Correct some questions like this:
s_lastcheck_hi field should be upper 8 bits of the
s_lastcheck field, rather than itself.
Signed-off-by: JunChao Sun <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst
index 268888522e35..0152888cac29 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst
@@ -456,15 +456,15 @@ The ext4 superblock is laid out as follows in
* - 0x277
- __u8
- s_lastcheck_hi
- - Upper 8 bits of the s_lastcheck_hi field.
+ - Upper 8 bits of the s_lastcheck field.
* - 0x278
- __u8
- s_first_error_time_hi
- - Upper 8 bits of the s_first_error_time_hi field.
+ - Upper 8 bits of the s_first_error_time field.
* - 0x279
- __u8
- s_last_error_time_hi
- - Upper 8 bits of the s_last_error_time_hi field.
+ - Upper 8 bits of the s_last_error_time field.
* - 0x27A
- __u8
- s_pad[2]
--
2.17.1
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 02:00:16AM -0700, JunChao Sun wrote:
> Correct some questions like this:
> s_lastcheck_hi field should be upper 8 bits of the
> s_lastcheck field, rather than itself.
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst
> index 268888522e35..0152888cac29 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst
> @@ -456,15 +456,15 @@ The ext4 superblock is laid out as follows in
> * - 0x277
> - __u8
> - s_lastcheck_hi
> - - Upper 8 bits of the s_lastcheck_hi field.
> + - Upper 8 bits of the s_lastcheck field.
> * - 0x278
> - __u8
> - s_first_error_time_hi
> - - Upper 8 bits of the s_first_error_time_hi field.
> + - Upper 8 bits of the s_first_error_time field.
> * - 0x279
> - __u8
> - s_last_error_time_hi
> - - Upper 8 bits of the s_last_error_time_hi field.
> + - Upper 8 bits of the s_last_error_time field.
> * - 0x27A
> - __u8
> - s_pad[2]
The diff looks OK, but the description should be:
"The description of s_lastcheck_hi, s_first_error_time_hi, and
s_last_error_time_hi fields refer to themselves, while these means
referring to upper 8 bits (byte) of corresponding fields (s_lastcheck,
s_first_error_time, and s_last_error_time). Correct the mistake."
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Thanks for your suggestions, I will send patchv2.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 5:21 PM Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 02:00:16AM -0700, JunChao Sun wrote:
> > Correct some questions like this:
> > s_lastcheck_hi field should be upper 8 bits of the
> > s_lastcheck field, rather than itself.
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst
> > index 268888522e35..0152888cac29 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst
> > @@ -456,15 +456,15 @@ The ext4 superblock is laid out as follows in
> > * - 0x277
> > - __u8
> > - s_lastcheck_hi
> > - - Upper 8 bits of the s_lastcheck_hi field.
> > + - Upper 8 bits of the s_lastcheck field.
> > * - 0x278
> > - __u8
> > - s_first_error_time_hi
> > - - Upper 8 bits of the s_first_error_time_hi field.
> > + - Upper 8 bits of the s_first_error_time field.
> > * - 0x279
> > - __u8
> > - s_last_error_time_hi
> > - - Upper 8 bits of the s_last_error_time_hi field.
> > + - Upper 8 bits of the s_last_error_time field.
> > * - 0x27A
> > - __u8
> > - s_pad[2]
>
> The diff looks OK, but the description should be:
> "The description of s_lastcheck_hi, s_first_error_time_hi, and
> s_last_error_time_hi fields refer to themselves, while these means
> referring to upper 8 bits (byte) of corresponding fields (s_lastcheck,
> s_first_error_time, and s_last_error_time). Correct the mistake."
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara