which are ocured in the 86a1c34a929f commit (x86_64 syscall audit
fast-path by Roland McGrath <[email protected]>) and now they are
not used anymore.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index ef766a3..4362f1c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -38,12 +38,6 @@
#include <asm/export.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
-/* Avoid __ASSEMBLER__'ifying <linux/audit.h> just for this. */
-#include <linux/elf-em.h>
-#define AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64 (EM_X86_64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE)
-#define __AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT 0x80000000
-#define __AUDIT_ARCH_LE 0x40000000
-
.code64
.section .entry.text, "ax"
--
2.8.0.rc3.1353.gea9bdc0
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:10:32AM +0600, Alexander Kuleshov wrote:
> which are ocured in the 86a1c34a929f commit (x86_64 syscall audit
> fast-path by Roland McGrath <[email protected]>) and now they are
> not used anymore.
I'd prefer it if you said which patch *removed* them and made those
defines unused again.
What would be even better is if your commit message explained *why* they
were removed in that patch and that because of <insert reason here> we
don't need them here anymore.
This should give people looking at your patch the warm and fuzzy feeling
they need in order to apply it. :-)
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Hello Borislav,
On 10-23-16, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> I'd prefer it if you said which patch *removed* them and made those
> defines unused again.
>
> What would be even better is if your commit message explained *why* they
> were removed in that patch and that because of <insert reason here> we
> don't need them here anymore.
>
> This should give people looking at your patch the warm and fuzzy feeling
> they need in order to apply it. :-)
I will describe this in V2.
Thanks.