores[i] = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(&child_pdev->dev);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(r5_cores[i])) {
>>>> + of_node_put(child);
>>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(r5_cores[i]);
>>>> + goto release_r5_cores;
>>> If we are here and i == 0, we are leaking a reference to child_pdev since the
>>> loop in release_r5_cores won't execute.
>> Ack. I will check if i == 0 and put_device() before jumping to
>> release_r5_cores.
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + i++;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * If two child nodes are available in dts in lockstep mode,
>>>> + * then ignore second child node.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (i == core_count) {
>>>> + of_node_put(child);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>> Instead of using the i to check the cores, simply break if cluster_mode ==
>>> LOCKSTEP_MODE. That will avoid the fragile dance around the manipulation of
>>> variable i and simplify the release of resources in release_r5_cores.
>>>
>> Actually variable name "i" needs to be changed. I need that variable to
>> track how many cores are added successfully.
>>
>> So, if first core is added and second core fails, then I can release
>> resources allocated for first core successfully.
>>
>> So, instead of "i" I can use meaningful variable name like "cores_added" or
>> "cores_allocated".
>
> You can still use variable @i, just don't use it to break out of the loop. As I
> pointed out, it would be much easier to simply do that if in lockstep mode.
Ah! makes sense. I will check for lockstep mode instead of @i counts.
Thanks.
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + cluster->mode = cluster_mode;
>>>> + cluster->core_count = core_count;
>>>> + cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret);
>>>> + cluster->core_count = 0;
>>>> + cluster->r5_cores = NULL;
>>>> + goto release_r5_cores;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + kfree(child_devs);
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +release_r5_cores:
>>>> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>>>> + put_device(child_devs[i]);
>>>> + rproc_del(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
>>>> + rproc_free(r5_cores[i]->rproc);
>>>> + }
>>>> + kfree(r5_cores);
>>>> + kfree(child_devs);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + cluster = (struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> + if (!cluster)
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>>>> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
>>>> + put_device(r5_core->dev);
>>>> + rproc_del(r5_core->rproc);
>>>> + rproc_free(r5_core->rproc);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + kfree(cluster->r5_cores);
>>>> + kfree(cluster);
>>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe()
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
>>>> + *
>>>> + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT,
>>>> + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + cluster = kzalloc(sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!cluster)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + cluster->dev = dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to populate platform dev\n");
>>>> + kfree(cluster);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */
>>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(pdev);
>>>> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Match table for OF platform binding */
>>>> +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
>>>> + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
>>>> + { /* end of list */ },
>>>> +};
>>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
>>>> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
>>>> + .driver = {
>>>> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
>>>> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
>>>> + },
>>>> +};
>>>> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
>>>> +
>>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
>>>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
>>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>>> There is a discrepency between the GPL-2.0 in the SPDS identifier and the above.
>>>
>>> More comments tomorrow or Tuesday.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mathieu
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
On 9/1/22 1:25 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 06:39:55PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
[ ... ]
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,1055 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Hi Mathieu,
I tried to fix SPDX-License-Identifier to GPL (same as MODULE_LICENSE
below), However checkpatch.pl reports this as following warning:
"WARNING: 'SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL' is not supported in LICENSES/..."
I see that GPL-1.0 is under LICENSE/deprecated directory.
>> +/*
>> + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
>> + *
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
[ ... ]
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
>> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
>> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> There is a discrepency between the GPL-2.0 in the SPDS identifier and the above.
Also, changing to MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2") gives following warning:
WARNING: Prefer "GPL" over "GPL v2" - see commit bf7fbeeae6db ("module:
Cure the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2" bogosity")
#1115: FILE: drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:1034:
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
So, It looks like SPDX-License-Identifier should be GPL-2.0-only and
MODULE_LICENSE should be change to "GPL".
It this ok? Any other suggestions ?
Thanks,
Tanmay
>
> More comments tomorrow or Tuesday.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 03:02:22PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>
> On 9/1/22 1:25 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 06:39:55PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,1055 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> I tried to fix SPDX-License-Identifier to GPL (same as MODULE_LICENSE
> below), However checkpatch.pl reports this as following warning:
>
> "WARNING: 'SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL' is not supported in LICENSES/..."
>
> I see that GPL-1.0 is under LICENSE/deprecated directory.
>
> > > +/*
> > > + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
> > > + *
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
> > > +
> > > +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
> > > + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
> > > + .driver = {
> > > + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
> > > + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
> > > + },
> > > +};
> > > +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
> > > +
> > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
> > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
> > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > There is a discrepency between the GPL-2.0 in the SPDS identifier and the above.
