2010-11-20 18:50:27

by Felix Fietkau

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ath9k_hw: fix endian issues with CTLs on AR9003

Parsing data using bitfields is messy, because it makes endian handling
much harder. AR9002 and earlier got it right, AR9003 got it wrong.
Fix it by getting rid of the CTL related bitfields entirely and use
masks instead.

Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c | 314 ++++++++++++------------
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.h | 9 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c | 6 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.h | 13 +-
4 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c
index 9a7e151..9182a9c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@
#define SUB_NUM_CTL_MODES_AT_5G_40 2 /* excluding HT40, EXT-OFDM */
#define SUB_NUM_CTL_MODES_AT_2G_40 3 /* excluding HT40, EXT-OFDM, EXT-CCK */

+#define CTL(_tpower, _flag) ((_tpower) | ((_flag) << 6))
+
static int ar9003_hw_power_interpolate(int32_t x,
int32_t *px, int32_t *py, u_int16_t np);
static const struct ar9300_eeprom ar9300_default = {
@@ -296,21 +298,21 @@ static const struct ar9300_eeprom ar9300_default = {
}
},
.ctlPowerData_2G = {
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 1} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1) } },

- { { {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(0, 0), CTL(0, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },

- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },

- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1) } },
},
.modalHeader5G = {
/* 4 idle,t1,t2,b (4 bits per setting) */
@@ -582,56 +584,56 @@ static const struct ar9300_eeprom ar9300_default = {
.ctlPowerData_5G = {
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
- {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
}
@@ -873,21 +875,21 @@ static const struct ar9300_eeprom ar9300_x113 = {
}
},
.ctlPowerData_2G = {
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 1} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1) } },

- { { {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(0, 0), CTL(0, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },

- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },

- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1) } },
},
.modalHeader5G = {
/* 4 idle,t1,t2,b (4 bits per setting) */
@@ -1159,56 +1161,56 @@ static const struct ar9300_eeprom ar9300_x113 = {
.ctlPowerData_5G = {
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
- {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
}
@@ -1451,21 +1453,21 @@ static const struct ar9300_eeprom ar9300_h112 = {
}
},
.ctlPowerData_2G = {
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 1} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1) } },

- { { {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(0, 0), CTL(0, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },

- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },

- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1) } },
},
.modalHeader5G = {
/* 4 idle,t1,t2,b (4 bits per setting) */
@@ -1737,56 +1739,56 @@ static const struct ar9300_eeprom ar9300_h112 = {
.ctlPowerData_5G = {
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
- {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
}
@@ -2029,21 +2031,21 @@ static const struct ar9300_eeprom ar9300_x112 = {
}
},
.ctlPowerData_2G = {
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 1} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1) } },

- { { {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(0, 0), CTL(0, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },

- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },

- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1) } },
},
.modalHeader5G = {
/* 4 idle,t1,t2,b (4 bits per setting) */
@@ -2315,56 +2317,56 @@ static const struct ar9300_eeprom ar9300_x112 = {
.ctlPowerData_5G = {
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
- {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
}
@@ -2606,21 +2608,21 @@ static const struct ar9300_eeprom ar9300_h116 = {
}
},
.ctlPowerData_2G = {
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 1} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1) } },

- { { {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(0, 0), CTL(0, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },

- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },

- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1} } },
- { { {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1} } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1) } },
+ { { CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1) } },
},
.modalHeader5G = {
/* 4 idle,t1,t2,b (4 bits per setting) */
@@ -2892,56 +2894,56 @@ static const struct ar9300_eeprom ar9300_h116 = {
.ctlPowerData_5G = {
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
- {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
+ CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 0}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0),
}
},
{
{
- {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1}, {60, 1},
- {60, 1}, {60, 1}, {60, 0}, {60, 1},
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1),
+ CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 1), CTL(60, 0), CTL(60, 1),
}
},
}
@@ -4363,9 +4365,9 @@ static u16 ar9003_hw_get_direct_edge_power(struct ar9300_eeprom *eep,
struct cal_ctl_data_5g *ctl_5g = eep->ctlPowerData_5G;

if (is2GHz)
- return ctl_2g[idx].ctlEdges[edge].tPower;
+ return CTL_EDGE_TPOWER(ctl_2g[idx].ctlEdges[edge]);
else
- return ctl_5g[idx].ctlEdges[edge].tPower;
+ return CTL_EDGE_TPOWER(ctl_5g[idx].ctlEdges[edge]);
}

static u16 ar9003_hw_get_indirect_edge_power(struct ar9300_eeprom *eep,
@@ -4383,12 +4385,12 @@ static u16 ar9003_hw_get_indirect_edge_power(struct ar9300_eeprom *eep,

if (is2GHz) {
if (ath9k_hw_fbin2freq(ctl_freqbin[edge - 1], 1) < freq &&
- ctl_2g[idx].ctlEdges[edge - 1].flag)
- return ctl_2g[idx].ctlEdges[edge - 1].tPower;
+ CTL_EDGE_FLAGS(ctl_2g[idx].ctlEdges[edge - 1]))
+ return CTL_EDGE_TPOWER(ctl_2g[idx].ctlEdges[edge - 1]);
} else {
if (ath9k_hw_fbin2freq(ctl_freqbin[edge - 1], 0) < freq &&
- ctl_5g[idx].ctlEdges[edge - 1].flag)
- return ctl_5g[idx].ctlEdges[edge - 1].tPower;
+ CTL_EDGE_FLAGS(ctl_5g[idx].ctlEdges[edge - 1]))
+ return CTL_EDGE_TPOWER(ctl_5g[idx].ctlEdges[edge - 1]);
}

return AR9300_MAX_RATE_POWER;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.h
index 57f64db..9c14633 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.h
@@ -270,17 +270,12 @@ struct cal_tgt_pow_ht {
u8 tPow2x[14];
} __packed;

-struct cal_ctl_edge_pwr {
- u8 tPower:6,
- flag:2;
-} __packed;
-
struct cal_ctl_data_2g {
- struct cal_ctl_edge_pwr ctlEdges[AR9300_NUM_BAND_EDGES_2G];
+ u8 ctlEdges[AR9300_NUM_BAND_EDGES_2G];
} __packed;

struct cal_ctl_data_5g {
- struct cal_ctl_edge_pwr ctlEdges[AR9300_NUM_BAND_EDGES_5G];
+ u8 ctlEdges[AR9300_NUM_BAND_EDGES_5G];
} __packed;

struct ar9300_BaseExtension_1 {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
index 1266333..2bbf94d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
@@ -240,16 +240,16 @@ u16 ath9k_hw_get_max_edge_power(u16 freq, struct cal_ctl_edges *pRdEdgesPower,
for (i = 0; (i < num_band_edges) &&
(pRdEdgesPower[i].bChannel != AR5416_BCHAN_UNUSED); i++) {
if (freq == ath9k_hw_fbin2freq(pRdEdgesPower[i].bChannel, is2GHz)) {
- twiceMaxEdgePower = pRdEdgesPower[i].tPower;
+ twiceMaxEdgePower = CTL_EDGE_TPOWER(pRdEdgesPower[i].ctl);
break;
} else if ((i > 0) &&
(freq < ath9k_hw_fbin2freq(pRdEdgesPower[i].bChannel,
is2GHz))) {
if (ath9k_hw_fbin2freq(pRdEdgesPower[i - 1].bChannel,
is2GHz) < freq &&
- pRdEdgesPower[i - 1].flag) {
+ CTL_EDGE_FLAGS(pRdEdgesPower[i - 1].ctl)) {
twiceMaxEdgePower =
- pRdEdgesPower[i - 1].tPower;
+ CTL_EDGE_TPOWER(pRdEdgesPower[i - 1].ctl);
}
break;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.h
index 3c99830..5766ce9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.h
@@ -233,6 +233,9 @@

#define AR9287_CHECKSUM_LOCATION (AR9287_EEP_START_LOC + 1)

+#define CTL_EDGE_TPOWER(_ctl) ((_ctl) & 0x3f)
+#define CTL_EDGE_FLAGS(_ctl) (((_ctl) >> 6) & 0x03)
+
enum eeprom_param {
EEP_NFTHRESH_5,
EEP_NFTHRESH_2,
@@ -535,18 +538,10 @@ struct cal_target_power_ht {
u8 tPow2x[8];
} __packed;

-
-#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
-struct cal_ctl_edges {
- u8 bChannel;
- u8 flag:2, tPower:6;
-} __packed;
-#else
struct cal_ctl_edges {
u8 bChannel;
- u8 tPower:6, flag:2;
+ u8 ctl;
} __packed;
-#endif

struct cal_data_op_loop_ar9287 {
u8 pwrPdg[2][5];
--
1.7.3.2



2010-11-29 19:52:24

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k_hw: fix endian issues with CTLs on AR9003

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:52:10PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2010-11-22 9:15 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:50:18PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> >> Parsing data using bitfields is messy, because it makes endian handling
> >> much harder. AR9002 and earlier got it right, AR9003 got it wrong.
> >> Fix it by getting rid of the CTL related bitfields entirely and use
> >> masks instead.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >
> > Why does this merit stable consideration?
> It's a simple fix and I would like it to make it to stable releases,
> because this bug might possibly cause the tx power to be too high in
> some instances (when running on big-endian systems), violating
> regulatory limits.

After being chided for having an excessive number of patches in -next
with "Cc: [email protected]", I would prefer to avoid (or strongly
limit) merging such patches that way.

Patches intended for stable are supposed to be fixes. Fixes are
supposed to go to the current release, even if that means that patches
need to be refactored to separate real fixes from other bits.

Now, what constitutes a fix is that part that can sometimes be subject
to debate. Fixes should be small and obvious if possible, and they
should address significant bug and/or a regression, and be documented
with bug reports, tested by users, etc. The later in the release,
the stricter we must adhere to such definitions.

