Some SC7280-based boards crash when providing the "secure_non_pixel"
context bank, so allow only one iommu in the bindings also.
Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
---
Reference:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml
index 8f9b6433aeb8..10c334e6b3dc 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties:
- const: vcodec_bus
iommus:
+ minItems: 1
maxItems: 2
interconnects:
---
base-commit: 596764183be8ebb13352b281a442a1f1151c9b06
change-id: 20240129-sc7280-venus-bindings-6e62a99620de
Best regards,
--
Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 08:48:54AM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Some SC7280-based boards crash when providing the "secure_non_pixel"
> context bank, so allow only one iommu in the bindings also.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
Do we have any idea why this happens? How is someone supposed to know
whether or not their system requires you to only provide one iommu?
Yes, a crash might be the obvious answer, but is there a way of knowing
without the crashes?
Cheers,
Conor.
> ---
> Reference:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml
> index 8f9b6433aeb8..10c334e6b3dc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties:
> - const: vcodec_bus
>
> iommus:
> + minItems: 1
> maxItems: 2
>
> interconnects:
>
> ---
> base-commit: 596764183be8ebb13352b281a442a1f1151c9b06
> change-id: 20240129-sc7280-venus-bindings-6e62a99620de
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
>
On Mon Jan 29, 2024 at 6:37 PM CET, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 08:48:54AM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > Some SC7280-based boards crash when providing the "secure_non_pixel"
> > context bank, so allow only one iommu in the bindings also.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
>
> Do we have any idea why this happens? How is someone supposed to know
> whether or not their system requires you to only provide one iommu?
> Yes, a crash might be the obvious answer, but is there a way of knowing
> without the crashes?
+CC Vikash Garodia
Unfortunately I don't really have much more information than this
message here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
And see also the following replies for a bit more context, like this
one:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
Maybe Vikash can add some more info regarding this.
Regards
Luca
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
> > ---
> > Reference:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml
> > index 8f9b6433aeb8..10c334e6b3dc 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7280-venus.yaml
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties:
> > - const: vcodec_bus
> >
> > iommus:
> > + minItems: 1
> > maxItems: 2
> >
> > interconnects:
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: 596764183be8ebb13352b281a442a1f1151c9b06
> > change-id: 20240129-sc7280-venus-bindings-6e62a99620de
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
> >
Hello,
On 1/30/2024 1:17 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Mon Jan 29, 2024 at 6:37 PM CET, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 08:48:54AM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> Some SC7280-based boards crash when providing the "secure_non_pixel"
>>> context bank, so allow only one iommu in the bindings also.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
>>
>> Do we have any idea why this happens? How is someone supposed to know
>> whether or not their system requires you to only provide one iommu?
>> Yes, a crash might be the obvious answer, but is there a way of knowing
>> without the crashes?
>
> +CC Vikash Garodia
>
> Unfortunately I don't really have much more information than this
> message here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
>
> And see also the following replies for a bit more context, like this
> one:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
>
> Maybe Vikash can add some more info regarding this.
0x2184 is a secure SID i.e any transactions with that ID would be access
controlled by trustzone (TZ). SC7280 (chromebook) was designed without TZ, while
some other DT deriving from SC7280 (like qcm6490) might have TZ. Hence it is
good to move the iommu entry from SC7280 to chrome-common.
Regards,
Vikash
On 29/01/2024 08:48, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Some SC7280-based boards crash when providing the "secure_non_pixel"
> context bank, so allow only one iommu in the bindings also.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
> ---
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Best regards,
Krzysztof