From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
After -Wstringop-overflow got enabled, the rtw89 driver produced
two odd warnings with gcc-13:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c: In function 'rtw89_btc_ntfy_scan_start':
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:5362:50: error: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
5362 | wl->dbcc_info.scan_band[phy_idx] = band;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.h:8,
from drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:5:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h:1441:12: note: at offset [64, 255] into destination object 'scan_band' of size 2
1441 | u8 scan_band[RTW89_PHY_MAX]; /* scan band in each phy */
| ^~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c: In function 'rtw89_btc_ntfy_switch_band':
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:5406:50: error: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
5406 | wl->dbcc_info.scan_band[phy_idx] = band;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h:1441:12: note: at offset [64, 255] into destination object 'scan_band' of size 2
1441 | u8 scan_band[RTW89_PHY_MAX]; /* scan band in each phy */
| ^~~~~~~~~
I don't know what happened here, but adding an explicit range check
shuts up the output.
Fixes: 89741e7e42f6 ("Makefile: Enable -Wstringop-overflow globally")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index b842cd9a86f8..9c0db35d3e13 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -5352,6 +5352,10 @@ void rtw89_btc_ntfy_scan_start(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 phy_idx, u8 band)
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_BTC,
"[BTC], %s(): phy_idx=%d, band=%d\n",
__func__, phy_idx, band);
+
+ if (phy_idx >= RTW89_PHY_MAX)
+ return;
+
btc->dm.cnt_notify[BTC_NCNT_SCAN_START]++;
wl->status.map.scan = true;
wl->scan_info.band[phy_idx] = band;
@@ -5396,6 +5400,10 @@ void rtw89_btc_ntfy_switch_band(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 phy_idx, u8 band)
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_BTC,
"[BTC], %s(): phy_idx=%d, band=%d\n",
__func__, phy_idx, band);
+
+ if (phy_idx >= RTW89_PHY_MAX)
+ return;
+
btc->dm.cnt_notify[BTC_NCNT_SWITCH_BAND]++;
wl->scan_info.band[phy_idx] = band;
--
2.39.2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 3:30 PM
> To: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>; Kalle Valo <[email protected]>; Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>; DeanKu <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: [PATCH] rtw89: avoid stringop-overflow warning
Subject prefix should be "wifi: rtw89: ..."
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
> After -Wstringop-overflow got enabled, the rtw89 driver produced
> two odd warnings with gcc-13:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c: In function 'rtw89_btc_ntfy_scan_start':
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:5362:50: error: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0
> [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
> 5362 | wl->dbcc_info.scan_band[phy_idx] = band;
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
> In file included from drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.h:8,
> from drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:5:
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h:1441:12: note: at offset [64, 255] into destination object
> 'scan_band' of size 2
> 1441 | u8 scan_band[RTW89_PHY_MAX]; /* scan band in each phy */
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c: In function 'rtw89_btc_ntfy_switch_band':
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:5406:50: error: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0
> [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
> 5406 | wl->dbcc_info.scan_band[phy_idx] = band;
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h:1441:12: note: at offset [64, 255] into destination object
> 'scan_band' of size 2
> 1441 | u8 scan_band[RTW89_PHY_MAX]; /* scan band in each phy */
> | ^~~~~~~~~
>
> I don't know what happened here, but adding an explicit range check
> shuts up the output.
The callers of these two cases will pass RTW89_PHY_0 (0) as argument of phy_idx,
and will extend to pass RTW89_PHY_1 (1) in the future, but should not be larger
than 1.
I don't mind to add this checking, but I really don't know what happened neither.
A statement 'wl->scan_info.band[phy_idx] = band;' did similar thing in the same
function, but why doesn't gcc complain this?
Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
> After -Wstringop-overflow got enabled, the rtw89 driver produced
> two odd warnings with gcc-13:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c: In function 'rtw89_btc_ntfy_scan_start':
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:5362:50: error: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
> 5362 | wl->dbcc_info.scan_band[phy_idx] = band;
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
> In file included from drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.h:8,
> from drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:5:
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h:1441:12: note: at offset [64, 255] into destination object 'scan_band' of size 2
> 1441 | u8 scan_band[RTW89_PHY_MAX]; /* scan band in each phy */
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c: In function 'rtw89_btc_ntfy_switch_band':
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:5406:50: error: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
> 5406 | wl->dbcc_info.scan_band[phy_idx] = band;
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h:1441:12: note: at offset [64, 255] into destination object 'scan_band' of size 2
> 1441 | u8 scan_band[RTW89_PHY_MAX]; /* scan band in each phy */
> | ^~~~~~~~~
>
> I don't know what happened here, but adding an explicit range check
> shuts up the output.
>
> Fixes: 89741e7e42f6 ("Makefile: Enable -Wstringop-overflow globally")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
ERROR: 'wifi:' prefix missing: '[PATCH] rtw89: avoid stringop-overflow warning'
ERROR: Failed to find commit id: Fixes: 89741e7e42f6 ("Makefile: Enable -Wstringop-overflow globally")
I can add the "wifi:" prefix but where can I find the commit 89741e7e42f6?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, at 16:47, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>>
>> Fixes: 89741e7e42f6 ("Makefile: Enable -Wstringop-overflow globally")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
> ERROR: 'wifi:' prefix missing: '[PATCH] rtw89: avoid stringop-overflow
> warning'
> ERROR: Failed to find commit id: Fixes: 89741e7e42f6 ("Makefile: Enable
> -Wstringop-overflow globally")
>
> I can add the "wifi:" prefix but where can I find the commit 89741e7e42f6?
It's in linux-next and came in from Gustavo's tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/kspp
Arnd
"Arnd Bergmann" <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, at 16:47, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Fixes: 89741e7e42f6 ("Makefile: Enable -Wstringop-overflow globally")
>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>>
>> ERROR: 'wifi:' prefix missing: '[PATCH] rtw89: avoid stringop-overflow
>> warning'
>> ERROR: Failed to find commit id: Fixes: 89741e7e42f6 ("Makefile: Enable
>> -Wstringop-overflow globally")
>>
>> I can add the "wifi:" prefix but where can I find the commit 89741e7e42f6?
>
> It's in linux-next and came in from Gustavo's tree at
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/kspp
Ah, I think then I'll drop the Fixes tag to avoid warnings or reports.
My understanding is that a commit in the Fixes tag should be a parent.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
> After -Wstringop-overflow got enabled, the rtw89 driver produced
> two odd warnings with gcc-13:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c: In function 'rtw89_btc_ntfy_scan_start':
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:5362:50: error: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
> 5362 | wl->dbcc_info.scan_band[phy_idx] = band;
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
> In file included from drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.h:8,
> from drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:5:
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h:1441:12: note: at offset [64, 255] into destination object 'scan_band' of size 2
> 1441 | u8 scan_band[RTW89_PHY_MAX]; /* scan band in each phy */
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c: In function 'rtw89_btc_ntfy_switch_band':
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:5406:50: error: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
> 5406 | wl->dbcc_info.scan_band[phy_idx] = band;
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h:1441:12: note: at offset [64, 255] into destination object 'scan_band' of size 2
> 1441 | u8 scan_band[RTW89_PHY_MAX]; /* scan band in each phy */
> | ^~~~~~~~~
>
> I don't know what happened here, but adding an explicit range check
> shuts up the output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Patch applied to wireless-next.git, thanks.
595b1280e2c9 wifi: rtw89: avoid stringop-overflow warning
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches