2024-02-20 23:58:51

by Dai Ngo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] NFSD: send OP_CB_RECALL_ANY to clients when number of delegations reaches its limit

The NFS server should ask clients to voluntarily return unused
delegations when the number of granted delegations reaches the
max_delegations. This is so that the server can continue to
hand out delegations for new requests.

Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index fdc95bfbfbb6..a0bd6f6b994d 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_notify_lock_ops;
static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_getattr_ops;

static struct workqueue_struct *laundry_wq;
+static void deleg_reaper(struct nfsd_net *nn);

int nfsd4_create_laundry_wq(void)
{
@@ -6550,6 +6551,8 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
/* service the server-to-server copy delayed unmount list */
nfsd4_ssc_expire_umount(nn);
#endif
+ if (atomic_long_read(&num_delegations) >= max_delegations)
+ deleg_reaper(nn);
out:
return max_t(time64_t, lt.new_timeo, NFSD_LAUNDROMAT_MINTIMEOUT);
}
--
2.39.3



2024-02-21 22:56:07

by Calum Mackay

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] NFSD: send OP_CB_RECALL_ANY to clients when number of delegations reaches its limit

hi Dai,

On 20/02/2024 11:58 pm, Dai Ngo wrote:
> The NFS server should ask clients to voluntarily return unused
> delegations when the number of granted delegations reaches the
> max_delegations. This is so that the server can continue to
> hand out delegations for new requests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index fdc95bfbfbb6..a0bd6f6b994d 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_notify_lock_ops;
> static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_getattr_ops;
>
> static struct workqueue_struct *laundry_wq;
> +static void deleg_reaper(struct nfsd_net *nn);

Nits: If this is actually needed (you seem to be calling it after it is
defined?), shouldn't it be with the other forward decls around lines 84–89?

cheers,
calum.

>
> int nfsd4_create_laundry_wq(void)
> {
> @@ -6550,6 +6551,8 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> /* service the server-to-server copy delayed unmount list */
> nfsd4_ssc_expire_umount(nn);
> #endif
> + if (atomic_long_read(&num_delegations) >= max_delegations)
> + deleg_reaper(nn);
> out:
> return max_t(time64_t, lt.new_timeo, NFSD_LAUNDROMAT_MINTIMEOUT);
> }



Attachments:
OpenPGP_signature.asc (855.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2024-02-21 23:53:09

by Dai Ngo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] NFSD: send OP_CB_RECALL_ANY to clients when number of delegations reaches its limit


On 2/21/24 2:55 PM, Calum Mackay wrote:
> hi Dai,
>
> On 20/02/2024 11:58 pm, Dai Ngo wrote:
>> The NFS server should ask clients to voluntarily return unused
>> delegations when the number of granted delegations reaches the
>> max_delegations. This is so that the server can continue to
>> hand out delegations for new requests.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index fdc95bfbfbb6..a0bd6f6b994d 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops
>> nfsd4_cb_notify_lock_ops;
>>   static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_getattr_ops;
>>     static struct workqueue_struct *laundry_wq;
>> +static void deleg_reaper(struct nfsd_net *nn);
>
> Nits: If this is actually needed (you seem to be calling it after it
> is defined?),

Yes, it's needed for a clean build:

fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:6554:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘deleg_reaper’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

> shouldn't it be with the other forward decls around lines 84–89?

I'll move it up in v2.

Thanks,
-Dai

>
> cheers,
> calum.
>
>>     int nfsd4_create_laundry_wq(void)
>>   {
>> @@ -6550,6 +6551,8 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
>>       /* service the server-to-server copy delayed unmount list */
>>       nfsd4_ssc_expire_umount(nn);
>>   #endif
>> +    if (atomic_long_read(&num_delegations) >= max_delegations)
>> +        deleg_reaper(nn);
>>   out:
>>       return max_t(time64_t, lt.new_timeo, NFSD_LAUNDROMAT_MINTIMEOUT);
>>   }
>
>