On 10/13/21 3:10 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>> On 10/13/21 1:10 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> Side topic, what do you think about s/assigned/private for the "public" APIs, as
>>> suggested/implied above? I actually like the terminology when talking specifically
>>> about the RMP, but it doesn't fit the abstractions that tend to be used when talking
>>> about these things in other contexts, e.g. in KVM.
>> I can float the idea to see if docs folks is okay with the changes but
>> generally speaking we all have been referring the assigned == private in
>> the Linux SNP support patch.
> Oh, I wasn't suggesting anything remotely close to an "official" change, it was
> purely a suggestion for the host-side patches. It might even be unique to this
> one helper.
Ah, sure I am good with calling a private in the helper.
-Brijesh