Hi,
Did anyone test latest OCF(20070727) with openssl 0.9.8e ?
I patched the OCF on kernel 2.6.23(rc) and ssl.patch on openssl 0.9.8e and got errors when tried to perform key decryption using cryptosoft driver.
I tested it with older OCF on older kernel(2.6.12.6) and it worked properly.
Thanks,
Eran Ben-Avi
____________________________________________________________________________________
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz
Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ...
> Hi,
>
> Did anyone test latest OCF(20070727) with openssl 0.9.8e ?
> I patched the OCF on kernel 2.6.23(rc) and ssl.patch on openssl 0.9.8e
> and got errors when tried to perform key decryption using cryptosoft driver.
> I tested it with older OCF on older kernel(2.6.12.6) and it worked properly.
Which specific commands/openssl features were you running so I can
reproduce it here ? A lot of the openssl patch was reworked to make
it more acceptable to send upstream as a patch.
The things I use regularly were tested, but not everything. We have
fixed a couple of bugs since 20070727 so if I can get some more
information it might be time to do a new version with it fixed ;-)
Cheers,
Davidm
--
David McCullough, [email protected], Ph:+61 734352815
Secure Computing - SnapGear http://www.uCdot.org http://www.cyberguard.com
Hi,
Please ignore.Apparently the ocfnull was enabled along
with the cryptosoft - that was the root cause of my
problem.
Thanks,
Eran Ben-Avi
--- David McCullough
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ...
> > Hi,
> >
> > Did anyone test latest OCF(20070727) with openssl
> 0.9.8e ?
> > I patched the OCF on kernel 2.6.23(rc) and
> ssl.patch on openssl 0.9.8e
> > and got errors when tried to perform key
> decryption using cryptosoft driver.
> > I tested it with older OCF on older
> kernel(2.6.12.6) and it worked properly.
>
> Which specific commands/openssl features were you
> running so I can
> reproduce it here ? A lot of the openssl patch was
> reworked to make
> it more acceptable to send upstream as a patch.
>
> The things I use regularly were tested, but not
> everything. We have
> fixed a couple of bugs since 20070727 so if I can
> get some more
> information it might be time to do a new version
> with it fixed ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Davidm
>
> --
> David McCullough,
> [email protected], Ph:+61
> 734352815
> Secure Computing - SnapGear http://www.uCdot.org
> http://www.cyberguard.com
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ...
> Hi,
>
> Please ignore.Apparently the ocfnull was enabled along
> with the cryptosoft - that was the root cause of my
> problem.
No problems.
Cheers,
Davidm
> --- David McCullough
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ...
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Did anyone test latest OCF(20070727) with openssl
> > 0.9.8e ?
> > > I patched the OCF on kernel 2.6.23(rc) and
> > ssl.patch on openssl 0.9.8e
> > > and got errors when tried to perform key
> > decryption using cryptosoft driver.
> > > I tested it with older OCF on older
> > kernel(2.6.12.6) and it worked properly.
> >
> > Which specific commands/openssl features were you
> > running so I can
> > reproduce it here ? A lot of the openssl patch was
> > reworked to make
> > it more acceptable to send upstream as a patch.
> >
> > The things I use regularly were tested, but not
> > everything. We have
> > fixed a couple of bugs since 20070727 so if I can
> > get some more
> > information it might be time to do a new version
> > with it fixed ;-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Davidm
> >
> > --
> > David McCullough,
> > [email protected], Ph:+61
> > 734352815
> > Secure Computing - SnapGear http://www.uCdot.org
> > http://www.cyberguard.com
> >
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
>
--
David McCullough, [email protected], Ph:+61 734352815
Secure Computing - SnapGear http://www.uCdot.org http://www.cyberguard.com