2021-10-19 01:07:37

by Kari Argillander

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: don't use ->bd_inode to access the block device size v3

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:53:08AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:

snip..

> diff --git a/include/linux/genhd.h b/include/linux/genhd.h
> index 7b0326661a1e..a967b3fb3c71 100644
> --- a/include/linux/genhd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/genhd.h
> @@ -236,14 +236,14 @@ static inline sector_t get_start_sect(struct block_device *bdev)
> return bdev->bd_start_sect;
> }
>
> -static inline loff_t bdev_nr_bytes(struct block_device *bdev)
> +static inline sector_t bdev_nr_sectors(struct block_device *bdev)
> {
> - return i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode);
> + return bdev->bd_nr_sectors;
> }
>
> -static inline sector_t bdev_nr_sectors(struct block_device *bdev)
> +static inline loff_t bdev_nr_bytes(struct block_device *bdev)
> {
> - return bdev_nr_bytes(bdev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> + return bdev_nr_setors(bdev) << SECTOR_SHIFT;

setors -> sectors

> }
>
> static inline sector_t get_capacity(struct gendisk *disk)
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>


2021-10-19 01:10:06

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: don't use ->bd_inode to access the block device size v3

On 10/18/21 7:04 PM, Kari Argillander wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:53:08AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> snip..
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/genhd.h b/include/linux/genhd.h
>> index 7b0326661a1e..a967b3fb3c71 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/genhd.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/genhd.h
>> @@ -236,14 +236,14 @@ static inline sector_t get_start_sect(struct block_device *bdev)
>> return bdev->bd_start_sect;
>> }
>>
>> -static inline loff_t bdev_nr_bytes(struct block_device *bdev)
>> +static inline sector_t bdev_nr_sectors(struct block_device *bdev)
>> {
>> - return i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode);
>> + return bdev->bd_nr_sectors;
>> }
>>
>> -static inline sector_t bdev_nr_sectors(struct block_device *bdev)
>> +static inline loff_t bdev_nr_bytes(struct block_device *bdev)
>> {
>> - return bdev_nr_bytes(bdev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
>> + return bdev_nr_setors(bdev) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
>
> setors -> sectors

Yep, did catch that prior.

--
Jens Axboe