Do we still need those typealiases in the gpg policy for
anything? ("typealias gpg_t alias { user_gpg_t staff_gpg_t
sysadm_gpg_t };" etc.)
Regards,
Luis Ressel
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 04:04:10PM +0200, Luis Ressel wrote:
> Do we still need those typealiases in the gpg policy for
> anything? ("typealias gpg_t alias { user_gpg_t staff_gpg_t
> sysadm_gpg_t };" etc.)
If we need them then we only need them for existing types (backwards compability). So you do not need them for any dirmngr types that you create.
>
> Regards,
> Luis Ressel
> _______________________________________________
> refpolicy mailing list
> refpolicy at oss.tresys.com
> http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy
--
02DFF788
4D30 903A 1CF3 B756 FB48 1514 3148 83A2 02DF F788
http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x314883A202DFF788
Dominick Grift
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 648 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20150810/ab447e44/attachment.bin