fix a code style in fs/ext4/move_extent.c
Signed-off-by: LiuQi <[email protected]>
---
fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
index aa5fe28..b399358 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
@@ -481,6 +481,7 @@ mext_leaf_block(handle_t *handle, struct inode *orig_inode,
int depth = ext_depth(orig_inode);
int ret;
+ start_ext.ee_block = end_ext.ee_block = 0;
o_start = o_end = oext = orig_path[depth].p_ext;
oext_alen = ext4_ext_get_actual_len(oext);
start_ext.ee_len = end_ext.ee_len = 0;
--
1.6.0.3
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:12:14PM +0800, Steven Liu wrote:
> fix a code style in fs/ext4/move_extent.c
>
> Signed-off-by: LiuQi <[email protected]>
I've added this to the ext4 patch queue with the following changelog
description:
ext4: Fix coding style in fs/ext4/move_extent.c
From: Steven Liu <[email protected]>
Making sure ee_block is initialized to zero to prevent gcc from
kvetching. It's harmless (although it's not obvious that it's
harmless) from code inspection:
fs/ext4/move_extent.c:478: warning: 'start_ext.ee_block' may be used
uninitialized in this function
Thanks to Stefan Richter for first bringing this to the attention of
[email protected].
Signed-off-by: LiuQi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Ted