Hi all,
After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/tc35876x-dsi-lvds.c: In function 'tc35876x_brightness_init':
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/tc35876x-dsi-lvds.c:454:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'intel_scu_ipc_ioread8'; did you mean 'intel_scu_ipc_readv'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
454 | ret = intel_scu_ipc_ioread8(GPIOPWMCTRL, &pwmctrl);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| intel_scu_ipc_readv
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/tc35876x-dsi-lvds.c:461:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'intel_scu_ipc_iowrite8'; did you mean 'intel_scu_ipc_writev'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
461 | ret = intel_scu_ipc_iowrite8(GPIOPWMCTRL, 0x01);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| intel_scu_ipc_writev
drivers/watchdog/intel_scu_watchdog.c:34:10: fatal error: asm/apb_timer.h: No such file or directory
34 | #include <asm/apb_timer.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/rtc/rtc-mrst.c:38:10: fatal error: asm/intel_mid_vrtc.h: No such file or directory
38 | #include <asm/intel_mid_vrtc.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Caused by commits
80b6aebc7705 ("x86/platform/intel-mid: Remove unused leftovers (vRTC)")
975272714c6f ("x86/apb_timer: Remove driver for deprecated platform")
08a1ce661b5c ("mfd: intel_msic: Remove driver for deprecated platform")
I have used the pm tree from next-20210204 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:14 AM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday, February 5, 2021, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
>> failed like this:
>>
>
> Rafael, maybe I was unclear when explaining to you the dependencies with the series of series, but all three parts should go ordered. In any case it’s easy to fix. I will send you a PR late today of the immutable tag (part 1) that needs to be included in order to avoid the above.
PR had just been sent to linux-acpi@ and Rafael in Cc.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Friday, February 5, 2021 12:15:22 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:14 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Friday, February 5, 2021, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> >> failed like this:
> >>
> >
> > Rafael, maybe I was unclear when explaining to you the dependencies with the series of series, but all three parts should go ordered. In any case it’s easy to fix. I will send you a PR late today of the immutable tag (part 1) that needs to be included in order to avoid the above.
>
> PR had just been sent to linux-acpi@ and Rafael in Cc.
I haven't seen that PR, though, in any of my inboxes etc.
Can you please point me to an archive or similar where I can find it?
Cheers!
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:30 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 5, 2021 12:15:22 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:14 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Friday, February 5, 2021, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > >> failed like this:
> > >>
> > >
> > > Rafael, maybe I was unclear when explaining to you the dependencies with the series of series, but all three parts should go ordered. In any case it’s easy to fix. I will send you a PR late today of the immutable tag (part 1) that needs to be included in order to avoid the above.
> >
> > PR had just been sent to linux-acpi@ and Rafael in Cc.
>
> I haven't seen that PR, though, in any of my inboxes etc.
>
> Can you please point me to an archive or similar where I can find it?
Sure, lore has it
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/[email protected]/T/#u
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:30 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, February 5, 2021 12:15:22 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:14 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Friday, February 5, 2021, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > >> failed like this:
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Rafael, maybe I was unclear when explaining to you the dependencies with the series of series, but all three parts should go ordered. In any case it’s easy to fix. I will send you a PR late today of the immutable tag (part 1) that needs to be included in order to avoid the above.
> > >
> > > PR had just been sent to linux-acpi@ and Rafael in Cc.
> >
> > I haven't seen that PR, though, in any of my inboxes etc.
> >
> > Can you please point me to an archive or similar where I can find it?
>
> Sure, lore has it
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/[email protected]/T/#u
If it is possible, please pull that PR and on top of that (re-)apply
the MFD related series.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:32:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 8:48 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:30 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Friday, February 5, 2021 12:15:22 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:14 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > On Friday, February 5, 2021, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > > > >> failed like this:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rafael, maybe I was unclear when explaining to you the dependencies with the series of series, but all three parts should go ordered. In any case it’s easy to fix. I will send you a PR late today of the immutable tag (part 1) that needs to be included in order to avoid the above.
> > > > >
> > > > > PR had just been sent to linux-acpi@ and Rafael in Cc.
> > > >
> > > > I haven't seen that PR, though, in any of my inboxes etc.
> > > >
> > > > Can you please point me to an archive or similar where I can find it?
> > >
> > > Sure, lore has it
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/[email protected]/T/#u
> >
> > If it is possible, please pull that PR and on top of that (re-)apply
> > the MFD related series.
>
> Done (merged into the bleeding-edge branch).
Looks perfect, thanks! I will send a last part soon (tomorrow at last).
> I was confused by it apparently asking Linus to pull. :-)
Ah, sorry, it looks like I forgot to update the text when sending it again...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 8:48 PM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:30 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday, February 5, 2021 12:15:22 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:14 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, February 5, 2021, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > > >> failed like this:
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > Rafael, maybe I was unclear when explaining to you the dependencies with the series of series, but all three parts should go ordered. In any case it’s easy to fix. I will send you a PR late today of the immutable tag (part 1) that needs to be included in order to avoid the above.
> > > >
> > > > PR had just been sent to linux-acpi@ and Rafael in Cc.
> > >
> > > I haven't seen that PR, though, in any of my inboxes etc.
> > >
> > > Can you please point me to an archive or similar where I can find it?
> >
> > Sure, lore has it
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/[email protected]/T/#u
>
> If it is possible, please pull that PR and on top of that (re-)apply
> the MFD related series.
Done (merged into the bleeding-edge branch).
I was confused by it apparently asking Linus to pull. :-)