This patch is to display the average ack signal,
last ack signal of tx ack packets.
Signed-off-by: Balaji Pothunoori <[email protected]>
---
v5:
* Rebased, No changes
v4:
* Changed the subject
* Added last ack signal support and renamed avg ack signal macro
v3:
* Added version no
v2:
* Removed nl80211.h changes and modified the commit log
station.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/station.c b/station.c
index 38c5f91..fd38043 100644
--- a/station.c
+++ b/station.c
@@ -308,6 +308,8 @@ static int print_sta_handler(struct nl_msg *msg, void *arg)
[NL80211_STA_INFO_TID_STATS] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
[NL80211_STA_INFO_BSS_PARAM] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
[NL80211_STA_INFO_RX_DURATION] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
+ [NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL] = {.type = NLA_U8 },
+ [NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL_AVG] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
};
char *chain;
@@ -409,6 +411,14 @@ static int print_sta_handler(struct nl_msg *msg, void *arg)
printf("\n\trx duration:\t%lld us",
(unsigned long long)nla_get_u64(sinfo[NL80211_STA_INFO_RX_DURATION]));
+ if (sinfo[NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL])
+ printf("\n\tlast ack signal:%d dBm",
+ (int8_t)nla_get_u8(sinfo[NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL]));
+
+ if (sinfo[NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL_AVG])
+ printf("\n\tavg ack signal:\t%d dBm",
+ (int8_t)nla_get_u8(sinfo[NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL_AVG]));
+
if (sinfo[NL80211_STA_INFO_EXPECTED_THROUGHPUT]) {
uint32_t thr;
--
2.7.4
Hi Johannes,
Now that corresponding driver patches are merged, could you please let
me know if anything is left from our end for merging this patch?
Regards,
Balaji.
On 2018-07-19 19:59, Balaji Pothunoori wrote:
> This patch is to display the average ack signal,
> last ack signal of tx ack packets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Balaji Pothunoori <[email protected]>
> ---
> v5:
> * Rebased, No changes
> v4:
> * Changed the subject
> * Added last ack signal support and renamed avg ack signal macro
> v3:
> * Added version no
> v2:
> * Removed nl80211.h changes and modified the commit log
>
> station.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/station.c b/station.c
> index 38c5f91..fd38043 100644
> --- a/station.c
> +++ b/station.c
> @@ -308,6 +308,8 @@ static int print_sta_handler(struct nl_msg *msg,
> void *arg)
> [NL80211_STA_INFO_TID_STATS] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
> [NL80211_STA_INFO_BSS_PARAM] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
> [NL80211_STA_INFO_RX_DURATION] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
> + [NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL] = {.type = NLA_U8 },
> + [NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL_AVG] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
> };
> char *chain;
>
> @@ -409,6 +411,14 @@ static int print_sta_handler(struct nl_msg *msg,
> void *arg)
> printf("\n\trx duration:\t%lld us",
> (unsigned long
> long)nla_get_u64(sinfo[NL80211_STA_INFO_RX_DURATION]));
>
> + if (sinfo[NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL])
> + printf("\n\tlast ack signal:%d dBm",
> + (int8_t)nla_get_u8(sinfo[NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL]));
> +
> + if (sinfo[NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL_AVG])
> + printf("\n\tavg ack signal:\t%d dBm",
> + (int8_t)nla_get_u8(sinfo[NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL_AVG]));
> +
> if (sinfo[NL80211_STA_INFO_EXPECTED_THROUGHPUT]) {
> uint32_t thr;
On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 21:56 +0530, Balaji Pothunoori wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> Now that corresponding driver patches are merged, could you please let
> me know if anything is left from our end for merging this patch?
Oh, I marked this as "changes requested" since I thought the updates we
discussed on the kernel side would require changes here (IIRC we talked
about changing some names?)
If it applies and compiles as is, I guess best if you just resend, since
I no longer have it in patchwork and am on vacation this week.
johannes
Hi Johannes,
Seems to be v5 patch is applied on "Jul 19 19:59:50 2018" but i couldn't
get acknowledgement for it.
commit id "d227267148275c63041aca62f4da5d5f07354a82"
kindly ignore my earlier comments.
Regards,
Balaji.
On 2018-11-13 00:32, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 21:56 +0530, Balaji Pothunoori wrote:
>> Hi Johannes,
>>
>> Now that corresponding driver patches are merged, could you please let
>> me know if anything is left from our end for merging this patch?
>
> Oh, I marked this as "changes requested" since I thought the updates we
> discussed on the kernel side would require changes here (IIRC we talked
> about changing some names?)
>
> If it applies and compiles as is, I guess best if you just resend,
> since
> I no longer have it in patchwork and am on vacation this week.
>
> johannes