I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at
git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common
with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server
(with just some protocol constants).
So we can all work on top of that if we want.
(Or just apply the thing separately--it's a tiny patch.)
I also pushed the minimal server 4.2 patches to the for-3.11 branch.
The actual labeled nfs server patch I'll add as soon as I hear it's
passing tests again.
--b.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Dickson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:31 PM
> To: Myklebust, Trond
> Cc: J. Bruce Fields; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: 3.11 patches
>
>
>
> On 13/05/13 11:28, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:23 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >> I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at
> >>
> >> git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common
> >>
> >> with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server
> >> (with just some protocol constants).
> >>
> >> So we can all work on top of that if we want.
> >
> > OK. I've pushed out a 'labeled-nfs' branch for the client side that is
> > based upon the above branch.
> Momentary I will be posting the 3.10-rc1 forward port.
>
> >
> > Has James added the security patches to a public branch that we can
> > pull yet?
> >
> No and he does not plan to... because "It won't be functional without the
> security subsystem patches, so they should all be in his tree." Meaning your
> tree...
As long as James is fine with me pushing those patches, then I'm happy to do so...
Cheers
Trond
On Mon, 13 May 2013, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:28:09PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:23 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at
> > >
> > > git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common
> > >
> > > with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server
> > > (with just some protocol constants).
> > >
> > > So we can all work on top of that if we want.
> >
> > OK. I've pushed out a 'labeled-nfs' branch for the client side that is
> > based upon the above branch.
> >
> > Has James added the security patches to a public branch that we can pull
> > yet?
>
> I assumed his ACK meant he was comfortable with us merging them.
>
> None of them are needed on the server side as far as I can tell, so
> that'd mean they'd go through your tree.
>
> James, is that OK with you?
Yep.
--
James Morris
<[email protected]>
On 13/05/13 11:28, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:23 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at
>>
>> git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common
>>
>> with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server
>> (with just some protocol constants).
>>
>> So we can all work on top of that if we want.
>
> OK. I've pushed out a 'labeled-nfs' branch for the client side that is
> based upon the above branch.
Momentary I will be posting the 3.10-rc1 forward port.
>
> Has James added the security patches to a public branch that we can pull
> yet?
>
No and he does not plan to... because "It won't be functional without the security
subsystem patches, so they should all be in his tree." Meaning your tree...
steved.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:28:09PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:23 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at
> >
> > git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common
> >
> > with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server
> > (with just some protocol constants).
> >
> > So we can all work on top of that if we want.
>
> OK. I've pushed out a 'labeled-nfs' branch for the client side that is
> based upon the above branch.
>
> Has James added the security patches to a public branch that we can pull
> yet?
I assumed his ACK meant he was comfortable with us merging them.
None of them are needed on the server side as far as I can tell, so
that'd mean they'd go through your tree.
James, is that OK with you?
--b.
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:23 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at
>
> git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common
>
> with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server
> (with just some protocol constants).
>
> So we can all work on top of that if we want.
OK. I've pushed out a 'labeled-nfs' branch for the client side that is
based upon the above branch.
Has James added the security patches to a public branch that we can pull
yet?
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
[email protected]
http://www.netapp.com