2014-05-27 11:46:30

by Vladimir Kondratiev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] wil6210 patches

Small fixes here and there; with notable exceptions for the
"detect scan timeouts", which is attempt to fix buggy
firmware behavior

Vladimir Kondratiev (7):
wil6210: limit MTU
wil6210: limit fw error recovery attempts
wil6210: inline functions for vring hi/lo watermarks
wil6210: improve debug for WMI receive
wil6210: detect scan timeouts
wil6210: improve pointers printing
wil6210: optimize wil_release_reorder_frames

drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c | 4 +--
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/main.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/netdev.c | 14 +++++++++++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pcie_bus.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/rx_reorder.c | 9 ++++++-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h | 6 +++++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c | 23 ++++++++++++------
9 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--
1.9.1



2014-05-27 14:00:05

by Joe Perches

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] wil6210: improve debug for WMI receive

On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:45 +0300, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote:
> Print error if no events received. This should not happen.
> If it is, it points to the problem in firmware.
>
> Print information as soon as possible - mbox pointers and
> event header right after reading it. This helps to identify potential
> problem with memory allocation for the event buffer.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c
[]
> @@ -658,21 +658,27 @@ void wmi_recv_cmd(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
[]
> for (;;) {
> + for (n = 0;; n++) {
> u16 len;
>
> r->head = ioread32(wil->csr + HOST_MBOX +
> offsetof(struct wil6210_mbox_ctl, rx.head));
> - if (r->tail == r->head)
> + if (r->tail == r->head) {
> + if (n == 0)
> + wil_err(wil, "No events?\n");

This error message might be expanded a bit to describe
a bit more about what to do: report to you, turn on
event debugging, update firmware, etc...



2014-05-27 14:46:49

by Vladimir Kondratiev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] wil6210: improve debug for WMI receive

On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 07:15:06 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> Then is it an error?
> Maybe use dev_notice instead.

Well, it is not an error, but rather some indication of the
firmware issue. I tend to agree with you and demote it
to the 'debug' category; I use dynamic printk for this and it is
convenient enough for both used and developer.

So, I'll resubmit shortly

John: can you apply other patches? I verified there are no
conflicts if you drop this one. Or, do you want me to re-submit
whole set? What works better for you?

Thanks, Vladimir

2014-05-27 11:46:37

by Vladimir Kondratiev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] wil6210: improve debug for WMI receive

Print error if no events received. This should not happen.
If it is, it points to the problem in firmware.

Print information as soon as possible - mbox pointers and
event header right after reading it. This helps to identify potential
problem with memory allocation for the event buffer.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c
index e9a11cb..abcba5a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c
@@ -658,21 +658,27 @@ void wmi_recv_cmd(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
u8 *cmd;
void __iomem *src;
ulong flags;
+ unsigned n;

if (!test_bit(wil_status_reset_done, &wil->status)) {
wil_err(wil, "Reset not completed\n");
return;
}

- for (;;) {
+ for (n = 0;; n++) {
u16 len;

r->head = ioread32(wil->csr + HOST_MBOX +
offsetof(struct wil6210_mbox_ctl, rx.head));
- if (r->tail == r->head)
+ if (r->tail == r->head) {
+ if (n == 0)
+ wil_err(wil, "No events?\n");
return;
+ }

- /* read cmd from tail */
+ wil_dbg_wmi(wil, "Mbox head %08x tail %08x\n",
+ r->head, r->tail);
+ /* read cmd descriptor from tail */
wil_memcpy_fromio_32(&d_tail, wil->csr + HOSTADDR(r->tail),
sizeof(struct wil6210_mbox_ring_desc));
if (d_tail.sync == 0) {
@@ -680,13 +686,18 @@ void wmi_recv_cmd(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
return;
}

+ /* read cmd header from descriptor */
if (0 != wmi_read_hdr(wil, d_tail.addr, &hdr)) {
wil_err(wil, "Mbox evt at 0x%08x?\n",
le32_to_cpu(d_tail.addr));
return;
}
-
len = le16_to_cpu(hdr.len);
+ wil_dbg_wmi(wil, "Mbox evt %04x %04x %04x %02x\n",
+ le16_to_cpu(hdr.seq), len, le16_to_cpu(hdr.type),
+ hdr.flags);
+
+ /* read cmd buffer from descriptor */
src = wmi_buffer(wil, d_tail.addr) +
sizeof(struct wil6210_mbox_hdr);
evt = kmalloc(ALIGN(offsetof(struct pending_wmi_event,
@@ -702,9 +713,6 @@ void wmi_recv_cmd(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
iowrite32(0, wil->csr + HOSTADDR(r->tail) +
offsetof(struct wil6210_mbox_ring_desc, sync));
/* indicate */
- wil_dbg_wmi(wil, "Mbox evt %04x %04x %04x %02x\n",
- le16_to_cpu(hdr.seq), len, le16_to_cpu(hdr.type),
- hdr.flags);
if ((hdr.type == WIL_MBOX_HDR_TYPE_WMI) &&
(len >= sizeof(struct wil6210_mbox_hdr_wmi))) {
struct wil6210_mbox_hdr_wmi *wmi = &evt->event.wmi;
--
1.9.1


2014-05-27 11:46:42

by Vladimir Kondratiev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] wil6210: optimize wil_release_reorder_frames

In case of receiving frame with sequence number far greater than current,
wil_release_reorder_frames() will iterate many times over empty buffer.

Optimize this case by checking buffer emptiness and simply update
head_seq_num without iterating.

Suggested-by: Vladimir Shulman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/rx_reorder.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/rx_reorder.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/rx_reorder.c
index ec29954..747ae12 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/rx_reorder.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/rx_reorder.c
@@ -49,10 +49,17 @@ static void wil_release_reorder_frames(struct wil6210_priv *wil,
{
int index;

- while (seq_less(r->head_seq_num, hseq)) {
+ /* note: this function is never called with
+ * hseq preceding r->head_seq_num, i.e it is always true
+ * !seq_less(hseq, r->head_seq_num)
+ * and thus on loop exit it should be
+ * r->head_seq_num == hseq
+ */
+ while (seq_less(r->head_seq_num, hseq) && r->stored_mpdu_num) {
index = reorder_index(r, r->head_seq_num);
wil_release_reorder_frame(wil, r, index);
}
+ r->head_seq_num = hseq;
}

static void wil_reorder_release(struct wil6210_priv *wil,
--
1.9.1


2014-05-29 15:40:01

by Vladimir Kondratiev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4/7 v2] wil6210: improve debug for WMI receive

Print message if no events received. This should not happen.
If it is, it points to the problem in firmware.
Track also cases when multiple events processed in one IRQ

Print information as soon as possible - mbox pointers and
event header right after reading it. This helps to identify potential
problem with memory allocation for the event buffer.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c
index e9a11cb..706ee52 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c
@@ -658,21 +658,27 @@ void wmi_recv_cmd(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
u8 *cmd;
void __iomem *src;
ulong flags;
+ unsigned n;

if (!test_bit(wil_status_reset_done, &wil->status)) {
wil_err(wil, "Reset not completed\n");
return;
}

- for (;;) {
+ for (n = 0;; n++) {
u16 len;

r->head = ioread32(wil->csr + HOST_MBOX +
offsetof(struct wil6210_mbox_ctl, rx.head));
- if (r->tail == r->head)
+ if (r->tail == r->head) {
+ if (n == 0)
+ wil_dbg_wmi(wil, "No events?\n");
return;
+ }

- /* read cmd from tail */
+ wil_dbg_wmi(wil, "Mbox head %08x tail %08x\n",
+ r->head, r->tail);
+ /* read cmd descriptor from tail */
wil_memcpy_fromio_32(&d_tail, wil->csr + HOSTADDR(r->tail),
sizeof(struct wil6210_mbox_ring_desc));
if (d_tail.sync == 0) {
@@ -680,13 +686,18 @@ void wmi_recv_cmd(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
return;
}

+ /* read cmd header from descriptor */
if (0 != wmi_read_hdr(wil, d_tail.addr, &hdr)) {
wil_err(wil, "Mbox evt at 0x%08x?\n",
le32_to_cpu(d_tail.addr));
return;
}
-
len = le16_to_cpu(hdr.len);
+ wil_dbg_wmi(wil, "Mbox evt %04x %04x %04x %02x\n",
+ le16_to_cpu(hdr.seq), len, le16_to_cpu(hdr.type),
+ hdr.flags);
+
+ /* read cmd buffer from descriptor */
src = wmi_buffer(wil, d_tail.addr) +
sizeof(struct wil6210_mbox_hdr);
evt = kmalloc(ALIGN(offsetof(struct pending_wmi_event,
@@ -702,9 +713,6 @@ void wmi_recv_cmd(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
iowrite32(0, wil->csr + HOSTADDR(r->tail) +
offsetof(struct wil6210_mbox_ring_desc, sync));
/* indicate */
- wil_dbg_wmi(wil, "Mbox evt %04x %04x %04x %02x\n",
- le16_to_cpu(hdr.seq), len, le16_to_cpu(hdr.type),
- hdr.flags);
if ((hdr.type == WIL_MBOX_HDR_TYPE_WMI) &&
(len >= sizeof(struct wil6210_mbox_hdr_wmi))) {
struct wil6210_mbox_hdr_wmi *wmi = &evt->event.wmi;
@@ -734,6 +742,8 @@ void wmi_recv_cmd(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
wil_dbg_wmi(wil, "queue_work -> %d\n", q);
}
}
+ if (n > 1)
+ wil_dbg_wmi(wil, "%s -> %d events processed\n", __func__, n);
}

int wmi_call(struct wil6210_priv *wil, u16 cmdid, void *buf, u16 len,
--
1.9.1


2014-05-27 14:15:11

by Joe Perches

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] wil6210: improve debug for WMI receive

On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 17:11 +0300, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 06:59:59 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > This error message might be expanded a bit to describe
> > a bit more about what to do: report to you, turn on
> > event debugging, update firmware, etc...
>
> As of now, for the user it is nothing to do;
> I expect to see this messages in the bug reports that
> may be potentially sent to me. It may help understanding
> the situation. But, again, this message itself do not
> indicate anything interesting.

Then is it an error?
Maybe use dev_notice instead.




2014-05-27 11:46:34

by Vladimir Kondratiev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] wil6210: limit fw error recovery attempts

In case there is something fundamentally wrong with the firmware
(example: RF cable disconnected), FW will always crash immediately
after reset. This leads to infinite fw error recovery loop.

Count consecutive unsuccessful error recovery attempts in a short period
of time, and stop doing recovery after some reasonable count.
It is still possible to manually reset fw doing
interface down/up sequence.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/main.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/main.c
index 670cc6d..f24cb92 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/main.c
@@ -161,12 +161,30 @@ static void wil_fw_error_worker(struct work_struct *work)
if (no_fw_recovery)
return;

+ /* increment @recovery_count if less then WIL6210_FW_RECOVERY_TO
+ * passed since last recovery attempt
+ */
+ if (time_is_after_jiffies(wil->last_fw_recovery +
+ WIL6210_FW_RECOVERY_TO))
+ wil->recovery_count++;
+ else
+ wil->recovery_count = 1; /* fw was alive for a long time */
+
+ if (wil->recovery_count > WIL6210_FW_RECOVERY_RETRIES) {
+ wil_err(wil, "too many recovery attempts (%d), giving up\n",
+ wil->recovery_count);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ wil->last_fw_recovery = jiffies;
+
mutex_lock(&wil->mutex);
switch (wdev->iftype) {
case NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION:
case NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_CLIENT:
case NL80211_IFTYPE_MONITOR:
- wil_info(wil, "fw error recovery started...\n");
+ wil_info(wil, "fw error recovery started (try %d)...\n",
+ wil->recovery_count);
wil_reset(wil);

/* need to re-allocate Rx ring after reset */
@@ -249,6 +267,8 @@ int wil_priv_init(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
return -EAGAIN;
}

+ wil->last_fw_recovery = jiffies;
+
return 0;
}

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h
index 3427ac4..f8c598e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ static inline u32 WIL_GET_BITS(u32 x, int b0, int b1)
#define WIL6210_MAX_CID (8) /* HW limit */
#define WIL6210_NAPI_BUDGET (16) /* arbitrary */
#define WIL6210_ITR_TRSH (10000) /* arbitrary - about 15 IRQs/msec */
+#define WIL6210_FW_RECOVERY_RETRIES (5) /* try to recover this many times */
+#define WIL6210_FW_RECOVERY_TO msecs_to_jiffies(5000)

/* Hardware definitions begin */

@@ -361,6 +363,8 @@ struct wil6210_priv {
u32 fw_version;
u32 hw_version;
u8 n_mids; /* number of additional MIDs as reported by FW */
+ int recovery_count; /* num of FW recovery attempts in a short time */
+ unsigned long last_fw_recovery; /* jiffies of last fw recovery */
/* profile */
u32 monitor_flags;
u32 secure_pcp; /* create secure PCP? */
--
1.9.1


2014-05-29 15:40:02

by Vladimir Kondratiev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Resubmitting [PATCH 4/7 v2]

Resubmitting patch with modification as suggested by Joe
(and some minor improvement).

John: patch ordes does not matter here, you can apply this after
my other patches.

Vladimir Kondratiev (1):
wil6210: improve debug for WMI receive

drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--
1.9.1


2014-05-27 11:46:35

by Vladimir Kondratiev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] wil6210: inline functions for vring hi/lo watermarks

Provide clear definition of the watermarks for the vring descriptor space.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c
index c8c5474..82140e0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c
@@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ static inline int wil_vring_avail_tx(struct vring *vring)
return vring->size - used - 1;
}

+/**
+ * wil_vring_wmark_low - low watermark for available descriptor space
+ */
+static inline int wil_vring_wmark_low(struct vring *vring)
+{
+ return vring->size/8;
+}
+
+/**
+ * wil_vring_wmark_high - high watermark for available descriptor space
+ */
+static inline int wil_vring_wmark_high(struct vring *vring)
+{
+ return vring->size/4;
+}
+
static int wil_vring_alloc(struct wil6210_priv *wil, struct vring *vring)
{
struct device *dev = wil_to_dev(wil);
@@ -1007,7 +1023,7 @@ netdev_tx_t wil_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
rc = wil_tx_vring(wil, vring, skb);

/* do we still have enough room in the vring? */
- if (wil_vring_avail_tx(vring) < vring->size/8)
+ if (wil_vring_avail_tx(vring) < wil_vring_wmark_low(vring))
netif_tx_stop_all_queues(wil_to_ndev(wil));

switch (rc) {
@@ -1116,7 +1132,7 @@ int wil_tx_complete(struct wil6210_priv *wil, int ringid)
done++;
}
}
- if (wil_vring_avail_tx(vring) > vring->size/4)
+ if (wil_vring_avail_tx(vring) > wil_vring_wmark_high(vring))
netif_tx_wake_all_queues(wil_to_ndev(wil));

return done;
--
1.9.1


2014-05-27 11:46:32

by Vladimir Kondratiev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] wil6210: limit MTU

Obey 802.11 spec that defines max. data size 7920 bytes

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/netdev.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/netdev.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/netdev.c
index fdcaeb8..106b6dc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/netdev.c
@@ -32,12 +32,26 @@ static int wil_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
return wil_down(wil);
}

+static int wil_change_mtu(struct net_device *ndev, int new_mtu)
+{
+ struct wil6210_priv *wil = ndev_to_wil(ndev);
+
+ if (new_mtu < 68 || new_mtu > IEEE80211_MAX_DATA_LEN_DMG)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ wil_dbg_misc(wil, "change MTU %d -> %d\n", ndev->mtu, new_mtu);
+ ndev->mtu = new_mtu;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static const struct net_device_ops wil_netdev_ops = {
.ndo_open = wil_open,
.ndo_stop = wil_stop,
.ndo_start_xmit = wil_start_xmit,
.ndo_set_mac_address = eth_mac_addr,
.ndo_validate_addr = eth_validate_addr,
+ .ndo_change_mtu = wil_change_mtu,
};

static int wil6210_netdev_poll_rx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
--
1.9.1


2014-05-27 14:11:25

by Vladimir Kondratiev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] wil6210: improve debug for WMI receive

On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 06:59:59 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> This error message might be expanded a bit to describe
> a bit more about what to do: report to you, turn on
> event debugging, update firmware, etc...

As of now, for the user it is nothing to do;
I expect to see this messages in the bug reports that
may be potentially sent to me. It may help understanding
the situation. But, again, this message itself do not
indicate anything interesting.

Thanks, Vladimir

2014-05-27 11:46:43

by Vladimir Kondratiev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] wil6210: improve pointers printing

use proper format %pad for the dma_addr_t arguments;
prefix %p with 0x, as %p don't print is by itself

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c | 4 ++--
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pcie_bus.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c
index ecdabe4..8d4bc4b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static void wil_print_vring(struct seq_file *s, struct wil6210_priv *wil,
void __iomem *x = wmi_addr(wil, vring->hwtail);

seq_printf(s, "VRING %s = {\n", name);
- seq_printf(s, " pa = 0x%016llx\n", (unsigned long long)vring->pa);
+ seq_printf(s, " pa = %pad\n", &vring->pa);
seq_printf(s, " va = 0x%p\n", vring->va);
seq_printf(s, " size = %d\n", vring->size);
seq_printf(s, " swtail = %d\n", vring->swtail);
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static int wil_txdesc_debugfs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
u[0], u[1], u[2], u[3]);
seq_printf(s, " DMA = 0x%08x 0x%08x 0x%08x 0x%08x\n",
u[4], u[5], u[6], u[7]);
- seq_printf(s, " SKB = %p\n", skb);
+ seq_printf(s, " SKB = 0x%p\n", skb);

if (skb) {
skb_get(skb);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pcie_bus.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pcie_bus.c
index 0660884..1e2e07b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pcie_bus.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pcie_bus.c
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int wil_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
goto err_release_reg;
}
/* rollback to err_iounmap */
- dev_info(&pdev->dev, "CSR at %pR -> %p\n", &pdev->resource[0], csr);
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "CSR at %pR -> 0x%p\n", &pdev->resource[0], csr);

wil = wil_if_alloc(dev, csr);
if (IS_ERR(wil)) {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c
index 82140e0..0784ef3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c
@@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ static int wil_vring_alloc(struct wil6210_priv *wil, struct vring *vring)
_d->dma.status = TX_DMA_STATUS_DU;
}

- wil_dbg_misc(wil, "vring[%d] 0x%p:0x%016llx 0x%p\n", vring->size,
- vring->va, (unsigned long long)vring->pa, vring->ctx);
+ wil_dbg_misc(wil, "vring[%d] 0x%p:%pad 0x%p\n", vring->size,
+ vring->va, &vring->pa, vring->ctx);

return 0;
}
@@ -896,8 +896,8 @@ static int wil_tx_vring(struct wil6210_priv *wil, struct vring *vring,
pa = dma_map_single(dev, skb->data,
skb_headlen(skb), DMA_TO_DEVICE);

- wil_dbg_txrx(wil, "Tx skb %d bytes %p -> %#08llx\n", skb_headlen(skb),
- skb->data, (unsigned long long)pa);
+ wil_dbg_txrx(wil, "Tx skb %d bytes 0x%p -> %pad\n", skb_headlen(skb),
+ skb->data, &pa);
wil_hex_dump_txrx("Tx ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,
skb->data, skb_headlen(skb), false);

--
1.9.1


2014-05-27 11:46:39

by Vladimir Kondratiev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] wil6210: detect scan timeouts

If scan has not finished in some reasonable time (10sec), interpret it as
if firmware error occurs but was not reported. Firmware should report
scan completion for every scan request, so it is error condition indeed.
Perform firmware recovery procedure.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/main.c | 13 +++++++++++++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h | 2 ++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c
index 6e699d0..820d4eb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c
@@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ static int wil_cfg80211_scan(struct wiphy *wiphy,
}

wil->scan_request = request;
+ mod_timer(&wil->scan_timer, jiffies + WIL6210_SCAN_TO);

memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(cmd));
cmd.cmd.num_channels = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/main.c
index f24cb92..11e6d9d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/main.c
@@ -150,6 +150,15 @@ static void wil_connect_timer_fn(ulong x)
schedule_work(&wil->disconnect_worker);
}

+static void wil_scan_timer_fn(ulong x)
+{
+ struct wil6210_priv *wil = (void *)x;
+
+ clear_bit(wil_status_fwready, &wil->status);
+ wil_err(wil, "Scan timeout detected, start fw error recovery\n");
+ schedule_work(&wil->fw_error_worker);
+}
+
static void wil_fw_error_worker(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct wil6210_priv *wil = container_of(work,
@@ -248,6 +257,7 @@ int wil_priv_init(struct wil6210_priv *wil)

wil->pending_connect_cid = -1;
setup_timer(&wil->connect_timer, wil_connect_timer_fn, (ulong)wil);
+ setup_timer(&wil->scan_timer, wil_scan_timer_fn, (ulong)wil);

INIT_WORK(&wil->connect_worker, wil_connect_worker);
INIT_WORK(&wil->disconnect_worker, wil_disconnect_worker);
@@ -280,6 +290,7 @@ void wil6210_disconnect(struct wil6210_priv *wil, const u8 *bssid)

void wil_priv_deinit(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
{
+ del_timer_sync(&wil->scan_timer);
cancel_work_sync(&wil->disconnect_worker);
cancel_work_sync(&wil->fw_error_worker);
mutex_lock(&wil->mutex);
@@ -411,6 +422,7 @@ int wil_reset(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
if (wil->scan_request) {
wil_dbg_misc(wil, "Abort scan_request 0x%p\n",
wil->scan_request);
+ del_timer_sync(&wil->scan_timer);
cfg80211_scan_done(wil->scan_request, true);
wil->scan_request = NULL;
}
@@ -540,6 +552,7 @@ static int __wil_down(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
napi_disable(&wil->napi_tx);

if (wil->scan_request) {
+ del_timer_sync(&wil->scan_timer);
cfg80211_scan_done(wil->scan_request, true);
wil->scan_request = NULL;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h
index f8c598e..e25edc5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static inline u32 WIL_GET_BITS(u32 x, int b0, int b1)
#define WIL6210_ITR_TRSH (10000) /* arbitrary - about 15 IRQs/msec */
#define WIL6210_FW_RECOVERY_RETRIES (5) /* try to recover this many times */
#define WIL6210_FW_RECOVERY_TO msecs_to_jiffies(5000)
+#define WIL6210_SCAN_TO msecs_to_jiffies(10000)

/* Hardware definitions begin */

@@ -386,6 +387,7 @@ struct wil6210_priv {
struct work_struct disconnect_worker;
struct work_struct fw_error_worker; /* for FW error recovery */
struct timer_list connect_timer;
+ struct timer_list scan_timer; /* detect scan timeout */
int pending_connect_cid;
struct list_head pending_wmi_ev;
/*
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c
index abcba5a..76b6657 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c
@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ static void wmi_evt_scan_complete(struct wil6210_priv *wil, int id,
bool aborted = (data->status != WMI_SCAN_SUCCESS);

wil_dbg_wmi(wil, "SCAN_COMPLETE(0x%08x)\n", data->status);
+ del_timer_sync(&wil->scan_timer);
cfg80211_scan_done(wil->scan_request, aborted);
wil->scan_request = NULL;
} else {
--
1.9.1