So...I guess what I am asking is if this is a fix, can you document
the effects of the bug? Can you retarget the patch against 2.6.37?

Otherwise, can we omit the Cc?

Thanks!

John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.

2010-11-29 21:29:44

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k_hw: fix endian issues with CTLs on AR9003

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:19:19PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM, John W. Linville
> <[email protected]> wrote:

> > After being chided for having an excessive number of patches in -next
> > with "Cc: [email protected]", I would prefer to avoid (or strongly
> > limit) merging such patches that way.
>
> Is this a bad thing?

The point was that if it was a fix worth of consideration for stable
then it generally ought to be worth of consideration for the current
release.

> Come to think of it we didn't get OTP patches in for 2.6.36 so I am
> not considering we should just disable AR9003 from the PCI ID list for
> ath9k as all cards sold should have it so in that case this patch
> would just need to go to 2.6.37 and not 2.6.36.

Do you perhaps mean "need to go to 2.6.38 and not 2.6.37"?

John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.

2010-11-29 21:19:40

by Luis R. Rodriguez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k_hw: fix endian issues with CTLs on AR9003

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM, John W. Linville
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:52:10PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2010-11-22 9:15 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
>> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:50:18PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> >> Parsing data using bitfields is messy, because it makes endian handling
>> >> much harder. AR9002 and earlier got it right, AR9003 got it wrong.
>> >> Fix it by getting rid of the CTL related bitfields entirely and use
>> >> masks instead.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
>> >> Cc: [email protected]
>> >
>> > Why does this merit stable consideration?
>> It's a simple fix and I would like it to make it to stable releases,
>> because this bug might possibly cause the tx power to be too high in
>> some instances (when running on big-endian systems), violating
>> regulatory limits.
>
> After being chided for having an excessive number of patches in -next
> with "Cc: [email protected]", I would prefer to avoid (or strongly
> limit) merging such patches that way.

Is this a bad thing?

> Patches intended for stable are supposed to be fixes.  Fixes are
> supposed to go to the current release, even if that means that patches
> need to be refactored to separate real fixes from other bits.
>
> Now, what constitutes a fix is that part that can sometimes be subject
> to debate.  Fixes should be small and obvious if possible, and they
> should address significant bug and/or a regression, and be documented
> with bug reports, tested by users, etc.  The later in the release,
> the stricter we must adhere to such definitions.
>
> So...I guess what I am asking is if this is a fix, can you document
> the effects of the bug?  Can you retarget the patch against 2.6.37?
>
> Otherwise, can we omit the Cc?

I just wanted to point out that last thing I heard on this topic was I
suggested I'd just take the patch and apply it to compat-wireless on
the linux-next-pending/ directory if some of these sort of patches do
not get merged as stable. After that Greg said he's be just happy
taking them, so this is what pushed us to just go ahead and send these
more grey-area fixes as stable fixes.

Come to think of it we didn't get OTP patches in for 2.6.36 so I am
not considering we should just disable AR9003 from the PCI ID list for
ath9k as all cards sold should have it so in that case this patch
would just need to go to 2.6.37 and not 2.6.36.

Luis

2010-11-29 21:35:41

by Luis R. Rodriguez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k_hw: fix endian issues with CTLs on AR9003

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:27 PM, John W. Linville
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:19:19PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM, John W. Linville
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > After being chided for having an excessive number of patches in -next
>> > with "Cc: [email protected]", I would prefer to avoid (or strongly
>> > limit) merging such patches that way.
>>
>> Is this a bad thing?
>
> The point was that if it was a fix worth of consideration for stable
> then it generally ought to be worth of consideration for the current
> release.
>
>> Come to think of it we didn't get OTP patches in for 2.6.36 so I am
>> not considering we should just disable AR9003 from the PCI ID list for
>> ath9k as all cards sold should have it so in that case this patch
>> would just need to go to 2.6.37 and not 2.6.36.
>
> Do you perhaps mean "need to go to 2.6.38 and not 2.6.37"?

Yeah sorry, proper OTP likely didn't make it for 2.6.37, not sure now.
Will have to check and get back to you.

Luis

2010-11-22 20:52:13

by Felix Fietkau

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k_hw: fix endian issues with CTLs on AR9003

On 2010-11-22 9:15 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:50:18PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> Parsing data using bitfields is messy, because it makes endian handling
>> much harder. AR9002 and earlier got it right, AR9003 got it wrong.
>> Fix it by getting rid of the CTL related bitfields entirely and use
>> masks instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>
> Why does this merit stable consideration?
It's a simple fix and I would like it to make it to stable releases,
because this bug might possibly cause the tx power to be too high in
some instances (when running on big-endian systems), violating
regulatory limits.

- Felix

2010-11-22 20:29:45

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k_hw: fix endian issues with CTLs on AR9003

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:50:18PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Parsing data using bitfields is messy, because it makes endian handling
> much harder. AR9002 and earlier got it right, AR9003 got it wrong.
> Fix it by getting rid of the CTL related bitfields entirely and use
> masks instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]

Why does this merit stable consideration?

--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.