>
> Also, changing to MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2") gives following warning:
>
> WARNING: Prefer "GPL" over "GPL v2" - see commit bf7fbeeae6db ("module: Cure
> the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2" bogosity")
> #1115: FILE: drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:1034:
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
> So, It looks like SPDX-License-Identifier should be GPL-2.0-only and
> MODULE_LICENSE should be change to "GPL".
Commit bf7fbeeae6db is an interesting read - thanks for pointing it out.
>
> It this ok? Any other suggestions ?
What you have looks good, in that regard there is no need to change anything
from your patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tanmay
>
> >
> > More comments tomorrow or Tuesday.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mathieu
> >
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
Thanks Mathieu.
Also, I see that last few revisions I have changed driver a lot based on
comments, but documentation in driver is not in sync.
I know we agreed initially, that I will address changes _only_ commented
in previous revision. However, in next revision I would like
to fix documentation all over the driver along with your comments. I
hope it's fine and I wanted to give you heads up so we stay on same page.
Thanks,
Tanmay
On 9/29/22 10:22 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 03:02:22PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> On 9/1/22 1:25 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 06:39:55PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> [ ... ]
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1055 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> Hi Mathieu,
>>
>> I tried to fix SPDX-License-Identifier to GPL (same as MODULE_LICENSE
>> below), However checkpatch.pl reports this as following warning:
>>
>> "WARNING: 'SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL' is not supported in LICENSES/..."
>>
>> I see that GPL-1.0 is under LICENSE/deprecated directory.
>>
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
>>>> + *
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
>>>> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
>>>> + .driver = {
>>>> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
>>>> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
>>>> + },
>>>> +};
>>>> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
>>>> +
>>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
>>>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
>>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>>> There is a discrepency between the GPL-2.0 in the SPDS identifier and the above.
>> Also, changing to MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2") gives following warning:
>>
>> WARNING: Prefer "GPL" over "GPL v2" - see commit bf7fbeeae6db ("module: Cure
>> the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2" bogosity")
>> #1115: FILE: drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:1034:
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>
>> So, It looks like SPDX-License-Identifier should be GPL-2.0-only and
>> MODULE_LICENSE should be change to "GPL".
> Commit bf7fbeeae6db is an interesting read - thanks for pointing it out.
>
>> It this ok? Any other suggestions ?
> What you have looks good, in that regard there is no need to change anything
> from your patch.
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tanmay
>>
>>> More comments tomorrow or Tuesday.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mathieu
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
On Thu, 29 Sept 2022 at 13:28, Tanmay Shah <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Mathieu.
>
> Also, I see that last few revisions I have changed driver a lot based on
> comments, but documentation in driver is not in sync.
>
> I know we agreed initially, that I will address changes _only_ commented
> in previous revision. However, in next revision I would like
>
> to fix documentation all over the driver along with your comments. I
> hope it's fine and I wanted to give you heads up so we stay on same page.
I'm fine with that. Thanks for the heads up.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tanmay
>
> On 9/29/22 10:22 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 03:02:22PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> >> On 9/1/22 1:25 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 06:39:55PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> >> [ ... ]
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1055 @@
> >>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> Hi Mathieu,
> >>
> >> I tried to fix SPDX-License-Identifier to GPL (same as MODULE_LICENSE
> >> below), However checkpatch.pl reports this as following warning:
> >>
> >> "WARNING: 'SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL' is not supported in LICENSES/..."
> >>
> >> I see that GPL-1.0 is under LICENSE/deprecated directory.
> >>
> >>>> +/*
> >>>> + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + */
> >>>> +
> >>>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
> >> [ ... ]
> >>
> >>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
> >>>> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
> >>>> + .driver = {
> >>>> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
> >>>> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
> >>>> + },
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
> >>>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
> >>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >>> There is a discrepency between the GPL-2.0 in the SPDS identifier and the above.
> >> Also, changing to MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2") gives following warning:
> >>
> >> WARNING: Prefer "GPL" over "GPL v2" - see commit bf7fbeeae6db ("module: Cure
> >> the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2" bogosity")
> >> #1115: FILE: drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:1034:
> >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> >>
> >> So, It looks like SPDX-License-Identifier should be GPL-2.0-only and
> >> MODULE_LICENSE should be change to "GPL".
> > Commit bf7fbeeae6db is an interesting read - thanks for pointing it out.
> >
> >> It this ok? Any other suggestions ?
> > What you have looks good, in that regard there is no need to change anything
> > from your patch.
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Tanmay
> >>
> >>> More comments tomorrow or Tuesday.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Mathieu
> >>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.25.1
> >>>>